PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Risk culture in a family business moving towards sustainability?

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The objective of the paper is to diagnose the features of risk culture in the studied family-owned enterprise. Design/methodology/approach: The theoretical part employs the method of Systematic Literature Review (SLR) while in the empirical part, qualitative research was used. The case study method was employed as it is particularly suited to answering the questions of why and how. Findings: The conducted research allows for the formulation of the following conclusions. The overarching factor which influences risk culture in the studied family business. is the risk approach of the owners. The other factor to be taken into consideration is the approach towards risk of external stakeholders. The dominant influence of the owners’ risk approach is related to their accumulation of institutional knowledge and their role in taking decisions and resolving strategic issues within the family. The influence of these factors results in caution in decision-making and a conservative approach to risk. Research limitations/implications: A limitation of the conducted empirical research is certainly the fact that it was carried out on a single family enterprise. However, considering the lack of empirical research on sustainable risk culture in family businesses so far, the conducted case study can be treated as a pilot study aiming to create a basis for future research. Practical implications: Given the limited empirical research on risk culture in family businesses in Poland, this case study can be considered a pilot study, laying the groundwork for future research in this area. Additionally. The findings aim to encourage family owners and managers to pay greater attention to understanding this aspect in the operations of family-controlled enterprises. Originality/value: The paper is based on own surveys.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
517--539
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 86 poz.
Bibliografia
  • 1. Ainsworth, S., Cox, J.W. (2003). Families Divided: Culture and Control in Small Family Business. Organization Studies, 24(9), pp. 1463-1485, https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0170840603249004.
  • 2. Andreini, D., Bettinelli, C., Pedeliento, G., Apa, R. (2020). How do consumers see firms' family nature? A review of the literature. Family Business Review, 33(1), pp. 18-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519890229.
  • 3. Aparicio, G., Ramos, E., Casillas, J.C., Iturralde, T. (2021). Family business research in the last decade. A bibliometric review. European Journal of Family Business, 11(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.24310/ejfbejfb.v11i1.12503.
  • 4. Ashby, S., Palermo, T., Power, M. (2012). Risk Culture in Financial Organisations: An Interim Report. London: School of Economics.
  • 5. Astrachan, J.H., Binz Astrachan, C., Campopiano, G., Baù, M. (2020). Values, spirituality and religion: Family business and the roots of sustainable ethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(4), 637-645.
  • 6. Astrachan, J.H., Klein, S.B., Smyrnios, K.X. (2002). The F-PEC Scale of Family Influence: A Proposal for Solving the Family Business Definition Problem. Family Business Review, 15(1).
  • 7. Bargoni, A., Alon, I., Ferraris, A. (2023). A systematic review of family business and consumer behaviour. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113698, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113698.
  • 8. Baykal, E. (2022). Family firms and the effects of organizational culture on their innovation. In: Research Anthology on Strategies for Maintaining Successful Family Firms, 1082-1102. IGI Global.
  • 9. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (2012). Socioemotional Wealth in Family Firms: Theoretical Dimensions, Assessment Approaches, and Agenda for Future Research. Family Business Review, 25(3).
  • 10. Bockius, H., Gatzert, N. (2023). Organizational risk culture: A literature review on dimensions, assessment, value relevance, and improvement levers. European Management Journal.
  • 11. Carrigan, M., Buckley, J. (2008). 'What's so special about family business?' An exploratory study of UK and Irish consumer experiences of family businesses. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(6), pp. 656-666.
  • 12. Cennamo, C., Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (2012). Socioemotional Wealth and Proactive Stakeholder Engagement: Why Family-Controlled Firms Care More About Their Stakeholders. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, no. 36(6).
  • 13. Chaudhary, S., Dhir, A., Ferraris, A., Bertoldi, B. (2021). Trust and reputation in family businesses: A systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises. Journal of Business Research, 137, pp. 143-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres. 2021.07.052.
  • 14. Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., Sharma, P. (2003). Current trends and future directions in family business management studies: Toward a theory of the family firm. Coleman White Paper Series, no. 0710(4).
  • 15. Combs, J.G., Shanine, K.K., Burrows, S., Allen, J.S., Pounds, T.W. (2020). What do we know about business families? Setting the stage for leveraging family science theories. Family Business Review, 33(1), pp. 38-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519863508
  • 16. Cornia, A., Dressel, K., Pfeil, D. (2016). Risk cultures and dominant approaches towards disasters in seven European countries. Journal of Risk Research, no. 19(3).
  • 17. Cruz, A., Hamilton, E., Jack, S. (2012). Understanding entrepreneurial cultures in family businesses: A study of family entrepreneurial teams in Honduras. Journal of Family Business Strategy, no. 3(3).
  • 18. Ćwiklicki, M. (2020). Metodyka przeglądu zakresu literatury (scoping review). In: A. Sopińska, A. Modliński (eds.), Współczesne zarządzanie - koncepcje i wyzwania (pp. 53-68). Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
  • 19. Czakon, W. (2006). Łabędzie Poppera - case studies w badaniach nauk o zarządzaniu. Przegląd Organizacji, no. 9.
  • 20. Czakon, W. (2016). W kierunku rozwoju badań ilościowych w naukach o zarządzaniu. Organizacja i Kierowanie, no. 3.
  • 21. Daft, R.L., Weick, K.E. (1984). Toward of Organizations as Model Interpretation Systems, Academy of Management Review, no. 9(2).
  • 22. Deloitte (2012). Cultivating a Risk Intelligent Culture Understand, measure, strengthen, and report.
  • 23. Dudek, M., Pawlowska, A. (2022). Can succession improve the economic situation of family farms in the short term? Evidence from Poland based on panel data. Land Use Policy Elsevier, no. 112c.
  • 24. Dyer Jr. W.G. (1988). Culture and continuity in family firms. The best of FBR II.
  • 25. Dyer Jr., W.G. (2006). Examining the "Family Effect" on Firm Performance. Family Business Review, XIX(4).
  • 26. Dyer, W.G. (1986). Cultural change in family firms: anticipating and managing business and family transitions. San Francisco/London: Jossey-Bass.
  • 27. Fan, J.P., Gu, Q., Yu, X. (2022). Collectivist cultures and the emergence of family firms. The Journal of Law and Economics, 65(S1), S293-S325.
  • 28. Financial Stability Board (2014). Guidance on Supervisory Interaction with Financial Institutions on Risk Culture. A framework for assessing Risk Culture.
  • 29. Ge, B., De Massis, A., Kotlar, J. (2022). Mining the past: History scripting strategies and competitive advantage in family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, no. 46(1).
  • 30. Gersick, K.E., Davis, J.A., Hampton, M.M., Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business. Harvard Business School Press Boston MA.
  • 31. Ghafoori, E., Mata, F., Lauren, N., Faulkner, N., Tear, M.J. (2023). Measuring risk culture in finance: Development of a comprehensive measure. Journal of Banking & Finance, 148, 106720.
  • 32. Gilson, L., Goldberg, C.B. (2015). Editors Comment: So, What Is a Conceptual Paper? Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 127-130.
  • 33. Glinka, B., Czakon, W. (2021). Podstawy badań jakościowych. Warszawa: PWE.
  • 34. Gorzeń-Mitka, I. (2015). Management Challenges in the Context of Risk Culture. Problems of Management in the 21st Century, no. 10(2).
  • 35. Gorzeń-Mitka, I. (2018). Leading markers of risk culture in organization. European Journal of Sustainable Development, no. 7(1).
  • 36. Guraziu, E. (2023). The Model of Project Management as a Sustainable Pedagogical Device: Case Study Research in the Tertiary Education Environment. Sustainability, 15, 11442. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411442.
  • 37. Haaskjold, H., Andersen, B., Langlo, J.A. (2023). Dissecting the project anatomy: Understanding the cost of managing construction projects. Production planning & control, 34(2), 117-138.
  • 38. Hadryś-Nowak, A., Więcek-Janka, E. (2016). Sukcesja kobiet w przedsiębiorstwach rodzinnych - wstępne wyniki badań. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, no. 17(6).
  • 39. Hatch, M. (2002). Teoria organizacji. Warszawa: PWN.
  • 40. Hilson, D. (2013). The A-B-C of risk culture: how to be risk-mature. Paper Presented at PMI Global Congress 2013 - North America, New Orleans, LA. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
  • 41. Ho, P.H., Huang, C.W., Lin, C.Y., Yen, J.F. (2024). Risk culture in corporate innovation. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91, 102999.
  • 42. IIF (2009). Reform in the financial services industry: Strengthening practices for a more stable system.
  • 43. IRM (2012a). Risk culture. Under the microscope guidance for boards. London.
  • 44. IRM (2012b). Risk Culture, Guidance from the IRM. London.
  • 45. Jackson, P. (ed.) (2014). Risk culture and effective risk governance. London: Inicisive Risk Information Limited.
  • 46. Kasiewicz, S., Kurkliński, L. (2017). Ryzyko klienta i kultura ryzyka a rozwój bankowości cyfrowej. Bezpieczny Bank, no. 3(68).
  • 47. Korombel, A. (2013). Istota i znaczenie kultury ryzyka dla funkcjonowania organizacji. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, no. 761(60).
  • 48. Korombel, A. (2017). Apetyt na ryzyko. Próba uporządkowania terminologii. Przegląd Organizacji, no. 927(4).
  • 49. Kuc, B.R. (2012). Funkcje nauki. Wstęp do metodologii. Nauka nie jest grą. Warszawa: PTM.
  • 50. Kunz, J., Heitz, M. (2021). Banks' risk culture and management control systems: A systematic literature review. Journal of Management Control, 32(4), pp. 439-493.
  • 51. Labelle, R., Hafsi, T., Francoeur, C., Amar, W.B. (2018). Family Firms' Corporate Social Performance: A Calculated Quest for Socioemotional Wealth. Journal of Business Ethics, 148.
  • 52. Lanza, V., Provitolo, D., Verdière, N., Bertelle, C., Dubos-Paillard, E., Navarro, O., Charrier, R., Mikiela, I., Aziz-Alaoui, M., Boudoukha, A.H. et al. (2023). Modeling and Analysis of the Impact of Risk Culture on Human Behavior during a Catastrophic Event. Sustainability, 15, 11063. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411063
  • 53. Li, Z., Mustapha, M., Hassan, A.F.S., Saidin, S.F. (2024). Sustainable Development of Chinese Family Businesses: Exploring the Role of Succession Planning in Maintaining Organizational Sustainability from the Perspective of Socioemotional Wealth. Sustainability, 16, 3456. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083456
  • 54. Merriam, S. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • 55. Morck, R., Yeung, B. (2003). Agency problems in large family groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4).
  • 56. Perez-Gonzalez, F. (2006). Inherited control and firm performance. American Economic Review, 96.
  • 57. Peters, T.J., Waterman, R.H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from American's bestrun companies. New York: Harper& Row.
  • 58. Popczyk, W. (2018). Implikacje struktury rodziny dla planowania sukcesji w przedsiębiorstwach rodzinnych - relacje z badań. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, no. 7.1.
  • 59. Previati, D. (2017). People first: Risk culture swings into action. In: A. Carretta, F. Fiordelisi, P. Schwizer (Eds.), Risk culture in banking (pp. 125-154). Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions.
  • 60. PriceWaterhouseCoopers (2011). Building effective risk cultures in financial organizations.
  • 61. Project Management Institute (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), 4.
  • 62. Raab, W. (2022). The understanding of risk culture among risk management practitioners. Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 4. Abilene Christian University.
  • 63. Rajan, B., Salunkhe, U., Kumar, V. (2023). Understanding customer engagement in family firms: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113342
  • 64. Rauschendorfer, N., Prügl, R., Lude, M. (2022). Love is in the air. Consumers' perception of products from firms signaling their family nature. Psychology & Marketing, 39(1), 239- 249. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21592
  • 65. Ring, P.J., Bryce, C., McKinney, R., Webb, R. (2016). Taking notice of risk culture-the regulator's approach. Journal of Risk Research, 19(3), 364-387.
  • 66. Rocco, T.S., Plakhotnik, M.S. (2009). Literature Reviews, Conceptual Frameworks, and Theoretical Frameworks: Terms, Functions, and Distinctions. Human Resource Development Review, 8(1), 120-130.
  • 67. Rovellii, P., Ferasso, M., De Massis, A., Kraus S. (2022). Thirty years of research in family business journals: Status quo and future directions. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(3), 100442.
  • 68. Schein, E.H. (1995). The Role of the Founder in Creating Organizational Culture, Organizational Dynamics, 8(1).
  • 69. Sharma, P. (2004). An Overview of the Field of Family Business Studies: Current Status and Directions for the Future. Family Business Review, no. 17(1).
  • 70. Sheedy, E., Canestrari-Soh, D.S. (2023). Does executive accountability enhance risk management and risk culture? Accounting & Finance, 63(4), 4093-4124.
  • 71. Sheedy, E.A., Griffin, B., Barbour, J.P. (2017). A framework and measure for examining risk climate in financial institutions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32, pp. 101-116.
  • 72. Sindakis, S., Kitsios, F., Aggarwal, S., Kamariotou, M. (2022). Entrepreneurial strategies and family firm culture in the Arab world: a systematic literature review. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(7), 994-1016.
  • 73. Sinha V., Arena, M. (2020). Manifold Conceptions of the Internal Auditing of Risk Culture in the Financial Sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(1).
  • 74. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, pp. 333-339.
  • 75. Sobiecki, R. (2018). Czy sukcesja jest problemem firm rodzinnych? Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, no 1.
  • 76. Song, S., Wu, M., Zhu, Y., Lv, Y. (2022). Can Family Involvement Improve Business Performance? Based on the Dual Moderating Effects of Overseas Experience and Charitable Donations. Sustainability, 14, 16141. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316141
  • 77. Streicher, B., Bielefeld, M. (2023). The Risk Culture Framework: Introducing an integrative framework for holistic risk analysis. SAGE Open, 13(3), 21582440231191789.
  • 78. Trinchero, R.I. (2004). Metodi Della Ricerca Educativa. Roma, Italia: GLF-Editori Laterza.
  • 79. Van Gils, A., Huybrechts, J., Minola, T., Cassia, L. (2019). Unraveling the impact of family antecedents on family firm image: A serial multiple-mediation model. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(1).
  • 80. Więcek-Janka, E. (2016). The essence of culture diversity in family businesses from Mexico and Poland. International Conference on Economics and Management Innovations (ICEMI 2016).
  • 81. Więcek-Janka, E., Mierzwiak, R., Kijewska, J. (2016). Bariery w procesach sukcesyjnych polskich firm rodzinnych - próba wykorzystania protokołu podobieństwa Grey System Analysis. In: B. Piasecki, A. Marjański (ed.), Firmy rodzinne - wyzwania współczesności. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, no. III(6).
  • 82. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • 83. Zahra, S., Hayton, J., Salvato, C. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non - family firms: A resource - based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, no. 26(4).
  • 84. Zahra, S.A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, no. 18(1).
  • 85. Zahra, S.A., Hayton, J.C., Neubaum, D.O., Dibrell, C., Craig, J. (2008). Culture of family commitment and strategic flexibility: The moderating effect of stewardship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, no. 32(6).
  • 86. Zeng, J., Jiang, M., Yuan, M. (2020). Environmental risk perception, risk culture, and proenvironmental behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1750.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-7ca1208a-6bea-4b1e-b065-2484bf57c2f1
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.