Collaborative planning for city development. A perspective from a city planner

• Autorzy: Purbani K.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.22630/PNIKS.2017.26.1.12

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A number of definitions related to collaborative governance have been developed since early 2000. The common characteristics of collaborative governance are, among others, policy consensus, community visioning, consensus rule-making, and collaborative network structures. Collaborative planning is a new paradigm of planning for a complex contemporary society through which it encourages people to be engaged in a dialogue in a situation of equal empowerment and shared information to learn new ideas through mutual understanding, to create innovative outcomes and to build institutional capacity. This indicates that collaborative planning can provide policy makers with more effective community participation. Collaborative process is the key of collaborative planning which also emphasizes the significant role of collaborative leadership. The process includes a participatory activity of dialogue oriented to the joint decision and summarized in a collaborative process. The collaborative leadership is crucial for setting and maintaining clear ground rules, building trust, facilitating dialogue, and exploring mutual gains. Along with the shift of planning paradigm, the role of city planner will also change since the city planning deals with the political process. In the political process, city planners must be able to perform as technocrats, bureaucrats, lawyers and politicians who always uphold their ethics because they are responsible to the society, the assignor for their integrity and professionalism.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

collaborative planning; city development; city planner

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie
• Czasopismo: Przegląd Naukowy Inżynieria i Kształtowanie Środowiska
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 26, No. 1
• Strony: 136--147
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 58 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Purbani K.

• Universitas Padjadjara, Postgraduate School, Jl. Dipati Ukur 35 Bandung, Indonesia 40132

Bibliografia

• Anshell, C. and Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543-571.
• Balducci, A. and Calvaresi, C. (2004). Participation and leadership in planning theory and practices. In: M. Haus, H. Heinelt, M. Stewart (Eds.), Urban Governance and Democracy: Leadership and Community Involvement (pp. 234-252). New York: Routledge.
• Beatley, T. (1989). Environmental Ethics and Planning Theory. Journal of Planning Literature, 4(1), 1-32.
• BBC Indonesia (2011). Memimpin Solo ala Jokowi. BBC Indonesia, 4 August. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/indonesia/majalah/2011/08/110804_tokohjokowidodo.shtml.
• Bhowmik, S. (Ed.) (2010). Street Vendors in the Global Urban Economy. New Delhi, India: Routledge.
• Booher, D.E. and Innes, J.E. (2002). Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 221-236.
• Bradford, D.L. and Cohen, A.R. (1998). Power up: Transforming organizations through shared leadership. New York: J. Wiley.
• Brand, R. and Gaffikin, F. (2007). Collaborative planning in an uncollaborative world. Planning Theory, 6(3), 282-313.
• Bunnell, T., Miller, M.A. and Phelps, N.A. (2013). Urban development in a decentralized Indonesia: Two success stories? Pacific Affairs, 86(4), 857-876.
• Chrislip, D.D. and Larson, C.E. (1994). Collaborative leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Crosby, B.C. and Bryson, J.M. (2005). Leadership for the Common Good: Tackling Public Problems in a Shared-Power World. 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Fahmi, F., Prawira, I., Hudalah, D., and Firman, T. (2016). Leadership and collaborative planning: the case of Surakarta. Indonesia. Planning Theory, 15(3), 294-315.
• Firman, T. (2010). Multi local-government under Indonesia’s decentralization reform: The case of Kartamantul (The Greater Yogyakarta). Habitat International, 34(4), 400-405.
• Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Forester, J. (2000). Multicultural planning in deed: lessons from the mediation practice of Shirley Solomon and Larry Sherman. In: M. Burayidi (Ed.), Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society (pp. 147-168). Westport, CT: Praeger.
• Fox, C.J. and Miller, H.T. (1996). Postmodern Public Administration: Toward Discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Frame, T.M., Gunton, T. and Day, J.C. (2004). The role of collaboration in environmental management: an evaluation of land and resource planning in British Columbia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47(1), 59-82.
• Freeman, J. (1997). Collaborative Governance in the Administrative State. UCLA Law Review, 54, 1-98.
• Gray, B. (2000). Assessing inter-organizational collaboration: Multiple Conceptions and multiple methods. In: D. Faulkner, M. de Rond (Eds.), Cooperative Strategy: Economic, Business, and Organizational Issues. (pp. 243-260). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Gunton, T. and Day, D. (2003). The theory and practice of collaborative planning inresource and environmental management. Environments, 31, 5-19.
• Habermas, J. (1981). Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Vol. 1, The Theory of Communicative Action (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
• Hardiansah, E.C. (2005). Peran Perencana dalam Era Demokratisasi Perencanaan: Kasus Perencanaan Jalan Dago-Lembang. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 16(2), 41-63.
• Healey, P. (1996). The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23(2), 217-234.
• Healey, P. (2003). Collaborative Planning in Perspective. Planning Theory, 2(2), 101-123.
• Healey, P. (2006). Collaborative Planning – Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. 2nd edn. London: Macmillan.
• Heikkila, T. and Gerlak, A.K. (2005). The formation of large-scale collaborative resource management institutions: Clarifying the roles of stakeholders, science, and institutions. Policy Studies Journal, 33(4), 583-612.
• Hemphill, L., Mcgreal, S., Berry, J. and Watson, S. (2006). Leadership, power and multisector urban regeneration partnerships. Urban Studies, 43(1), 59-80.
• Hudalah, D., Firman, T., and Woltjer, J. (2014). Cultural cooperation, institution building, and metropolitan governance in decentralizing Indonesia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(6), 2217-2234.
• Huxham, C. (2000). The Challenge of Collaborative Governance. Public Management. International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(3), 337-357.
• Huxham, C. and Vangen, S. (2000). Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a (not quite) joined-up world. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1159-1175.
• Imperial, M.T. (2005). Using Collaboration as Governance Strategy: Lessons from Six Watershed Management Programs. Administration & Society, 37(3), 281-320.
• Innes, J.E. (1998). Information in Communicative Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(1), 52-63.
• Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E. (1999a). Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems – A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4), 412-423.
• Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E. (1999b). Metropolitan Development as a Complex System: A New Approach to Sustainability. Economic Development Quarterly, 13(2), 141-156.
• Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E. (2004). Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century. Planning Theory and Practice, 5(4), 419-436.
• Innes, J.E., Connick, S., Kaplan, L. and Booher, D.E. (2006). Collaborative governance in the CALFED program: Adaptive policy making for California water. Institute of Urban and Regional Development Working paper 1.
• Isaacs, W. (1999). Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together. London: Crown Business.
• Johnston, E. (2010). Managing the Inclusion Process in Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Resources Theory, 21(4), 699-721.
• Kobler, A.M. (2009). Building community capacity: how collaborative planning is changing the culture of governance in Seattle (master thesis). Ames: Iowa State University.
• Lasker, R.D. and Weiss, E.S. (2003). Broadening participation in community problem solving: a multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. Journal of Urban Health, 80(1), 14-47.
• Lasker, R.D., Weiss, E.S. and Miller, R. (2001). Partnership synergy: a practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. The Milbank Quarterly, 79(2), 179-205.
• Lofgren, K. and Agger, A (2008) Democratic Assessment of Collaborative Planning Processes. Planning Theory, 7(2), 145-164.
• Maginn, P. (2007). Towards more effective community participation in urban regeneration: the potential of collaborative planning and applied ethnography. Qualitative Research, 6(4), 25-43.
• Margerum, R.D. (2002). Collaborative Planning – Building Consensus and Building a Distinct Model for Practice. Journal of Planning and Education and Research, 21, 237-253.
• Meneses-Reyes, R. and Caballero-Juárez, J. (2014). The Right To Work on the Street: Public Space and Constitutional Rights. Planning Theory, 13(4), 370-386. DOI: 10.1177/1473095213503967.
• Phelps, N.A., Bunnell, T. and Miller, M.A. (2014). Urban inter-referencing within and beyond a decentralized Indonesia. Cities, 39, 37-49.
• Porter, L., Lombard, M. and Huxley, M. (2011). Informality, the commons and the paradoxes for planning: Concepts and debates for informality and planning self-made cities: Ordinary informality? The reordering of a Romany neighbourhood The Land Formalisation Process and the Peri-Urban Zone of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania street vendors and planning in Indonesian cities informal urbanism in the USA: New challenges for theory and practice engaging with citizenship and urban struggle through an informality lens. Planning Theory & Practice, 12(1), 115-153
• Rondinelli, D.A. (2009). Changing concepts of leadership in a globalizing society. In: D.A. Rondinelli, J.M. Heffron (Eds). Leadership for Development: What Globalization Demands of Leaders Fighting for Change (pp. 27-47). Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.
• Ryan, C.M. (2001). Leadership in collaborative policy-making: An analysis of agency roles in regulatory negotiations. Policy Sciences, 34(3), 221-245.
• Sokol, M. (2014). Theorizing Planning Practice: Collaborative Planning for Smart Growth on Long Island, New York (master thesis). New York: Columbia University.
• Sufianti, E. (2014). Kepemimpinan dan Perencanaan Kolaboratif pada Masyarakat Non Kolaboratif. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 25(1), 77-95.
• Sufianti, E., Sawitri, D. and Pribadi, K.N. (2013). Proses Kolaboratif dalam Perencanaan Berbasis Komunikasi Pada Masyarakat Non Kolaboratif. Mimbar, 29(2), 133-144.
• Sullivan, H. and Skelcher, C. (2002). Working across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Talvitie, A. (2012). The problem of trust in planning. Planning Theory, 11(3), 257–278.
• UNDP (1993). Human Development Report. New York: UNDP.
• Vangen, S. and Huxham, C. (2003). Enacting leadership for collaborative advantage: Dilemmas of ideology and pragmatism in the activities of partnership managers. British Journal of Management, 14(1), 61-76.
• Walls, J.R. (2015). Flood resilient cities – A Jakarta case study.
• Woltjer, J. (2000). Consensus Planning: The Relevance of Communicative Planning Theory in Dutch Infrastructure Development. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).