Signal controlled junctions calculations in traffic capacity assessment - Aimsun, OmniTrans, Webster and TP 10/2010 results comparison

• Autorzy: Černický L. , Kalašová A. , Kapusta J.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.20858/tp.2016.11.1.12

Warianty tytułu

FR

Calcul de la capacité des carrefours à feux au cour de l’évaluation des capacités de trafic - la comparaison des résultats de Aimsun, Omnitrans, Webster et TP 10/2010

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Every increase in traffic volume on road network in towns can lead to overcrowding of road network. This results in undesirable external costs such as traffic congestions, which cause high loses in time during transportation, increased fuel consumption and thus higher production of greenhouse gases and noise. This all ultimately reduces the attractiveness of the area. The increase of traffic volume and therefrom derived traffic problems are needed to be solved during traffic-capacity assessment of every larger investment. The software can help to assess increased traffic in solved area and thus help authorities to make a right decision during approving of the investment plan. This article is focused on comparison of two software – Aimsun and OmniTrans, and calculations according to Webster and technical regulations for assessing junction capacity in the Slovak Republic. The packages outputs are also compared to the measured data at the assessed junction in this article. The analysis showed that outputs of various tools differ, generally all packages showed higher delays compared to measured data at the main road and lower delays compared to measured data at the side roads.

FR

Chaque augmentation du volume de trafic sur le réseau routier dans les villes peut conduire à la surcharge du réseau routier. Il en résulte des coûts externs indésirables tels que des embouteillages, qui provoquent de grands retards pendant le transport, augmentation de la consommation de carburant et donc la production plus élevée de l'effet de serre et du bruit. Finalement, cela réduit l'attractivité de la région. Cette augmentation du volume de trafic et des problèmes de circulation en dérivés devraient être résolues par l'évaluation des capacités de trafic des impacts de chaque investissement plus important. En faisant cette évaluation, il est possible d'utiliser des logiciels qui aident à évaluer des effets de l'augmentation du trafic dans la zone observée et donc ils aident les autorités compétentes à prendre les bonnes décisions. Cet article se concentre sur la comparaison des deux logiciels – Aimsun et Omnitrans, et la comparaison des calculs selon Webster et selon des règlements techniques pour l’évaluation des capacités de communications terrestres de la République slovaque. Les sorties des instruments individuels sont en outre comparées avec les données mesurées mesurées.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

traffic-capacity assessment; Webster; technical regulations; Aimsun; OmniTrans

PL

ocena przepustowości skrzyżowania; Webster; przepisy techniczne; Aimsun; OmniTrans

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Transport Problems
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: T. 11, z. 1
• Strony: 121--130
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Černický L.

• University of Žilina, Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, Department of Road and Urban Transport Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia

autor

Kalašová A.

• University of Žilina, Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, Department of Road and Urban Transport Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia

autor

Kapusta J.

• University of Žilina, Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, Department of Road and Urban Transport Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia

Bibliografia

• 1. Gogola, M. Applications of methodology of calculation of the number of connections (MCNC) in solving transport attendance. Communications - scientific letters of the University of Žilina. 2005. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 17-19.
• 2. Kubasáková, I. & Kampf, R. & Stopka, O. Logistics information and communication technology. Communications - scientific letters of the University of Žilina. 2005. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 17-19.
• 3. Faith, P. & Paľo, J. Cestné a miestne komunikácie. 1. vyd. Žilina: Žilinská univerzita. 2013. 311 p. [In Slovak: Faith, P. & Paľo, J. Road and urban communications. Zilina: University of Zilina].
• 4. Metodika dopravno-kapacitného posudzovania vplyvov investičných projektov. Bratislava: Oficiálne stránky mesta. 2014. [In Slovak: Methodology for traffic-capacity assessment of investment plans. Bratislava: Official webside]. Available at:http://www.bratislava.sk/VismoOnline_ActionScripts/File.ashx?id_org=700000&id_dokumenty=11043591
• 5. Metodika dopravno-kapacitného posudzovania vplyvov investičných projektov. Prešov: Oficiálne stránky mesta. 2014. [In Slovak: Methodology for traffic-capacity assessment of investment plans. Presov: Official website]. Available at: http://www.presov.sk/file/8113/metodika_dopravnokapacitneho_posudzovania_vplyvov_velkych_investicnych_celkov.pdf
• 6. Murat, Y.S. & Baskan, O. Modeling vehicle delays at signalized junctions: Artificial neural networks approach. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research. 2006. Vol. 67. No. 7.P. 558-564.
• 7. Balsys, K. & Valinevičius, A. & Eidukas, D. Traffic flow detection and forecasting. Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika. 2010. No. 5(101). P. 91–94.
• 8. Chaudhry, M.S. & Ranjitkar, P. Capacity Analysis of Signalised Intersection using Microsimulation. In: 32nd Australasian Transport Research Forum, ATRF 2009. Auckland; New Zealand, 2009. Available at: http://atrf.info/papers/2009/2009_chaudry_ranjitkar.pdf
• 9. Mathew, T.V. Signalized intersection delay models. NPTEL: E-learning courses from the IITS&IISC. Available at: http://nptel.ac.in/courses/105101008/35
• 10. Cheng, D. & Messer, C. & Tian, Z. & Liu, J. Modification of Webster´s Minimum Delay Cycle Length Equation Based on HCM 2000. Paper Submitted to the Transportation Research Board for Presentation and Publication at the 2003 Annual Meeting in Washington. D.C. 2003.
• 11. Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board. National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
• 12. HBS 2001, Handbuch für die Bemessung von Strassenverkehrsanlagen, FGSV, Cologne, 2001 [In German: HBS 2001, Highway capacity manual, FGSV, Cologne, 2001].
• 13. TP 10/2010. Technické podmienky. Výpočet kapacít pozemných komunikácií. Bratislava: Ministerstvo dopravy, vystavba a regionálneho rozvoja SR 197 p. [In Slovak: Technical regulations. Roads capacity calculation. Bratislava: Ministry of transport, construction and regional development] Available at: http://www.ssc.sk/files/documents/technickepredpisy/ tp2010/tp_10_2010.pdf
• 14. TSS – Transport Simulation Systems – Aimsun. Available at: http://www.aimsun.com/wp/
• 15. OmniTrans. Available at: http://www.omnitrans.org/
• 16. Kalašová, A. & Černicky, Ľ. & Kupčuljaková, J. The impact of public transport priority on the traffic in the chosen part of the city of Žilina. Transport Problems. 2014. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 19-26.
• 17. Virdiková, D. Možné využitie modelovania dopravy ako preventívneho nástroja na zvyšeniebezpečnosti na cestách. Krížový Manažment. 2011. Vol. 10. No. 1. P. 98-104. [In Slovak: Virdikova, D. Transport modelling as preventive tool for increasing road traffic safety. Crisis management]. Available at: http://fsi.uniza.sk/kkm/files/admincasopis/KM%201%202011/ODBORNE/Vidrikova.pdf
• 18. Bezembinder, E & Brandt, F. Junction Modelling in OmniTRANS, Technical note 2013. Available at: http://www.omnitrans-international.com/en/download/212junction-modelling
• 19. PolCam systems. PolCam PC2006 Video Recorder. Available at.: http://polcam.eu/en/productsen/in-car-video-systems/polcam-pc2006-en

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.