Comparison of stress susceptibility index of silage corn and sorghum crops

• Autorzy: Keten Mualla , Değirmenci Hasan
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Drought is an important factor that causes a decrease in yield and quality in regions where second crop silage plants are grown. One of the biggest problems in animal husbandry is feed. Especially silage feed production tends to decrease in areas with increasing water deficit and where water needs cannot be met. The high water requirement of the corn plant requires irrigation in arid and semi-arid regions. However, in order to continue the production of silage fodder in regions where water resources are insufficient with the increase of drought, it will be necessary to grow forage plants that can be an alternative to corn plant. In previous studies, it has been discussed whether the sorghum plant is an alternative to the corn plant. The aim of this study is to determine the drought sensitivity index based on the yield values of both plants in wet and dry conditions. Thus, it will be determined whether the sorghum plant will be an alternative to the corn plant in terms of drought. The identification and selection of drought-resistant cultivars and species is possible using various indices. In this study, second crop silage maize and sorghum crops were grown in Kahramanmaraş conditions for two years (2018 and 2019), dry and irrigated. Stress sensitivity index (SSI) was used to determine the drought tolerance of silage maize and sorghum crops. 'Colonia' variety was used for silage corn and 'Es Foehn' variety was used for sorghum. When the STI values are examined, the corn and sorghum values for 2018 were 0.55 and 0.53, respectively, while the d values for 2019 were found as 0.33 in corn and 0.54 in sorghum. these values are very close to the YSI values. While the 2018 values in both indices were not determinative in terms of drought resistance, the value of sorghum in 2019 was 64% higher than corn (this value was found to be 61% for YSI). This also showed that there is a direct correlation between YSI and STI indices.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

maize; sorghum; yield; stress susceptibility index

• Wydawca: Stowarzyszenie Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich
• Czasopismo: Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: nr I/1
• Strony: 21--28
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Keten Mualla

• Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University, Biosystem Engineering Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Biosystem Engineering

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7741-922X

autor

Değirmenci Hasan

• Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Biosystem Engineering

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6157-816X

Bibliografia

• 1. Almodares A., Hadi M.R. 2009: Production of bioethanol from sweet sorghum: A Review. African Journal Of Agricultural Research, 4(9): 772- 780. ISSN 1991-637X. pp.7.
• 2. Arslan M., Erdurmuş C., Öten M., Aydınoğlu B., Çakmakçı S. 2017: Quality charecteristics of sorghum and some plants silages mixed at different rates. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty. 14 (02). pp.7.
• 3. Bilal A.K., Adnan M., Rehman F.U., Hasnain A., Usman M., Javed M.S., Aziz A.D and Ahmad R. 2021: Role of silage in agriculture: A Review. Green Reports. pp. 4. DOI: 10.36686/Ariviyal.GR.2021.02.04.010.
• 4. Bouslama M, Schapaugh W.T: 1984. Stress tolerance in soy-bean. Part 1: Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Sci., 24: 933-937. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400050026x.
• 5. Çakmakçı S., Gündüz İ., Aydınoğlu B., Çeçen S. ve Tüsüz M.A. 1999: Sorgum (Sorghum bicolor L.)’un silajlık kullanımında farklı biçim devrelerinin verim ve kalite üzerine etkileri. Tübitak-Tr J of Agriculture and Forestry 23 (3): 603-613. ISSN: 1300-011X / 1303-6173.
• 6. Çeçen S., Öten M. ve Erdurmuş C. 2005: Batı Akdeniz sahil kuşağında sorgum (Sorghum bicolor L.), sudanotu (Sorghum sudanense Staph.) ve mısırın (Zea mays L.) ikinci ürün olarak değerlendirilmesi, Akdeniz Üniv. Zir. Fak. Derg., 18(3):337-341.
• 7. Cerit İ., Turkay M.A., Sarıhan H., Şen H.M. 2001: “Mısır Yetiştiriciliği”. www.tarimsalbilgi.org.
• 8. Çırak C., Esendal E. 2006: Soyada kuraklık stresi. J. of Fac. of Agric., OMU, 21(2): 231-237.
• 9. Fageria N.K., Baligar V.C., Jones C.A. 1997: Growth and mineral nutrition of field crops. 2 nd Ed.; Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
• 10. Fernandez G.C.J. 1992: Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance”, In: C.G. Kuo, editor, Adaptation of Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Taiwan. 13- 18 Aug. Asian Vegetable Res. and Dev. Ctr., Shanhua, Tainan, pp. 13. DOI: 10.22001/wvc.72511.
• 11. Geren H., Avcıoğlu R., Kır B., Demiroğlu G., Yılmaz U., Cevheri A.C. 2003: İkinci ürün silajlık olarak yetiştirilen bazı mısır çeşitlerinde farklı ekim zamanlarının verim ve kalite özelliklerine etkisi. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi,40 (3): 57-64. ISSN 1018-8851.
• 12. Golestani-Araghi S., Assad M.T. 1998: Evaluation of four screening techniques for drought resistance and their rela- tionship to yield reduction ratio in wheat. Euphytica, 103: 293-299.
• 13. Goshadrou A., Karimi K., Taherzadeh M.J. 2011: Bioethanol production from sweet sorghum bagasse by mucır hiemalis. Industrial Crops And Products, 34: 1219-1225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.04.018.
• 14. Klocke N., Currie R., Kisekka I., Stone,L.R. 2014: Corn and grain sorghum response to limited İrrigation, Drought, and Hail. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. 30(6): 915-924. ISSN 0883-8542. DOI 10.13031/aea.30.10810.
• 15. Kılıç, A. 1986: Silo yemi (öğretim, öğrenim ve uygulama önerileri). Bilgehan Basımevi, İzmir.
• 16. Kristin A.S., Senra R.R., Perez F.I., Enriquez B.C., Gallegos J.A.A, Vallego P.R., Wassimi N., Kelley J.D. 1997: Improving common bean performance under drought stres. Crop Sci., 37: 43-50. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700010007x.
• 17. McDonald P., Henderson A.R. ve Heron S.J.E. 1991: The Biochemistry of silage 2nd ed. Chalcombe Publications 81-151.
• 18. Mitra J. 2001: Genetics and genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants. Curr. Sci. 80:758-762. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-32423-4_2.
• 19. Reynolds M.P., Mujeeb-Kazi .A,Sawkins M. 2005: Prospects for utilizing plantadaptive mechanisms to improve wheat and other crops in drought- and salinityprone environments. Ann. App. Bio.146: 239-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.040058.x.
• 20. Rosielle A.A., Hamblin J. 1981: Theoretical aspect of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Sci. 21: 943-946. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x.
• 21. Rosielle A.A., Hamblin J. 1981: Theoretical aspect of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Sci., 21: 943-946. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x.
• 22. Sarwar M., Khan M.A., Zafar I. 2002: Feed resources for livestock in Pakistan. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 1, 186-192.
• 23. Seysoşoğu S. 2017: Diyarbakır koşullarında farklı ekim zamanlarının ikinci ürün silajlık mısır çeşitlerinde verim ve kalite özelliklerine etkisi. dicle üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi. S:200.
• 24. Staniak M., Bojarszczuk J., Kraska P., Kwıatkowskı C., and Harasım, E. 2020: Prolonged drought stress induced changes in yield and physiological processes of trifolium repens and Festulolium braunii. Bıologıa Plantarum 64: 701-709. DOI:10.32615/bp.2020.114.
• 25. Yadav O.P., Bhatnagar S.K. 2001: Evaluation of indices for identification of pearl millet cultivars adapted to stress and non-stress conditions. Field Crops Res. 70:201-208. DOI: 10.5567/sciintl.2013.64.69.
• 26. Singh C., Kumar V., Prasad I., Patil V.R., Rajkumar B.K. 2015: Response of upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.) genotipypes to drought stress using drought tolerance indices. J. Crop Sci. Biotech., 19 (1): 53-59. DOI:10.1007/s12892-015- 0073-1.
• 27. USSL. 1954: Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils, Agriculture Handbook, No:60, 160s., USA.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).