Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Wskaźniki zrównoważonego użytkowania dzikiej przyrody: problemy związane z ich formowaniem i wdrażaniem w Federacji Rosyjskiej
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
This article examines the legal category sustainable use of wildlife as a process of realization of rights and obligations by the subjects, based on the provisions of the Concept of Sustainable Development, International law and National legislation on wildlife. This process is aimed at ensuring biological diversity, achieving a balance of economic, environmental and social interests of the citizens, society and the state as a whole, the process, as well as to preserve the reproductive ability of the animal world. Based on the analysis of certain provisions of the legislation on wildlife and law enforcement practice, the author makes a conclusion that Russia lacks a complex system of legal support measures for the sustainable use of wildlife. Legal, economic, ideological, organizational measures, proposed by the author of the article will make it possible to use wildlife in such a way, that will preserve and increase the number of wildlife populations, maintain an ecological balance, and ensure the needs in favorable environment for life and health for the present and future generations. The measures proposed by the author can create the legal basis for sustainable management of wildlife. The author suggests, that these measures can be useful in developing national programs for sustainable use of wildlife; providing incentives for the transition to sustainable use; strengthening the dialogue between the authorities and the population in order to involve them into the process of sustainable use of wildlife, so that to ensure a balance of economic, environmental and social interests.
Artykuł analizuje kategorię prawną zrównoważone użytkowanie dzikiej przyrody rozumianą jako proces realizacji praw i obowiązków przez podmioty, w oparciu o postanowienia koncepcji zrównoważonego rozwoju, prawa międzynarodowego i ustawodawstwa krajowego dotyczącego dzikiej przyrody. Proces ma na celu zapewnienie różnorodności biologicznej, osiągnięcie równowagi interesów ekonomicznych, środowiskowych i społecznych obywateli, społeczeństwa i państwa jako całości oraz zachowanie zdolności reprodukcyjnych świata zwierząt. Na podstawie analizy niektórych przepisów dotyczących dzikiej fauny i flory i oceny realizowania tych zapisów w praktyce, autorka stwierdza, że w Rosji brakuje kompleksowego systemu prawnych środków wsparcia dla zrównoważonego użytkowania dzikiej przyrody. Zaproponowane przez autorkę artykułu rozwiązania prawne, ekonomiczne i organizacyjne umożliwią korzystanie z dzikiej przyrody w taki sposób, który zachowa i zwiększy liczbę populacji dzikich zwierząt, utrzyma równowagę ekologiczną i zapewni zaspokojenie potrzeb życia i zdrowia dla obecnych i przyszłych pokoleń, w korzystnym środowisku. Środki zaproponowane przez autorkę mogą stworzyć podstawę prawną dla zrównoważonego zarządzania dziką przyrodą. Autorka sugeruje, że rozwiązania te mogą być przydatne w opracowywaniu krajowych programów zrównoważonego użytkowania dzikiej przyrody; zapewniania zachęt do przejścia na zrównoważone użytkowanie; wzmocnienia dialogu między władzami a ludnością w celu włączenia ich w proces zrównoważonego wykorzystywania dzikiej fauny i flory, aby w ten sposób zapewnić równowagę interesów gospodarczych, środowiskowych i społecznych.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
121--130
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 45 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- Orenburg State Agrarian University, Land Law and Labor Law Department, Orenburg,Russian Federation Home address: 12, ul. Ozernaya, Prigorodny Settlement, Orenburg District, Orenburg Region, 460507, Russian Federation
Bibliografia
- 1. ANISIMOV A.P., RYZHENKOV A.J., 2014, Ecotourism Development, in: Environmental Policy and Law, 44(6), p. 545-565.
- 2. ARZAMASKIN A.N., 2016, Definition of the concept ‘legal support’ statement of the problem, in: Science and School, 6, p. 50.
- 3. BALDUS, R. D., DAMM, G. R. AND L. WOLLSCHEID, 2009, Sustainable hunting tourism: position of the CIC Commission on Tropical Wildlife, in Best Practices for the Sustainable Use of Hunting Animals, http://www. cic-wildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/ Technical_series_1_RU.pdf (16.03.2019)
- 4. BOCHKAREVA T.V., Ecotourism: analysis of existing international experience, http://tourlib. net/statti_tourism/bochkareva.htm (25.05.2019).
- 5. BONNER R., 1993, At The Hand Of Man: Peril and Hope for Africa's Wildlife, Vintage, New York.
- 6. BOOTH W., 1993, Bag a Gator and Save the Species, Environmentalists Link Habitat Preservation to Sales of Skins, in: Washington Post, Aug 25.
- 7. CLEPPER H., 1966, The Conservation Movement Birth and Infancy, in: Origins of American conservation, Clepper H. ed., Ronald Press, New York.
- 8. CONE M., 1994, Conflict Marks Endangered Species Treaty, in: L.A. Times, A26.
- 9. DECREE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION No. 13, dated June, 1997, On the Approval of the Rules for the Taking of Fauna Belonging to Species Listed in the Red Book of the Russian Federation, with the Exception of Aquatic Biological Resources, (R.E. from 05.06.2013), «Consultant Plus» computerbased legal research system (25.01.2018).
- 10. DECREE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION No. 236, dated February 4, 1994, On the National Strategy of the Russian Federation for Environment Protection and Sustainable Development, «Consultant Plus» computer-based legal research system (26.01.2018).
- 11. DECREE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION No. 440 dated April 1, 1996, On the Concept of Transition of the Russian Federation towards Sustainable Development. «Consultant Plus» computer-based legal research system (26.01.2018).
- 12. DECREE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION No. 559, dated May 8, 1996, On Development of the Draft National Strategy for Sustainable Development of the Russian Federation, «Consultant Plus» computer-based legal research system (26.01.2018).
- 13. EVSTAFIEV V.A., 2000, Legal framework and practical mechanisms for conservation of rare species, Publishing house Ima-Press, p. 23.
- 14. FEDERAL LAW No. 209-FZ, dated July 24, 2009, On Hunting and Conservation of Hunting Resources and on Amending Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation, «Consultant Plus» computer-based legal research system (29.01.2018).
- 15. FEDERAL LAW No. 7-FZ, January 10, dated 2002, On Environmental Protection, «Consultant Plus» computer-based legal research system (26.01.2018).
- 16. FEDERAL LAW OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION No. 52-FZ, dated April 24, 1995, On Wildlife, «Consultant Plus» computer-based legal research system (26.01.2018).
- 17. FREESE C.H., SAAVEDRA C.J., 1991, Prospects for Wildlife Management in Latin America and the Caribbean, in: Neotropical Wildlife Use and Conservation, eds. Robinson J., Redford K., Chicago University Press, Chicago, p. 430-431.
- 18. GENERAL THEORY OF STATE AND LAW. ACADEMIC COURSE IN 3 VOLUMES. VOLUME 2, 2002, M: ICD Mirror-M, p. 496
- 19. GERSTENZANG J., 1994, U.S. Will Impose Trade Sanctions Against Taiwan to Protect Wildlife, in: L.A. Times.
- 20. IKONNIKOVA M.A., KIRILLOV A.V., NAZARENKO A.V., 2015, Factors determining the effectiveness of environmental education, in: Pedagogical, psychological and biomedical problems of physical education and sport, 37(4), p. 102-104.
- 21. KALININ I.B., 2003, Rational Use of Natural Resources and Protection of Environment as a Basis for Sustainable Use of Natural Resources, in: Tomsk State University Bulletin, 279, p. 48- 51.
- 22. KHARKOV V.N., 2015, Legal Support of Public Participation in Environmental Management and Environmental Protection, in: Regional Aspect // Izvestiya, Tula State University, Ecological and Legal Sciences, 2(2), p. 111.
- 23. KIREENKO A.P., BATURINA O.V., GOLOVAN S.A., 2014, The use of tax benefits in environmental regulation: foreign experience and prospects in Russia, in: Bulletin of the Irkutsk State Economic Academy, 1, p. 25-33.
- 24. KOLBASOV O.S., 1982, International legal environmental protection, in: International Relations, p. 130.
- 25. KOLBASOV O.S., 1980, Property Right in Wildlife, in: Development of Agrarian and Legal Sciences, Moscow, p. 61-62.
- 26. KOPYLOV M.N., MERKULOV K.A., 2013, ‘Pros’ and ‘cons’ of CITES: on the anniversary of the convention, in: Legal Initiative, 7, p.18.
- 27. KRIEPS C.L., Sustainable use of endangered species cites: is it a sustainable alternative?, https://www.law.upenn.edu/journals/jil/articles/volume17/issue1/Krieps17U.Pa.J.Int%2 (21/06/2019).
- 28. MARCHENKO. M., 2001, Problems of theory of state and law, Publishing House Prospect, Moscow, p. 354.
- 29. MONCRIEFFE J., LUTTRELL C., 2005, Analytical framework for understanding political economy of sectors and policy arenas, https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odiassets/publications-opinion-files/3898.pdf.
- 30. MYASKOV A.V., 2009, Relevance of biodiversity conservation as a basis of natural ecosystems, in: Mountain Information and Analytical Bulletin (scientific and technical journal), 6(12), o. 263.
- 31. RUSSIAN FEDERATION GOVERNMENT RESOLUTION No. 212-P, dated February 17, 2014, On the Strategy for the Conservation of Rare and Endangered Species of Animals and Plants and Development of Hunting Activities in the Russian Federation until 2030, «Consultant Plus» computer-based legal research system (29.01.2018).
- 32. SANCHEZ-BAYOA WYCKHUYSBN K.G., 2019, Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers, in: Biological Conservation, 232, p. 2-27. SAPUN V.A., 1992, The instrumental theory of law in legal science , in Modern State and Law. Questions of theory and practice, Vladivostok, p. 20.
- 33. STAINOV P., 1974, Legal Issues of Nature Protection, ed. Kolbasova O.S., Progress Publishing House, Moscow, p.21-22.
- 34. STATE REPORT, 2014, On the State and Protection of the Environment in the Russian Federation in 2014, http://www.mnr.gov.ru (26.01. 2018).
- 35. STATE REPORT, 2016, On the State and Protection of the Environment in the Russian Federation, p. 196, http://www.mnr.gov.ru/docs/ (27. 08.2019).
- 36. STUDY, 2016, Humans to Wipe out Two-Thirds of Wildlife by 2020, https://new.wwf.ru/resources/news/klimat-i-energetika/k-2020-godumir-poteryaet-dve-treti-dikikh-zhivotnykh/ (25.01.2018).
- 37. Tax Code of the Russian Federation of August 5, 2000, Part 2, N 117-ФЗ, «Consultant Plus» computer-based legal research system (15.03. 2019).
- 38. TORIA R.A., 2016, Legal Regulation of Financial Provision of Small Indigenous Peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East, ed. Gracheva E. Yu., Prospekt Publishing House, Moscow, p. 3-4.
- 39. TYSON R., 1993, Herds Pay Highest Price, in: Det. Free Press, 1.
- 40. URL: Legal support, 2018, http://www.centeryf.ru/data/Yuristu/Pravovoe-obespechenie.php (19.08.2018)
- 41. UN, 1973, The Convention On International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, Washington, 3 March, «Consultant Plus» computer-based legal research system (29.01.2018).
- 42. VOLIANSKY E.V., 2014, Normative-Legal Aspects of State Regulation for Hunting and Hunting Resources, in: Economics. State, Society, http://ego.uapa.ru/en/issue/2014/01/01/ (29.01.2018).
- 43. WEBB G., 2002, Conservation and sustainable use of wildlife – an evolving concept, in: Pacific Conservation Biology, 8, p. 12-26.
- 44. WWF, 2016, Living Planet Report, http://wwf. panda.org/about_our_earth/all_publications /lpr_2016/ (25.01.2018).
- 45. ZHOCHKINA I.N., 2011, Current state and development prospects of the environmental governance system in the regions (the Republic of Mordovia), in: Environmental Law, 6, p. 26.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-7bbabc4b-07c6-48a0-a6fa-88e827dc9786