PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Expectations and reality: towards management programs for academic leaders in higher education

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The study aims to enrich the discourse surrounding the necessity of managerial education for academic leaders ascending to university senior and middle management positions, such as deans and associate deans. The paper builds on the studies by Preston and Price (2012) and Floyd (2016) who point out that there is often no formal training for academics in new leadership positions. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative case study, complemented by qualitative content analysis using a deductive approach, was applied to examine data from open-ended questionnaires filled out by participants of the "Deans Academy" managerial training program. Findings: The study identifies the need for management training among deans and associate deans, guided by a feedback-driven approach. It also outlines key competencies and knowledge areas to be incorporated into development programs for academic leaders. Research limitations/implications: The findings are not universally applicable to the educational needs of all deans or academic managers, given the small sample size, the project's online-only format, and the recruitment of participants from a single organization. For a broader understanding, further research is encouraged across different higher education institutions and varied managerial training programs. Practical implications: This study provides valuable insights for developing training program curricula tailored for academics in managerial roles within higher education institutions. Originality/value: The research adopts an innovative "expectations and reality" framework, rooted in Experiential Learning Theory (ELT), to generate detailed evidence for creating effective managerial training programs for executive roles in academia. The insights gained contribute to the current understanding of support and training needs for senior and middle managers in higher education. The findings are particularly relevant for educators, academics, and HR professionals in higher education involved in designing and implementing training programs aimed at enhancing managerial skills in academia.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
349--366
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 55 poz.
Twórcy
Bibliografia
  • 1. Alajoutsijärvi, K., Kettunen, K. (2016). The "Dean's Squeeze" revisited: A contextual approach. Journal of Management Development, 35(3), 326-340. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-02-2015-0017
  • 2. Bezanilla, M.J., García-Olalla, A., Paños-Castro, J., Arruti, A. (2020). Developing the entrepreneurial university: Factors of influence. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030842
  • 3. Blaschke, S., Frost, J., Hattke, F. (2014). Towards a micro foundation of leadership, governance, and management in universities. Higher Education, 68(5), 711-732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9740-2
  • 4. Bobe, B.J., Kober, R. (2020). University dean personal characteristics and use of management control systems and performance measures. Studies in Higher Education, 45(2), 235-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1504911
  • 5. Burgoyne, J., Hirsh, W., Williams, S. (2004). The Development of Management and Leadership Capability and its Contribution to Performance: The evidence, the prospects and the research need. London: Department for Education and Skills.
  • 6. Carroll, J.B., Wolverton, M. (2004). Who becomes a chair? New Directions for Higher Education, 126, 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.144
  • 7. Coates, H., Dobson, I.R., Goedegebuure, L., Meek, L. (2010). Across the great divide: What do Australian academics think of university leadership? Advice from the CAP survey. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(4), 379-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2010.491111
  • 8. Cox, J.W., Hassard, J. (2005). Triangulation in Organizational Research: A Re-Presentation. Organization, 12(1), 109-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405048579
  • 9. Czakon, W. (2011). Metodyka systematycznego przeglądu literatury. Przegląd Organizacji, 3, 57-61. https://doi.org/10.33141/po.2011.3.13
  • 10. Deem, R. (1998). "New managerialism" and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8(1), 47-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/0962021980020014
  • 11. Del Favero, M. (2006). Disciplinary variation in preparation for the academic dean role. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(3), 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360600793069
  • 12. Elo, S., Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  • 13. Fanghanel, J. (2011). Being an Academic. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9780203818237
  • 14. Floyd, A. (2016). Supporting Academic Middle Managers in Higher Education: Do We Care? Higher Education Policy, 29(2), 167-183. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2015.11
  • 15. Floyd, A., Preston, D. (2018). The role of the associate dean in UK universities: Distributed leadership in action? Higher Education, 75(5), 925-943. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10734-017-0178-1
  • 16. Forman, J., Damschroder, L. (2007). Qualitative Content Analysis. In: L. Jacoby, L.A. Siminoff (eds.), Empirical Methods for Bioethics: A Primer, vol. 11 (pp. 39-62). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3709(07)11003-7
  • 17. Gallos, J.V. (2002). The Dean's Squeeze: The Myths and Realities of Academic Leadership in the Middle. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(2), 174-184. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2002.8509367
  • 18. Guyottot, O., Thelisson, A.-S. (2023). Coping with paradoxical demands: The dual position of deans in French business schools. Studies in Higher Education, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2265405
  • 19. Harrison, H., Birks, M., Franklin, R., Mills, J. (2017). Case Study Research: Foundations and Methodological Orientations. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung [Forum: Qualitative Social Research], 18(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-18.1.2655
  • 20. Hasinoff, S., Mandzuk, D. (2018). Navigating Uncertainty: Sensemaking for Educational Leaders. BRILL.
  • 21. Hassan, A., Gallear, D., Sivarajah, U. (2018). Critical factors affecting leadership: A higher education context. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 12(1), 110-130. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2017-0075
  • 22. Hecht, I.W.D. (2004). The professional development of department chairs. New Directions for Higher Education, 126, 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.146
  • 23. Heffernan, T. (2021). Examining university leadership and the increase in workplace hostility through a Bourdieusian lens. Higher Education Quarterly, 75(2), 199-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12272
  • 24. Heffernan, T. (2022). Deans: The Faculty's New Managers. In: T. Heffernan (Ed.), Bourdieu and Higher Education: Life in the Modern University (pp. 109-119). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8221-6_8
  • 25. Heffernan, T., Bosetti, L. (2023). University bullying and incivility towards faculty deans. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 26(4), 604-623. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13603124.2020.1850870
  • 26. Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49(1), 155-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2919-1
  • 27. Kinman, G. (2014). Doing More with Less? Work and Wellbeing in Academics. Somatechnics, 4(2), 219-235. https://doi.org/10.3366/soma.2014.0129
  • 28. Kolb, A., Kolb, D.A. (2005). Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), pp. 193-212.
  • 29. Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • 30. Kolsaker, A. (2008). Academic professionalism in the managerialist era: A study of English universities. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 513-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 03075070802372885
  • 31. Maddock, L.C. (2023). Academic middle leaders, middle leading and middle leadership of university learning and teaching: A systematic review of the higher education literature. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 45(4), 357-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2022.2160888
  • 32. Mandzuk, D. (2015). Walking the Tightrope: Staying Upright in Turbulent Times. In: Leadership for Change in Teacher Education (pp. 61-65). Brill. https://brill.com/display/book/9789462099326/BP000012.xml
  • 33. Mandzuk, D. (2024). On the edge of chaos: How the deans at one Canadian university have managed to lead in the face of the pandemic and other sources of uncertainty and complexity. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 46(1), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2023.2238335
  • 34. Martin-Sardesai, A. (2016). Institutional entrepreneurship and management control systems. Pacific Accounting Review, 28(4), 458-470. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-02-2016-0015
  • 35. McKenna, S. (2020). The Rise of the Executive Dean and the Slide into Managerialism. Educational Research for Social Change, 9(SPE), 78-91. https://doi.org/10.17159/2221-4070/2020/v9i0a6
  • 36. Meek, V.L., Goedegebuure, L., De Boer, H. (2010). The Changing Role of Academic Leadership in Australia and the Netherlands: Who Is the Modern Dean? In: V.L. Meek, L. Goedegebuure, R. Santiago, T. Carvalho (eds.), The Changing Dynamics of Higher Education Middle Management (pp. 31-54). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-90-481-9163-5_3
  • 37. Mierzwa, D., Mierzwa, D. (2020). Organisational culture of higher education institutions in the process of implementing changes - case study. Journal of Decision Systems, 29(sup1), 190-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1848377
  • 38. Morris, T.L., Laipple, J.S. (2015). How prepared are academic administrators? Leadership and job satisfaction within US research universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(2), 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2015.1019125
  • 39. Paul, J., Criado, A.R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
  • 40. Preston, D., Floyd, A. (2016). Supporting the Role of Associate Dean in Universities: An Alternative Approach to Management Development. Higher Education Quarterly, 70(3), 264-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12099
  • 41. Preston, D., Price, D. (2012). 'I see it as a phase: I don't see it as the future': academics as managers in a United Kingdom university. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(4), 409-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.689201
  • 42. Ruan, J., Cai, Y., Stensaker, B. (2024). University managers or institutional leaders? An exploration of top-level leadership in Chinese universities. Higher Education, 87(3), 703-719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01031-x
  • 43. Santiago, R., Carvalho, T., Amaral, A., Meek, V.L. (2006). Changing Patterns in the Middle Management of Higher Education Institutions: The Case of Portugal. Higher Education, 52(2), 215-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-2747-3
  • 44. Seale, O. (2021). Deanship in the Global South: Bridging Troubled Waters. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004459861
  • 45. Seale, O., Cross, M. (2016). Leading and managing in complexity: The case of South African deans. Studies in Higher Education, 41(8), 1514-1532. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 03075079.2014.988705
  • 46. Slaughter, S., Rhoades, G. (2009). Academic Capitalism and the New Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • 47. Stensaker, B., Frølich, N., Huisman, J., Waagene, E., Scordato, L., Pimentel Bótas, P. (2014). Factors affecting strategic change in higher education. Journal of Strategy and Management, 7(2), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-12-2012-0066
  • 48. Thian, L.B., Alam, G.M., Idris, A.R. (2016). Balancing managerial and academic values: Mid-level academic management at a private university in Malaysia. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(2), 308-322. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2014-0165
  • 49. Thomé, A.M.T., Scavarda, L.F., Scavarda, A.J. (2016). Conducting systematic literature review in operations management. Production Planning & Control, 27(5), 408-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2015.1129464
  • 50. Vaira, M. (2004). Globalization and higher education organizational change: A framework for analysis. Higher Education, 48(4), 483-510. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH. 0000046711.31908.e5
  • 51. Vieira da Motta, M., Bolan, V. (2008). Academic and Managerial Skills of Academic Deans: A self-assessment perspective. Tertiary Education and Management, 14(4), 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880802481740
  • 52. Wepner, S.B., Henk, W.A. (2020). Education deans' perspectives on factors contributing to their longevity. Tertiary Education and Management, 26(4), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-020-09059-9
  • 53. Winter, R. (2009). Academic manager or managed academic? Academic identity schisms in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(2), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800902825835
  • 54. Wohlin, C. (2014). Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2601248.2601268
  • 55. Wolverton, M., Gmelch, W.H., Montez, J., Nies, C.T. (2001). The Changing Nature of the Academic Deanship. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Vol. 28, No. 1. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass Publishers, Inc. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED457708
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-7b5e9e8d-1ebd-434e-bb02-f826cde76318
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.