New concept of digital innovation ecosystem in boostering circularity development. Twilight of traditional brokerage of innovation

• Autorzy: Kochanska Ewa , Adamkiewicz Iwona , Wozniak Katarzyna , Podgórski Marcin , Przygodzki Zbigniew

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.32933/ActaInnovations.48.7

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the paper is to identify the direction of evolution, the conditions of organisation and the impact of the new concept of digital innovation ecosystem in boostering circularity development. The traditional model of innovation brokerage and the new circularity broker paradigm in the development of the circular economy is presented. The authors discuss the circularity broker as an IT interface, equipped with wide range of IT tools, and above all, self-learning applications with AI elements. The circularity broker is accompanied by its watch dog, i.e. a set of IT tools used to search, process and transfer information dedicated to specific stakeholders, exactly when they need this information. The concept of circular brokerage is anchored in the area of the regional clusters dedicated to circular economy development.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

broker of innovation; circularity; megatrends; interface

PL

broker innowacji; obieg zamknięty; megatrendy; interfejs

• Wydawca: Centrum Badań i Innowacji Pro-Akademia ; Ukrainian Academy of Sciences - Research and Development Centre for Industrial Problems of Development
• Czasopismo: Acta Innovations
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: no. 48
• Strony: 92--106
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 62 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Kochanska Ewa

• Research and Innovation Centre Pro-Akademia, 9/11 Innowacyjna str., 95-050 Lodz, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4735-7969

autor

Adamkiewicz Iwona

• Research and Innovation Centre Pro-Akademia, 9/11 Innowacyjna str., 95-050 Lodz, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2272-802X

autor

Wozniak Katarzyna

• Research and Innovation Centre Pro-Akademia, 9/11 Innowacyjna str., 95-050 Lodz, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9871-732X

autor

Podgórski Marcin

• University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Polskiej Organizacji Wojskowej 3/5, 90-255 Łódź

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2054-194X

autor

Przygodzki Zbigniew

• University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Polskiej Organizacji Wojskowej 3/5, 90-255 Łódź

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6964-8479

Bibliografia

• [1] D.J. Watts, Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon 1, Am. J. Sociol. 105 (1999) 493–527. https://doi.org/10.1086/210318.
• [2] Mark S. Granovetter, The Strenth of Weak Ties, Am. J. Sociol. 78 (1973) 1360–1380.
• [3] R.S. Burt, Structural Holes and Good Ideas, Am. J. Sociol. 110 (2004) 349–399. https://doi.org/10.1086/421787.
• [4] E.L. Lingo, S. O’Mahony, Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects, Adm. Sci. Q. 55 (2010) 47–81. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.47.
• [5] J. Howells, Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation, Res. Policy. 35 (2006) 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005.
• [6] European Commission, Guidance on Innovation Procurement, 2021.
• [7] P. Kumar, R.K. Singh, V. Kumar, Managing supply chains for sustainable operations in the era of industry 4.0 and circular economy: Analysis of barriers, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 164 (2021) 105215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105215.
• [8] I. Cosme, R. Santos, D.W. O’Neill, Assessing the degrowth discourse: A review and analysis of academic degrowth policy proposals, J. Clean. Prod. 149 (2017) 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.016.
• [9] T. Vadén, V. Lähde, A. Majava, P. Järvensivu, T. Toivanen, E. Hakala, J.T. Eronen, Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature, Environ. Sci. Policy. 112 (2020) 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016.
• [10] L. Georgeson, M. Maslin, M. Poessinouw, The global green economy: a review of concepts, definitions, measurement methodologies and their interactions, Geo Geogr. Environ. 4 (2017) e00036. https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.36.
• [11] European Parliament, Circular economy: definition, importance and benefits, (2022). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/economy/20151201STO05603/circular-economy-definition-importance-and-benefits.
• [12] ISM Waste & Recycling, What is the Waste Hierarchy?, (2022).
• [13] F. Bartolacci, R. Cerqueti, A. Paolini, M. Soverchia, An economic efficiency indicator for assessing income opportunities in sustainable waste management, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 78 (2019) 106279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.05.001.
• [14] M. Bianchi, M. Cordella, Does circular economy mitigate the extraction of natural resources? Empirical evidence based on analysis of 28 European economies over the past decade, Ecol. Econ. 203 (2023) 107607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107607.
• [15] S. Böhm, C.H. Ho, H. Holmes, C. Manolchev, M. Rödl, W. Spekkink, 14 Circular society activism: De Gruyter, (2023) 241–260.
• [16] PeoplePerHour, The Evolution of the On-Demand Economy, 2015.
• [17] J. Frankenfield, Collaborative economy, Investopedia. (2021). https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/collaborative-economy.asp.
• [18] K. Frenken, J. Schor, Putting the sharing economy into perspective, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions. 23 (2017) 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.003.
• [19] G. Petropoulos, An economic review of the collaborative economy, Policy Contrib. (2017) 1–17.
• [20] H. Bruyninckx, Summer 2022: Living in a state of multiple crises, Eur. Environ. Agency. (2022).
• [21] PwC, The sharing economy : how will it disrupt your business ? Megatrends : the collisions August 2014 The Sharing Economy : Key Messages, London, 2014.
• [22] V. Laury, Collaborative consumtion, (2014).
• [23] J. Hamari, M. Sjöklint, A. Ukkonen, The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67 (2016) 2047–2059. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23552.
• [24] A. Menor-Campos, M. de los B. García-Moreno, T. López-Guzmán, A. Hidalgo-Fernández, Effects of collaborative economy: A reflection, Soc. Sci. 8 (2019) 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8050142.
• [25] S. Carlin, K. Curran, Cloud Computing Technologies, Int. J. Cloud Comput. Serv. Sci. 1 (2012). https://doi.org/10.11591/closer.v1i2.486.
• [26] R. Kurzweil, Technology and the New, Improved You, Wall Str. J. (2014).
• [27] A. Pluta-Zaremba, A. Szelągowska, Transformation of the economy. Towards era 5.0, in: Econ. Sustain. Transform., Routledge, London, 2021: pp. 12–56. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003219958-3.
• [28] E. Kochańska, Language of benefits for digital sharing of knowledge on the open access interactive platform, Acta Innov. 20 (2016) 31–42.
• [29] P.D. Gluckman, A. Bardsley, M. Kaiser, Brokerage at the science–policy interface: from conceptual framework to practical guidance, Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 8 (2021) 84. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00756-3.
• [30] A. Di Vaio, S. Hasan, R. Palladino, R. Hassan, The transition towards circular economy and waste within accounting and accountability models: a systematic literature review and conceptual framework, Environ. Dev. Sustain. 25 (2023) 734–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02078-5.
• [31] A. Alcalde-Calonge, F.J. Sáez-Martínez, P. Ruiz-Palomino, Evolution of research on circular economy and related trends and topics. A thirteen-year review, Ecol. Inform. 70 (2022) 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101716.
• [32] V. Durgekar, Towards Sustainable Waste Management Through Technological Innovations, Effective Policy, Supply Chain Integration & Participation, Procedia Environ. Sci. 35 (2016) 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.061.
• [33] C. Fogarassy, D. Finger, Theoretical and practical approaches of circular economy for business models and technological solutions, Resources. 9 (2020) 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9060076.
• [34] M. Lewandowski, Designing the business models for circular economy-towards the conceptual framework, Sustain. 8 (2016) 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010043.
• [35] M. Lieder, A. Rashid, Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry, J. Clean. Prod. 115 (2016) 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042.
• [36] A. Upadhyay, K.C. Balodi, F. Naz, M. Di Nardo, L. Jraisat, Implementing industry 4.0 in the manufacturing sector: Circular economy as a societal solution, Comput. Ind. Eng. 177 (2023) 109072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109072.
• [37] M. Agyemang, S. Kusi-Sarpong, S.A. Khan, V. Mani, S.T. Rehman, H. Kusi-Sarpong, Drivers and barriers to circular economy implementation: An explorative study in Pakistan’s automobile industry, Manag. Decis. 57 (2019) 971–994. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2018-1178.
• [38] J.M. Cramer, The function of transition brokers in the regional governance of implementing circular economy - A comparative case study of six dutch regions, Sustain. 12 (2020) 5015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125015.
• [39] W. McDowall, Y. Geng, B. Huang, E. Barteková, R. Bleischwitz, S. Türkeli, R. Kemp, T. Doménech, Circular Economy Policies in China and Europe, J. Ind. Ecol. 21 (2017) 651–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12597.
• [40] A. Padilla-Rivera, S. Russo-Garrido, N. Merveille, Addressing the social aspects of a circular economy: A systematic literature review, Sustain. 12 (2020) 7912. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12197912.
• [41] Z. Liu, D. Schraven, M. de Jong, M. Hertogh, The societal strength of transition: a critical review of the circular economy through the lens of inclusion, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. (2023) 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2208547.
• [42] A.S. Tumilar, D. Milani, Z. Cohn, N. Florin, A. Abbas, A modelling framework for the conceptual design of low-emission eco-industrial parks in the circular economy: A case for algae-centered business consortia, Water (Switzerland). 13 (2021) 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010069.
• [43] A. Angelis-Dimakis, G. Arampatzis, A. Alexopoulos, A. Pantazopoulos, I. Vyrides, N. Chourdakis, V. Angelis, Waste Management and the Circular Economy in Cyprus—The Case of the SWAN Project, Environ. - MDPI. 9 (2022) 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments9020016.
• [44] K.A. Patton, L. D., & Renn, Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice., Jossey-Bass, 2016.
• [45] A. Parzonko, S. Wawrzyniak, K. Krzyżanowska, the Role of the Innovation Broker in the Formation of Eip-Agri Operational Groups, Ann. Polish Assoc. Agric. Agribus. Econ. XXIV (2022) 194–208. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.7252.
• [46] D. Obstfeld, Social Networks, the Tertius lungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation., 2005.
• [47] K.C. Kellogg, Brokerage Professions and Implementing Reform in an Age of Experts, Am. Sociol. Rev. 79 (2014) 912–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414544734.
• [48] R. Huising, S.S. Silbey, Governing the gap: Forging safe science through relational regulation, Regul. Gov. 5 (2011) 14–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01100.x.
• [49] Ö. Öz, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Harvard Business Review, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429439087-1.
• [50] Z. Przygodzki, et.al., Policy Framework and Market analysis, 2023.
• [51] M.R. Chertow, Industrial symbiosis: Literature and taxonomy, Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 25 (2000) 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.313.
• [52] A.M. Lis, M. Mackiewicz, The implementation of green transformation through clusters, Ecol. Econ. 209 (2023) 107842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107842.
• [53] E. Kochańska, R.M. Łukasik, M. Dzikuć, New circular challenges in the development of take-away food packaging in the covid-19 period, Energies. 14 (2021) 4705. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154705.
• [54] E. Kochanska, et.al., Regional Circularity Booster Toolkit, 2023.
• [55] A. Zandiatashbar, S. Hamidi, Exploring the microgeography and typology of U.S. high-tech clusters, Cities. 131 (2022) 103973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103973.
• [56] The World Bank, Carbon Pricing 2021 State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2021, Washington DC (USA), 2021. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1586-7.
• [57] The Frontsh1p, A FRONTrunner approach to Systemic circular, Holistic & Inclusive solutions for a New Paradigm of territorial circular economy, (2021).
• [58] Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Artificial intelligence and the circular economy - AI as a tool to accelerate the transition, (2019).
• [59] Chui Michael, et.al, Notes from the AI frontier applying AI for social good, 2018.
• [60] H. Roberts, J. Zhang, B. Bariach, J. Cowls, B. Gilburt, P. Juneja, A. Tsamados, M. Ziosi, M. Taddeo, L. Floridi, Artificial intelligence in support of the circular economy: ethical considerations and a path forward, AI Soc. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01596-8.
• [61] M.S. Pathan, E. Richardson, E. Galvan, P. Mooney, The Role of Artificial Intelligence within Circular Economy Activities—A View from Ireland, Sustainability. 15 (2023) 9451. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129451.
• [62] F. Ciulli, A. Kolk, S. Boe-Lillegraven, Circularity Brokers: Digital Platform Organizations and Waste Recovery in Food Supply Chains, J. Bus. Ethics. 167 (2020) 299–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04160-5

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).