The STCW 1995 Convention: Awareness, attitude, and compliance among seafarers

• Autorzy: Pador R.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This survey research focused on the STCW 1995 and related awareness, attitude and compliance among 232 selected seafarers in the Philippines. Conducted in August 2004, the study utilized three researcher-made data-gathering instruments- the STCW 1995 Awareness Scale, STCW 1995 Attitude Scale, and Seafarer’s Compliance with the STCW 1995 Code Rating Scale. Means, standard deviations, the ttest for independent samples, the One-Way Analysis of Variance, and the Stepwise Multiple Regression Analysis were the statistical tools used. Significance level for all inferential tests was set at .05. The study found out that, generally, the seafarers had “very high” level of awareness of, “neutral” attitude towards, and “above average” compliance with the requirements of the STCW 1995 Convention.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

STCW-95; STCW Implementation; Maritime Education and Training (MET); stepwise multiple regression analysis; seafarers; career paths for seafarers; awareness; Compliance

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: Vol. 1, no. 4
• Strony: 435--456
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Pador R.

• John B. Lacson Maritime University, Iloilo City, Philippines

Bibliografia

• 1. Aldanese V. 1995. How can the Philippine manning industry meet new quality standards. The First Philippine Conventionand Training Conference, Manila.
• 2. Alm A.L.1984. Establishing a compliance and enforcement strategies process. USA: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
• 3. Alsop R. 1988, May. Advertisers put consumers on the couch. The Wall Street Journal, p. 19.
• 4. Aurora N. 2005. Changes/compliance to regulations.http://www.knowledgecm.com.
• 5. Best J. W. & Khan J.V. (8th ed.)1998. Research in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Allyn and Bacon.
• 6. Charlton T. 1985. Study of Literature concerning the roles of penalties in regulatory enforcement. USA: Compliance Policy and Planning Branch, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Monitoring.
• 7. Edwards T. & Kuusinen T. 1989. Strategies for improving indusial compliance, a draft report. USA: Regulatory Innovations Staff, Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, US EPA.
• 8. Fraenkel J.R. & Wallen N.E. (2nd ed.) 1994. How to design and evaluate research in education. San Francisco, CA:Prentice-Hall.
• 9. Heider F 1958. The psychology of interpersonal behavior. New York: Wiley.
• 10. Hoyenga K.B. & Hoyenga K.T. 1984. Motivational explanations of behavior: Evolutionary, psychological, and cognitive ideas. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
• 11. International Maritime Organization 1996. Standard of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping (STCW) Code. London: Author.
• 12. International Maritime Organization 1998. Standard of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping (STCW) Code(Amendment 1). London: Author.
• 13. International Maritime Organization 2001. Standard of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping (STCW) Code (Amendment 2). London: Author.Jones E.E., Kanouse D.E.. Kelley H.H., Nisbett R.
• 14. E., Valins, S. & Weiner, B. (eds.)1972. Introduction to attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. New York: General Learning Press.
• 15. Kagan R.A. & Scholtz J.T. 1984. The criminology of the cooperation and regulatory enforcement strategies: Enforcing regulation. USA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing
• 16. Lina A. 2002, November. The quality of the quality standards system. The Maritime Enquirer Newsmagazine, 7 (3) 15.
• 17. Maravillas N.C. 2001. The perception of the extent of implementation of the JBLF quality standards system.Unpublished master’s thesis, John B. Lacson Foundation, Inc., Iloilo City.
• 18. McConnell J.V. & Philipchalk R.P. (7thed) 1992. Understandinghuman behavior. Forthworth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
• 19. Meidinger, E., Boyer, B., & Thomas, J. 1987. Analysis of environmental compliance theories. New York: SUNY.
• 20. Miller D.T. 1985. Psychological factors influencing compliance. Ottawa, Canada: Study for the Statutes Compliance Project, Department of Justice.
• 21. Perez M.P. 1999. Exploratory study on the extent of implementation of quality standards system in maritime schools in Region VI and VII: Basis for a proposed guide for quality assurance managers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Philippines, Cebu City.
• 22. Robbins S.P. 2001. Organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• 23. Section 35, Article 13 of CHED Memorandum #51 (Quality Standard System) issued in 1997.
• 24. Scholtz J.T. 1984. Cooperation, deterrence, and the ecology of regulatory enforcement. Law and Society Review, 18 (2), 4.
• 25. Warsash Maritime Center. 2002. Improving the training and supply of Filipino senior officers qualified at the STCW ’95 management level: A feasibility study. Warsash, Southhamton:Author.
• 26. Wasserman C.E. 1984. Improving the efficiency and effectivenessof compliance monitoring and enforcement of environmental policies, United States: A national review. USA: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
• 27. Wasserman C.E. 1987. Environmental compliance and enforcement: Theory, practice, and the challenge to environmental economists. University of Delaware, USA: Association of Environment and Economists Works Environmental Enforcement and Monitoring.