Simulations in orthopedics and rehabilitation - Part 1: Simulators

• Autorzy: Dygut J. , Piwowar P. , Gołda M. , Popławski K. , Jakubas R. , Gonzales G. , Piwowar M.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/bams-2016-0021

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Nowadays, medical simulators and computer simulation programs are used to train various skills required in medicine. The development of medicine, including orthopedics and rehabilitation, has meant that resident physicians, within a much shorter period of time, must acquire the knowledge and skills that their older colleagues gained over years, learning as they operated on patients. For this reason, simulation very often helps the doctor and others engaged in health care train some techniques necessary during the work before they start working in a clinical environment. They have a chance of fine-tuning certain skills under nonclinical environment. On the other hand, simulation techniques are used in medical scientific research to know and explain the different biological processes that can be used for better patient treatment in the future. In this paper (Part I), the authors focused on the presentation of different types of simulators for the following purposes: test (conducted under laboratory conditions), training (incorporated into school, universities syllabus), diagnostic and therapeutic (within the hospital, clinics, private medical practice).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

simulation; medicine; orthopedics; rehabilitation; simulator

• Wydawca: Uniwersytet Jagielloński - Collegium Medicum ; Index Copernicus Sp. z o.o.
• Czasopismo: Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 12, no. 4
• Strony: 147--157
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz., rys., zdj.

Twórcy

autor

Dygut J.

• Hospital in Przemyśl, Monte Cassino 18, 37-700 Przemyśl, Poland

autor

Piwowar P.

• AGH University of Science and Technology, Department of Measurements and Electronic, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland

autor

Gołda M.

• Non-public Health Care Facility RehStabul. Piłsudskiego 53, 34-600 Limanowa, Poland

autor

Popławski K.

• Hospital in Przemyśl, Monte Cassino 18, 37-700 Przemyśl, Poland

autor

Jakubas R.

• Hospital in Przemyśl, Monte Cassino 18, 37-700 Przemyśl, Poland

autor

Gonzales G.

• Hospital in Przemyśl, Monte Cassino 18, 37-700 Przemyśl, Poland

autor

Piwowar M.

• Department of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine, Jagiellonian University – Medical College, Łazarza 16, 31-530 Krakow, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Prawie jak na operacji. 2014. W Lublinie będą ćwiczyć na symulatorach. Available at: http://www.dziennikwschodni.pl/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20140330/MAGAZYN/140329559. Accessed: 2 Jan 2015.
• 2. Centrum Symulacji Medycznych, II Klinika Anestezjologii i IntensywnejTerapii WUM. 2016. Available at: http://csm.wum.edu.pl/.
• 3. Protezy, stabilizatory, obuwie. 2016. Available at: http://www.elhys.com.pl/protezy__stabilizatory.html.
• 4. Fantom Polar III. 2016. Available at: http://world.honda.com/news/2008/4080918POLAR-III/.
• 5. 3bscientific. 2016. Available at: http://www.3bscientific.com/.
• 6. Przekora A, Ginalska G. Biological properties of novel chitosanbased composites for medical application as bone substitute. Cent Eur J Biol 2014;9:634–41. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.2478/s11535-014-0297-y. Accessed: 2 Jan 2015.
• 7. Arthro-mentor. 2016. Available at: http://simbionix.com/simulators/arthro-mentor/.
• 8. Atesok K, Mabrey JD, Jazrawi LM, Egol KA. Surgical simulation in orthopaedic skills training. J Am AcadOrthopSurg 2012;20:410–22. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22751160. Accessed: 19 Dec 2014.
• 9. Noszczyk B. Chirurgia Bliska Przyszłości. Pol PrzeglChir 2004;32:409–14.
• 10. Grunwald T, Krummel T, Sherman R. Advanced technologies in plastic surgery: how new innovations can improve our training and practice. PlastReconstrSurg 2004;114:1556–67. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15509950. Accessed: 30 Dec 2014.
• 11. Old-Age-Simulator. 2016. Available at: http://www.excusememe.com/article/1085/Old-Age-Simulator.
• 12. Noszczyk B. Chirurgia bliższej przyszłości. Pol PrzeglChir 1995;30:444–9.
• 13. da Vinci Surgery. 2016. Available at: http://www.davincisurgery.com/.
• 14. Diers. 2016. Available at: http://www.mediprofit.pl.
• 15. Exoskeleton Simulation on LOPEZ. 2012. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlfW1nK9fcE.
• 16. Wolff J, Parker C, Borisoff J, Mortenson W Ben, Mattie J. A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology. J NeuroengRehabil 2014;11:169. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25523497. Accessed: 21 Dec2014.
• 17. Jarrasse N, Proietti T, Crocher V, Robertson J, Sahbani A, Morel G, et al. Robotic exoskeletons: a perspective for the rehabilitation of arm coordination in stroke patients. Front Hum Neurosci 2014;8:947. Available at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih. gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4249450&tool=pmcentrez&rend ertype=abstract. Accessed: 27 Dec 2014.
• 18. Rehabilitacjajak lot sterowcem. 2014. Available at: http://www.mp.pl/treningzdrowotny/aktualnosci/100063,rehabilitacja-jaklot-sterowcem.
• 19. Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 2016. Available at: http://www.ssih.org/.
• 20. Society in Europe for Simulation applied to Medicine. 2016.Available at: http://www.sesam-web.org/.
• 21. Doughty CB, Kessler DO, Zuckerbraun NS, Stone KP, Reid JR, Kennedy CS, Nypaver MM, Auerbach MA. Simulation in Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowships. Pediatrics. 2015;136:e152–8. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-4158. PubMed PMID: 26055850.