Social practices within the framework of sustainable development in 4.0 organizations

• Autorzy: Kuźniarska Aneta , Stuss Magdalena M.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.200.16

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The purpose of the research described in this article was to identify the types of GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) indicators applied in the social area by companies declaring the implementation of the concept of Industry 4.0 with relation to companies listed on the WIG ESG index. Design/methodology/approach: For the purpose of analysing the reports on the companies chosen for research, the content analysis method was applied. Findings: All the companies analysed file reports in accordance with the GRI indicators, while their identification and level of detail are differentiated. The implementation of the Industry 4.0 concept by enterprises is based on strategies and leadership, as well as culture and organizational structure, digital integration, security, management, labour force, as well as products and services. Research limitations/implications: only WIG ESG index companies, only Poland company, only public reports and website. Future research: the relation between Industry 5.0 and the GRI indicators. Originality/value: Until now, there has been such detailed analysis conducted on companies listed on the WIG ESG index that indicates the element of reporting of social GRI on the part of companies declaring the implementation of the concept of Industry 4.0.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ESG; GRI; Industry 4.0; Industry 5.0

PL

ESG; GRI; Przemysł 4.0; Przemysł 5.0

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: z. 200
• Strony: 217--228
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 44 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Kuźniarska Aneta

• Jagiellonian University

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2786-2781

autor

Stuss Magdalena M.

• Jagiellonian University

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9911-649X

Bibliografia

• 1. Allegro (2022). Raport ESG za rok 2022.
• 2. Berelson, B. (1970). Teoria i metodologia badań. Ośrodek Badań pracoznawczych RSW "PRASA".
• 3. Berthon, P., Airn, A., Money, A. (2003). Through the paradigm funnel: a conceptual tool for literature analysis. Marketing Education Review, 13(2), 55-66.
• 4. Chichilnisky, G. (1997). What Is Sustainable Development? Land Economics, 73(4), 467- 491. https://doi.org/10.2307/3147240
• 5. Creswell, J. (2013). Projektowanie badań naukowych, Metody jakościowe, ilościowe i mieszane. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
• 6. da Silva, V.L., Kovaleski, J.L., Pagani, R.N. (2019). Technology transfer in the supply chain oriented to industry 4.0: a literature review. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(5), 546-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1524135
• 7. Denyer, D., Tranfield, D. (2006). Using qualitative research synthesis to build an actionable knowledge base. Management Decision, 44(2), 213-227. https://doi.org/10.1108/ 00251740610650201
• 8. Duberley, J. (2015). The future of qualitative research: unity, fragmentation or pluralism? Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 10(4), 340-343.
• 9. Ejsmont, K. (2018). Inteligentne Technologie - Pomiar i Ocena Wymiaru Społecznego. In: R. Knosala (Ed.), Innowacje w Zarządzaniu i Inżynierii Produkcji (pp. 409-419).
• 10. Elkington, J. (1999). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. StoneyCreek, CT: New Society Publishers.
• 11. GRI (2016). Empowering Sustainable Decisions.
• 12. Grupa Azoty S.A. (2022). Sprawozdanie na temat informacji niefinansowych Grupy Kapitałowej Grupa Azoty za okres 12 miesięcy zakończony dnia 31 grudnia 2022 roku.
• 13. Grupa CD Projekt S.A. (2022). Raport zrównoważonego rozwoju grupy cd projekt za 2022 r.
• 14. Grupa PKN ORLEN S.A. (2022). Sprawozdanie na temat Informacji Niefinansowych Grupy ORLEN i PKN ORLEN S.A. za rok 2022.
• 15. Higgins, J., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M., Welch, V. (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
• 16. Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1049732305276687
• 17. Hull, Z. (2008). The philosophical and social conditioning of sustainable development. Problems of sustainable development, 3(1), 27-31.
• 18. Hyde, K.F. (2000). Recognising deductive processes in qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research, 3(2), 82-89.
• 19. ING Bank Śląski S.A. (2022). Sprawozdanie na temat informacji niefinansowych Grupy Kapitałowej ING Banku Śląskiego S.A w 2022 roku.
• 20. Joubish, M.F., Khurram, M.A. (2011). Outlook on some concepts in the curriculum of social studies. World Applied Sciences Journal, 12(9), 1374-1377.
• 21. KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. (2022). Raport Zintegrowany KGHM Polska Miedź S.A.
• 22. Khan, K.S., Ter Riet, G., Glanville, J., Sowden, A.J., Kleijnen, J. (2001). Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness: CRD's Guidance for Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews (2nd ed.). NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.
• 23. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
• 24. Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon. 2017.06.041
• 25. Kovacs, O. (2022). Inclusive Industry 4.0 in Europe-Japanese Lessons on Socially Responsible Industry 4.0. Social Sciences, 11(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ socsci11010029
• 26. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage publications Inc.
• 27. le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards Integration at Last? The Sustainable Development Goals as a Network of Targets. Sustainable Development, 23(3), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1582
• 28. LPP S.A. (2022). Sprawozdanie zrównoważonego rozwoju za rok 2021/22.
• 29. Nahavandi, S. (2019). Industry 5.0-A Human-Centric Solution. Sustainability, 11(16), 4371. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164371
• 30. Oxford Economics (2019). How Robots Change the World What Automation Really Means for Jobs and Productivity.
• 31. Putnam, R.D. (2001). Social Capital: Measurement and Consequences. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2, 41-51.
• 32. Romero, D., Stahre, J., Taisch, M. (2020). The Operator 4.0: Towards socially sustainable factories of the future. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, 106128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106128
• 33. Rowley, J., Slack, F. (2004). Conducting a literature review. Manag. Res. News, 4(27), 31- 39.
• 34. Sangwan, S.R., Bhatia, M.P.S. (2020). Sustainable Development in Industry 4.0, pp. 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14544-6_3
• 35. Schwarz, N., Tanur, J.M., Tourangeau, R. (Eds.) (1999). Cognition and Survey Research. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
• 36. Seuring, S., Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699-1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020
• 37. TAURON S.A. (2022). Sprawozdanie na temat informacji niefinansowych grupy kapitałowej TAURON za 2022 r.
• 38. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
• 39. Van Duren, E., D'Amico, J., Knoth, K. (2015). Lean talent acquisition: one team's journey of improvement. Strategic HR Review, 14(5), 188-193. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-07- 2015-0056
• 40. Vereycken, Y., Ramioul, M., Desiere, S., Bal, M. (2021). Human resource practices accompanying industry 4.0 in European manufacturing industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(5), 1016-1036. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2020-0331
• 41. Vidrascu, P.A. (2015). Implications of sustainable development (SD) and intangible assets (IA). In: F. Bran, I. IIdko, TG. Maruntjelu, C.V. Radulescu (Eds.), Ecological Performance in a competitive economy (pp. 600-608).
• 42. WCED (1987). Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development.
• 43. Wu, Y.J., Wu, T., Sharpe, J. (2020). Consensus on the definition of social entrepreneurship: a content analysis approach. Management Decision, 58(12), 2593-2619. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2016-0791
• 44. Zezulka, F., Marcon, P., Vesely, I., Sajdl, O. (2016). Industry 4.0 - An Introduction in the phenomenon. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(25), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol. 2016.12.002