Fairway Navigation – Observing Safety-Related Performance in a Bridge Simulator

• Autorzy: Nilsson R. , Lützhoft M. , Garling T.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper proposes an approach of measuring navigation performance using a full mission bridge simulator. The motivation for this research is the updates in equipment and that the desire of using new instruments and technology not always is accompanied by analyses of the impact of the changes. The task of navigating in a fairway is proposed to be assessed through various methods to answer questions related to performance and the experience of using bridge equipment. The overall aim is to reach a higher degree of understanding and knowledge through the testing of different instrumentation setups.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Fairway Navigation; Bridge Simulator; Safety-Related Performance; Full Mission Bridge Simulator (FMBS); Navigational Bridge; Navigational Bridge Equipment; Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA); Navigational Risk

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: Vol. 2, no. 1
• Strony: 17--21
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 13 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Nilsson R.

• Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden

autor

Lützhoft M.

• Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden

autor

Garling T.

• Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden

Bibliografia

• 1. Boisson P., 1999. SAFETY AT SEA Policies, Regulations & International law. Paris: Edition Bureau Veritas.
• 2. Brehmer B., 1999. Reasonable Decision Making in Complex Environment. In Juslin, P. & Montgomery, H. 1999, Judgment and Decision Making: Neo-Brunswikian and Process-Tracing Approaches. (pp. 9-21)London: Lawrence Erlbaum associates.
• 3. Funke J., 1988. Using simulation to study complex problem solving, Simulation and games, vol 19 No3, September 1988: 277-303.
• 4. Gawron VJ., 2000. Human performance measures handbook. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Kommittédirektiv Dir.2006:116.
• 5. http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/8095/a/74338;jsessionid=aWTRXOif4qz_
• 6. Lee JD., & Sanquist TF., 1993. A systematic Evaluation of Technological Innovation: A case study Of Ship navigation. Battelle Seattle research Center. Seattle: WA 98105.
• 7. Lützhöft M., 2002. On your watch: Automation on the bridge. Journal of Navigation, 55(1): 83-96.
• 8. Lützhöft M.. 2004. The Technology is great when it works. Dissertation N0.907. Linköping: Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. University of Linköping.
• 9. Magnusson S., 2002. Similarities and Differences in Psychophysiological Reactions Between Simulated and Real Air-to Ground Missions. The international journal of aviation psychology 12(1): 49-61.
• 10. Transportation Safety Board of Canada (1995), A safety study of the operational relationship between ship masters/ watch keeping officers and marine pilots, Report nr SM9501 Available at: http://www.tsb.gc.ca/en/reports/marine/ studies/ ms9501/ms9501.asp.
• 11. Norros L., 2004. Acting under uncertainty, Espoo: VTT publications.
• 12. Wickens CD. & Hollands JG., 2000. Engineering Psychology and human performance. 3:rd edition, New Jersy: Prentice-Hall Inc.
• 13. Västfjäll D., Friman M., Gärling T., Kleiner M., 2002.The measurement of core affect: A Swedish self-report measure derived from the affect circumplex. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 43:19-31.