Influence of positions of the geotextile on the load-settlement behaviour of circular footing resting on single stone column by 2D Plaxis software

• Autorzy: Yadav J. S. , Kumar K. , Dutta R. K. , Garg A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0015.3584

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: This study aims to study the load – settlement behaviour of circular footing rested on encased single stone column. Design/methodology/approach: The effect of vertical, horizontal and combined verticalhorizontal encasement of stone column on the load carrying capacity were examined numerically. The effect of stone column dimension (80 mm and 100 mm), length (400 mm and 500 mm), and spacing of reinforcement on the load carrying capacity and reinforcement ratio were assessed. Findings: The obtained results revealed that the load carrying capacity of geotextile encased stone columns are more than ordinary stone columns. For vertically encased stone columns as the diameter increases, the advantage of encasement decreases. Whereas, for horizontally encased stone column and combined vertical- horizontal encased stone column, the performance of encasement intensifies as the diameter of stone column increases. The improvement in the load carrying capacity of clay bed reinforced with combined verticalhorizontal encased stone columns are higher than vertical encased stone columns or horizontal encased stone column. The maximum performance of encasement was observed for VHESC1 of D = 80 mm. Research limitations/implications: For this study, the diameter of footing and stone column was kept same. The interface strength factor between stone column and clay bed was not considered. Practical implications: The encased stone column could be use improve the laod bearing capacity of weak soils. Originality/value: Many studies are available in literature regarding use of geosynthetic as vertical encasement and horizontal encasement of stone column. The study on combined effect of vertical and horizontal encasement of stone column on load carrying capacity of weak soil is very minimal. Keeping this in view, the present work was carried out.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

clay bed; circular footing; stone column; geotextile; numerical analysis

PL

podstawa okrągła; kolumna kamienna; geotkanina; analiza numeryczna

• Wydawca: International OCSCO World Press
• Czasopismo: Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 107, nr 2
• Strony: 75--85
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 30 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Yadav J. S.

• Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur, H.P, India

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6283-1588++++

autor

Kumar K.

• Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur, H.P, India

autor

Dutta R. K.

• Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur, H.P, India

autor

Garg A.

• Foreign Specialist, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University Kazakhstan, Kazakhstan

Bibliografia

• [1] Indian Standard, I.S. Design and construction for ground improvement - Guidelines. Part 1: Stone columns. IS 15284, 2003, 267-290.
• [2] W. Van Impe, P. Silence, Improving of the bearing capacity of weak hydraulic fills by means of geotextiles, Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotextiles, 1986, 1411-1416.
• [3] A.P. Ambily, S.R. Gandhi, Behavior of stone columns based on experimental and FEM analysis, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 133/4 (2007) 405-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:4(405)
• [4] V. Sivakumar, D. McKelvey, J. Graham, D. Hughes, Triaxial tests on model sand columns in clay, Canadian Geotechnical Journal 41/2 (2004) 299-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-097
• [5] K. Deb, A. Dhar, P. Bhagat, Evolutionary approach for optimal stability analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced stone column-supported embankments on clay, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 16/7 (2012) 1185-1192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1797-9
• [6] Y.K. Tandel, C.H. Solanki, A.K. Desai, Reinforced granular column for deep soil stabilization: A review, International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering 2/3 (2012) 720-730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6088/ijcser.00202030002
• [7] J. Castro, Groups of encased stone columns: Influence of column length and arrangement, Geotextiles and Geomembranes 45/2 (2017) 68-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.12.001
• [8] S. Basack, B. Indraratna, C. Rujikiatkamjorn, F. Siahaan, Modeling the stone column behavior in soft ground with special emphasis on lateral deformation, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 143/6 (2017) 04017016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001652
• [9] M. Samanta, R. Bhowmik, 3D numerical analysis of piled raft foundation in stone column improved soft soil, International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 13/5 (2019) 474-483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1368139
• [10] A. Hamzh, H. Mohamad, M.F. Bin Yusof, The effect of stone column geometry on soft soil bearing capacity, International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (2019) (published online). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2019.1666557
• [11] R. Bhatia, A. Kumar, Model tests on geosynthetic-encased construction concrete debris column in fly ash fill, Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 4/1 (2019) 31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-019-0217-0
• [12] S. Murugesan, K. Rajagopal, Model tests on geosynthetic-encased stone columns, Geosynthetics International 14/6 (2007) 346-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2007.14.6.346
• [13] S. Murugesan, K. Rajagopal, Studies on the behavior of single and group of geosynthetic encased stone columns, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 136/1 (2010) 129-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000187
• [14] J.-F. Chen, X.-T. Wang, J.-F. Xue, Y. Zeng, S.-Z. Feng, Uniaxial compression behavior of geotextile encased stone columns, Geotextiles and Geomembranes 46/3 (2018) 277-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.01.003
• [15] J. Gniel, A. Bouazza, Construction of geogrid encased stone columns: A new proposal based on laboratory testing, Geotextiles and Geomembranes 28/1 (2010) 108-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.012
• [16] K. Ali, J.T. Shahu, K.G. Sharma, Model tests on geosynthetic-reinforced stone columns: a comparative study, Geosynthetics International 19/4 (2012) 292-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.12.00016
• [17] S.K. Dash, M.C. Bora, Influence of geosynthetic encasement on the performance of stone columns floating in soft clay, Canadian Geotechnical Journal 50/7 (2013) 754-765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0437
• [18] S.H. Lajevardi, S. Enami, H.R. Shamsi, M. Hamidi, Experimental study of single and groups of stone columns encased by geotextile, Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering 50/6 (2019) 1053-1060. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.22060/ceej.2018.12789.5269
• [19] S. Verma, V. Kumar, A. Priyadarshee, An experimental test study on ring footing resting on clay bed reinforced by stone column, Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 3/1 (2018) 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-018-0169-9
• [20] R.S. Sharma, B.R. Phani Kumar, G. Nagendra, Compressive load response of granular piles reinforced with geogrids, Canadian Geotechnical Journal 41/1 (2004) 187-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-075
• [21] T. Ayadat, A.M. Hanna, A. Hamitouche, Soil improvement by internally reinforced stone columns, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Ground Improvement 161/2 (2008) 55-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.2008.161.2.55
• [22] M. Ghazavi, A. Ehsani Yamchi, J. Nazari Afshar, Bearing capacity of horizontally layered geosynthetic reinforced stone columns, Geotextiles and Geomembranes 46/3 (2018) 312-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.01.002
• [23] S. Siva Gowri Prasad, P.V.V. Satyanarayana, Improvement of soft soil performance using stone columns improved with circular geogrid discs, Indian Journal of Science and Technology 9/30 (2016) 1-6. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i30/99186
• [24] K. Ali, J.T. Shahu, K.G. Sharma, Model tests on single and groups of stone columns with different geosynthetic reinforcement arrangement, Geosynthetics International 21/2 (2014) 103-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.14.00002
• [25] M.M. Rezaei, S.H. Lajevardi, H.R. Saba, Abas Ghalandarzadeh, E. Zeighamie, Experimental and numerical studies on load-carrying capacity of single floating aggregate piers reinforced with vertical steel bars, Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering 52/7 (2019) 14-14. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.22060/ceej.2019.15640.5991
• [26] S.B. Bonab, S.H. Lajevardi, H.R. Saba, A. Ghalandarzadeh, S.M. Mirhosseini, Experimental studies on single reinforced stone columns with various positions of geotextile, Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 5/3 (2020) 98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00349-0
• [27] D.A. Greenwood, Mechanical improvement of soils below ground surface, Proceedings of the Ground Engineerig Conference, London, UK, 1970.
• [28] A. Thakur, R.K. Dutta, Study of bearing capacity of skirted irregular pentagonal footings on different sands, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 105/1 (2021) 5-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.8741
• [29] S. Nazeer, R.K. Dutta, Bearing capacity of E-shaped footing on layered sand, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 105/2 (2021) 49-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.0517
• [30] J.E. Bowles, Foundation analysis and design, McGraw-Hill Professional, 1988.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).