PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Wpływ nanometrycznego karbonizatu z łupin pestek moreli na właściwości mechaniczne kompozytów cementowych

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
EN
The effects of apricot kernel shell nanobiochar on mechanical properties of cement composites
Języki publikacji
PL EN
Abstrakty
PL
Waloryzacja odpadów rolniczych jest ważna zarówno pod względem ekonomicznym jak i środowiskowym. Celem pracy było zbadanie możliwości wykorzystania karbonizatu z pestek moreli jako wypełniacza do poprawy właściwości mechanicznych zaprawy i wspomagania sekwestracji CO2. Karbonizat został wyprodukowany w wyniku pirolizy łupin pestek moreli w temperaturze 500°C. Karbonizat o wymiarach mniejszych niż 500 nm otrzymano w procesie wysokoenergetycznego mielenia kulowego. Do określenia morfologii ziaren karbonizatu użyto skaningowego mikroskopu elektronowego. Krbonizat w różnych procentach objętościowych [0,00-0,04-0,06-0,08-0,12-0,15%] dodawano do zaprawy. Zaprawę formowano w beleczki o wymiarach 40x40x160 mm. Po dojrzewaniu w wodzie w temperaturze 20°C przez 28 dni wykonano badania wytrzymałości na ściskanie i zginanie. Mieszanka zawierająca 0,04% objętości nanometrycznego karbonizatu wyróżniała się wzrostem wytrzymałości na zginanie i ściskanie odpowiednio o 5% i 15%, a jej energia pękania przy zginaniu i ściskaniu wzrosła odpowiednio o 98% i 38% w stosunku do zaprawy referencyjnej. Ponadto, w mieszance o zawartości 0,12% objętości nastąpił wzrost wytrzymałości na zginanie i ściskanie odpowiednio o 32% i 11%. Natomiast wzrost energii pękania przy zginaniu i ściskaniu wyniósł odpowiednio 52% i 25% w porównaniu z zaprawą referencyjną. Wyjaśniono mechanizmy wpływu nanometrycznego karbonizatu na płynięcie, wytrzymałość i energię pękania. Ziarna karbonizatu mostkują pęknięcia, odwracają je, działają jako miejsca nukleacji hydratacji, wzmacniają matrycę przez jej porowatą strukturę i rozwijają wewnętrzne twardnienie, co prowadzi do wzrostu wytrzymałości i energii pękania. Badanie to wykazuje, że karbonizat produkowany z łupiny pestek moreli ma potencjał do wykorzystania jako mieszanina sekwestrująca węgiel w celu poprawy efektywności zaprawy, a tym samym wykorzystania odpadów jako materiału budowlanego, przyczyniając się do rozwoju gospodarki i ochrony środowiska.
EN
Valorization of agricultural wastes is important both economically and environmentally. This study aimed to investigate the use of biochar as a filler to improve the mechanical properties of mortar and to help sequestrate CO2. The biochar was produced by pyrolysis of apricot kernel shell at 500°C. Nanobiochar particles with dimensions less than 500 nm were obtained by high-energy ball milling process. Scanning electron microscope was used for determining the morphology of nanobiochar. The nanobiochar at different volume percentages [0.00-0.04-0.06-0.08-0.12-0.15%] was added to mortar. The mortar was casted into 40x40x160 mm molds. After water curing at 20°C for 28 days, compressive strength and flexural strength tests were performed. The mixture containing 0.04% nanobiochar by volume had an increase in flexural and compressive strengths by 5% and 15% respectively, while its fracture energies for flexure and compression increased by 98% and 38% respectively compared to the reference mortar. Furthermore, the mixture having 0.12% volume had an increase in flexural and compressive strengths by 32% and 11%, respectively, while the increase in fracture energies for flexure and compression was 52% and 25%, respectively, compared to the reference mortar. The mechanisms of nanobiochar effect on flow, strength, and fracture energy were enlightened. The nanobiochars bridge the cracks, divert the cracks, act as hydration nucleation sites, enhance the matrix by its porous structure, and developed internal curing that led to increase in strength and fracture energy. This study suggests that the biochar produced from the apricot kernel shell has the potential to be used as a carbon sequestering mixture to improve performance of mortar and thereby utilizing waste as a construction material, contributing to the economy and environment.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
2--15
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 44 poz., il., tab.
Twórcy
  • Department of Civil Engineering, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
autor
  • Department of Chemistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
  • Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
  • Department of Chemistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
Bibliografia
  • 1. R.M. Andrew, Global CO2 emissions from cement production, 1928-2018. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 11, 1675-1710 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1675-2019.
  • 2. F. Sanchez, K. Sobolev, Nanotechnology in concrete-a review. Constr. Build. Mater. 24, 2060-2071 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.014.
  • 3. S. Kawashima, P. Hou, D.J. Corr, S.P. Shah, Modification of cement-based materials with nanoparticles. Cem. Concr. Compos. 36, 8-15 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.06.012.
  • 4. M. Cao, C. Zhang, J. Wei, Microscopic reinforcement for cement based composite materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 40, 14-25 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.10.012.
  • 5. S. Gupta, H.W. Kua, Factors determining the potential of biochar as a carbon capturing and sequestering construction material: critical review. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 29 (9), 04017086 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001924.
  • 6. E.N. Yargicoglu, B. Yamini, K.R. Reddy, K. Spokas, Physical and chemical characterization of waste wood derived biochars. Waste Manag. 36, 256-268 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.029.
  • 7. H. Zhang, C. Chen, E.M. Gray, S.E. Boyd, Effect of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature on properties of biochar governing end use efficacy. Biomass Bioen. 105, 136-146 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.06.024.
  • 8. S. Zhao, N. Ta, X. Wang, Effect of temperature on the structural and physicochemical properties of biochar with apple tree branches as feedstock material. Energies. 10, 1293 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/en10091293.
  • 9. Y. Shen, P. Zhao, Q. Shao, Porous silica and carbon derived materials from rice husk pyrolysis char. Microporous and Mesoporous Mat. 188, 46-76 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.01.005.
  • 10. T.A. Sial, M.N. Khan, Z. Lan, F. Kumbhar, Z. Ying, J. Zhang, D. Sun, X. Li, Contrasting effects of banana peels waste and its biochar on greenhouse gas emissions and soil biochemical properties. Proc. Saf. Environ. Protec. 122, 366-377 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.10.030.
  • 11. B. Liu, Z. Cai, Y. Zhang, G. Liu, X. Luo, Comparison of efficacies of peanut shell biochar and biochar-based compost on two leafy vegetable productivity in an infertile land. Chemosphere 224, 151-161 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.100.
  • 12. A. Toptas, G. Duman, S. Ucar, J. Yanik, Effects of feedstock type and pyrolysis temperature on potential applications of biochar. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 120, 200-206 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2016.05.006.
  • 13. S. Gupta, H. W. Kua, Combination of biochar and silica fume as partial cement replacement in mortar: performance evaluation under normal and elevated temperature. Waste Biomass Valor. 11, 2807-2824 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-00573-x.
  • 14. H. Li, S. Awadh, A. Mahyoub, W. Liao, S. Xia, H. Zhao, M. Guo, Effect of pyrolysis temperature on characteristics and aromatic contaminants adsorption behavior of magnetic biochar derived from pyrolysis oil distillation residue. Bioresource Techn. 223, 20-26 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.033.
  • 15. S.S.A Syed-Hassan, Y. Wang, S. Hu, S. Su, J. Xiang, Thermochemical processing of sewage sludge to energy and fuel: fundamentals, challenges and considerations, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 80, 888-913 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.262.
  • 16. D. Barry, C. Barbiero, C. Briens, F. Berruti, Pyrolysis as an economical and ecological treatment option for municipal sewage sludge. Biomass Bioen. 122, 472-480 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.01.041.
  • 17. J. Yanik, R. Stahl, N. Troeger, A. Sinag, Pyrolysis of algal biomass. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 103, 134-141 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2012.08.016.
  • 18. J.S. Cha, S.H. Park, S.C. Jung, C. Ryu, J.K. Jeon, M.C. Shin, Y.K. Park, Production and utilization of biochar: a review. J. Indust. Eng. Chem. 40, 1-15 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.06.002.
  • 19. M. Tripathi, J.N. Sahu, P. Ganesan, Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis: a review. Renew. Sustain. Ener. Rev. 55, 467-481 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.122.
  • 20. J. Lehmann, Bio-energy in the black. Front. in Eco. the Environ. 5, 381-387 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[381:BITB]2.0.CO;2.
  • 21. S. Ahmad, R.A. Khushnood, P. Jagdale, J.M. Tulliani, G.A. Ferro, High performance self-consolidating cementitious composites by using micro carbonized bamboo particles. Mater. Des. 76, 223-229 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.048.
  • 22. R.A. Khushnood, S. Ahmad, G.A. Ferro, L. Restuccia, J.M. Tulliani, P. Jagdale, Modified fracture properties of cement composites with nano/micro carbonized bagasse fibers. Frat. Ed. Integ. Strutt. 9(34), 534-542 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.34.59.
  • 23. L. Restuccia, G.A. Ferro, Promising low cost carbon-based materials to improve strength and toughness in cement composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 126, 1034-1043 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.101.
  • 24. S. Gupta, H.W. Kua, S.D. Pang, Biochar-mortar composite: Manufacturing, evaluation of physical properties and economic viability. Constr. Build. Mater. 167, 874-889 (2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.104.
  • 25. F. Wu, C. Liu, L. Zhang, Y. Lu, Y. Ma, Comparative study of carbonized peach shell and carbonized apricot shell to improve the performance of lightweight concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 188, 758-771 (2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.094.
  • 26. B.A. Akinyemi, A. Adesina, Recent advancements in the use of biochar for cementitious applications: a review. J. Build. Eng. 32, 101705 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101705.
  • 27. R. Liu, H. Xiao, S. Guan, J. Zhang, D. Yao, Technology and method for applying biochar in building materials to evidently improve the carbon capture ability. J. Clean. Prod. 273, 123154 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123154.
  • 28. K.G. Roberts, B.A. Gloy, S. Joseph, N.R. Scott, J. Lehmann, Life cycle assessment of biochar systems: estimating the energetic, economic, and climate change potential. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 827-833 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/es902266r.
  • 29. S. Gupta, H.W. Kua, C.Y. Low, Use of biochar as carbon sequestering additive in cement mortar. Cem. Concr. Compos. 87, 110-129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.12.009.
  • 30. S. Gupta, Carbon sequestration in cementitious matrix containing pyrogenic carbon from waste biomass: A comparison of external and internal carbonation approach. J. Build. Eng. 43, 102910 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102910.
  • 31. S. Praneeth, L. Saavedra, M. Zeng, B. K. Dubey, A. K. Sarmah, Biochar admixtured lightweight, porous and tougher cement mortars: Mechanical, durability and micro computed tomography analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 750, 142327 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142327.
  • 32. S. Elkhalifa, T. Al-Ansari, H.R. Mackey, G. McKay, Food waste to biochars through pyrolysis: A review. Res. Conser. Recyc. 144, 310-320 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.024.
  • 33. I. Cosentino, L. Restuccia, G.A. Ferro, J.M. Tulliani, Influence of pyrolysis parameters on the efficiency of the biochar as nanoparticles into cement-based composites. Proc. Struct. Integ. 13, 2132-2136 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.194.
  • 34. K.A. Spokas, Review of the stability of biochar in soils: predictability of O:C molar ratios. Carbon Manag. 1, 289-303 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.10.32.
  • 35. I.B. Initiative, Standardized product definition and product testing guidelines for biochar that is used in soil, IBI biochar Stand. (2012).
  • 36. O. Das, A.K. Sarmah, D. Bhattacharyya, Structure-mechanics property relationship of waste derived biochars. Sci. Total Environ. 538, 611-620 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.073.
  • 37. ASTM C1437-15, Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar, ASTM International, USA, (2015).
  • 38. ASTM C1609M, Standard Test Method for Flexural Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (Using Beam with Third-Point Loading), West Conshohocken, (2012).
  • 39. ASTM C349-14, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars (Using Portions of Prisms Broken in Flexure), West Conshohocken, (2014).
  • 40. J. Jin, Y. Li, J. Zhang, S. Wu, Y. Cao, P. Liang, J. Zhang, M.H. Wong, M. Wang, S. Shan, P. Christie, Influence of pyrolysis temperature on properties and environmental safety of heavy metals in biochars derived from municipal sewage sludge. J. Hazard. Mater. 320, 417-426 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.050.
  • 41. S. Gupta, H.W. Kua, H.J. Koh, Application of biochar from food and wood waste as green admixture for cement mortar. Sci. Total Environ. 619, 419-435 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.044.
  • 42. X. Yang, X-Y. Wang, Hydration-strength-durability-workability of biochar-cement binary blends. J. Build. Eng. 42, 103064 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103064.
  • 43. P. Lawrence, M. Cyr, E. Ringot, Mineral admixtures in mortars: Effect of inert materials on short-term hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. 33, 1939-1947 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00183-2.
  • 44. A. Dixit, S. Gupta, S.Z. Pang, H.W. Kua, Waste Valorisation using biochar for cement replacement and internal curing in ultra-high performance concrete. J. Clean. Produc. 238, 117876 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117876.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-7987a84c-382c-4fde-852f-0e8896602068
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.