The impact of ongoing technological changes on key aspects of theatre management – the director's perspective

Karcz-Ryndak, Julia

doi:10.29119/1641-3466.2024.197.15

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

The impact of ongoing technological changes on key aspects of theatre management – the director's perspective

Autorzy

Karcz-Ryndak Julia

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Karcz-Ryndak_the impact_znpsl_org_197_2024.pdf

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.197.15

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Purpose: The purpose of the survey is to determine how theatre directors’ perceive the impact of ongoing technological change on key aspects of theatre management. Design/methodology/approach: The study adopted a qualitative perspective. Empirical data was obtained through interviews with theatre directors. The interviews were in-depth, partly standardised and unstructured. The research sample included theatre directors from different countries. Findings: The research identified aspects of theatre management that are particularly susceptible to the dynamic development of next-generation technology. The theatre managers most frequently perceive the impact of technology in relation to: the meaning and function of the theatre; funding of theatre operations; stakeholder relations; maintaining audience relations; aspects of the production of theatre productions; and staffing policy and the functioning of theatre companies. Strongly negative perceptions of the impact of technology are held by theatre directors on, among other things, the functions and relevance of the theatre, the impact of cultural policy, and the autonomy of arts. In contrast, positive perceptions of the impact of technology mainly related to aspects of the production of theatre performances. Research limitations/implications: The research is primarily limited to theatre directors' perspectives and the purposive nature of the sample cautions against broad claims about the entire population. Moreover, private and not-for-profit theatres are underrepresented. However, these findings could serve as a foundation for quantitative research aiming to generalize and explore new technology implementation processes in theatres. Further research into the implementation of artificial intelligence, perceived as a threat to the arts and theatre companies, seems crucial. Practical implications: The results of the research can be taken into account by theatre directors as they implement next-generation technologies. Originality/value: To the best of the author's knowledge, this article presents the first research on theatre managers' perceptions of ongoing technological changes in key management areas grounded in literature. The study's international scope enhances its value. The findings could benefit theatre directors, cultural organizers, researchers in theatre and cultural management, third-sector organizations in the theatre industry, and developers of new cultural technologies.

Słowa kluczowe

theatre management arts management technology theatre director artificial intelligence

zarządzanie teatrem zarządzanie sztuką technologia reżyser teatralny sztuczna inteligencja

Wydawca

Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej

Czasopismo

Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska

Rocznik

2024

Tom

z. 197

Strony

233--256

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 83 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Karcz-Ryndak Julia

jkarcz@uek.krakow.pl

Krakow University of Economics, Department of Process Management

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2749-4325

Bibliografia

1. Adria-Art.pl (2024). Chatboty w teatrze: Spektakl napisany przez sztuczną inteligencję. Retrieved from: https://adria-art.pl/za-kulisami/369/chatboty-w-teatrze-spektakl-napisany-przez-sztuczna-inteligencje, 25.01.2024.
2. Ågerfalk, P.J. (2020). Artificial Intelligence as Digital Agency. European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1-8. doi: 10.1080/0960085X.2020.1721947.
3. Alcouffe, S., Amans, P., Assassi, I., Oriot, F. (2019). French budget act (LOLF) indicators as seen through the lens of the national drama centres: A case study. International Journal of Arts Management, Vol. 21, No.3, pp. 57-72.
4. Anderton, M., Pick, J. (1996). Arts Administration. London/New York: EFNSpon Press.
5. Babicka, M., Czarnota-Misztal, J. (2021). Doświadczając hojności. Autoetnograficzny szkic z procesu koordynacji badań życia teatralnego w pandemii. Zarządzanie w Kulturze, Vol. 2021, pp. 99-118. doi:https://doi.org/10.4467/20843976ZK.21.008.13762
6. Baldin, A. (2017). A DEA approach for selecting a bundle of tickets for performing arts events. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 39, pp. 190-200, doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.08.014
7. Befera, L., Bioglio, L. (2022). Classifying contemporary AI applications in intermedia theatre: overview and analysis of some cases. CREAI 2022, Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Creativity. Retrieved from: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3278/paper4.pdf, 6.05.2024.
8. Beirne, M., Knight, S. (2004). The Art of Reflective Management: Dramatic Insights from Scottish Community Theatre. International Journal of Arts Management, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 33-43. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41064818, 24.04.2024.
9. Bennett, R. (2009). Perceived importance of performance management metrics among UK theatre companies an empirical investigation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 58, No. 7, pp. 670-693. doi:10.1108/17410400910989476
10. Bhansing, P.V., Leenders, M.A.A.M., Wiinberg, N.M. (2012). Performance effects of cognitive heterogeneity in dual leadership structures in the arts: The role of selection system orientations. European Management Journal, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 523-534. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2012.04.002
11. Broadw.ai (2024). https://www.broadw.ai/, 25.01.2024.
12. Buchner, A., Urbańska, A., Wierzbicka, M., Janus, A., Cetera, N. (2021). Kultura w pandemii. Raport z badania. Warszawa: Centrum Cyfrowe. Retrieved from: https://centrumcyfrowe.pl/raport-kultura-w-pandemii/, 22.02.2024.
13. Bukvic, I.B., Mihaljevic, M., Tokic, I. (2016). Financing the Theatre: The role of management and the state. Ekonomski Vjesnik, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 125-142.
14. Cassell, C., Cunliffe, A.L., Grandy, G. (Eds.) (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative business and management research methods. SAGE, doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/ 9781526430236
15. Colton, S., Wiggins, G.A. (2012). Computational creativity: the final frontier? In: L. De Raedt, Ch. Bessiere, D. Dubois, P. Doherty, P. Frasconi (Eds.), ECAI’12: Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 21-26). Montpellier, France: IOS Press.
16. Cray, D., Inglis, L. (2011). Strategic Decision Making in Arts Organizations. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 84-102. doi:10.1080/10632921.2011.573444
17. Ćwikła, M. (2012). Czy można organizować sztukę niezależną? Analiza rozwiązań stosowanych w pozainstytucjonalnym teatrze niemieckim. Zarządzanie w Kulturze, Vol. 2012, pp. 281-292. doi:https://doi.org/10.4467/20843976ZK.12.018.0632
18. Damiano, R., Lombardo, V., Monticone, G., Pizzo, A. (2019). Artificial Intelligence for Dramatic Performance. In: M. Alviano, M. Gianluigi, F. Scarcello (Eds.) Greco International Conference of the Italia Association for Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1. Cham: Springer.
19. Daugherty, P.R., Wilson, J.R. (2018). Human + Machine: Reimagining Work in the Age of AI. Harvard Business Review Press, p. 264.
20. Dempster, A.M. (2006). Managing uncertainty in creative industries: Lessons from jerry springer the opera, Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 224-233. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00391.x
21. Dolecka, J. (2024). Teatr wzbudził kontrowersje. Poszło o plakat wygenerowany przez AI. https://www.wirtualnemedia.pl/artykul/hamlet-sztuczna-inteligencja, 19.01.2024.
22. Dorsen, A. (2012). On Algorithmic Theatre. The Theater Magazine, Vol. 42, No. 2. Retrieved from: https://theatermagazine.org/web-features/article/algorithmic-theater, 5.05.2024.
23. Eikhof, D.R., Haunschild, A. (2006). Lifestyle meets market: Bohemian entrepreneurs in creative industries. Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 234-241. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00392.x
24. Eikhof, D.R., Haunschild, A. (2007). For art's sake! artistic and economic logics in creative production. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 523-538. doi:10.1002/job.462
25. Eriksson, P., Kovalainen, A. (2015). Qualitative methods in business research: A practical guide to social research. SAGE, doi: 10.4135/9780857028044
26. Fontana, A., Frey, J. (2009). Wywiad. Od neutralności do politycznego zaangażowania. In: N.K. Denzim, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Metody badań jakościowych, t. 2 (pp. 81-128). Warszawa: PWN.
27. Ginsberg, R.E. (2018). Lifting the Curtain on Sundance – Frankenstein AI: A Monster Made by Many, Medium. Retrieved from: https://medium.com/columbia-dsl/lifting-the-curtain-on-sundancefrankenstein-ai-a-monster-made-by-many-97fced2c9e90, 28.04.2024.
28. Goodwin, K. (2020). Leadership Reluctance in the Australian Arts and Cultural Sector. Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10632921.2020.1739184
29. Grząba, M. (2022). Rozwój marketingu cyfrowego w instytucjach kultury podczas pandemii COVID-19. In: A. Kwiecień, A. Nocoń (Eds.), Biznes w kulturze - kultura w biznesie: strategie rozwoju jednostek kultury w kontekście trendów występujących w ich otoczeniu (pp. 39-50). Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.22367/uekat.9788378758099, 23.04.2024.
30. Gudkova, S. (2012). Wywiad w badaniach jakościowych. In: D. Jemielniak (Ed.), Badania jakościowe. Metody i narzędzia, t. 2 (pp. 111-130). Warszawa: PWN.
31. Gumiński, J. (2008). Porozmawiajmy o technologii teatru. Łódź: Przedsiębiorstwo specjalistyczne TEATR.
32. Jabłoński, M., Karcz, J. (2024). Key Aspects of Theatre Management: Literature Review.
33. Järvinen, M., Ansio, H., Houni, P. (2015). New Variations of Dual Leadership: Insights From Finnish Theatre. International Journal of Arts Management, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 16-27.
34. Jemielniak, D. (2012). Badania jakościowe, t. 1. Warszawa: PWN.
35. Kalinowska, K., Kułakowska, K. (2021). Teatr w pandemii. Warszawa: Instytut Teatralny im. Zbigniewa Raszewskiego.
36. Karcz-Ryndak, J. (2024). Zarządzanie współczesnym teatrem w warunkach postępujących zmian technologicznych – ograniczenia wdrożeniowe nowych technologii. In: A. Kwiecień, A. Nocoń (Eds.), Biznes w kulturze – kultura w biznesie. Kultura wspierana technologią Next Tech.
37. Karna, W. (2008). Zmiany w zarządzaniu publicznymi instytucjami kultury. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
38. Kieliszewski, P. (2021). Przywództwo instytucji artystycznej w czasie pandemii na przykładzie Teatru Muzycznego w Poznaniu. Zarządzanie w kulturze, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 83-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.4467/20843976ZK.21.007.13635
39. Kiszko-Dojlidko, M. (2023). Technika i technologia teatru cieni. Białystok: Akademia Teatralna im. Aleksandra Zelwerowicza w Warszawie, Filia w Białymstoku.
40. Kleppe, B. (2018). Managing Autonomy: Analyzing Arts Management and Artistic Autonomy through the Theory of Justification. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 191-205. DOI: 10.1080/10632921.2017.1377661
41. Knight, H. (2011). Eight lessons learned about non-verbal interactions through robot theater. In: B. Mutlu, Ch. Bartneck, J. Ham, V. Evers, T. Kanda (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7072 (pp. 42-51). Proceedings of Social Robotics: Third International Conference, ICSR. Amsterdam: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25504-5_5
42. Korzeniowska, E., Ptaszek, G. (2021). Kompetencje cyfrowe w instytucjach kultury. Kraków: Małopolski Instytut Kultury.
43. Kvale, S. (2023). Prowadzenie wywiadów. Warszawa: PWN.
44. Labaronne, L., Slembeck, T. (2015). Dynamic pricing in subsidized performing arts. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 122-136. doi:10.1002/nvsm.1528
45. Lehman, K. (2009). Australian Museums and the Modern Public: A Marketing Context, The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 87-100. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249037434_Australian_Museums_and_th e_Modern_Public_A_Marketing_Context, 23.04.2024.
46. Lindgren, M., Packendorff, J. (2007). Performing arts and the art of performing - on co-construction of project work and professional identities in theatres. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 354-364. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.01.005
47. MacDorman, K.F., Chattopadhyay, D. (2016). Reducing consistency in human realism increases the uncanny valley effect; increasing category uncertainty does not. Cognition, Vol. 146, pp. 190-205, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.019
48. Maison, D. (2022). Jakościowe metody badań społecznych. Podejście aplikacyjne. Warszawa: PWN.
49. Mateas, M., Stern, A. (2007). Writing Façade: A Case Study in Procedural Authorship. In: P. Harrigan, N. Wardrip-Fruin (Eds.), Second Person. Role-Playing and Story in Games and Playable Media (pp. 183-212). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Michalak-Pawłowska, A., Plebańczyk, K. (2021). Technologie cyfrowe i kanały komunikacji w budowaniu relacji animatorów kultury z odbiorcami działań. Kultura, Media, Teologia. Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 308-326. doi: 10.21697/kmt.48.13
51. Milne, G. (2003). Theatre in rural Australia: Theatre of the region or in the region? Rural Society, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 270-286. doi:10.5172/rsj.13.3.270
52. Modlinski, A., Pinto, L.M. (2020). Managing substitutive and complementary technologies in cultural institutions: Market/mission perspectives. Management, Vol. 25 (Special issue), pp. 1-10, https://doi.org/10.30924/mjcmi.25.s.2
53. Modliński, A. (2019). Strategie instytucji kultury wobec niezadowolenia i bojkotów konsumenckich. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
54. Monteverdi, A.M. (2020). Leggere uno Spettacolo Multimediale: La Nuova Scena tra Videomapping, Interaction Design e Intelligenza Artificiale. Rome: Dino Audino.
55. Mori, M. (2012). The uncanny valley. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Robotics and Automation Magazine, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 98-100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811
56. Nishiguchi, Sh., Ogawa, K., Yoshikawa, Y., Chikaraishi, T., Hirata, O., Ishiguro, H. (2017). Theatrical approach: designing human-like behaviour in humanoid robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 89, pp. 158-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.robot.2016.11.017
57. Otto, U. (2019). Theatres of Control: The Performance of Algorithms and the Question of Governance. TDR/The Drama Review - A Journal of Performance Studies, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 121-138, doi: 10.1162/dram_a_00879
58. Paglen, T. (2020). Sight Machine. Retrieved from: https://paglen.studio/2019/07/01/sight-machine/, 29.04.2024.
59. Paré, Z. (2015). Robot actors: theatre for robot engineering. In: Ehwa Institute for Humanities Science and LABEX Arts-H2H Laboratory (Eds.), Theatres du Posthumain (pp. 143–162). Arcarnet.
60. Pawlicka, K. (2020). Menedżer, artysta, kapłan… o dyrekcji Jacka Głomba w Legnicy. Zarządzanie w Kulturze, Vol. 2020, pp. 187-198. doi:https://doi.org/10.4467/ 20843976ZK.20.015.12168
61. Pearlman, E. (2020). AI Comes of Age. PAJ - Journal of Performance and Art, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 55-62, doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/pajj_a_00539
62. Pizzo, A. (2021). Performing/Watching Artificial Intelligence On Stage. Skenè: Journal of Theatre and Drama Studies, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 91-110. doi: 10.13136/sjtds.v7i1.308.
63. Pizzo, A., Lombardo, V., Damiano, R. (2019). Algorithms and Interoperability between Drama and Artificial Intelligence. TDR/The Drama Review, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 14-32.
64. Płoski, P. (2021). Analiza sytuacji teatrów w czasie pandemii. Retrieved from: https://www.senat.gov.pl/gfx/senat/pl/senatekspertyzy/5954/plik/oe-346_popr..pdf, 7.05.2024.
65. Raimo, N., De Turi, I., Ricciardelli, A., Vitolla, F. (2022). Digitalization in the cultural industry: evidence from Italian museums. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, Vol. 28, No. 8, pp. 1962-1974. doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-01-2021-0082
66. Reid, W., Karambayya, R. (2009). Impact of dual executive leadership dynamics in creative organizations. Human Relations, Vol. 62, No. 7, pp. 1073-1112. doi:10.1177/ 0018726709335539
67. Rius-Ulldemolins, J., Klein, R. (2021). From artistic direction to cultural management: governance and management of Barcelona's artistic institutions in the twenty-first century. International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 33-49, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2020-0082
68. Rokeby, D. (2019). Perspectives on Algorithmic Performance Through the Lens of Interactive Art. TDR/The Drama Review, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 88-98, doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/dram_a_00876
69. Rond, J., Sanchez, A., Berger, J., Knight, H. (2019). Improv with robots: creativity, inspiration, co-performance. 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 1-8. Retrieved from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8956410, 4.05.2024.
70. Røyseng, S. (2008). Arts management and the autonomy of art. International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 37-48. doi:10.1080/10286630701856484
71. Røyseng, S., Paoli, D.D., Wennes, G. (2020). As you like it! how performance measurement affects professional autonomy in the Norwegian public theater sector. Journal of Arts Management Law and Society, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 52-66. doi:10.1080/10632921. 2019.1693458
72. Sagasti, F. (2019). Information Technology and the Arts: The Evolution of Computer Choreography during the Last Half Century. Dance Chronicle, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 1-52, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01472526.2019.1575661
73. Scapolan, A., Montanari, F. (2013). How to Attract and Retain Artistic Talent: The Case of an Italian Ballet Company. International Journal of Arts Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 4-19.
74. Sone, Y. (2012). Double acts: human-robot performance in Japan’s Bacarobo Theatre. In: G. Arrighi, V. Emeljanow (Eds.), A world of popular entertainments: an edited volume of critical essays. Cambridge Scholars.
75. Sovhyra, T. (2021). Robotic theatre: comparative analysis of human and mechanized activities in the creative process. Creativity Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 295-306. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2021.13545
76. St. James, Y., Colbert, F. (2011). Staging magic: Forty years of product management at théâtre sans fil. International Journal of Arts Management, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 69-78.
77. Tabak, W. (2020). Publiczność w wirtualnej rzeczywistości. Didaskalia, Vol. 155. https://didaskalia.pl/artykul/publicznosc-w-wirtualnej-rzeczywistosci, 23.01.2024.
78. Talbot, Ch. (2013). Creating an artificially intelligent director (aid) for theatre and virtual environments. Retrieved from: https://www.ifaamas.org/Proceedings/aamas2013/docs/ p1457.pdf, 25.01.2024.
79. Velli, V., Sirakoulis, K. (2018). Performance Measurement in Non-profit Theatre Organizations: The Case of Greek Municipal and Regional Theatres. International Journal of Arts Management, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 49-60.
80. Vojtíšková, K., Lorencová, R. (2015). Public funding of culture in the czech republic since the fall of the iron curtain: Contemporary dilemmas. International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 529-553. doi:10.1080/10286632.2014.931380
81. Voss, Z.G., Cova, V. (2006). How sex differences in perceptions influence customer satisfaction: A study of theatre audiences. Marketing Theory, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 201-221. doi:10.1177/1470593106063983
82. Waszkiel, M. (2020). Lalkarz: Dyrektor. Zarządzanie w Kulturze, Vol. 2020, pp. 135-146. doi:https://doi.org/10.4467/20843976ZK.20.012.12165
83. Żubryk, K. (2021). Instytucje kultury podczas pierwszej fali pandemii koronawirusa – analiza porównawcza działań w mediach społecznościowych wybranych teatrów. Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis, Studia de Cultura, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 118-133. doi: 10.24917/20837275.13.4.9

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-797bf9d3-96e8-4655-bfc0-3d878569fe14