Impact of Financial Globalization on Environmental Degradation in the E7 Countries: Application of the Hybrid Nonparametric Quantile Causality Approach

• Autorzy: Adebayo Tomiwa Sunday

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/pe.2022.2.16

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wpływ globalizacji finansowej na degradację środowiska w krajach E7: zastosowanie hybrydowego nieparametrycznego podejścia kwantylowej przyczynowości

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Despite their economic success, the E7 countries have not been able to provide environmental protection. These countries, on the other hand, will not be able to maintain their economic progress if they do not also protect their natural resources. In this regard, the goal of this research is to examine the impact of financial globalization on CO2 emissions in the E7 countries. Utilizing a quarterly dataset between 1990Q1 and 2018Q4, we applied the novel quantile-on-quantile regression (QQR) and nonparametric causality in quantiles approaches to assess these interconnections. Furthermore, the quantile cointegration outcomes revealed cointegration between financial globalization and CO2 in each of the E7 nations. Furthermore, the QQR outcomes disclosed that in the majority of the quantiles, the effect of financial globalization on CO2 is positive for Brazil, China, India and Turkey, thus validating the pollution-haven-hypothesis. Moreover, for Indonesia, Russia and Mexico, in the majority of the quantiles, the effect of financial globalization on CO2 is negative, therefore validating the pollution-halo hypothesis. Moreover, the novel causality in quantiles approach disclosed that financial globalization can predict CO2 emissions for the E7 nations. Therefore, any policy channeled towards financial globalization will have a significant influence on CO2 emissions in the E7 economies. In light of these significant observations, the research suggests that Mexico, Russia, and Indonesia should be more financially interconnected, whereas China, India, Turkey, and Brazil should reevaluate their financial globalization policies.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

financial globalization; CO2 emissions; environmental sustainability; E7 nations; Quantile-on-Quantile Regression

PL

globalizacja finansowa; emisje CO2; zrównoważoność środowiskowa; kraje E7; regresja kwantylowa

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Problemy Ekorozwoju
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 17, nr 2
• Strony: 148--160
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., fig.,tab.

Twórcy

autor

Adebayo Tomiwa Sunday

• Cyprus International University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Science, Nicosia, Northern Cyprus, Mersin 10, Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0094-1778

Bibliografia

• 1. ACHEMPONG A. O., ADAMS S., BOATENG E. 2019, Do globalization and renewable energy contribute to carbon emissions mitigation in Sub-Saharan Africa?, Science of The Total Environment, 677: 436-446.
• 2. ACHEMPONG A. O., ADEBAYO T. S., 2021, Modelling the globalization-CO2 emission nexus in Australia: Evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 4(2): 12-34.
• 3. ADEBAYO T. S., KIRIKKALELI D., 2021, Impact of renewable energy consumption, globalization, and technological innovation on environmental degradation in Japan: Application of wavelet tools, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 45: 23-35.
• 4. ADEBAYO T. S., OLADIPUPO S. D., ADESHOLA I., RJOUB H. 2021, Wavelet analysis of impact of renewable energy consumption and technological innovation on CO2 emissions: Evidence from Portugal, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 3(4): 9-16.
• 5. AHMAD M., JIANG P., MURSHED M., SHEHZAD K., AKRAM R., CUI L., KHAN Z., 2021, Modelling the dynamic linkages between eco-innovation, urbanization, economic growth and ecological footprints for G7 countries: Does financial globalization matter?, Sustainable Cities and Society, 70: 10-21
• 6. AHMED Z., LE H.P., 2021, Linking Information Communication Technology, trade globalization index, and CO2 emissions: Evidence from advanced panel techniques, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(7): 8770-8781.
• 7. AHMED Z., ZHANG B., CARY M., 2021, Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL, Ecological Indicators, 12: 103-123.
• 8. BALCILAR M., BEKIROS S., GUPTA R. 2018, The role of news-based uncertainty indices in predicting oil markets: a hybrid nonparametric quantile causality method, Empirical Economics, 53(3): 879-889.
• 9. BALSALOBRE-LORENTE D., DRIHA O. M., LEITAO N. C., MURSHED, M., 2021, The carbon dioxide neutralizing effect of energy innovation on international tourism in EU-5 countries under the prism of the EKC hypothesis, Journal of Environmental Management, 29: 113-123.
• 10. BASHIR M. F., MA B., SHAHBAZ M., SHAHZAD U., VO X. V., 2021, Unveiling the heterogeneous impacts of environmental taxes on energy consumption and energy intensity: Empirical evidence from OECD countries, Energy, 22: 20-24.
• 11. BASSETT G., KOENKER R., 1978, Asymptotic Theory of Least Absolute Error Regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73(363): 618–622.
• 12. CLEVELAND W. S., 1979, Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(368): 829-836.
• 13. COLE M. A., 2004, Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: Examining the linkages, Ecological Economics, 48(1): 71-81.
• 14. FAREED Z., SALEM S., ADEBAYO T.S., PATA U.K., SHAHZAD F., 2021, Role of export diversification and renewable energy on the load capacity factor in Indonesia: A Fourier quantile causality approach, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 434: 23-35.
• 15. GROSSMAN G.M., KRUEGER A.B., 1991, Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, Papers:158..
• 16. GUNGOR H., KIRIKALELI D., ADEBAYO T. S., 2021, Consumption-based carbon emissions, renewable energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in Chile, Business Strategy and the Environment, 2(4), 22-34.
• 17. GYGLI S., HAELG F., POTRAFKE N., STURM J.-E., 2019, The KOF Globalisation Index – revisited, The Review of International Organizations, 14(3): 543-574.
• 18. HE K., RAMZAN M., AWOSUSI A. A., AHMED Z., AHMAND M., ALTUNTAS M. 2021, Does Globalization Moderate the Effect of Economic Complexity on CO2 Emissions? Evidence From the Top 10 Energy Transition Economies, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9: 55-66.
• 19. KENGGKHAN M., FUINHAS J. A., SANTIAGO R., 2020, Asymmetric impacts of globalisation on CO2 emissions of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, Environment Systems and Decisions, 40(1): 135-147.
• 20. LEAL P. H., MARQUES A. C., 2020, The environmental impacts of globalisation and corruption: Evidence from a set of African countries, Environmental Science & Policy, 115: 116-124.
• 21. MURSHED M., RASHID S., ULUCAK R., DAGAR V., REHMAN A., ALVARADO R., NATHANIEL S. P., 2021, Mitigating energy production-based carbon dioxide emissions in Argentina: The roles of renewable energy and economic globalization, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 4(1): 1-14.
• 22. RAHMAN M. M., 2020, Environmental degradation: The role of electricity consumption, economic growth and globalization, Journal of Environmental Management, 253: 109-122.
• 23. SHAHBAZ M., LOGANATHAN N., ZESHAN M., ZAMAN K., 2015, Does renewable energy consumption add in economic growth? An application of auto-regressive distributed lag model in Pakistan, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44: 576-585.
• 24. SHABHAZ M., SHAHZAD S. J. H., MAHALIK M. K., HAMMOUDEH S. 2018, Does Globalisation Worsen Environmental Quality in Developed Economies?, Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 23(2): 141-156.
• 25. SIM N., ZHOU H. 2015, Oil prices, US stock return, and the dependence between their quantiles, Journal of Banking & Finance, 55: 1-8.
• 26. SOLARINS. A., AL-MULALI U., MUSAH I., OZTRUK I., 2017, Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana:An empirical investigation, Energy, 124: 706-719.
• 27. STONE, C. J. 1977, Consistent Nonparametric Regression, The Annals of Statistics, 5(4): 595-620.
• 28. World Bank. 2021, World Development Indicators, http://data.worldbank.org/country.
• 29. YUPING L., RAMZAN M., XINCHENG L., MURSHED M., AWOSUSI A. A., BAH S. I., ADEBAYO T. S., 2021, Determinants of carbon emissions in Argentina: The roles of renewable energy consumption and globalization, Energy Reports, 7: 4747-4760.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).