Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Objectives: This article intends to review the strategies for coping with stress and psychological defense mechanisms. Method: Research Goal: to determine the relationship between stress coping strategies and defense mechanisms, among students (the Junkers).Target Group: the Junkers of the National Defense Academy of Georgia. Hypothesis: It is assumed that Junkers may have different stress coping strategies than civilian students, depending on their activities. Their defense mechanisms may be different too depending on the academic year. Data Collection Procedure: The research was conducted in April 2023 on 289 members of the Junker Training Battalion of the Academy, which includes 40 female Junkers. These individuals receive professional military education and participate in practical activities, unlike civilian students. The research focused on the age group of 18-22 years and analyzed the results of a survey conducted on 283 respondents. In the research we used the following methods: The Lazarus/Folkman test adapted to the Georgian population for the study of stress-coping strategies was used as a research tool; In the case for both civilian and military students, an adapted Georgian version of the Kellerman-Plutchik test "Lifestyle Index" was used to study psychological defense mechanisms (Plutchik, Kellerman, 1980: 3-33). Results: After analyzing the conducted research, it has become evident that the tests are reliable in terms of total reliability as well as each component. In our study(In military institutions) the Cronbach's alpha coefficient is 0.743, which confirms the reliability of both individual subscales and the total scale. We can say that our hypothesis was confirmed. According to the research, a difference was found between civilian students and Junkers in terms of the relationship between stress-coping strategies and defense mechanisms and their use. In addition, we obtained different results with Junkers according to courses, gender, and specialties, which has been empirically confirmed and is a good prerequisite for planning future research. Conclusions: According to the research, a difference was found between civilian students and Junkers in terms of the relationship between stress-coping strategies and defense mechanisms and their use.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
89--105
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 14 poz., wykr.
Twórcy
autor
- Scientific-Research Center, National Defense Academy of Georgia, Georgia
autor
- Psychologist of the Junker Training Battalion, National Defence Academy of Georgia, Georgia
Bibliografia
- 1. Chomakhidze E. et al. (2020-2021). ‘Addiction as illusory-compensatory behavior’, Scientific Papers of Sokhumi State University, Humanities and Socio-Political Sciences, Vol. XIX, Sukhumi State University / Caucasus University; Doi: https://doi.org/10.52340/sou.2023.19.49.
- 2. Coombs, C. H. (1987). The structure of conflict. American Psychologist, 42(4), 355-363. American Psychological Association. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.42.4.355.
- 3. Khadka, P. B. (2023). ‘The relevance of psychological testing in the selection of Army Officers’, Unity Journal, 4(01), 227-238. DOI:10.3126/unityj.v4i01.52243.
- 4. Kobuladze, T. (2017). ‘Organizational Justice, Work Stress: Moderating and Mediating Effects’, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, p.305. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366398948.
- 5. Kopaliani, K. (2018). ‘Stress Coping Strategies and Psychological Defense Mechanisms’, Scientific Papers of Sukhumi State University, XVIII, Humanities and Socio-Political Sciences, Sukhumi State University Publishing House, Tb. 2018-2019; p. 532, Available at: https://www.sou.edu.ge/content/3/11/147/66/0.
- 6. Kropadze, T. (2022). ‘Factors Determining The Combat Motivation’, LEPL David Aghmashenebeli National Defence Academy of Georgia. Doi: 10.61446/ds.1.2022.6458.
- 7. Kukulyar, A., Kolenova, A, Butenko, O., and Butenko, V., (2021). Study of the psychological characteristics of the personality of students with varying degrees of severity of Internet addiction, E3S Web of Conferences 273, 10014 (2021), INTERAGROMASH, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127310014.
- 8. Lazarus, R., Folkman S. (1984). Stress: Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer.
- 9. Maier, M. H. (1971). Analysis of Army Recruiting System - Selection and Training, U. S. Army Behaviour and Systems Research Laboratory.
- 10. McWilliams, N. (2004). Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy: A Practitioner's Guide. Annotated Edition. The Guilford Press, ISBN-1593850098.
- 11. Plutchik, R., Kellerman H. (1980). Emotion: Theory, research and experience, Vol.1. Theories of emotion. New York: Academic Press.
- 12. Solberg, Nes L., Segerstrom, S. C. (2006). ‘Dispositional Optimism and Coping: A MetaAnalytic Review’, Volume 10, Issue 3. Doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_3.
- 13. Straus, M. A. (1979). ‘Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41(1), 75-88. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/351733.
- 14. Tillberg, L.V. (2020). ‘The dynamics of military skills: The role of experience-based knowledge in challenging situations’, Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 3(1), 5-67. Doi: 10.31374/sjms.40.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-788a21f4-a114-4644-8996-aadc05776424