PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Soybean Productivity in Rice Crop Rotation Depending on the Impact of Biodestructor on Post-Harvest Rice Residues

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The use of biodestructors in agricultural technologies for efficient decomposition of crop residues affects the number and species composition of soil fungi, especially pathogenic species, and as a consequence, plant productivity. However, to date, this issue has not been extensively studied. The purpose of this experiment was to develop an effective method of destruction of post-harvest residues using biological products to realize the productive potential of soybeans in rice crop rotation. The work was conducted on the experimental plots of the Institute of Rice NAAS (Skadovsk district, Kherson region, Ukraine) during 2016–2018. In the experiment, the treatment of post-harvest rice residues with a biodestructor Biocomplex-BTU "Ecostern" (1 l/ha) in combination with concentrated amide water-soluble fertilizer, carbamide (30 kg/ha) was carried out in autumn. Application of carbamide alone (30 kg/ha) was used as a control. "Ecostern" is a concentrated agent, which comprises antagonists of pathogenic microorganisms as well as fungi and bacteria that accelerate decomposition of plant residues. The application of biodestructor Biocomplex-BTU "Ecostern" (1 l/ha) in combination with carbamide increased the total number of pathogenic and saprotrophic fungi in the soil from 65.5 to 80.5 thousand /g of soil or by 22.9%. However, the content of pathogenic microflora under this condition was 21.8% lower compared to the control (30 kg/ha carbamide), and the number of saprotrophs increased 3.3-fold. Following the combined use of biodestructor "Ecostern" and carbamide, the number of antagonist fungi has doubled, while the number of toxin-forming fungi decreased by 9.4%. The yield of soybeans also increased by 0.6 t/ha or by 17.9% compared to the control. The increase in yield was observed due to the higher standing density of plants and the number of beans per plant. Before the harvest, the standing density of soybean plants was 45 pcs/m2, which is 9.7% higher than the control (41 pcs/m2), due to the high level of field germination of seeds. The number of beans was 24 and 28 pieces per plant, exceeding the control by 16.7%, and the weight of 1000 grains was 156.2 g and 157.5 g, which is 0.8% than the control.
Słowa kluczowe
Twórcy
  • Institute of Rice of NAAS, Studentska Street 11, Antonivka, Skadovsk district Kherson region, 75705, Ukraine
  • Kherson State Agrarian and Economic University, Stritenska St. 23, 73006, Kherson, Ukraine
  • Kherson State Agrarian and Economic University, Stritenska St. 23, 73006, Kherson, Ukraine
Bibliografia
  • 1. Abdel-lateif К.S. 2017. Trichoderma as biological control weapon against soil borne plant pathogens. African Journal of Biotechnology, 16(50), 2299–2306.
  • 2. Aghamirian M.R., Ghiasian S.A. 2012. The prevalence of fungi in thesoil of Qazvin, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol, 6(1), 76–79.
  • 3. Ampt E.A., van Ruijven J., Raaijmakers J.M., Termorshuizen A.J., Mommer L. 2019. Linking ecology and plant pathology to unravel the importance of soil-borne fungal pathogens in species-rich grasslands. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 154(1), 141–156.
  • 4. Bikin A.V., Humeniuk O.V. 2013. Influence of mineral fertilizers and biodestructor on potassium nutrition of table potato plants. Scientific works of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beets, 18, 115–117 (in Ukrainian).
  • 5. Bolokhovsky V. 2013. Reviving soil fertility. Agronomist, 3, 464–465 (in Ukrainian).
  • 6. Cao Y., Zheng F., Zhang W., Meng X., Liu W. 2019. Trichoderma reesei XYR 1 recruits SWI/SNF to facilitate cellulase gene expression. Mol. Microbiol., 112, 1145–1162.
  • 7. Chandra Н., Kumari Р., Bisht R., Prasad R., Yadav S. 2020. Plant growth promoting Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Valeriana wallichii displays antagonistic potential against three phytopathogenic fungi. Molecular Biology Reports, 47, 6015–6026.
  • 8. Domsh K.H., Gams W., Andersоn T.H. 2007. Compendium of soil fungi. Eching: IHW-Verlag, 672.
  • 9. Gaddeyya G., Niharika P.S., Bharathi P., Kumar P.R. 2012. Isolation,and identification of soil mycoflora in different crop fields at Salur Mandal. Adv Appl Sci Res., 3(4), 2020-2026.
  • 10. Hamaiunova V., Hlushko T., Honenko L. 2018. Preservation of soil fertility as basis for improving the efficiency of management in the Southern Steppe of Ukraine. Scientific development and achievements. London, 4, 13–27.
  • 11. Hamaiunova V.V., Kovalenko O.A., Panfilova A.V., Bolokhovsky V.V. 2011. Microbiological activity of soil after spring barley when using stubble biodestructor. Scientific works of the Black Sea State University. Petro Mohyla of the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy complex. Series: Ecology, 150, 138, 61–63 (in Ukrainian).
  • 12. Hillocks R.J. 2012. Farming with fewer pesticides: EU pesticide review and resulting challenges for UK agriculture. Crop Protection, 31(1), 85–93.
  • 13. Humeniuk O.V. 2012. Influence of biodestructor on soil microbiological activity and yield of table potatoes. Bulletin of Agricultural Science, 11, 73–75 (in Ukrainian).
  • 14. Humeniuk O.V. 2013. Nutrient regime of dark gray podzolic soil using stubble biodestructor. Bulletin of Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V.V. Dokuchaev. Series: Soil science, agrochemistry, agriculture, forestry, soil ecology, 1, 129–134 (in Ukrainian).
  • 15. Kondakova I.A., Levin V.I., Lgova I.P., Lomova Y.V., Vologzhanina E.A., Antoshina O.A. 2019. Mycotoxins of the grain mass are an important problem of agricultural enterprises. International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research, 10(2), 223–230.
  • 16. Korsun S.G., Klimenko I.I., Davydyuk G.V., Dovbash N.I., Shkarivska L.I. 2017. Ecological expediency of application of biodestructor "Ecostern" in intensive agriculture. Farming, 1, 69–73 (in Ukrainian).
  • 17. Kovalenko A.M., Novohyzhnii M.V., Tymoshenko G.Z., Sergheyeva Yu.O. 2020. Features of application of destructors of stubble in the steppe zone. Bulletin of Agricultural Science, 2(803), 44–51 (in Ukrainian).
  • 18. Kulish O. 2014. Influence of stubble biodestructor on oilseed flax seed yield in the area of small Polissya of Ukraine. Technical and technological aspects of development and testing of new equipment and technologies for agriculture of Ukraine, 18(2), 169–174 (in Ukrainian).
  • 19. Kushnaryov A., Kravchuk V., Bobrovny E. 2012. Influence of degree of crushing and depth of laying of straw in soil on intensity of its decomposition with use of the biodestructor "Sternifag". Machinery and technologies of agro-industrial complex, 12, 24–27 (in Ukrainian).
  • 20. Li J.X., Zhang F., Jiang D.D., Li J., Wang F.L., Zhang Z., Wang W., Zhao X.Q. 2020. Diversity of Cellulase-Producing Filamentous Fungi From Tibet and Transcriptomic Analysis of a Superior Cellulase Producer Trichoderma harzianum LZ117. Frontiers in microbiology, 11, 1617.
  • 21. Marinoha P. 2010. Microbiological improvement of soils. Agronomist, 3, 28–29 (in Ukrainian).
  • 22. Markovskaya O.E. 2018. Dynamics of microorganism in dark kastanozems in different systems of basic tillage and fertilizer in crop rotation on irrigation. Agrology, 1(3), 294–299 (in Ukrainian).
  • 23. Markovska O., Maliarchuk M., Maliarchuk V., Ivaniv M., Dudchenko V. 2020. Modelling of humus balance under different systems of basic tillage and soil fertilization in crop rotations Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 10(5), 291–295 (in Ukrainian).
  • 24. Nosratabadi M., Kordbacheh P., Kachuei R., Safara M., Rezaie S., Afshari M.A., Jafari H. 2017. Isolation and identification of non-pathogenic and pathogenic fungi from the soil of Greater Tunb, Abu-Musa and Sirri Islands, Persian Gulf, Iran. Journal of Applied Biotechnology Reports, 4(4), 713–718.
  • 25. Panfilova A.V., Hamaiunova V.V., Drobitko A.V. 2019. Yield of winter wheat depending on the predecessor and biodestructor of stubble. Bulletin of the Poltava State Agrarian Academy, 3, 18–25 (in Ukrainian).
  • 26. Panfilova A.V., Hamaiunova V.V. 2019. Influence of stubble biodestructor on soil nutrient regime. Bulletin of Lviv National Agrarian University. Agronomy, 23, 229–233 (in Ukrainian).
  • 27. Termorshuizen A.J. 2016. Ecology of fungal plant pathogens. Microbiology Spectrum, 4(6), 387–397.
  • 28. Tsentilo L., Sendetsky V. 2014. Biological efficiency of biodestructors use. Bulletin of Zhytomyr National Agroecological University, 2(1), 93–99 (in Ukrainian).
  • 29. Underhill D.M., Iliev I.D. 2014. The mycobiota: interactions between commensal fungi and the host immune system. Nat Rev Immunol, 14(6), 405–416.
  • 30. Ushkarenko V.O., Nikishenko V.L., Goloborodko S.P., Kokovihin S.V. 2008. Disperse and correlation analysis in agriculture and plant science: textbook. Kherson: Aylant (in Ukrainian).
  • 31. Ushkarenko V.O., Kokovikhin S.V., Holoborodko S.P., Vozhehova R.A. 2014. Metodologiya poliovoho doslidu (Zroshuvane zemlerobstvo). Kherson: Hrin DS (in Ukrainian).
  • 32. Velička R., Rimkevičienė M., Kriauciuniene Z., Pupalienė R., Salina O. 2009. The effect of cellulosedegrading micro-organisms on the biodestruction of crop residues in the soil. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 96(1), 113–126.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-785f62ac-22d8-4dce-bbd5-fbc46192dcbd
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.