PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

The Performance of Treatment Train System Incorporated with Nature-Based Materials in Capturing Nutrient for Stormwater Runoff

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Biofilters, commonly called rain gardens, are becoming increasingly popular among best-management practices (BMPs). They have recently sparked significant interest due to their ability to control stormwater quality. These systems face challenges in manipulating dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus species. This study reports the results of the removal of nitrogen and phosphorus in two modified bioretention systems. The performance of modified bioretention with coconut and durian was compared. The modified bioretention system was evaluated as a single and a series. Sequencing these systems in a series maintained the continuity of nutrient removal. Both series efficiently removed NH3-N (97% in TC5, 95% in TD5), while the removal of NO3-N was moderate (65% inTC5, 67% in TD5). Good removal efficiencies of TP were observed in two series (84% in TC5, 81% in TD5). However, the PO4 removal was equalized in all series (98%). The TN and ON removal were poor and fluctuated with time and column number in TC5, the overall removal efficiencies were (69% and 43%), respectively, while in TD5 a significant fraction of TN and ON were removed (86% and 78%), respectively. As compared with coconut husk, durian peel is considered a promising material that can enhance the water quality in bioretention systems.
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Strony
92--101
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 23 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
  • Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Catholic University of America, Washington, District of Columbia 20064, United States
Bibliografia
  • 1. Abbasi H.N., Xie J., Hussain S.I., Lu X. 2019. Nutrient Removal in Hybrid Constructed Wetlands: Spatial-Seasonal Variation and the Effect of Vegetation. Water Science and Technology, 79(10), 1985–94. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2019.196
  • 2. Wafaa A., Takaijudin H., Yusof K.W., Osman M., Abdurrasheed A.S. 2021. The Common Approaches of Nitrogen Removal in Bioretention System. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(5), 1–17. DOI: 10.3390/su13052575
  • 3. Anon. 1990a. British Standards Institution, British Standard Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes: Part 1, General Requirements and Sample Preparation. British Standards Institution, London (BS1377), 1, 1990.
  • 4. Anon. 1990b. British Standards Institution, BSI Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes: Part 2. Classification Tests. London (BS1377), 1990.
  • 5. Braswell A.S., Anderson A.R., Hunt W.F. 2018. Hydrologic and Water Quality Evaluation of a Permeable Pavement and Biofiltration Device in Series. Water (Switzerland), 10(1). DOI: 10.3390/w10010033
  • 6. Brown R.A., Line D.E., Hunt W.F. 2012. LID Treatment Train: Pervious Concrete with Subsurface Storage in Series with Bioretention and Care with Seasonal High Water Tables. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 138(6), 689–697. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000506
  • 7. Brown R.A., Hunt W.F. 2011. Impacts of Media Depth on Effluent Water Quality and Hydrologic Performance of Undersized Bioretention Cells. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 137(3), 132–143. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000167
  • 8. Chen Y., Shao Z., Kong Z., Gu L., Fang J., Chai H. 2020. Study of Pyrite Based Autotrophic Denitrification System for Low-Carbon Source Stormwater Treatment. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 37, 101414.
  • 9. Doan L.N., Davis A.P. 2017. Bioretention–Cistern–Irrigation Treatment Train to Minimize Stormwater Runoff. Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment, 3(2), 04017003. DOI: 10.1061/jswbay.0000820
  • 10. Hathaway J.M., Hunt W.F. 2010. Evaluation of Storm-Water Wetlands in Series in Piedmont North Carolina. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 136(1), 140–146. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000130
  • 11. Hermawan A.A., Talei A., Salamatinia B., Chua L.H.C. 2020. Seasonal Performance of Stormwater Biofiltration System under Tropical Conditions. Ecological Engineering, 143(November 2019), 105676. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.105676
  • 12. Huong M., Costa D.T., van Hoi B. 2020. Enhanced Removal of Nutrients and Heavy Metals from Domestic-Industrial Wastewater in an Academic Campus of Hanoi Using Modified Hybrid Constructed Wetlands. Water Science and Technology, 82(10), 1995–2006. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2020.468
  • 13. Takaijudin H., Ghani A.A., Nor Azazi Z.N. 2014. The Impact of Stormwater Runoff on Nutrient Removal in Sand Columns. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 567, 155–160.
  • 14. Liqing L., Davis A.P. 2014. Urban Stormwater Runoff Nitrogen Composition and Fate in Bioretention Systems. Environmental Science and Technology, 48(6), 3403–3410. DOI: 10.1021/es4055302
  • 15. Li L., Yang J., Davis A.P., Liu Y. 2019. Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen Behavior and Fate in Bioretention Systems: Role of Vegetation and Saturated Zones. Journal of Environmental Engineering (United States), 145(11), 1–9. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001587
  • 16. Lopez-Ponnada, Emma V., Lynn T.J., Ergas S.J., Mihelcic J.R. 2020. Long-Term Field Performance of a Conventional and Modified Bioretention System for Removing Dissolved Nitrogen Species in Stormwater Runoff. Water Research, 170, 115336. DOI: 10.1016/J.WATRES.2019.115336
  • 17. Marvin J.T., Passeport E., Drake J. 2020. State-of-theArt Review of Phosphorus Sorption Amendments in Bioretention Media: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment, 6(1). DOI: 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000893
  • 18. Muerdter C.P., Smith D.J., Davis A.P. 2020. Impact of vegetation selection on nitrogen and phosphorus processing in bioretention containers. Water Environment Research, 92(2), 236–244. DOI: 10.1002/wer.1195
  • 19. Peterson I.J., Igielski S., Davis A.P. 2015. Enhanced Denitrification in Bioretention Using Woodchips as an Organic Carbon Source. Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment, 1(4), 04015004. DOI: 10.1061/jswbay.0000800
  • 20. Shrestha P., Hurley S.E., Wemple B.C. 2018. Effects of Different Soil Media, Vegetation, and Hydrologic Treatments on Nutrient and Sediment Removal in Roadside Bioretention Systems. Ecological Engineering, 112(August 2017), 116–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.12.004
  • 21. Tirpak R.A., Afrooz A.N., Winston R.J., Valenca R., Schiff K., Mohanty S.K. 2021. Conventional and Amended Bioretention Soil Media for Targeted Pollutant Treatment: A Critical Review to Guide the State of the Practice. Water Research, 189, 116648. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116648
  • 22. Wan Z., Li T., Shi Z. 2017. A Layered Bioretention System for Inhibiting Nitrate and Organic Matters Leaching. Ecological Engineering, 107(August 2016), 233–238. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.07.040
  • 23. Wang H.W., Zhai Y.J., Wei Y.Y., Mao Y.F. 2019. Evaluation of the Effects of Low-Impact Development Practices under Different Rainy Types: Case of Fuxing Island Park, Shanghai, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(7), 6706–6716. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04129-x
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-77e98bde-b26a-40b1-a78d-e598ccd9ff35
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.