PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Temporal Patterns of Wetland-Associated Bird Assemblages in Altered Wetlands in Turkey

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
A loss of wetlands, one of the highly sensitive ecosystems, necessitates the monitoring and assessment of wildlife population trends for the continuity and sustainable management of species. The goal of our study was to evaluate temporal changes in wetland-associated bird composition by conducting monthly counts during December 2006 - November 2007 and March 2015 - February 2016 in Efteni Lake, Duzce, Turkey. This lake has been exposed to structural change including shoreline length, area and depth for the last 50 years. Wetland-associated bird richness decreased, and abundance increased during the decade, but this change was not significant except for two species with an increased population, ferruginous duck Aythya nyroca and great crested grebe Podiceps cristatus. Cluster analyses resulted in two groups: the breeding season from April to September, and the non-breeding season from October to March. The most numerous species were observed mostly during the non-breeding season. Some guilds, including diving carnivores, omnivores, shoreline omnivores and herbivores species were more prevalent during the non-breeding season. The insectivores had higher population densities during the breeding season. Thus, wetland-associated bird abundance during the non-breeding season was higher than during the breeding season, although species richness was the opposite. The planned restoration of habitats of Efteni Lake should have a positive impact on birds by creating more space available to them. Our result should help to better understand the impact of habitat changes on waterbird assemblages. Long-term monitoring of Efteni Lake will be useful for the wetland-associated avian community, and for other animal and plant communities.
Rocznik
Strony
316--330
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 65 poz., rys., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Wildlife Ecology and Management, Faculty of Forestry, Düzce University, Düzce 81620, Turkey
  • School of Natural Resources, West Virginia University, 1145 Evansdale Drive, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
  • IX. Region Directorate, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Düzce 81620, Turkey
  • School of Natural Resources, West Virginia University, 1145 Evansdale Drive, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
Bibliografia
  • 1. Aksoy N. 2006 – The vegetation of Duzce-Elmacık Mountain – Ph.D. thesis, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • 2. Amano T., Székely T., Sandel B., Nagy S., Mundkur T., Langendoen T., Blanco D., Soykan C. U., Sutherland W. J. 2018 – Successful conservation of global waterbird populations depends on effective governance – Nature, 553 (7687): 199-202.
  • 3. Anderson J. T., Smith L. M. 1999 – Carrying capacity and diet habitat use of managed plays wetlands by non-breeding waterbirds – Wildl. Soc. Bull. 27: 281-291.
  • 4. Anonymous 2018a – Wildlife Reservoir Area Wetland Management Plan Sub-Project – Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Duzce.
  • 5. Anonymous 2018b – Duzce Meteorological Data. Turkish State Meteorological Service – Duzce.
  • 6. Arai K., Barakbah A. R. 2007 – Hierarchical K-means: an algorithm for centroids initialization for K-means – Rep. Faculty Sci. Eng. 36: 25-31.
  • 7. Barbier, E. 1993 – Sustainable Use of Wetlands Valuing Tropical Wetland Benefits: Economic Methodologies and Applications – Geog. J. 159: 22-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/3451486.
  • 8. Bibby, C. J., Burgess, N. D., Hill, D. A., 1992 – Bird Census Tecniques – Academic Press San Diego, CA. ISBN 0-12-095830-9.
  • 9. Canterbury G. E., Martin T. E., Petit D. R., Petit L. J., Bradford D. F. 2000 – Bird communities and habitat as ecological indicators of forest condition in regional monitoring – Conserv. Biol. 14: 544-558.
  • 10. Clipp H. L., Peters M. L., Anderson J. T. 2017 – Winter waterbird community composition and use at created wetlands in West Virginia, USA – Scientifica, Article ID 1730130, 13 pp. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1730130.
  • 11. Costanza R., d'Arge R., De Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O'Neill R. V., Paruelo J., Raskin R. G., Sutton P., van den Belt M. 1997 – The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital – Nature, 387 (6630): 253-260.
  • 12. Davidson N. C. 2014 – How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area – Mar. Fresh. Res. 65: 934-941.
  • 13. De Zan, R., Battisti, C., Carpaneto, G. M. 2010 – Effect of spring water stress induced by fishery farming on two duck species Anas platyrhynchos L. and Anas crecca L. in a Mediterranean wetland. – Pol. J. Ecol. 58: 599-604.
  • 14. Duncan P., Hewison A. J. M., Houte S., Rosoux R., Tournebize T., Dubs F., Burel F., Bretagnolle V. 1999 – Long-term changes in agricultural practices and wildfowling in an internationally important wetland, and their effects on the guild of wintering ducks – J. Appl. Ecol. 36: 11-23.
  • 15. Elphick C. S. 2000 – Functional equivalency between rice fields and seminatural wetlands habitats – Conserv. Biol. 14: 181-191.
  • 16. Gawlik D. E. 2006 – The role of wildlife science in wetland ecosystem restoration: lessons from the Everglades – Ecol. Eng. 26: 70-83.
  • 17. Gelbard R., Goldman O., Spiegler I. 2007 – Investigating diversity of clustering methods: An empirical comparison – Data Know. Eng. 63: 155-166.
  • 18. Green A. J., El Hamzaoui M., El Agbani M. A., Franchimont J. 2002 – The conservation status of Moroccan wetlands with particular reference to waterbirds and to changes since 1978 – Biol. Conserv. 104: 71-82.
  • 19. Heenan A., Gorospe K., Williams I., Levine A., Maurin P., Nadon M., Oliver T., Rooney J., Timmers M., Wongbusarakum S., Brainard R. 2016 – Ecosystem monitoring for ecosystem-based management: using a polycentric approach to balance information trade-offs – J. Appl. Ecol. 53: 699-704.
  • 20. Heinzel H., Fitter R., Parseow J. 1995 – [Birds of Turkey and Europe] – DHKD, İstanbul (in Turkish).
  • 21. IUCN 2019 – The IUCN Redlist of Threatened Species, Version: 2019.1. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 20 April 2019.
  • 22. Jokimäki J., Suhonen J., Inki K., Jokinen S. 1996 – Biogeographical comparison of winter bird assemblages in urban environments in Finland – J. Biogeogr. 23: 379-386.
  • 23. Juni S., Berry C. R., Fish S. D. C. 2001 – A biodiversity assessment of compensatory mitigation wetlands in eastern South Dakota (In: Proceedings of the South Dakota) – Academy of Science, 80: 185-200.
  • 24. Kajtoch L., Zmihorski M., Piestrzynska-Kajtoch A. 2014 – The goosander as potential indicator of naturalness and biodiversity in submontane river valleys of northern Carpathians – Ecol. Indicators, 45: 83-92.
  • 25. Kassambara A., Mundt F. 2016 – Package ‘factoextra’ https://mran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2016-06-09/web/packages/factoextra/factoextra.pdf. Accessed 20 January 2019.
  • 26. Keddy P. A. 1983 – Freshwater wetlands human-induced changes: indirect effects must also be considered – Environ. Manage. 7: 299-302.
  • 27. Keten A. 2009 – Investigations on Vertebrata Fauna of Düzce-Efteni Lake – Ph.D. thesis, İstanbul University, Istanbul Turkey.
  • 28. Keten A., Arslangündoğdu Z., Selmi E. 2012 – Ornithofauna of Efteni Lake in Düzce – Düzce University Journal of Forestry, 8: 10-18.
  • 29. Kirkan R. 1962 – The monograph of Duzce Town – M.Sc. thesis, İstanbul University, Istanbul Turkey.
  • 30. Koskimies P. 1989 – Birds as a tool in environmental monitoring – Ann. Zool. Fen. 26: 153-166.
  • 31. Larson J. S., Mueller A. J., MacConnell W. P. 1980 – A model of natural and man-induced changes in open freshwater wetlands on the Massachusetts coastal plain – J. Appl. Ecol. 17: 667-673.
  • 32. Ma Z., Cai Y., Li B., Chen J. 2010 – Managing wetland habitats for waterbirds: an international perspective – Wetlands, 30: 15-27.
  • 33. Ma Z., Wang Y., Gan X., Li B., Cai Y., Chen J. 2009 – Waterbird population changes in the wetlands at Chongming Dongtan in the Yangtze River estuary, China – Environ. Manage. 43: 1187-1200.
  • 34. Magurran A. E. 1988 – Ecological diversity and its measurement – Princeton University Press.
  • 35. Magurran A. E., Baillie S. R., Buckland S. T., McPick J., Elston D. A., Scott E. M., Smith R. I., Somerfield P. J., Watt A. D. 2010 – Long-term datasets in biodiversity research and monitoring, assessing change in ecological communities through time – Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: S574-S582.
  • 36. Mazzotti F. J., Hughes N., Harvey R. G. 2007 – Why do we need environmental monitoring for Everglades restoration? – Inst. Food Agri. Sci., Publication Number WEC, 241: 1-3.
  • 37. Mistry J., Berardi A., Simpson M. 2008 – Birds as indicators of wetland status and change in the North Rupununi, Guyana – Biodivers. Conserv. 17 (10): 2383.
  • 38. Mullarney K., Svenson L., Zetterström D., Grant P. J. 1999 – Bird Guide, The Most Complete Field Guide to the Birds of Britain and Europe – Harper Collins, London.
  • 39. Musil P., Musilová Z., Fuchs R., Poláková S. 2011 – Long-term changes in numbers and distribution of wintering waterbirds in the Czech Republic, 1966-2008 – Bird Study, 58: 450-460.
  • 40. Nebel S., Porter J. L., Kingsford R. T. 2008 – Long-term trends of shorebird populations in eastern Australia and impacts of freshwater extraction – Biol. Conserv. 141: 971-980.
  • 41. Newton I. 1998 – Population Limitation in Birds – Academic Press, London.
  • 42. Özbek M., Sarı H. M. 2007 – Hirudinea (Annelida) fauna of some lakes located in western Black Sea Region – E.U. J. Fish. Aquatic Sci. 24: 83-88.
  • 43. Özbek M., Ustaoğlu R., Balık S., Sarı H. 2004 – Mollusca Fauna of Some of the Lakes Located in Western Black Sea Region – 1st National Malacology Congress, 1-3 September 2004, İzmir Turkey.
  • 44. Paszkowski C. A., Tonn W. M. 2006 – Foraging guilds of aquatic birds on productive boreal lakes: environmental relations and concordance patterns – Hydrobiologia, 567: 19-30.
  • 45. R Development Core Team. 2018 – R: A language and environment for statistical computing – http://R-project.org. Accessed 16 November 2018.
  • 46. Rahman F., Ismail A. 2018 – Waterbirds: An Important Bio-Indicator of Ecosystem – Pertanika J. Scholarly Res. Rev. 4: 81-90.
  • 47. Reif J. 2013 – Long-term trends in bird populations: a review of patterns and potential drivers in North America and Europe – Acta Ornithol. 48: 1-16.
  • 48. Rendon M. A., Green A. J., Aguilera E., Almaraz P. 2008 – Status, distribution and long-term changes in the waterbird community wintering in Doñana, south-west Spain – Biol. Conserv. 141: 1371-1388.
  • 49. Sanders M. D. 2000 – Enhancing food supplies for waders: inconsistent effects of substratum manipulations on aquatic invertebrate biomass – J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 66-76.
  • 50. Sebastián-González E., Green A. J. 2016 – Reduction of avian diversity in created versus natural and restored wetlands – Ecography, 39: 1176-1184.
  • 51. Shine C., Klemm C. 1999 – Wetlands, Water and the Law. Using law to advance wetland conservation and wise use – IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, Cambridge, UK and Bonn, Germany.
  • 52. Snell-Rood E. C., Cristol D. A. 2003 – Avian communities of created and natural wetlands: bottomland forests in Virginia – Condor, 105: 303-315.
  • 53. Steen D. A., Gibbs J. P., Timmermans S. T. 2006 – Assessing the sensitivity of wetland bird communities to hydrologic change in the eastern Great Lakes region. – Wetlands, 26: 605-611.
  • 54. Strain G. F., Turk P. J., Tri A. N., Anderson J. T. 2017 – Anuran occupancy of created wetlands in the Central Appalachians – Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 25: 369-384.
  • 55. Sutherland W. J. 1996 – Predicting the consequences of habitat loss for migratory populations – Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 263 (1375): 1325-1327.
  • 56. Taft O. W., Colwell M. A., Isola C. R., Safran R. J. 2002 – Waterbird responses to experimental drawdown: implications for the multispecies management of wetland mosaics – J. Appl. Ecol. 39: 987-1001.
  • 57. Topkara E. T. 2008 – Investigations on the Aquatic Coleoptera (Insecta) Fauna of Inland Waters in the West Black Sea Region and its Environs – Ph.D. thesis, Ege University, Izmir Turkey.
  • 58. Trakus. 2019 – Birds of Turkey – http://www.trakus.org. Accessed 16 February 2019.
  • 59. Türkmen M. A. 1999 – Determination of the aquatic organisms (Vertabrate and invertabrates in the Melen Stream basin and evaluation of them in relation to the environmental alterations – M.Sc. thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara Turkey.
  • 60. van Asselen S., Verburg P. H., Vermaat J. E., Janse J. H. 2013 – Drivers of Wetland Conversion: a Global Meta-Analysis – PloS ONE, 8 (11): e81292. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081292.
  • 61. Ward M.P., Semel B., Herkert J. R. 2010 – Identifying the ecological causes of long-term de clines of wetland-associated birds in an urbanizing landscape – Biodiv. Conserv. 19: 3287-3300.
  • 62. Weller M. W. 1988 – Issues and approaches in assessing cumulative impacts on waterbird habitat in wetlands – Environ. Manage. 12: 695-701.
  • 63. Wetlands International 2012 – Waterbird Population Estimates, fifth ed. – Wetlands International, Wageningen, The Netherlands https://www.wetlands.org/publications/waterbird-populations-estimatesfifth-edition/ Accessed 10 February 2019.
  • 64. Zacchei D., Battisti C., Carpaneto G. M. 2011 – Contrasting effects of water stress on wetland-obligated birds in a semi-natural Mediterranean wetland – Lakes Reserv. Res. Manage. 16: 281-286.
  • 65. Zorrilla-Miras P., Palomo I., Gómez-Baggethun E., Martín-López B., Lomas P. L., Montes C. 2014 – Effects of land-use change on wetland ecosystem services: A case study in the Doñana marshes (SW Spain) – Landscape Urban Plan. 122: 160-174.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-77a152dc-c033-4048-a545-bfb0d52691da
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.