Assessment method of end-of-life vehicles recycling network efficiency

• Autorzy: Merkisz-Guranowska A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0010.3145

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Recycling is a final stage closing the life cycle of vehicles. The quality of this process affects the combined impact of automobiles on the environment. Recycling networks differ in the level of efficiency due to the differences in how the recycling system is organized, their environment, and the characteristics of the entities taking part in recycling process. The article presents an algorithm of a method for assessing the effectiveness of a vehicle-recycling network, which can be used in a comparative analysis of networks, or for evaluating changes over time. A set of indicators relating to the technical, economic, environmental, and social aspects was proposed. The article presents the variety of aspects involved in assessing, the efficiency of a vehicle-recycling network the best solution seems to be the inclusion of selected indicators for the assessment model, which will also act as a tool to assess the state of the network and conduct rankings of available solutions. The model for assessing the efficiency has to be preceded by determining the purpose and scope of the assessment and analysis of available evaluation tools.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

recycling network; end-of-life vehicles; system efficiency; indicators

• Wydawca: Łukasiewicz Research Network - Institute of Aviation ; European Science Society of Powertrain and Transport KONES Poland ; Wydawnictwo Instytutu Technicznego Wojsk Lotniczych
• Czasopismo: Journal of KONES
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 24, No. 4
• Strony: 193--201
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Merkisz-Guranowska A.

• Poznan University of Technology Faculty of Machines and Transportation Piotrowo Street 3, 60-965 Poznan, Poland tel.: [phone]

Bibliografia

• [1] Armijo, C., Puma, A., Ojeda, S., A set of indicators for waste management programs, 2nd International Conference on Environmental Engineering and Applications, LACSIT Press, Singapore 2011.
• [2] Arendse, L., Godfrey, L., Waste Management Indicators for National State of Environmental Reporting, The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), www.unep.or.jp/ietc/ kms/data/2010.pdf, accessed 25.09.2015.
• [3] Buslenko, H. P., Kałasznikow, W. W., Kowalenko, I. U., Teoria systemów złożonych, PWN, Warszawa 1979.
• [4] Callan, S., Thomas, J., Economies of scale and scope: a cost analysis of municipal solid waste services, Land economics, Vol. 77 (4), pp. 548-560, 2001.
• [5] Chavez, A. P., Armijo de Vega, C., Benitez, S. O., Measuring Progress of Waste Management Programs, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, Vol. 2 (5), pp. 372-376, 2011.
• [6] DG Environment A study to examine the benefits of the End of Life Vehicles Directive and the costs and benefits of a revision of the 2015 targets for recycling, re-use and recovery under the ELV Directive. Final Report, J2232, 2006.
• [7] Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of-life vehicles, Official Journal of the European Communities, 269, 2000.
• [8] Greene, K. L., Tonjes, D. J., Quantitative assessments of municipal waste management systems: Using different indicators to compare and rank programs in New York State, Waste Management, Vol. 34, pp. 825-836, 2014.
• [9] Jacyna, M., Wasiak, M. (ed.), Simulation model to support designing a sustainable national transport system, Index Copernicus International, Warszawa 2014.
• [10] Kaufman, S. M., Krishnan, N., Themelis, N. J., A screening life cycle metric to benchmark the environmental sustainability of waste management systems, Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 44, pp. 5949-5955, 2010.
• [11] Leu, H-G., Lin, S. H., Cost-benefit analysis of resource material recycling, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 23, pp. 183-192, 1998.
• [12] Marques, R. C., Ferreira da Cruz, N., Carvalho, P., Assessing and exploring (in)efficiency in Portuguese recycling systems using non-parametric methods, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 67, pp. 34-43, 2012.
• [13] Mendes, P., Santos, A. C., Nunes, L. M., Teixeira, M. R., Evaluating municipal solid waste management performance in regions with strong seasonal variability, Ecological Indicators, Vol. 30, pp. 170-177, 2013.
• [14] Ministry for the Environment Recycling – Cost and benefit analysis, Final Report, Auckland New Zealand 2007.
• [15] OECD Environmental Indicators: Development, Measurement, and Use, OECD, Paris 2003.
• [16] Olugu, E. U., Wong, K. Y., Shaharoun, A. M., Development of key performance measures for the automobile green supply chain, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 55 (6), pp. 567-579, 2011.
• [17] Vergara, S., Tchobanoglous, G., Municipal solid waste and the environment: a global perspective, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Vol. 37, pp. 277-309, 2012.
• [18] Wen, L., Lin, C. H., Lee, S. C., Review of recycling performance indicators: a study on collection rate in Taiwan, Waste Management, Vol. 29, pp. 2248-2256, 2009.
• [19] Wilson, D., Rodic, L., Cowing, M., Velis, C., Whiteman, A., Scheinberg, A., Vilches, R., Masterson, D., Stretz, J., Oelz, B., Wasteaware’ benchmark indicators for integrated sustainable waste management in cities, Waste Management, Vol. 35, pp. 329-342, 2015.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).