PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Institutional quality and government expenditure: an empirical study of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) in G20 countries

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
G20 member countries are forced to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from the global community as well as economic development constraints from domestic resources and the environment. Literature related to institutional quality and government expenditure is still limited, especially in G20 countries. To provide empirical evidence to support the theoretical argument, the study investigated the effects of institutional quality and government expenditure on CO2 emissions using a balanced panel dataset of nineteen countries that were members of the G20 between 1995 and 2015. Empirical results show that institutional quality is able to reduce carbon emissions. A good government can formulate strict environmental regulations and ensure transparency, which allows investment in green technologies and renewable energy. Other findings suggest that government spending can increase carbon emissions. The findings show that government spending in G20 countries still does not consider environmental impacts. Several policy recommendations are suggested.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
art. no. 883
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 66 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Dr. Soetomo, Indonesia, Taman Pondok Jati blok AP No. 4, Sidoarjo, Indonesia
  • Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Dr. Soetomo, Indonesia
  • Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Dr. Soetomo, Indonesia
Bibliografia
  • Adewuyi, A. O. (2016). Effects of public and private expenditures on environmental pollution: A dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 489-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.090
  • Amin, A., Ameer, W., Yousaf, H., & Akbar, M. (2022). Financial Development, Institutional Quality, and the Influence of Various Environmental Factors on Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Exploring the Nexus in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.838714
  • Apergis, N., & Ozturk, I. (2015). Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecological Indicators, 52, 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.026
  • Aytun, C., Erdogan, S., Pata, U. K., & Cengiz, O. (2024). Associating environmental quality, human capital, financial development and technological innovation in 19 middle-income countries: A disaggregated ecological footprint approach. Technology in Society, 76, 102445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102445
  • Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Cham: Springer.
  • Beckerman, W. (1992). Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? whose environment? World Development, 20(4), 481-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(92)90038-W
  • Bekhet, H. A., & Othman, N. S. (2018). The role of renewable energy to validate dynamic interaction between CO2 emissions and GDP toward sustainable development in Malaysia. Energy Economics, 72, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.03.028
  • Ben Jebli, M., & Ben Youssef, S. (2015). The environmental Kuznets curve, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy, and trade in Tunisia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.049
  • Bletsas, K., Oikonomou, G., Panagiotidis, M., & Spyromitros, E. (2022). Carbon Dioxide and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Role of Monetary Policy, Fiscal Policy, and Institutional Quality. Energies, 15(13), 4733. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134733
  • Chang, H. Y., Wang, W., & Yu, J. (2021). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in China: A spatial dynamic panel data approach. Energy Economics, 104, 105600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105600
  • Chen, J., Xian, Q., Zhou, J., & Li, D. (2020). Impact of income inequality on CO2 emissions in G20 countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 110987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110987
  • Dogan, E., & Seker, F. (2016). The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 1074-1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.006
  • Dong, B., Wang, F., & Guo, Y. (2016). The global EKCs. International Review of Economics and Finance, 43, 210-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.02.010
  • Dong, K., Dong, X., & Jiang, Q. (2020a). How renewable energy consumption lower global CO2 emissions? Evidence from countries with different income levels. World Economy, 43(6), 1665-1698. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12898
  • Dong, K., Hochman, G., & Timilsina, G. R. (2020b). Do drivers of CO2 emission growth alter overtime and by the stage of economic development? Energy Policy, 140, 111420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111420
  • Erdogan, S., Pata, U. K., & Solarin, S. A. (2023). Towards carbon-neutral world: The effect of renewable energy investments and technologies in G7 countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 186, 113683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113683
  • Eweade, B. S., Karlilar, S., Pata, U. K., Adeshola, I., & Olaifa, J. O. (2023). Examining the asymmetric effects of fossil fuel consumption, foreign direct investment, and globalization on ecological footprint in Mexico. Sustainable Development, 32(4), 2899-2909. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2825
  • Fernández, Y. F., López, M. A. F., & Blanco, B. O. (2018). Innovation for sustainability: The impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3459-3467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.001
  • Galeotti, M. (2007). Economic growth and the quality of the environment: Taking stock. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 9(4), 427-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9030-y
  • Gao, W., Liang, S., Wang, R., Jiang, Q., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Q., Xie, B., Toe, C. Y., Zhu, X., Wang, J., Huang, L., Gao, Y., Wang, Z., Jo, C., Wang, Q., Wang, L., Liu, Y., Louis, B., Scott, J., Roger, A.-C., Amal, R., He, H., & Park, S.-E. (2020). Industrial carbon dioxide capture and utilization: state of the art and future challenges. Chemical Society Reviews, 49(23), 8584-8686. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS00025F
  • Gill, A. R., Viswanathan, K. K., & Hassan, S. (2017). Is environmental kuznets curve still relevant? International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(1), 156-165. https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/3644
  • Gyamfi, B. A., Adedoyin, F. F., Bein, M. A., & Bekun, F. V. (2021). Environmental implications of N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve for E7 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(25), 33072-33082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12967-x
  • International Monetary Fund. (2024). Government expenditure, percent of GDP. https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/exp@FPP/USA/FRA/JPN/GBR/SWE/ESP/ITA/ZAF/IND
  • Iwata, H., Okada, K., & Samreth, S. (2011). A note on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2: A pooled mean group approach. Applied Energy, 88(5), 1986-1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.005
  • Jiang, X., Nie, X., Guo, X., Song, C., & Chen, J. G. (2020). Recent Advances in Carbon Dioxide Hydrogenation to Methanol via Heterogeneous Catalysis. Chemical Reviews, 120(15), 7984-8034. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00723
  • Kamal, M., Usman, M., Jahanger, A., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2021). Revisiting the role of fiscal policy, financial development, and foreign direct investment in reducing environmental pollution during globalization mode: Evidence from linear and nonlinear panel data approaches. Energies, 14(21), 6968. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14216968
  • Khan, I., Hou, F., Zakari, A., Irfan, M., & Ahmad, M. (2022). Links among energy intensity, non-linear financial development, and environmental sustainability: New evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129747
  • Khan, Z., Ali, S., Dong, K., & Li, R. Y. M. (2021). How does fiscal decentralization affect CO2 emissions? The roles of institutions and human capital. Energy Economics, 94, 105060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105060
  • Leal, P. H., & Marques, A. C. (2022). The evolution of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis assessment: A literature review under a critical analysis perspective. Heliyon, 8(11), e11521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11521
  • López-Menéndez, A. J., Pérez, R., & Moreno, B. (2014). Environmental costs and renewable energy: Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 368-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.017
  • Lorente, D. B., & Álvarez-Herranz, A. (2016). Economic growth and energy regulation in the environmental Kuznets curve. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(16), 16478-16494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6773-3
  • Moshiri, S., & Daneshmand, A. (2020). How effective is government spending on environmental protection in a developing country? An empirical evidence from Iran. Journal of Economic Studies, 47(4), 789-803. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-12-2018-0458
  • Musolesi, A., Mazzanti, M., & Zoboli, R. (2010). A panel data heterogeneous Bayesian estimation of environmental Kuznets curves for CO2 emissions. Applied Economics, 42(18), 2275-2287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840701858034
  • Neve, M., & Hamaide, B. (2017). Environmental Kuznets Curve with Adjusted Net Savings as a Trade-Off Between Environment and Development. Australian Economic Papers, 56(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12078
  • Nguyen, V. B. (2024). Does governance contribute to the public spending – CO2 emissions nexus in developing economies? Policy lessons for sustainable development. Public Sector Economics, 48(1), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.48.1.4
  • Pata, U. K. (2018). Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: Testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 770-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.236
  • Pata, U. K., & Caglar, A. E. (2021). Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: Evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. Energy, 216, 119220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119220
  • Pata, U. K., Erdogan, S., & Ozcan, B. (2023a). Evaluating the role of the share and intensity of renewable energy for sustainable development in Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production, 421, 138482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138482
  • Pata, U. K., Erdogan, S., & Ozkan, O. (2023b). Is reducing fossil fuel intensity important for environmental management and ensuring ecological efficiency in China? Journal of Environmental Management, 329, 117080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117080
  • Pata, U. K., & Karlilar Pata, S. (2024a). Towards sustainable development in African countries: Are modern and combustible renewable energies effective? Sustainable Development, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3040
  • Pata, U. K., & Karlilar, S. (2024b). The integrated influence of energy security risk and green innovation on the material footprint: An EKC analysis based on fossil material flows. Journal of Cleaner Production, 435, 140469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140469
  • Petrović, P., & Lobanov, M. M. (2020). The impact of R&D expenditures on CO2 emissions: Evidence from sixteen OECD countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119187
  • Pirgaip, B., Bayrakdar, S., & Kaya, M. V. (2023). The role of government spending within the environmental Kuznets curve framework: evidence from G7 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(34), 81513-81530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25180-9
  • Postula, M., & Radecka-Moroz, K. (2020). Fiscal policy instruments in environmental protection. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 84, 106435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106435
  • Rehman, M. U., & Rashid, M. (2017). Energy consumption to environmental degradation, the growth appetite in SAARC nations. Renewable Energy, 111, 284-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.100
  • Sadik-Zada, E. R., & Loewenstein, W. (2020). Drivers of CO 2 -Emissions in Fossil Fuel Abundant. Energies, 13.
  • Safi, A., Chen, Y., & Zheng, L. (2022). The Impact of Energy Productivity and Eco-Innovation on Sustainable Environment in Emerging Seven (E-7) Countries: Does Institutional Quality Matter? Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.878243
  • Salman, M., Long, X., Dauda, L., & Mensah, C. N. (2019). The impact of institutional quality on economic growth and carbon emissions: Evidence from Indonesia, South Korea and Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118331
  • Sapkota, P., & Bastola, U. (2017). Foreign direct investment, income, and environmental pollution in developing countries: Panel data analysis of Latin America. Energy Economics, 64, 206-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.001
  • Shafik, N., & Bandyopadhya, S. (1992). Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Time-Series and Cross-Country Evidence. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/833431468739515725/Economic-growth-and-environmental-quality-time-series-and-cross-country-evidence
  • Shahbaz, M., & Sinha, A. (2019). Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a literature survey. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(1), 106-168. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-09-2017-0249
  • Shao, L., Zhang, H., & Irfan, M. (2022). How public expenditure in recreational and cultural industry and socioeconomic status caused environmental sustainability in OECD countries? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 4625-4642. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.2015614
  • Sinha, A., & Shahbaz, M. (2018). Estimation of Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 emission: Role of renewable energy generation in India. Renewable Energy, 119, 703-711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.058
  • Sinha, A., Shahbaz, M., & Balsalobre, D. (2017). Exploring the relationship between energy usage segregation and environmental degradation in N-11 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1217-1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.071
  • Stef, N., Başağaoğlu, H., Chakraborty, D., & Ben Jabeur, S. (2023). Does institutional quality affect CO2 emissions? Evidence from explainable artificial intelligence models. Energy Economics, 124, 106822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106822
  • Tenaw, D., & Beyene, A. D. (2021). Environmental sustainability and economic development in sub-Saharan Africa: A modified EKC hypothesis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110897
  • Uzar, U. (2021). The relationship between institutional quality and ecological footprint: Is there a connection? Natural Resources Forum, 45(4), 380-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12235
  • Wang, Q., Li, Y., & Li, R. (2024). Rethinking the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across 214 countries: the impacts of 12 economic, institutional, technological, resource, and social factors. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02736-9
  • Wawrzyniak, D., & Doryń, W. (2020). Does the quality of institutions modify the economic growth-carbon dioxide emissions nexus? Evidence from a group of emerging and developing countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 33(1), 124-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1708770
  • World Bank. (2024). World Development Indicators. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=World%20Development%20Indicators
  • Xaisongkham, S., & Liu, X. (2024). Institutional quality, employment, FDI and environmental degradation in developing countries: evidence from the balanced panel GMM estimator. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 19(7), 1920-1939. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-10-2021-1583
  • Yaduma, N., Kortelainen, M., & Wossink, A. (2015). The environmental Kuznets curve at different levels of economic development: a counterfactual quantile regression analysis for CO2 emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4(3), 278-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2015.1004118
  • Yang, Y., Niu, G., Tang, D., & Zhu, M. (2018). Spatial econometric analysis of the effect of government governance on regional emission reduction: Evidence from China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 27(6), 2833-2842. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/80727
  • Yilanci, V., & Pata, U. K. (2022). On the interaction between fiscal policy and CO2 emissions in G7 countries: 1875–2016. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(2), 196-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2021.1950575
  • Zheng, L., Umar, M., Safi, A., & Khaddage-Soboh, N. (2024). The role of higher education and institutional quality for carbon neutrality: Evidence from emerging economies. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 406-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.12.008
  • Zoundi, Z. (2017). CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 1067-1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.018
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-76daa88a-f391-4c91-b9f4-26ef60b7a5bd
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.