PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Comparing Probabilistic Economic Order Quantity and Periodic Order Quantity Model Performance Under Lumpy Demand Environment

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Improper planning of inventory will affect the factory operating costs, building costs, the cost of loss, and the cost of product defects due to being stored for too long which will eventually become a loss. This research discusses the processing industry which is experiencing lumpy demand. In carrying out the production process, the company has never made plans for future demand, resulting in a waste of message costs due to repeated orders of raw materials ordered to suppliers. This paper contributes to overcoming this issue by simulating future demand by using the Material Requirement Planning (MRP) method with a probabilistic Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) and Periodic Order Quantity (POQ) model. The demand in the coming period is determined using the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) method, and an aggregate plan is carried out to determine the regular cost of raw material production and optimal subcontracting. The final analysis states that the calculation of MRP on the selected items using POQ produces the lowest cost for planning S45C-F, SGT-R, and SKD11-R, while SLD-R uses the probabilistic EOQ method.
Twórcy
  • Filscha Nurprihatin – Department of Industrial Engineering, Sampoerna University, Indonesia
  • Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Bunda Mulia, Indonesia
  • Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Bunda Mulia, Indonesia
Bibliografia
  • Alinaghian M. & Goli A. (2017), Location, allocation and routing of temporary health centers in rural areas in crisis, solved by improved harmony search algorithm, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, Vol. 10, pp. 894–913.
  • Andiyan Putra, R.M., Rembulan G.D. and Tannady H. (2021), Construction project evaluation using CPMcrashing, CPM-PERT and CCPM for minimize project delays, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, No. 1933(1), pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012096.
  • Andry J.F., Tannady H. and Nurprihatin F. (2020), Eliciting requirements of order fulfilment in a company, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, No. 1, Vol. 771. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/771/1/012023.
  • Ballou R.H. (2004), Business logistics: supply chain management (5th ed.), Prentice Hall.
  • Bounou O., el Barkany A. and el Biyaali A. (2021), Contribution overview to the evaluation and development of spare parts management models: Metaheuristic and probabilistic methods. In Management and Production Engineering Review, Vol. 12, Issue 1, pp. 24–37), Polska Akademia Nauk. DOI: 10.24425/mper.2021.136869.
  • Boute R.N., Gijsbrechts J., van Jaarsveld W. and Vanvuchelen N. (2022), Deep reinforcement learning for inventory control: A roadmap, European Journal of Operational Research, No. 2, Vol. 298, pp. 401–412. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.07.016.
  • Chen Z. and Sarker B.R. (2015), Aggregate production planning with learning effect and uncertain demand, Journal of Modelling in Management, No. 3, Vol. 10, pp. 296–324. DOI: 10.1108/JM2-07-2013-0035.
  • Christian M., Dewi D., Rembulan G.D., Indriyarti E.R., Wibowo S. and Yuniarto Y. (2021), Business performance determinants of salted fish distribution in Kapuk during the COVID-19, Journal of Distribution Science, No. 6, Vol. 19, pp. 29–39. DOI: 10.15722/jds.19.6.202106.29.
  • Goli A. and Keshavarz T. (2022), Just-in-time scheduling in identical parallel machine sequence-dependent group scheduling problem, Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, No. 6, Vol. 18. DOI: 10.3934/jimo.2021124.
  • Goli A., Khademi-Zare H., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R., Sadeghieh A., Sasanian M. and Kordestanizadeh R.M. (2021), An integrated approach based on artificial intelligence and novel meta-heuristic algorithms to predict demand for dairy products: a case study, Network: Computation in Neural Systems, No. 1, Vol. 32, pp. 1–35. DOI: 10.1080/0954898X.2020.1849841.
  • Goli A. and Malmir B. (2020), A covering tour approach for disaster relief locating and routing with fuzzy demand, International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research, No. 1, Vol. 18, pp. 140– 152. DOI: 10.1007/s13177-019-00185-2.
  • Goli A., Zare H.K., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R. and Sadeghieh A. (2019), Hybrid artificial intelligence and robust optimization for a multi-objective product portfolio problem Case study: The dairy products industry, Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 137, pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.106090.
  • Gunawan F.E., Wilujeng F.R., Rembulan G.D. and Tannady H. (2020), Service quality analysis of SMEs tempe in province of Jakarta, Indonesia, Technology Reports of Kansai University, No. 7, Vol. 62, pp. 3827–3833.
  • Heizer J., Render B. and Munson C. (2020), Operations management: sustainability and supply chain management (13th ed.). Pearson.
  • Mahagaonkar S.S. and Kelkar P.A.A. (2017), Application of ABC analysis for material management of a residential building, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, No. 8, Vol. 4, pp. 614–620. https://irjet.net/archives/V4/i8/IRJET-V4I8108.pdf.
  • Mahmoud A.A., Aly M.F., Mohib A.M. and Afefy I.H. (2020), A two-stage stochastic programming approach for production planning system with seasonal demand, Management and Production Engineering Review, No. 1, Vol. 11, pp. 31–42. DOI: 10.24425/mper.2020.132941.
  • Marziali M., Rossit D.A. and Toncovich A. (2021), Warehouse management problem and a KPI approach: A case study, Management and Production Engineering Review, Vol. 12, Issue 3, pp. 51–62). DOI: 10.24425/mper.2021.138530.
  • Montororing Y.D.R. and Nurprihatin F. (2021), Model of quality control station allocation with consider work in process, and defect probability of final product, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, pp. 1–12. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012013.
  • Nahmias S. and Olsen T.L. (2015), Production and operations analysis (7th ed.), Waveland Press Inc.
  • Nurprihatin F., Andry J.F. and Tannady H. (2021), Setting the natural gas selling price through pipeline network optimization and project feasibility study, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012008.
  • Nurprihatin F., Angely M. and Tannady H. (2019), Total productive maintenance policy to increase effectiveness and maintenance performance using overall equipment effectiveness, Journal of Applied Research on Industrial Engineering, No. 3, Vol. 6, pp. 184–199. DOI: 10.22105/jarie.2019.199037.1104.
  • Nurprihatin F., Elnathan R., Rumawan R.E. and Regina T. (2019), A distribution strategy using a two-step optimization to maximize blood services considering stochastic travel times, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, No. 1, Vol. 650. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/650/1/012043.
  • Nurprihatin F., Elvina Rembulan G.D., Christianto K. and Hartono H. (2021), Decision support system for truck scheduling in logistic network through cross-docking strategy, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012009.
  • Nurprihatin F., Gotami M. and Rembulan G.D. (2021), Improving the performance of planning and controlling raw material inventory in food industry, International Journal of Research in Industrial Engineering, No. 4, Vol. 10, pp. 332–345. DOI: 10.22105/riej.2021.306872.1250.
  • Nurprihatin F., Jayadi E.L. and Tannady H. (2020), Comparing heuristic methods’ performance for pure flow shop scheduling under certain and uncertain demand, Management and Production Engineering Review, No. 2, Vol. 11. DOI: 10.24425/mper.2020.133728.
  • Nurprihatin F. and Lestari A. (2020), Waste collection vehicle routing problem model with multiple trips, time windows, split delivery, heterogeneous fleet and intermediate facility, Engineering Journal, No. 5, Vol. 24, pp. 55–64. DOI: 10.4186/ej.2020.24.5.55.
  • Nurprihatin F. and Montororing Y.D.R. (2021), Improving vehicle routing decision for subsidized rice distribution using linear programming considering stochastic travel times, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012007.
  • Nurprihatin F., Octa A., Regina T., Wijaya T., Luin J. and Tannady H. (2019), The extension analysis of natural gas network location-routing design through the feasibility study, Journal of Applied Research on Industrial Engineering, No. 2, Vol. 6, pp. 108–124. DOI: 10.22105/jarie.2019.174164.1082.
  • Nurprihatin F., Regina T. and Rembulan G.D. (2021), Optimizing rice distribution routes in Indonesia using a two-step linear programming considering logistics costs, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, pp. 1– 8. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012010.
  • Nurprihatin F. and Tannady H. (2018), An integrated transportation models and savings algorithm to minimize distribution costs, Proceeding of the 1st Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems Engineering, pp. 216–221. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335231165.
  • Ramya G., Chandrasekaran M. and Shankar E. (2019), Case study analysis of job shop scheduling and its integration with material requirement planning, Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 16, pp. 1034–1042. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.192.
  • Saha E. and Ray P.K. (2019), Modelling and analysis of inventory management systems in healthcare: A review and reflections, Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 137. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.106051.
  • Singh D. and Verma A. (2018), Inventory management in supply chain, Materials Today: Proceedings, No. 2, Vol. 5, pp. 3867–3872. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.641.
  • Stevenson W.J. (2018), Operations management (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Tannady H., Andry J.F. and Nurprihatin F. (2020), Determinants factors toward the performance of the employee in the crude palm oil industry in West Sumatera, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, No. 1, Vol. 771. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/771/1/012066.
  • Tannady H., Erlyana Y. and Nurprihatin F. (2019), Effects of work environment and self-efficacy toward motivation of workers in creative sector in province of Jakarta, Indonesia, Quality-Access to Success, No. 172, Vol. 20.
  • Tannady H., Gunawan E., Nurprihatin F. and Wilujeng F.R. (2019), Process improvement to reduce waste in the biggest instant noodle manufacturing company in South East Asia, Journal of Applied Engineering Science, No. 2, Vol. 17. DOI: 10.5937/jaes17-18951.
  • Tannady H., Nurprihatin F. and Hartono H. (2018), Service quality analysis of two of the largest retail chains with minimart concept in Indonesia, Business: Theory and Practice, Vol. 19. DOI: 10.3846/BTP.2018.18.
  • Tirkolaee E.B., Goli A., Ghasemi P. and Goodarzian F. (2022), Designing a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network of face masks during the COVID19 pandemic: Pareto-based algorithms, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 333, pp. 1–21. DOI: 10. 1016/j.jclepro.2021.130056.
  • Yıldız R. and Yaman R. (2018), Case study about economic order quantities and comparison of results from conventional EOQ model and response surfacebased approach, Management and Production Engineering Review, No. 3, Vol. 9, pp. 23–32. DOI: 10.24425/119531.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-76d0e263-0abf-45b4-bc13-66b3f87cf583
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.