Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The prospects for aligning transport, spatial, and development planning at the regional level in Slovenia are presented in this article. We focus primarily on assessing the possibility of linking and interweaving the contents of documents provided for existing legislation, as well as legislation that is in the preparation phase. First, we present the general factors of differentiation and connection between the documents of the considered areas of planning. Then, we present the substantive factors of differentiation and the connection between the documents at the state level. In the next chapter, we present emerging technologies and transport services and their inclusion in spatial, development, and transport planning in national documents and regional development programs. In the last part of the article, we present the final findings and proposals for the substantive integration of the preparation of transport, spatial, and development planning documents at the regional level in Slovenia. The article was repared in the framework of the CARE4CLIMATE project – boosting greenhouse gas emissions reduction by 2020 with a view to 2030 – promoting sustainable transport, energy efficiency, renewable energies, and sustainable, climate-protecting land use in the transition to a low-carbon society.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
115--126
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 30 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia; Trnovski pristan 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Bibliografia
- 1. de Abreu e Silva, J. & Melo, P.C. Home telework, travel behavior, and land-use patterns: A path analysis of British single-worker households. The Journal of Transport and Land use. 2018. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 419-441.
- 2. Barrios, J.M. & Hochberg, Y.V. & Yi, H. The cost of convenience: ridesharing and traffic fatalities. Chicago Booth Research Paper. 2019. No. 27. P. 1-4.
- 3. Bieser, J.C.T. & Vaddadi, B. & Kramers, A. & Höjer, M. & Hilty, L.M. Impacts of telecommuting on time use and travel: A case study of a neighborhood telecommuting center in Stockholm. Travel Behaviour and Society. 2021. Vol. 23. P. 157-165.
- 4. BMK. Action programme on automated mobility. Bundesministerin für Klimaschutz, Umwelt, Energie, Mobilität, Innovation und Technologie. 2018. Available at: https://www.bmk.gv.at/en/topics/mobility/alternative_transport/automated/actionpackage.html.
- 5. BMVI. Strategy for automated and connected driving. Bundesministeriums für Digitales und Verkehr. 2015. Available at: https://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/EN/publications/strategy-forautomated-and-connected-driving.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.
- 6. Elldér, E. Telework and daily travel: New evidence from Sweden. Journal of Transport Geography. 2020. Vol. 86. No. 102777.
- 7. ERTICO. ITS Europe Mobility as a Service (MaaS) and sustainable urban mobility planning. 2019. Available at: https://www.eltis.org/sites/default/files/mobility_as_a_service_maas_and_sustainable_urban_mobility_planning.pdf.
- 8. Global Workplace Analytics. Global workplace analytics. 2021. Available at: https://globalworkplaceanalytics.com/.
- 9. Gulič, A. Možnosti povezovanja prostorskega, razvojnega in prometnega načrtovanja na regionalni ravni. [In Slovenian: Possibilities for integrating spatial, development and transport planning at the regional level]. CARE4CLIMATE project. Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana. 2022.
- 10. ITF – International Transport Forum. Travel Transitions: How Transport Planners and Policy Makers Can Respond to Shifting Mobility Trends. 2021. Available at: https://bit.ly/3BGJewh.
- 11. ITF – International Transport Forum. Broadening Transport Appraisal: Summary and Conclusions. ITF Roundtable Report 188, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2022. Available at: www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/broadening-transport-appraisal.pdf.
- 12. Jing, P. & Zhao, M. & He, M. & Chen, L. Travel Mode and Travel Route Choice Behavior Based on Random Regret Minimization: A Systematic Review. Sustainability. 2018. Vol. 10. Iss. 4. No 1185.
- 13. Laird, J. & Nash, C. & Mackie, P. Transformational transport infrastructure: cost-benefit analysis challenges. Town Planning Review. 2014. Vol. 85. No. 6. P. 709-730.
- 14. Lawrence, M. Uber and the labor market – Uber drivers’ compensation, wages, and the scale of Uber and the gig economy. Economic Policy Institute. Washington, DC. 2018.
- 15. Litman, T. Clean vehicles versus vehicle travel reductions: Better transportation emission reduction planning. Planetizen. 2021. Available at: https://www.planetizen.com/blogs/114511-clean-vehicles-versus-vehicle-travel-reductions-better-transportationemission#:~:text=Because%20cleaner%20vehicles%20generally%20have,%2Dmiles%2010%2D30%25.
- 16. Litman, T. Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions – implications for transport planning.2022. Available at: https://www.vtpi.org/avip.pdf.
- 17. Litman, T. Land use impacts on transport: How land use factors affect travel behavior. 2022. Available at: https://www.vtpi.org/landtravel.pdf.
- 18. McDonald, N.C. & Combs, T.S. Reinventing TIA: Contemporary Approaches to Addressing the Traffic Impacts of Urban Development. ITE Journal. September, 2020. Available at: https://bit.ly/2Js3dsv.
- 19. Mladenovič, L. & et al. CARE4CLIMATE Boosting greenhouse gas emissions reduction by 2020 with a view to 2030 – promoting sustainable transport, energy efficiency, renewable energies and sustainable, climate protecting land use in the transition to low carbon society. LIFE Programme 2014 -2020. Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana. 2022.
- 20. MOI. Integrated Transport Planning Act – Draft. Ministry of Infrastructure, Ljubljana. 2021.
- 21. Onderwater, M. & Boisjoly, G. & El-Geneidy, A. Influence of travel behavior, personal preferences, and lifestyle on perceived convenience to amenities among Calgary residents. Transportation Research Record. 2019. Vol. 2673. No. 8. P. 508-522.
- 22. Reichmuth, D. Are electric vehicles really better for the climate? Yes. here’s why. Union of Concerned Scientists. 2020. Available at: https://blog.ucsusa.org/dave-reichmuth/are-electricvehicles-really-better-for-the-climate-yes-heres-why.
- 23. RideGuru. Resources. 2021. Available at: https://ride.guru/.
- 24. Spiekermann, K. & Wegener, M. Accessibility and spatial development in Europe. Scienze Regionali. 2006. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 15-46.
- 25. SUMC. What is shared mobility? The Shared-Use Mobility Center. 2021. Available at: https://sharedusemobilitycenter.org/what-is-shared-mobility/.
- 26. SUMC. Learning module: Microtransit. The Shared-Use Mobility Center. 2021. Available at: https://learn.sharedusemobilitycenter.org/learning_module/microtransit/.
- 27. Toš, N. 1997. Vrednote v prehodu I. Slovensko javno mnenje 1968-1990. Inštitut za družbene vede, FDV. Ljubljana.
- 28. Vickerman, R. Recent Evolution of Research into the Wider Economic Benefits of Transport Infrastructure Investments. OECD and International Transport Forum – Joint Transport Research Centre. December 2007. Discussion Paper No. 2007-9.
- 29. Vickerman, R. & Chen, C. Can transport infrastructure change regions’ economic fortunes? Some evidence from Europe and China. Regional Studies. 2017. Vol. 51. Iss. 1. 50th Anniversary Special Issue.
- 30. Wong, Y.Z. & Hensher, D.A. & Mulley, C. Mobility as a service (MaaS): Charting a future context. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2020. Vol. 131. P. 5-19.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-75f3db9e-1507-4b4a-b04c-2669a4599c91