Cooperative innovation strategies - review and analysis

• Autorzy: Wolf Victoria , Dobrucka Renata , Przekop Robert , Haubold Stephan

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17270/J.LOG.2021.621

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: As the terms innovation, innovation strategy and especially cooperative innovation strategy are owned and discussed by many business disciplines, they can have various definitions. But a defined innovation strategy is the first step to enable a generation of innovation in a constant way. There are different approaches how a strategy can be defined. One common approach of an innovation strategy which includes the idea of an exploratory and cooperative strategy is the Open Innovation method. It describes three possible cooperation archetypes of an organization and its environment. Caused by the increased importance of startups and their innovation approaches a transfer of the common Open Innovation approach to a cooperation between established organization and startups is the aim of this article and results in the description of the startup orientated cooperative innovation (SOCI) strategy. Methods: This article gives at first an introduction in the topic of innovation and innovation strategy and its different approaches. The Open Innovation approach is described and in a further step the transfer to the new framework of (SOCI) strategies is presented. Result: As a result, the paper presents a new framework for three archetypes of SOCI-strategies. Three archetypes of SOCI-strategies were identified, by relating the three archetypes of Open Innovation to cooperations between established companies and startups. The three SOCI-strategies are: Buy/rent a startup, spin-off and startup in coupled process. Conclusion: The SOCI framework can be seen as a helpful to categorized cooperations between established companies and startups in context of generation innovation and gives an overview which archetypes of startup cooperations are possible.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

innovation; strategy; defining innovation; cooperative innovation; open innovation; startup

PL

innowacja; strategia; definiowanie innowacji; innowacja kooperacyjna; innowacja otwarta; startup

• Wydawca: Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki
• Czasopismo: LogForum
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 17, no. 4
• Strony: 477--484
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 28 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Wolf Victoria

• Doctoral Seminars in English, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1118-1858

autor

Dobrucka Renata

• Department of Non-Food Products Quality and Packaging Development, Institute of Quality Science, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1486-9412

autor

Przekop Robert

• Centre for Advanced Technologies, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 10, 61-614 Poznań, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7355-5803

autor

Haubold Stephan

• Department of Business Chemistry, Fresenius University of Applied Sciences, Limburger Str. 2, 65510 Idstein, Germany

Bibliografia

• 1. Antonioli D., Marzucchi A., Savona M., 2016. Pain shared, pain halved? Cooperation as a coping strategy for innovation barriers. Springerlink 42, 841-864. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9545-9
• 2. Berraies S., 2019. The effect of enterprise social networks use on exploitative and exploratory innovations. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20 (3). http://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-02-2019-0030
• 3. Bogers M, Chesbrough H., Moedas C., 2018. Open Innovation: Research, Practices, and Policies. California Management Review 60 (2), 5-16. http://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617745086
• 4. Bonzom A., Netessine S., 2017. How do the World’s Biggest Companies Deal with the Startup Revoluton. INSEAD.
• 5. Charue-Duboc F., Aggeri F., Chanal V., Garel G., 2010. Managing exploratory innovation. Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société.
• 6. Davenport S., Carr A., Bibby D., 2002. Leveraging talent: spin-off strategy at Industrial Research. R&D Management 32 (3). http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00257
• 7. Dörr N., Müller-Prothmann T, 2014. Innovationsmanagement: Strategien, Methoden und Werkzeuge für systematische Innovationsprozesse. (Innovation Management: Strategies, methods and tolls for systematical innovation processes), München: Hanser.
• 8. Enkel E., Gassmann O., Chesbrough H., 2009. Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management 39 (4), 311-316. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00570.x
• 9. European Union/European Regional Development Fund, 2017. Startup Manual. Springboard.
• 10. Fadiah N. Wahab S.A., Al Mamun A., Yaacob A.S., Samy N.K., Fazal S. A., 2016. Defining the Concept of Innovation and Firm Innovativeness: A Critical Analysis from Resorce-Based View Perspective. International Journal of Business and Management 11 (6), 87-94. http://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v11n6p87.
• 11. Fazzi Bortolini, R., Nogueira Cortimiglia, M.,de Moura Ferreira Danilevicz, A., 2018. Lean Startup: a comprehensive historical review. Management Decision. http://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2017-0663
• 12. Gassmann O., Enkel E., 2004. Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes, in: Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference (RADMA). Sesimbra, Portugal July 8-9, 2004.
• 13. Gault F., 2018. Defining and measuring innovation in all sectors of the economy. Research Policy 47(3), 617-622. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.007
• 14. Goffin K., Herstatt C., Mitchell R., 2012. Innovationsmanagement: Strategien und effektive Umsetzung von Innovationsprozessen mit dem Pentathlon-Prinzip (Innovation management: Strategies and efficient implementation of innovation processes through Pentathlon principle), München: Finanzbuchverlag.
• 15. He J., Tian X., 2018. Finance and Corporate Innovation: A Survey. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies 47 (2), 165–212. http://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12208
• 16. Jia N., 2017. Corporate Innovation Strategy, Analyst Forecasting Activities and the Economic Consequences. Journal of Bu siness Finance & Accounting 44 (5-6). http://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12242
• 17.Jia N., 2019. The impact of accounting restatements on corporate innovation strategy. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 38 (3), 219-237. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2019.05.004
• 18. Li Z., Liao G., Albitar K., 2020. Does corporate environmental responsibility engagement affect firm value? The mediating role of corporate innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment 29 (3). http://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2416
• 19. Luo J., Hu Z., 2015. Risk paradigm and risk evaluation of farmers cooperatives' technology innovation. Economic Modelling 44, 80-85. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.024
• 20. Mind the Bridge, Crunchbase, 2017. STARTUP M&As 2017 REPORT. Paper presented at the EIT Digital, Silicon Valley.
• 21. Mintzberg H., 1987. The Strategy Concept 1: 5 Ps for Strategy. California Management Review 30 (1), 11-24. http://doi.org/10.2307/41165263
• 22. Haddad M., Williams A., Dwyer R. J., 2019. Strategies for implementing innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development 16(1), 12-29. http://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-05-2019-0032
• 23. Sarpong O. Teirlinck P, 2017. The influence of functional and geographical diversity in collaboration on product innovation performance in SMEs. Springer Science+Business Media 43, 1667-1695. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9582-z
• 24. Ramus T., La Cara B., Vaccaro A., Brusoni S., 2018. Social or Commercial? Innovation.
• 25. Strategies in Social Enterprises at Times of Turbulence. Business Ethics Quarterly 28 (4), 463-492. http://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2017.55
• 26. Wolf, V. Dobrucka R., Przekop R., Haubold S., 2020. The PANDA approach as a method for creating female STEMpreneurs. 2020 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing and Technologies (3ICT), Sakheer, Bahrain, 1-5. http://doi.org/10.1109/3ICT51146.2020.9312001
• 27. Wolf V., Dobrucka R., Przekop R., Haubold St., 2021. Innovation strategies in the context of the paradigm of the five dimensions of innovation strategy, LogForum, 2, 2021, http://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2021.587
• 28. Zhoua X., Yangb S., Wangc G., 2020. Impacts of knowledge spillovers and cartelization on cooperative innovation decisions with uncertain technology efficiency. Computers & Industrial Engineering 143. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106395

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).