Creating shared value (CSV) measurement tool: conceptualizing the construct and its dimensions

• Autorzy: Sibińska Anna , Krawiec Wioletta

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.174.18

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: Despite the scientific interest in Creating Shared Value concept there is still the continual lack of an appropriate scale measuring CSV. Our paper addresses the research gap by proposing the conceptualization of CSV dimensions and is an attempt for developing the measurement of CSV attributes based on insights from scholars and practitioners. Design/methodology/approach: The conducted survey presents the findings obtained from Delphi Study with nineteen researchers and practitioners with expertise of the fields of CSR, sustainability, marketing, strategic management, and ICT. The study was used to generate the proposed construct with dimensions of value creation and items describing each dimension. Findings: The paper provides the conceptualizing measurement construct of CSV with identification of four dimensions as social value creation (SVC), environmental value creation (EnVC), economic value creation (EVC) and innovation value creation (IVC) and sustain the notion that business organization is creating multiply values as a multi-purpose entity. Research limitations/implications: There is a need to develop the future study employ both qualitative and quantitative methods to develop the entire CSV scale for verification of the measurement tool. Practical implications: The paper includes the implications for managers and the managements of business organizations to assess the effects of their performances to create values for diverse groups of stakeholders. Social implications: The paper is presenting the challenges for the modern organizations by expanding spectrum of value creation within the company for mutual benefits among an enterprise, society, and environment. Originality/value: The paper is an attempt for CSV conceptualizing and the first stage to create and develop measuring scale of creating shared value.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

creating shared value; social value creation; economic value creation; environmental value creation; innovation value creation

PL

tworzenie wspólnej wartości; tworzenie wartości społecznej; tworzenie wartości ekonomicznej; tworzenie wartości środowiskowej; tworzenie wartości innowacyjnej

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: z. 174
• Strony: 255--274
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 68 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Sibińska Anna

• University of Lodz, Marketing Department

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0847-2374

autor

Krawiec Wioletta

• University of Lodz, Marketing Department

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5619-9467

Bibliografia

• 1. Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, Vol. 17, Iss. 1, pp. 90-120, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/ 014920639101700108.
• 2. Paulraj, A. (2011). Understanding the relationship between internal resources and capabilities, Sustainable supply management and organizational Sustainability. Academy of management Journal, Vol. 47, Iss. 1, pp. 19-37, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745- 493X.2010.03212.x.
• 3. Allen, M.J., Yen, W.M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey (CA): Brooks/Cole.
• 4. Allison, N.K. (1978). A psychometric development of a test for consumer alienation from the marketplace. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 15, Iss. 4, pp. 565-575, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437780150040.
• 5. Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan.
• 6. Atuahene-Gima, K. (1996). Market Orientation and Innovation. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 35, Iss. 2, pp. 93-103, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00051-8.
• 7. Aupperle, K. (1984). An empirical measure of corporate social orientation. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 6, pp. 27-54.
• 8. Bacq, S., Eddleston, K.A. (2016). A Resource-Based View of Social Entrepreneurship: How Stewardship Culture Benefits Scale of Social Impact. Journal of Business Etics, Vol. 152, Iss. 3, pp. 589-611, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3317-1.
• 9. Barczak, G., Griffin, A., Kahn, K.B. (2008). Trends and Drivers of Success in NPD Practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA Best Practices Study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 26, Iss. 1, pp. 3-23, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 5885.2009.00331.x.
• 10. Beschorner, T., Hajduk T. (2017). Creating shared value. A fundamental critique. In: Creating Shared Value: Concepts, Expirience, Criticism (pp. 27-37). Cham: Springer, doi: DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-48802-8_3.
• 11. Bilge, P. (2017). Sustainable value creation by applying industrial engineering principles and methodologies. Retrieved from: https://depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/6357.
• 12. Bloom, P., Smith, B. (2010). Identifying the drivers of social entrepreneurial impact: Theoretical development and an exploratory empirical test of SCALERS. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Vol. 1, Iss. 1, pp. 126-145, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1942067090 3458042.
• 13. Bruneel, J., Moray, N., Stevens, R., Fassin, Y. (2016). Balancing competing logics in for- profit social enterprises: A need for hybrid governance. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Vol. 7, Iss. 3, pp. 263-288, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2016.1166147.
• 14. Liu, C.-H. (2017). Creating competitive advantage: Linking perspectives of organization learning, innovation behavior and intellectual capital. International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 66, pp. 13-23, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.06.013.
• 15. Castellas, E.I., Stubbs, W., Ambrosini, V. (2019). Responding to Value Pluralism in Hybrid Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 159, pp. 635-650, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3809-2.
• 16. Chang, Y.-C., Chang, H.-T., Chi, H.-R., Chen, M.-H., Deng, L.-L. (2012). How do established firms improve radical innovation performance? The organizational capabilities view. Technovation: the international journal of technological innovation, entrepreneurship and technology management, Vol. 32, Iss. 7-8, pp. 441-451, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.03.001.
• 17. Chaurasia, S.S., Kaul, N., Yadav, B., Shukla, D. (2020). Open innovation for sustainability through creating shared value-role of knowledge management system, openness and organizational structure. Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 24, No. 10, pp. 2491-2511, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0319.
• 18. Churchill, G. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, Iss. 1, pp. 64-73, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/ 002224377901600110.
• 19. Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L.J., Matten, D. (2014). Contesting the value of creating shared value. California Management Review, Vol. 56, Iss. 2, pp. 130-153, doi: https://doi.Org/10.1525/cmr.2014.56.2.130.
• 20. De Guimaraes, J.C., Severe, E.A., de Vasconcelos, C.R. (2018). The influence of entrepreneurial, market, knowledge management orientations on cleaner production and the sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 174, pp. 1653¬1663, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.074.
• 21. Graafland, J.J., Eijffinger, S.C., Smid, H. (2004). Building Ethical Institutions for Business: Sixteenth Annual Conference of the European Business Ethics Network (EBEN) || Benchmarking of Corporate Social Responsibility: Methodological Problems and Robustness. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 53, Iss. 2, pp. 137-152, doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039404.67854.e1.
• 22. Gregori, P., Holzmann, P. (2020). Digital sustainable entrepreneurship: A business model perspective on embedding digital technologies for social and environmental value creation. Journal of cleaner production, Vol. 272, doi: DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122817.
• 23. Hardesty, D.M., Bearden, W.O. (2004). The use of expert judges in scale development: implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57, Iss. 2, pp. 98-107, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148- 2963(01)00295-8.
• 24. Xiao, H., Yu, D. (2020). Achieving Sustainable Competitive Advantage Through Intellectual Capital and Corporate Character: The Mediating Role of Innovation. Problemy ekorozwoju, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 33-45, doi:https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2020.1.04.
• 25. Hurley, R.F., Hult, G.T. (1998). Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination. Journal of Marketing,Vol. 62, Iss. 3, pp. 42-54, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200303.
• 26. How Johnson & Johnson promotes environmental and social responsibility throughout its supply chain, SustainCase. Sustainability Magazine, 20.08.2022.
• 27. Khurshid, H., Snell, R.S. (2021). Examining mechanisms for creating shared value by Asian firms. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 129, pp. 122-133, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jbusres.2021.02.030.
• 28. Klein, S., Schneider, S., Speith, P. (2021). How to stay on the road? A business model perspective on mission drift in social purpose organisation. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 125, pp. 658-671, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.053.
• 29. Kratzer, J., Meissner, D., Roud, V. (2017). Open innovation and company culture: Internal openness makes the difference. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 119, pp. 128-138, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.022.
• 30. Kraus, S., Niemand, T., Halberstadt, J., Shaw, E., Syrja, P. (2017). Social entrepreneurship orientation: development of a measurement scale. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, Vol. 23, Iss. 6, pp. 977-997, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07- 2016-0206.
• 31. Lenssen, G., Spitzeck, H., Chapman, S. (2012). Creating shared value as a differentiation strategy - the example of BASF in Brazil. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, Vol. 12, Iss. 4, pp. 499-513, pp. 499-513, doi:10.1108/14720701211267838.
• 32. Lichtenthaler, U. (2017). Shared value innovation: linking competitivness and societal goals in the context of digital transformation. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, Vol. 14, Iss. 4, pp. 1-14, doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877017500183.
• 33. Lichtenthaler, U. (2022). Data management efficiency: major opportunities for shared value innovation. Management Research Review, Vol. 45, No. 2, doi:10.1108/MRR-10-2020- 0639.
• 34. Gnap, M. (2018). Triple Bottom Line = CSR, Triple Bottom Line = CSR. Retrieved from: https://pl.linkedin.com/pulse/triple-bottom-line-csr-marek-gnap, 13.06.2018.
• 35. Madan J. (2018). Klienci oczekują od firm zaangażowania w obszary ESG. Środowisko naturalne, społeczeństwo i ład korporacyjny ważne w prowadzeniu biznesu. Retrieved from: Zhttps://strefabiznesu.pl/klienci-oczekuja-od-firm-zaangazowania-w-obszary-esg-srodowisko-naturalne-spoleczenstwo-i-lad-korporacyjny-wazne-w-prowadzeniu/ar/c3- 16457927, 13.06.2018.
• 36. Mair, J., Mayer, J., Lutz , E. (2015). Navigating institutional plurality: organizational governance in hybrid organizations. Organization Studies, Vol. 36, pp. 713-739, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615580007.
• 37. Maletic, M., Maletic, D., Gomiscek, B. (2018). The Role of Contingency Factors on the Relationship between Sustainability Practices and Organizational Performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 171, pp. 423-433, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.172.
• 38. Menghwar, P.S., Daood, A. (2021). Creating shared value: A systematic review, synthesis and integrative perspective. International Journal of Management Review, Vol. 23, Iss. 4, pp. 466-485, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12252.
• 39. Mezias, J.M., Starbuck, W.H. (2003). The Odyssey Continues. British Journal of Management, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, pp. 45-47, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00264.
• 40. Nunnally, J.C., Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• 41. Okoli Ch., Pawłowski S.D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, Vol. 1, Iss. 42, pp. 15-29, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002.
• 42. Paliwoda, S.J. (1983). Predicting the future using Delphi. Management Decision, Vol. 21, Iss. 1, pp. 31-38, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb001309.
• 43. Patala, S., Jalkala, A., Keranen, J., Vaisanen, S., Tuominen, V., Soukka, R. (2016). Sustainable value propositions. Framework and implications for technology suppliers. Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 59, pp. 144-156, doi: DOI:10.1016/J.INDMARMAN.2016.03.001.
• 44. Pfitzer, M., Bockstette, V., Stamp, M. (2013). Innovating for shared value. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 9. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2013/09/innovating-for-shared- value, 1.09.2013.
• 45. Porter, M.E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
• 46. Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.E. (2011). Creating Shared Value. How to reinvent capitalism and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 89, Iss. 1/2, pp. 62-77. Retrieved from: Creating Shared Value (hbr.org).
• 47. Porter, M., Kramer, M. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2002/12/the-competitive- advantage-of-corporate-philanthropy.
• 48. Porter, M., Kramer, M. (2019). Creating shared value. In: G. Lenssen, N. Smith, (Eds.), Managing Sustainable Business (pp. 323-346). Dordrecht: Springer, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1144-7_16.
• 49. Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 85, No. 12, pp. 78-92, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/sd.2007.05623ead.006.
• 50. Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 41, Iss. 4, pp. 376-382, doi: doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x.
• 51. Prahalad, C.K., Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: the nest practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 18, Iss. 3, pp. 5-14, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015.
• 52. Rowe, G., Wright, G. (2001). Expert Opinions in Forecasting: The Role of the Delphi Technique. In: J.S. Armstrong (Eds.), Principles of Forecasting. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 30. Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3_7.
• 53. Rubio-Andrés, M., del Mar Ramos-Gonzalez, M., Sastre-Castillo, M.Â. (2022). Driving innovation management to create shared value and sustainable growth. Review of Managerial Science, Vol. 16, Iss. 7, pp. 2181-221, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022- 00520-0.
• 54. Salyova, S., Taborecka-Petrovicova, J., Nedelova, G., Dad’o, J. (2015). Effect of Marketing Orientation on Business Performance: A Study from Slovak Foodstuff Industry. Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 34, pp. 622-629, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01677-9.
• 55. Sanders, N.R. (2007). An empirical study of the impact of e-business technologies on organizational collaboration and performance. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 25, Iss. 6, pp. 1332-1347, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.008.
• 56. Santos, F., Pache, A.C., Birkholz, C. (2015). Making hybrids work: aligning business models and organizational design for social enterprises. California Management Review, Vol. 57, Iss. 3, pp. 36-58, doi: https://doi.Org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.36.
• 57. Schmidt, R.C. (1997). Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decision Sciences, Vol. 28, Iss. 3, pp. 763-774. doi: https://doi.Org/10.1111/j.1540- 5915.1997.tb01330.x.
• 58. Severo, E.A., de Guimaraes, J.C.F., Dorion, E.C.H., Nodari, C.H. (2015). Cleaner production, environmental sustainability and organizational performance: an empirical study in the Brazilian Metal-Mechanic industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 96, pp. 118-125, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.027.
• 59. Shane, S., Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 217-226, doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611.
• 60. Sinthupundaja, J., Kohda, Y., Chiadamrong, N. (2020). Examining capabilities of social entrepreneurship for shared value creation. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 1-22, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1543726.
• 61. Smets, M., Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G.T., Spee, P. (2015). Reinsurance traiding in Lloyd's of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 58, Iss. 3, pp. 932-970, doi: 10.5465/amj.2012.0638.
• 62. Tetlock, P.E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 50, Iss. 4, pp. 819-827, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.819.
• 63. Thompson, J.D., MacMillan, I.C. (2010). Business Models: Creating New Markets and Societal Wealth. Long Range Planning, Vol. 43, Iss. 2-3, pp. 291-307, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.11.002.
• 64. Weerawardena, J., Salunke, S., Haigh, N., Mort, G.S. (2021). Business model innovation in social purpose organizations: Conceptualizing dual social-economic value creation. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 125, pp. 762-771, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jbusres.2019.10.016.
• 65. Xiao, H., Yu, D. (2020). Achieving Sustainable Competitive Advantage through Intellectual Capital and Corporate Character: The Mediating Role of Innovation. Problems of Sustainable Development, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, pp. 33-45, DOI:10.35784/PE.2020.1.04.
• 66. Yang, M., Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Rana, P. (2017). Value uncaptured perspective for sustainable business model innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 140, Part. 3, pp. 1794-1804, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.102.
• 67. Yunus, M. (2007). Creating a World without Poverty: Social Business and the Future of Capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.
• 68. Zott, C., Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: an activity system perspective. Long Range Plan, Vol. 43, Iss. 2-3, pp. 216-226, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004.