Six Sigma vs. Other Quality Improvement Tools: Comparative Analysis of Trends over Period of 1985–present

• Autorzy: Nakielski Marcin , Ludwig Anna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7494/dmms.2024.18.6227

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Six Sigma is a widely adopted method in various industries that is aimed at process improvement and quality management. Understanding Six Sigma's evolving interest and utilization can provide valuable insights into its current significance and prospects. Using data from Google Trends, Google Books, Web of Science, and Scopus, this study examined the search volumes and interests in keywords and phrases that were related to Six Sigma over a specified period. The global analysis revealed the overall direction of interest in Six Sigma worldwide, highlighting periods of peak interest and potential significant shifts in the method’s popularity. By identifying those times with the highest concentrations of interest, the article provides a deeper understanding of the adoption and perception of Six Sigma. On top of this, Six Sigma was compared in popularity (by trends) with other known methods such as Lean, Kaizen, PDCA, and TQM. This research contributes to the existing body of knowledge by shedding light on the current trends and future directions of Six Sigma globally. The findings offer valuable insights for practitioners, researchers, and organizations that seek to leverage Six Sigma for process improvements and quality management.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Six Sigma; Lean Six Sigma; Lean; DMAIC; Kaizen; TQM; PDCA; trends; Google Trends; WoS; Google Books Ngram Viewer

• Wydawca: AGH University of Science and Technology Press
• Czasopismo: Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 18
• Strony: 19--38
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 17 poz., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Nakielski Marcin

• AGH University of Krakow, AGH Doctoral School, Krakow, Poland; Nexteer Automotive Sp. z o.o., Tychy, Poland

autor

Ludwig Anna

• EMBS, Gliwice, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Alawag A.M., Alaloul M.S., Liew W.S.,, Baarimah A.O., Musarat M.A. & Al-Mekhlafi A.-B.A. (2023). The role of the Total-Quality-Management (TQM) drivers in overcoming the challenges of implementing TQM in Industrialized-Building-System (IBS) Projects in Malaysia: Experts’ Perspectives. Sustainability, 15(8), 6607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086607.
• 2. Antony J., Sony M. & Gutierrez L. (2022). An empirical study into the limitations and emerging trends of Six Sigma: Findings from a global survey. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(5), pp. 2088–2101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2995168.
• 3. De Feo J.A. & Barnard W. (2005). Juran Institute’s Six Sigma Breakthrough and Beyond: Quality Performance Breakthrough Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.
• 4. Dusharme D. (2024). Six Sigma Survey: Breaking Through the Six Sigma Hype. URL: https://www.qualitydigest.com/static/magazine/nov01/html/sixsigmaarticle.html [24.03.2024].
• 5. Eckes G. (2001). The Six Sigma Revolution: How General Electric and Others Turned Process into Profits. New York: Wiley.
• 6. Goh T.N. (2020). Six triumphs and six tragedies of Six Sigma. Quality Engineering, 22(4), pp. 299–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2010.495102.
• 7. Graafmans T., Turetken O., Poppelaars H. & Fahland D. (2021). Process mining for Six Sigma. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63(12), pp. 277–300. DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12599-020-00649-w.
• 8. Huang J., Irfan M., Fatima S.S. & Shahid R.M. (2023). The role of lean six sigma in driving sustainable manufacturing practices: an analysis of the relationship between lean six sigma principles, data-driven decision making, and environmental performance. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1184488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1184488.
• 9. Maware C. & Parsley D.M. (2023). Can Industry 4.0 assist lean manufacturing in attaining sustainability over time? Evidence from the US organizations. Sustainability, 15(3), 1962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031962.
• 10. Muralidharan K. (2015). Six Sigma for organizational excellence. A statistical approach. Springer (India).
• 11. Palací-López D., Borrŕs-Ferrís J., da Silva de Oliveria L.T. & Ferrer A. (2020). Multivariate Six Sigma: A case study in Industry 4.0. Processes, 8(9), 1119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8091119.
• 12. Prošić S. (2011). Kaizen management philosophy. In: I International Symposium Engineering Management And Competitiveness 2011 (EMC 2011). Zrenjanin, Serbia, June 24–25, 2011, pp. 173–178.
• 13. Sanders A. (2024). What Is the Product Life Cycle? Stages and Examples. URL: https://www.thestreet.com/markets/commodities/productlife-cycle-14882534 [ 24.03.2024].
• 14. Sokovic M., Pavletic D. & Fakin S. (2005). Application of Six Sigma methodology for process design. Journal of Processing Materials Technology, 162–163(3), pp. 777–783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.231.
• 15. Uluskan M. (2022). Enhancing Six Sigma Understanding: Insights into Various Dimensions and Aspects of Six Sigma, Engineering Management Journal, 34(1), pp. 99–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2020.1852806.
• 16. Watson G.H. (1994). The Motorola Six Sigma System Breakthroughs. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• 17. Zhong X., Wu X. & Xie X. (2023). A descriptive study on clinical department managers’ cognition of the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle and factors influencing their cognition. BMC Medical Education 23(1), 294. DOI: https://.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04293-2.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025)