Evaluation of harvest waste in soilless agriculture tomato cultivation

• Autorzy: Boyaci Sedat , Abaci Bayar Ahu Alev , Başak Hakan
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this study, it was carried out in order to determine the amount of plant nutrients that can be obtained from the wastes of tomato plants grown with soilless agriculture technique in the greenhouse and to make suggestions for evaluation possibilities. For this purpose, cocopeat and plant samples were taken from the soilless greenhouse where tomatoes were grown at the end of production. The stem, leaf, fruit and root of the collected cocopeat and plant samples were separated and N, P, K, analyzes were made in these separated samples. According to the results obtained, the amount of N that can be added to the soil with the cocopeat wastes is determined as 10.58 kg, the amount of P 0.09 kg and the amount of K 0.52 kg for one decare area. The total N amount that can be gained from the roots, stems, leaves and fruits of the waste tomato plant per decare area was determined as 6.65-11.97 kg, P content 1.22-2.52 kg and K amount between 5.10-18.21 kg. Considering the distribution of the amount of NPK that can be added to the soil according to the plant parts. On average, 4.18 kg in root, 2.50 kg in stem, 7.58 kg in leaf and 7.46 kg in fruit were found to be wasted due to not evaluating plant wastes. The organ with the highest N content among plant parts is the leaf, and 42.73% of the total N is found in the leaf. P and K are mostly found in fruits. In addition, 41.73% of P and 36.62% of K are excreted with fruit. It will be possible to improve the soils with insufficient organic matter content throughout Turkey by composting the wastes from greenhouses. In addition, it has been determined that these wastes are very important in terms of reducing the visual pollution caused by these wastes, harmful emissions that will arise as a result of burning and bringing them into the economy.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

plant wastes; recycle; tomato; plant nutrients

• Wydawca: Stowarzyszenie Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich
• Czasopismo: Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: nr I/1
• Strony: 29--42
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 42 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Boyaci Sedat

• Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Biosystems Engineering, 40100-Kırşehir, Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9356-1736

autor

Abaci Bayar Ahu Alev

• Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Landscape Architecture, 40100-Kırşehir, Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4467-7676

autor

Başak Hakan

• Hakan BAŞAK Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, 40100-Kırşehir, Turkey

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1128-4059

Bibliografia

• 1. Abad M., Noguera P., Puchades R., Maquieira A., Noguera V. 2002: Physicochemical and chemical properties of some coconut coir dusts for use as a peat substitute for containerised ornamental plants. Bioresource Technology, 82(3): 241-245.
• 2. Alaboz P., Çakmakcı T. 2020: Effect of cocopeat application on field capacity and permanent wilting point in sandy loam and clay loam soil. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 33(2): 285-290.
• 3. Alkoaik F., Ghaly A.E. 2006: Influence of dairy manure addition on the biological and thermal kinetics of composting of greenhouse tomato plant residues. Waste Manage, 26(8): 902-913.
• 4. Antón M.A., Muñoz P., Castells F., Montero J.I., Soliva M. 2005: Improving waste management in protected horticulture. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 25: 447-453. DOI: 10.1051/agro:2005045.
• 5. Arachchi L.V., Somasiri LLW. 1997: Use of coir dust on the productivity of coconut on sandy soils. In Cocos, (12): 54-71.
• 6. Atilgan A., Oz H., Yilmaz H.I., Uzer H. 2014: Determination of current status in the resulting of waste materials from production of grenhouse and its environmental interaction. Engineering for Rural Development, 29: 120-125.
• 7. Benito M., Masaguer A., De Antonio R., Moliner A. 2005:. Use of pruning waste compost as a component in soilless growing media. Bioresource Technology, 96(5): 597-603.
• 8. Benito M., Masaguer A., Moliner A., De Antonio R. 2006: Chemical and physical properties of pruning waste compost and their seasonal variability. Bioresource Technology, 97(16): 20171-2076.
• 9. Bilgin S., Ertekin C., Kürklü A. 2012: Determination of greenhouse vegetable biomass waste amount in Turkey. 27. Tarımsal Mekanizasyon Ulusal Kongresi, 5-7 September, Samsun, Turkey. 499-508p.
• 10. Boyaci S., 2018: Environmental problems caused by agricultural wastes resulting from greenhouse and high tunnel cultivation and solution suggestions. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 27(4): 2510-2517.
• 11. Boyacı S., Kartal S. 2019: Determination of environmental problems caused by agricultural wastes in greenhouse enterprises and solution suggestions. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 24(Special Issue): 51-60.
• 12. Bremner J.M., Mulvaney C.S. 1982: Nitrogen-Total. In: A.L. Page, R.H. Miller (Eds). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, s. 595-624.
• 13. Cheuk W., Lo K.V., Branion R.M.R., Fraser B. 2003: Benefits of sustainable waste management in the vegetable greenhouse industry. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, Pesticides, Food Conteminants, and Agricultural Wastes, 38(6): 855-863.
• 14. Çerçioğlu M. 2019: Evaluation of greenhouse wastes as compost in sustainable waste management. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Bursa Uludag University, 33(1): 167-177.
• 15. Çınar S., Akdemir Ş. 1999: Çukurova bölgesinde önemli tarla ürünlerinde gübre kullanımının ekonomik analizi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2) 49-56.
• 16. Çıtak S., Sönmez S., Öktüren F. 2006: The usage possibility of plant origin wastes in agriculture. Derim, 23: 40-53.
• 17. Fernández-Gómez M.J., Díaz-Raviña M., Romero E., Nogales R. 2013: Recycling of environmentally problematic plant wastes generated from greenhouse tomato crops through vermicomposting. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 10: 697-708.
• 18. Giuliano V., Teitel M., Pardossi A., Minuto A., Tinivella F., Schettini E. 2010: Sustainable Greenhouse Systems. Sustainable Agriculture. ISBN: 978-1-60876-269-9. Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
• 19. Gül A. 2019: Topraksız Tarım, Meta Basım Yayım, İzmir.
• 20. Güzey S., Atılgan A. 2015: Determining of pollutant factors in greenhouse: Denizli case. Süleyman Demirel Üniv. Zir. Fak. Derg., 10(2): 22-33.
• 21. Helmke P.A., Sparks D.L. 1996: Lithium, Sodium, Potassium, Rubidium, and Calcium. In: Sparks D.L. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods, 551- 574. ISBN: 9780891188254 (Print) ISBN:9780891188667(Online), doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.3.
• 22. Ilahi WFF., Ahmad D. 2017: A study on the physical and hydraulic characteristics of cocopeat perlite mixture as a growing media in containerized plant production. Sains Malaysiana, 46(6): 975-980.
• 23. Jones Jr.J.B., Case V.W. 1990: Sampling, handling, and analyzing plant tissue samples, Chapter 15. In R.L. Westerman (ed) Soil Testing and Plant Analysis, Third Edition, SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 390-420p.
• 24. Kacar B. 1972: Bitki ve Toprağın Kimyasal Analizleri. II. Bitki Analizleri. Ank. Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Yayın No:453, Ankara.
• 25. Kadıoğlu B., Canbolat M.Y. 2019: Hydrophysical properties of growing media prepared by addition of organic and inorganic materials to fine textured soil. Atatürk Univ., J. of the Agricultural Faculty, 50(2): 107-114.
• 26. Kaygısız H. 1996: Organik gübreler, topraktaki fonksiyonları ve ülkemizdeki potansiyel kaynakları. Hasad Dergisi, 12(137): 30-31.
• 27. Kotuby-Amacher J., Koenig R., Kitchen B. 1997: Salinity and Plant Tolerance. Publication AG-SO-03. Utah State University Extension. Logan, Utah.
• 28. Kuo S. 1996: Phosphorus. In: Sparks D.L. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods, 869-921. ISBN:9780891188254 (Print) ISBN:9780891188667 (Online), doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.3.
• 29. Kürklü A., Bilgin S., Külcü R., Yaldız O. 2004: Bazı sera bitkisel biyokütle atıklarının miktar ve enerji içeriklerinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Biyoenerji Sempozyumu, 20-22 October 2004, İzmir, Turkey.
• 30. Manzano-Agugliaro F. 2007: Gasificacio´n de residuos de invernadero para la obtencio´n de energı´a ele´ctrica en el sur de Espan˜a: ubicacio´n mediante SIG. Interciencia, 32(2): 131-136.
• 31. Nelson D.W., Sommers L.E. 1996: Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter. In: Sparks D.L. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods, 961-1011 ISBN:9780891188254 (Print) ISBN:9780891188667 (Online), doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.3.
• 32. Özenç N. 2004: Effects of hazelnuthusk and the other organic materials on properties of hazelnut cultivated soils and yield quality. Phd Thesis, Ankara Üniversity Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, 399p.
• 33. Öztürk G., Engindeniz S. 2018: Analysis of input usage efficiency in greenhouse tomato production in Muğla province. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Economics, 24(2):175-183.
• 34. Pardossi A., Tognoni F., Incrocci L. 2004: Mediterranean greenhouse technology. Chronica Horticulturae, 44:28-34.
• 35. Parra S., Aguilar F.J., Calatrava J. 2008: Decision modelling for environmental protection: the contingent valuation method applied to greenhouse waste management. Biosyst Eng., 99(4): 469-477.
• 36. Sönmez İ., Kalkan H., Demir H., Külcü R., Kaplan M., Yaldız O. 2016:. The effects of composts obtained from greenhouse wastes, used cocopeat wastes and spent mushroom compost on soil nutrient contents. Çukurova J. Agric. Food Sci., 31(3): 21-28.
• 37. Sönmez İ., Kalkan H., Demir, H., Külcü R., Yaldiz O., Kaplan M. 2017: Mineral composition and quality parameters of greenhouse-grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) depending on fertilization with agricultural waste composts. Acta Sci. Pol. Hortorum Cultus, 16(3): 85-95.
• 38. Sonmez S., Citak S., Sonmez I., Kaplan M. 2008: Evaluation of mineral contents of greenhouse plant wastes in Antalya region. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 20(6): 4739-4748.
• 39. Sönmez S., Kaplan, M., Orman Ş., Sönmez İ. 2002: The amounts of nutrient elements uptake with plant wastes after harvest in tomato greenhouses and some suggestions concerning its evaluation in kumluca region of Antalya. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1): 19-25.
• 40. Thomas G.W., 1996: Soil pH and soil acidity, in: Sparks, D.L. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3, Chemical Methods. SSSA Book Series 5. Madison, WI: pp. 475-490.
• 41. Ülgen N., Yurtsever N. 1988: Türkiye gübre ve gübreleme rehberi (3. Baskı). T.C. Tarım Orman Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Toprak ve Gübre Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Genel Yayın No: 151, 182 s., Ankara.
• 42. Yangyuoru M., Boateng E., Adiku SGK., Acquah D., Adjadeh TA., Mawunya F. 2006: Effects of natural and synthetic soil conditioners on soil moisture retention and maize yield. West Africa Journal of Applied Ecology (WAJAE), 9(1): 6-18.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).