Development of sustainable assessment method and design tool for existing and traditional buildings in Jordan

• Autorzy: Matarneh R. T.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In the last ten years, numerous Sustainability Assessment Systems have been developed worldwide to provide construction stakeholders tools that help in achieving better sustainable development. Jordan developed its own Green Building Guideline in 2013 for new buildings but unfortunately, the guideline hasn’t included any criteria for existing or traditional buildings. The main objective of this study is to develop a sustainable Assessment Method for existing and traditional buildings to assist both public and private construction sectors in Jordan in achieving more sustainable buildings. The adopted methodology is based on in-depth analysis of three leading international green building rating systems, which are: LEED and BREEAM and Green Globes, from which a system was developed to meet the requirements of the Jordanian National Building Code. It is expected that the implementation of the developed sustainability assessment method will ease the process of measuring sustainability of existing and traditional buildings and therefore will highlight the importance of traditional architecture to set out fundamental principles for contemporary green housing construction.

PL

W ciągu ostatnich dziesięciu lat na całym świecie opracowano wiele systemów oceny zrównoważonego rozwoju, aby zapewnić zainteresowanym stronom narzędzia budowlane, które pomagają w osiągnięciu lepszego zrównoważonego rozwoju. W 2013 r. w Jordanii opracowano własne wytyczne w zakresie zielonych budynków dla nowych budynków, ale niestety w wytycznych nie zawarto żadnych kryteriów dotyczących istniejących lub tradycyjnych budynków. Głównym celem tego badania jest opracowanie zrównoważonej metody oceny istniejących i tradycyjnych budynków, aby pomóc zarówno prywatnym, jak i publicznym sektorom budowlanym w Jordanii w osiąganiu bardziej zrównoważonych budynków. Przyjęta metodologia opiera się na dogłębnej analizie trzech wiodących międzynarodowych systemów oceny budynków ekologicznych: LEED, BREEAM oraz Green Globes, z których opracowano system spełniający wymagania Jordańskiego Krajowego Kodeksu Budowlanego. Oczekuje się, że wdrożenie opracowanej metody oceny zrównoważonego rozwoju ułatwi proces pomiaru zrównoważenia istniejących i tradycyjnych budynków, a tym samym podkreśli znaczenie tradycyjnej architektury dla określenia podstawowych zasad dla współczesnego zielonego budownictwa mieszkaniowego.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

BREEAM; Jordan; LEED; salt old town; sustainability assessment method; SAM; traditional house

PL

BREEAM; Jordania; LEED; zrównoważona metoda oceny; budynek tradycyjny

• Wydawca: Silesian University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Architecture Civil Engineering Environment
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 10, no. 4
• Strony: 15--31
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Matarneh R. T.

• Architecture Engineering Department, Faculty of Architecture & Design, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, 19328 Amman, Jordan

Bibliografia

• [1] Horvath, A. (1999). Construction for Sustainable Development - A Research and Educational Agenda. Berkley, USA.
• [2] Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) and the Royal Scientific Society (RSS). Green Building Development in Jordan. library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/amman/10678.pdf. Accessed Aug. 18, 2017
• [3] Crawley, D. Aho, I. (1999). Building environmental assessment methods: environmental performance or sustainability? Building Research & Information. 27(4/5), 300-308.
• [4] Ding, C.K.C. (2008). Sustainable construction: The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86, 451-464.
• [5] Cooper, I. (1999). Which focus for building assessment methods: environmental performance or sustainability? Building Research & Information. 27(4/5). 321-331.
• [6] Kohler, N. (1999). The relevance of Green Building Challenge: An observer’s perspective. Building Research & Information, 27(4/5), 309-320.
• [7] Yudelson, J. (2008). The Green Building Revolution. Island press. United States of America.
• [8] Gomes da Silva, V. (2007). Sustainability assessment of buildings: Would LEED lead Brazil anywhere? In proceedings: CIB World Building Congress 2007. 14-18 May 2008, Cape Town, South Africa. Published abstracts, 2417-2427.
• [9] Cole, R.J. (1998). Emerging trends in building environmental methods. Building Research & Information, 26(1), 3-16.
• [10] Blom, I. (2006). Environmental assessment of buildings: Bottlenecks in current practices. In proceedings: Housing in an expanding Europe: Theory, policy, participation and implementation. 2-6 July 2006, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
• [11] Yates, A., Baldwin, R., Howard, N., Rao, S. (1998) “BREEAM 98 for Offices”, pub Construction Research Communications Ltd, Watford, UK.
• [12] GBTool, pub iiSBE, Canada, www.greenbuilding.ca (1999).
• [13] LEED, pub US Green Building Council, USA (2000).
• [14] Green Building Rating System For Existing Buildings Upgrades, Operations and Maintenance, (2005). file:///E:/15.8.2017/LEED%20for%20Existing%20Buildings.pdf
• [15] Canada GBC (2010). Canada Green Building Council. www.cagbc.org. Accessed Aug. 18, 2017.
• [16] GBCB (2008). Green Building Council Brazil. www.gbcbrasil.org.br. Accessed Aug. 18, 2017.
• [17] GBI (2010). Green Building Initiative. www.thegbi.org. Accessed Aug. 18, 2017.
• [18] green globes environmental rating and assessment. http://www.desotocountyms.gov/DocumentCenter/View/159
• [19] HK BEAM (2003). BEAM Society. www.beamsociety.org.hk/en_index.php. Accessed Aug. 18, 2017.
• [20] IGBC (2008). Indian Green Building Council. www.igbc.in. Accessed Aug. 18, 2017.
• [21] Korea Green Building Council (KGBC) [homepage on the Internet]. Available at: http://greenbuilding.re.kr. Accessed Aug. 18, 2017.
• [22] CASBEE (2014). Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment Efficiency. www.ibec.or.jp/CASBEE/english/statistics.htm. Accessed Aug. 18, 2017.
• [23] DGNB (2010). German Sustainable Building Council. www.dgnb.de. Accessed Aug. 18, 2017.
• [24] Cole, R.J. (2005). Building environmental methods: redefining intentions. Building Research & Information, 35(5), 455-467.
• [25] Awadallah, Tala et al. (2011). Green Building Guideline of Jordan. https://www.researchgate.net
• [26] Habees, al-, Mahmoud (2011): Heritage buildings and Cultural Identity of Salt, Jordanian Historical Journal, 5(1), 91-115, (Arabic).
• [27] Chiu, R. L. H. (2003). Social Sustainability, Sustainable Development and and Housing Development: the Experience of Hong Kong, in Forrest R. and Lee J. (Eds), Housing and Social Change: East-West perspectives, Routledge, London.
• [28] CNU [Congress for the New Urbanism], NRDC [Natural Resources Defense Council], and USGBC [U.S. Green Building Council]. 2014. LEED 2009 for Neighborhood Development. U.S. Green Building Council. http://www.usgbc.org/sites/default/files/LEED% 202009%20RS_ND_07.01.14_current%20version.pdf; accessed on 7 January 2017.
• [29] City of Vancouver (2005), A Social Development Plan for the City of Vancouver: Moving Towards Social Sustainability, Administrative Report A7, Vancouver.
• [30] As-Salt Greater Muncipality, As-Salt City Development Projects Unit (ASCDP). Architectural Heritage in As-Salt City, Jordan (2016).
• [31] Qadi al-, Hassan, (1995). Typology of Urban Space in Salt, Master's Thesis, University of Jordan, (Arabic).
• [32] Royal Scientific Society (1991). The Architectural Heritage of Salt, 1, Amman, (Arabic).
• [33] Salt Development Commission (1990). Salt: A Plan for Action, 3, Salt, (Arabic).
• [34] Mollenhauer, Anne (1997). Historical Houses in Salt- Remarks on their Shape and Function, Jordanian Antiquities Journal, 41, 415-429.
• [35] Kim, Jong-Jin & Rigdon, Brenda (1998B). Qualities, Use, and Examples of Sustainable Building Materials, National Pollution Prevention Center for Higher Education, Michigan, USA.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018)