Comaparative study of the accuracy of AIS and ARPA indications. Part 2. Accuracy of the opposite vessel true course and true speed indication

• Autorzy: Wawruch R.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.12.04.04

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article presents analysis of the automatic radar plotting aid (ARPA) and automatic identification system (AIS) indications reliability performed on the base of the results of measurements conducted on merchant vessels at sea. In the first part of the article titled “Comparative study of the accuracy of AIS and ARPA indications. Part 1. Accuracy of the CPA indications” are described: vessels on which the tests were carried out, AIS and radar equipment installed on them, observed meeting situations and accuracy of the CPA indication. In this article are discussed, for the same meeting situations, accuracy of the information on true course and true speed of the opposite vessel presented by ARPA and AIS and correlation between this accuracies and errors of the CPA indication.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Automatic Identification System (AIS); ARPA; Closest Point of Approach (CPA); radar equipment; accuracy; accuracy of position; accuracy of AIS indications; accuracy of ARPA indications

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 12, no. 4
• Strony: 673--678
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr, 8 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Wawruch R.

• Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Wawruch R.: Comparative Study of the Accuracy of AIS and ARPA Indications. Part 1. Accuracy of the CPA Indications. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 12, No. 3, doi:10.12716/1001.12.03.02, pp. 439-443, 2018
• 2. Resolution MSC.192(79) “Adoption of the revised performance standards for radar equipment”, IMO, London 2004.
• 3. Resolution A.1106(29) “Revised guidelines for the operational use of shipborne automatic identification systems (AIS)”, IMO, London 2015.
• 4. IEC Standard 61993-2 ED3 “Maritime navigation and radiocommunication equipment and systems – Automatic identification systems (AIS) – Part 2: Class A shipborne equipment of the automatic identification system (AIS) – Operational and performance requirements, methods of test and required test results”, IEC, Geneva 2017.
• 5. IEC 62388 “Maritime navigation and radiocommunication equipment and systems – Ship-borne radar – Performance requirements, methods of testing and required test results”, IEC, Geneva 2012.
• 6. R. Wawruch, “Tests of the Accuracy of Indications by ARPA and AIS of the Opposite Vessel True Course, True Speed and CPA”, The 19th International Radar Symposium “IRS 2018”, June 20-22, 2018, Bonn, 2018, Proceedings, DGON, Bonn 2018 (CD).
• 7. M. Kalamon, “AIS jako dodatkowy środek obserwacji i oceny ryzyka zderzenia”, engineering thesis, Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia 2017.
• 8. M. Wilczyński, “Analiza porównawcza dokładności śledzenia systemów AIS i ARPA”, engineering thesis, Gdynia Maritime University, Gdynia 2015.