Why is TASK Quarterly a Significant Journal to Publish Your Article? — A Bibliometric Analysis of a Scientific and Technical Journal

• Autorzy: Adamczak Beata

Identyfikatory

DOI

0000-0001-7912-1427

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A bibliometric analysis of TASK Quarterly in the years 1997-2021 in terms of various bibliometric indicators was performed to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the publication of the first issue of the journal. The number of publications and citations increased over the mentioned span of years. The leading countries in terms of the greatest number of papers published in TASK Quarterly are Poland, Italy, Germany, Ukraine, USA and Russia. Moreover, it is shown that international collaboration can result in a greater number of citations per publication. The average publication time in TASK Quarterly is 77 days, including the average submission-acceptance time (44 days) and the average acceptance publication time (33 days). Based on the author’s findings, it can be seen that although TASK Quarterly is a journal devoted mainly to physical and computer sciences, many publications also focus on the aspects related to mathematics, biomedical engineering and biophysics. CFD, molecular dynamics, the finite element method (FEM) and numerical simulations are the most frequently used keywords in articles published in TASK Quarterly.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

publications; citations; bibliometric analysis

PL

publikacje; cytat; analiza bibliometryczna

• Wydawca: Politechnika Gdańska
• Czasopismo: TASK Quarterly : scientific bulletin of Academic Computer Centre in Gdansk
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 26, No 3
• Strony: 19--35
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Adamczak Beata

• Gdansk University of Technology

Bibliografia

• [1] TASK Quarterly, Author guidelines. 2022.
• [2] Biblioteka Nauki, Biblioteka Nauki. 2022.
• [3] H. Téllez and J. M. Vadillo, “Bibliometric study of journal publications on analytical chemistry 2000–2007: Publication productivity and journal preferences by country,” Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, vol. 397, no. 4, pp. 1477–1484, 2010.
• [4] W. Hassan, J. P. Kamdem, and J. B. da Rocha, “Research trends in chemico-biological interactions: The golden jubilee (1969–2019),” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 327, p. 109177, 2020.
• [5] G. Restrepo and P. Willett, “The journal of mathematical chemistry: a bibliometric profile,” Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1589–1596, 2017.
• [6] J. M. Merigó, W. Pedrycz, R. Weber, and C. de la Sotta, “Twenty years of information sciences: a bibliometric overview,” Information Sciences, vol. 432, pp. 245–268, 2018.
• [7] J. M. Merigó, M. J. Cobo, S. Laengle, D. Rivas, and E. Herrera- Viedma, “Twenty years of soft computing: a bibliometric overview,” Soft Computing, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1477–1497, 2019.
• [8] J. M. Merigo, F. Blanco-Mesa, A. M. Gil-Lafuente, and R. R. Yager, “Thirty years of the international journal of intelligent systems: A bibliometric review,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 526–554, 2017.
• [9] X.Wang, Y. Chang, Z. Xu, Z.Wang, and V. Kadirkamanathan, “50 years of international journal of systems science: a review of the past and trends for the future,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 1515–1538, 2021.
• [10] R. Ohlan, R. Singh, S. Kaur, and A. Ohlan, “A bibliometric analysis of first 45 years of journal of management,” Serials Review, pp. 1–22, 2022.
• [11] S. Kumar, N. Pandey, and A. Haldar, “Forty-five years of the international journal of social economics (ijse): a bibliometric overview,” International Journal of Social Economics, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 1876–1896, 2020.
• [12] M. Gaviria-Marin, J. M. Merigo, and S. Popa, “Twenty years of the journal of knowledge management: A bibliometric analysis,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1655–1687, 2018.
• [13] S. Kumar, R. Sureka, and N. Pandey, “Forty-five years of public management review (pmr): a bibliometric overview,” Public Management Review, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1876–1896, 2020.
• [14] S. Laengle, J. M. Merigo, J. Miranda, R. Słowiński, I. Bomze, E. Borgonovo, R. G. Dyson, J. F. Oliveira, and R. Teunter, “Forty years of the european journal of operational research: A bibliometric overview,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 262, no. 3, pp. 803–816, 2017.
• [15] K. C. Garg and H. K. Tripathi, “Bibliometrics and scientometrics in india: An overview of studies during 1995-2014 part ii: Contents of the articles in terms of disciplines and their bibliometric aspects,” Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS), vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 7–42, 2018.
• [16] C. Wang, M. K. Lim, and A. Lyons, “Twenty years of the international journal of logistics research and applications: a bibliometric overview,” International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 304–323, 2019.
• [17] S. de Barros, R. G. Barbastefano, C. G. de Souza, L. F. da Silva, and L. Sharpe, “Fifty years of the journal of adhesion,” The Journal of Adhesion, vol. 95, no. 11, pp. 971–978, 2019.
• [18] BazTech, “Baztech,” 2022.
• [19] Indicators, “Indicators,” 2022.
• [20] Google Scholar, “Google scholar,” 2022.
• [21] S. R. A. R. of World Universities, “Shanghai ranking’s academic ranking of world universities,” 2022.
• [22] Q. W. U. R. . T. G. Universities, “Qs world university rankings 2023: Top global universities,” 2022.
• [23] N. J. Van Eck and L. Waltman, “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523–538, 2010.
• [24] N. J. Van Eck and L.Waltman, “VOSviewer manual 1.6.11. manual (version 1.6.9),” 2018.
• [25] M. Z. Andersen, S. Fonnes, and J. Rosenberg, “Time from submission to publication varied widely for biomedical journals: a systematic review,” Current Medical Research and Opinion, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 985–993, 2021.
• [26] P. Sebo, J.-P. Fournier, S. Ragot, P.-H. Gorioux, F. R. Herrmann, and H. Maisonneuve, “Factors associated with publication speed in general medical journals: a retrospective study of bibliometric data,” Scientometrics, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 1037–1058, 2019.
• [27] P. Dong, M. Loh, and A. Mondry, “Publication lag in biomedical journals varies due to the periodical’s publishing model,” Scientometrics, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 271–286, 2006.
• [28] J. Huisman and J. Smits, “Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective,” Scientometrics, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 633–650, 2017.
• [29] A. Schubert and G. Schubert, “Internationality at university level,” Scientometrics, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 1341–1364, 2020.
• [30] L.-M. Elena, L.-M. Evelia, and P.-A. Ángel, “Influence of the international collaboration in the field of metric studies of science and technology: the case of mexico (1971–2018),” Scientometrics, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 2485–2511, 2021.
• [31] J. G. Breugelmans, G. Roberge, C. Tippett, M. Durning, D. B. Struck, and M. M. Makanga, “Scientific impact increases when researchers publish in open access and international collaboration: A bibliometric analysis on poverty-related disease papers,” PLOS ONE, vol. 13, pp. 1–20, 09 2018.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).