Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
In Maritime Education and Training (MET) where students are trained for professions with high standards of safety, the use of simulators is taken to provide opportunities for safe and cost-effective training. Although the use of simulators for training and certifying technical proficiency and so-called non-technical skills is well established and regulated by international standards, previous research suggests that simulator-based assessment has been poorly implemented in the MET system. Now the challenge is to contribute with knowledge about how to conduct consistent, unbiased, and transparent assessments of navigational skills and competencies. However, in current research it is not evident how training of non-technical skills in simulated environments should be assessed. The aim of this study is to explore the pedagogical challenges instructors face when assessing students’ navigational skills and competencies in a simulated environment. The study is based on video-recorded data from the certification part in a navigation course for second year master mariner students. A situated approach to cognition and learning is employed to analyze the co-construction of assessment in the simulated exercises by means of instructors’ questions and students’ answers. Results reveal an assessment practice where the students are still developing their navigational skills with instructional support from examiners whilst being certified on using Radar equipment in accordance to COLREG.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
881--886
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 19 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
- University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
autor
- Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
- University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
autor
- Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
- University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Bibliografia
- 1. Conceição, V. P., Basso, J. C., Lopes, C. F., & Dahlman, J. (2017). Development of a behavioural marker system for rating cadet’s non‐technical skills. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation. Doi:10.12716/1001.11.02.07
- 2. Emad, G., & Roth, W. M. (2008). Contradictions in the practices of training for and assessment of competency: A case study from the maritime domain. Education+ Training. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910810874026
- 3. Flin, R., O’Connor, P., & Crichton, M. (2008). Safety at the sharp end: a guide to non‐technical skills. Aldershot England: Ashgate.
- 4. Flin, R., Martin, L., Goeters, K‐M., Hörmann, H‐J., Amalberti, R., Valot, C. & Nijhuis., H. (2003). Development of the NOTECHS (non‐tecnical skills) system for assessing pilots’ CRM skills. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 3(2), 97‐119
- 5. Gekara, V. O., Bloor, M. & Sampson, H. (2011). Computerbased assessment in safety‐critical industries: The case of shipping. Journal of Vocational Education & Training. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2010.536850
- 6. Ghosh, S, Bowles, M, Ranmuthugala, D. & Brooks, B. (2014). Reviewing seafarer assessment methods to determine the need for authentic assessment. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs. Doi: 10.1080/18366503.2014.888133
- 7. Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J. & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. SAGE Publications Ltd, London.
- 8. Hontvedt, M. (2015). Professional vision in simulated environments—Examining professional maritime pilotsʹ performance of work tasks in a full‐mission ship simulator. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.07.003
- 9.Mavin, T., & Roth, W‐M. (2014). A holistic view of cockpit performance: An analysis of the assessment discourse of flight examiners. International Journal of Aviation Psychology. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2014.918434
- 10. Roth, W‐M. (2015). Flight Examiners’ Methods of Ascertaining Pilot Proficiency. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology. Doi: 10.1080/10508414.2015.1162642
- 11. Roth, W‐M. & Mavin, T. (2015). Peer Assessment of Aviation Performance: Inconsistent for Good Reasons. Cognitive Science. Doi: 10.1111/cogs.12152
- 12. Sampson, H., Gekara, V. & Bloor, M. (2011). Water‐tight or sinking? A consideration of the standards of the contemporary assessment practices underpinning seafarer licence examinations and their implications for employers. Maritime Policy Management. Doi: https://doiorg.ezproxy.ub.gu.se/10.1080/03088839.2010.533713
- 13. Sellberg, C. (2017). Simulators in bridge operation training and assessment: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437‐016‐0114‐8
- 14. Sellberg, C. & Lundin, M. (2017). Sellberg, C., & Lundin, M. (2017). Demonstrating professional intersubjectivity: The instructorʹs work in simulator‐based learning environments. Learning, culture and social interaction. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.02.003
- 15. Sellberg, C., & Lundin, M. (2018). Tasks and instructions on the simulated bridge: Discourses of temporality in maritime training. Discourse Studies. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617734956
- 16. Stahl G (2005) Group cognition in computer‐assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652729.2005.00115.
- 17. Taylor, D. H. (1998). Rules and regulations in maritime collision avoidance: New directions for bridge team training. Journal of Navigation, 51(1), 67–72.
- 18. Weber, D., Roth, W‐M., Mavin, T. & S. Dekker. (2013). Should we pursue interrater reliability or diversity? An empirical study of pilot performance assessment. Aviation in Focus, 4(2), 34‐58
- 19. Øvergård, K. I., Nazir, S., & Solberg, A. S. (2017). Towards automated performance assessment for maritime navigation. TransNav, International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation. Doi:10.12716/1001.11.02.03
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-749d705a-fd70-4852-8367-1fd948432f83