Znaczenie wielkości przedsiębiorstwa w międzynarodowej współpracy gospodarczo-obronnej

• Autorzy: Kurinia S.

Warianty tytułu

EN

The importance on the company size in international economic and defense cooperation

• Języki publikacji: PL EN

Abstrakty

EN

Today, as a result of significant reductions in the armed forces in the world, it is difficult to maintain the scale of production at a high level and economically rational. In addition, self-mastery all the necessary modern battlefield technology is a huge challenge for even the biggest economic powers. That is why it is so important today for the security of states international economic cooperation. Today has been a growing interest in international economic cooperation in the field of defense technology. Economic and defense cooperation in the field of advanced technology is especially important for small businesses. Small businesses are more flexible in taking risks, but do not have the capabilities. Interesting research on the factors influencing the development of economic and defense cooperation of small businnesses conducted British economists P. Bishop. Empiricall studies on a sample of 355 British companies have confirmed a significant positive relationship between firm size measured by the level of employment and the likekihood of international cooperation. The study also showed that innovation and a significant share of defense in total company revenue can facilitate establishing international economic cooperation.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

współpraca gospodarcza; spółka; małe firmy

EN

economic cooperation; company; small businesses

• Wydawca: Akademia Sztuki Wojennej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe AON
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: nr 2(91)
• Strony: 270--287
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 8 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kurinia S.

• Akademia Obrony Narodowej

Bibliografia

• 1. Bishop P.: Collaboration and firm size: some evidence from the UK defence industry, Applied Economics, 2003.
• 2. Defence Industrial Strategy, Defence White Paper, MoD, December 2005.
• 3. EES South Employer Survey 2003.
• 4. Hartley K., Martin S., UK Firms' Experience and Perceptions of Defence Offsets: Survey Results, Defence and Peace Economics, vol. 6, 1995.
• 5. Kaldor M., European Defence Industries- National and International Implications, ISIO Monographs, vol. 1, no. 8.
• 6. Science & Innovation Investment Framework 2004-2014, HM Tresury, 2003.
• 7. Strategic Science Provision in English Universities. HOC Select, Committee on Science and Technology Inquiry, 2005.
• 8. UK must on promoting and funding science. Nature Volume 483, 3 November 2005.