PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Przegląd metod wielokryterialnych stosowanych w analizie rozwoju sektora wytwórczego energii elektrycznej

Autorzy
Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
EN
Review of multi-criteria methods used in the power industry development studies
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
PL
Artykuł przedstawia opis, klasyfikację oraz sposoby wykorzystania metod wielokryterialnych w sektorze wytwarzania energii elektrycznej. Jak wynika z przeglądu literatury metody wielokryterialne wykorzystywane są w analizach planowania rozbudowy istniejących źródeł wytwórczych, budowy nowych pojedynczych źródeł lub budowy źródeł hybrydowych. Analizowane są także plany rozwoju systemów energetycznych przy uwzględnieniu dywersyfikacji dostaw energii elektrycznej.
EN
The article presents a description, classification and ways of using multi-criteria methods in electricity generation sector. As is apparent from literature review, methods of multi-criteria analyzes are used in planning the development of existing generation sources, construction of new individual sources or the hybrid sources construction. The plans for development of power systems taking into account diversification of the electricity supply have been analysed.
Wydawca
Rocznik
Strony
128--134
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 37 poz.
Twórcy
autor
  • Politechnika Gdańska
Bibliografia
  • [1] Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady 2009/28/WE w sprawie promowania stosowania energii ze źródeł odnawialnych z dnia 23 kwietnia 2009 r.
  • [2] Ustawa z dn. 27 kwietnia 2001 r. Prawo ochrony środowiska, Dz. U. 2001 Nr 62 poz. 627.
  • [3] J. Malczewski: GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York 1999.
  • [4] G. Mendoza, H. Martins: Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms, Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, Jul., vol. 230, no. 1–3, pp. 1–22 .
  • [5] T. L. Saaty, How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, vol. 48, pp. 9–26.
  • [6] B. Roy: Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples, RAIRO – Operations Research – Recherche Opérationnelle, 1968, vol. 2, no. V1, pp. 57–75.
  • [7] J.P. Brans, P. Vincke: A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: (The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making), Management Science, 1985, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 647–656.
  • [8] C.L. Hwang, K. Yoon: Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, Berlin-Heidelberg 1981.
  • [9] E. Hinloopen, P. Nijkamp: The REGIME method: a new multicriteria technique, Essays and surveys on multiple criteria decision making, Springer, 1983.
  • [10] P. Cabała, Z. Ondeka: Przegląd metod wielokryterialnego wspomagania decyzji, [w:] Praktyka projektowania systemów organizacyjnych przedsiebiorstwa, 2015.
  • [11] L. Fabisiak, P. Ziemba: Wybrane metody analizy wielokryterialnej w ocenie użyteczności serwisów internetowych, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecinskiego, 2011, nr 656.
  • [12] P. Aragonés-Beltrán, J. a Mendoza-Roca, a Bes-Piá, M. García-Melón, E. Parra-Ruiz: Application of multicriteria decision analysis to jar-test results for chemicals selection in the physical-chemical treatment of textile wastewater, Journal of hazardous materials, 2009, May, vol. 164, no. 1, pp. 288–95.
  • [13] T. Kaya, C. Kahraman: Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul, Energy, 2010, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 2517–2527.
  • [14] D. Choudhary, R. Shankar: An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India, Energy, 2012, Jun, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 510–521.
  • [15] P. a. Pilavachi, S.D. Stephanidis, V. a. Pappas, N.H. Afgan: Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen and natural gas fuelled power plant technologies, Applied Thermal Engineering, 2009, Aug, vol. 29, no. 11–12, pp. 2228–2234.
  • [16] W. Kamrat: Zastosowanie hierarchicznej analizy problemowej w badaniach efektywności inwestowania, Energetyka, 2013, pp. 721–725.
  • [17] A.I. Chatzimouratidis, P.A. Pilavachi: Objective and subjective evaluation of power plants and their non-radioactive emissions using the analytic hierarchy process, Energy Policy, 2007, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 4027–4038.
  • [18] R.E.N. Feng: Optimal site selection for thermal power plant based on rough sets and multi-objective programming, IEEE International Conference on E- product E-service and E-entertainment, 2010, pp. 1–5.
  • [19] A. Zangeneh, S. Jadid, A. Rahimi-Kian: A hierarchical decision making model for the prioritization of distributed generation technologies: A case study for Iran, Energy Policy, 2009, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 5752–5763.
  • [20] C. Kahraman, İ. Kaya, S. Cebi: A comparative analysis for multiattribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, Energy, 2009, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1603–1616.
  • [21] A.H.I. Lee, M.-C. Hung, H.-Y. Kang, W. L. Pearn: A wind turbine evaluation model under a multi-criteria decision making environment, Energy Conversion Management, 2012, vol. 64, pp. 289–300.
  • [22] M. Uyan: GIS-based solar farms site selection using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in Karapinar region Konya/Turkey, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, vol. 28, pp. 11–17.
  • [23] L.-I. Tegou, H. Polatidis, D.A. Haralambopoulos: Environmental management framework for wind farm siting: Methodology and case study, Journal of Environmental Management, 2010, vol. 91, no. 11, pp. 2134–2147.
  • [24] J.M. Sánchez-Lozano, J. Teruel-Solano, P.L. Soto-Elvira, M. Socorro García-Cascales: Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi- Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in south-eastern Spain, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, vol. 24, pp. 544–556.
  • [25] D.A. Haralambopoulos and H. Polatidis: Renewable energy projects : structuring a multi- criteria group decision-making framework, Renewable Energy, 2003, vol. 28, pp. 961–973.
  • [26] R. Madlener, K. Kowalski, S. Stagl: New ways for the integrated appraisal of national energy scenarios: The case of renewable energy use in Austria, Energy Policy, 2007, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 6060–6074.
  • [27] M. Goumas, V. Lygerou: Extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects, European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 606–613.
  • [28] M. Troldborg, S. Heslop, R.L. Hough: Assessing the sustainability of renewable energy technologies using multi-criteria analysis: Suitability of approach for national-scale assessments and associated uncertainties, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , 2014, vol. 39, pp. 1173–1184.
  • [29] E.Y. Ivanova, N.I. Voropai, S. Member, E. Handschin: A Multi-Criteria Approach to Expansion Planning of Wind Power Plants in Electric Power Systems, IEEE Conference Power Tech 2005,2010.
  • [30] H. Aras, Ş. Erdoğmuş, E. Koç: Multi-criteria selection for a wind observation station location using analytic hierarchy process, Renewable Energy, 2004, Jul, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1383–1392.
  • [31] J.D. Nixon, P.K. Dey, P. a. Davies: Design of a novel solar thermal collector using a multi-criteria decision-making methodology, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, vol. 59, pp. 150–159.
  • [32] M. Beccali, M. Cellura, M. Mistretta: Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology, Renewable Energy, 2003, vol. 28, no. 13, pp. 2063–2087.
  • [33] J.-J. Wang, Y.-Y. Jing, C.-F. Zhang, G.-H. Shi, X.-T. Zhang: A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system, Energy Policy, 2008, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 3823–3832.
  • [34] B. Brand, R. Missaoui: Multi-criteria analysis of electricity generation mix scenarios in Tunisia, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, vol. 39, pp. 251–261.
  • [35] J.C. Mourmouris, C. Potolias: A multi-criteria methodology for energy planning and developing renewable energy sources at a regional level: A case study Thassos, Greece, Energy Policy, 2013, vol. 52, pp. 522–530.
  • [36] T. Tsoutsos, M. Drandaki, N. Frantzeskaki, E. Iosifidis, I. Kiosses: Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete, Energy Policy, 2009, May, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1587–1600.
  • [37] D. Jun, F. Tian-Tian, Y. Yi-Sheng, M. Yu: Macro-site selection of wind/solar hybrid power station based on ELECTRE-II, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, vol. 35, pp. 194–204.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-744a6302-6e8d-4341-9daa-402c60ee1ccf
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.