An experimental study of the surface and subsurface irrigation methods with respect to soil moisture on grape yard

• Autorzy: Kadbhane S. J. , Manekar V. L.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/jwld-2016-0038

Warianty tytułu

PL

Badania powierzchniowego i podpowierzchniowego nawadniania w nawiązaniu do wilgotności gleby w winnicy

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this study, field experiment has been carried out on the grape yard during the summer, Rainy, and winter seasons using different irrigation methods and measuring its impact on moisture retention. Six different irrigation methods such as drip irrigation (DI), drip irrigation with plastic mulching (DIPM), drip irrigation with organic mulching (DIOM), subsurface irrigation with stone column (SISC), subsurface irrigation with mud pot (SIMP), and subsurface irrigation with plastic bottles (SIPB) are used during experimental work. CROPWAT-8.0 model (FAO) is used to find out crop water requirements. Soil moisture is measured using soil moisture sensors fixed in the depth of 30 and 60 cm at the same location. Climatic parameters are obtained from the automatic weather station which is located near the experimental field. Multifactorial statistical analysis has been carried out using recorded soil moisture and climatic data. As per experimental results and analysis, it is observed that drip irrigation with the plastic mulching method is found to be the best method of irrigation for soil moisture retention among all other methods due to its highest soil moisture retention value as 25–30%. Whereas subsurface irrigation with the plastic bottle method is found to be suitable as it retained 15–20% soil moisture and material used in this irrigation method is waste material and the cheapest one.

PL

Przeprowadzono eksperyment polowy w winnicy w czasie lata, pory mokrej i zimowej, stosując różne metody nawadniania i mierząc jego wpływ na zachowanie wilgotności w glebie. Zastosowano sześć metod nawadniania: nawadnianie kroplowe, nawadnianie kroplowe z przykrywaniem syntetyczną włókniną, nawadnianie kroplowe z mulczowaniem organicznym, podpowierzchniowe nawadnianie z kolumnami z kamieni, podpowierzchniowe nawadnianie z glinianymi naczyniami i nawadnianie za pomocą butelek plastikowych. Do oceny zapotrzebowania uprawy na wodę zastosowano model CROPWAT 8.0. Wilgotność gleby mierzono czujnikami wprowadzonymi do gleby na głębokość 30 i 60 cm. Parametry klimatyczne uzyskano z automatycznej stacji pogodowej usytuowanej w pobliżu pola doświadczalnego. Wieloczynnikową analizę statystyczną przeprowadzono z wykorzystaniem pomierzonej wilgotności gleby i danych klimatycznych. Metoda kroplowego nawadniania z przykrywaniem syntetyczną włókniną okazała się najlepsza spośród wszystkich zastosowanych metod z powodu największej retencji wilgoci glebowej (25–30%). Użyteczna okazała się także metoda podpowierzchniowego nawadniania z plastikowymi butelkami, ponieważ zatrzymywała 15–20% wilgoci glebowej.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

drip irrigation; mud pot; organic mulching; plastic mulching; soil moisture retention; subsurface irrigation; surface irrigation

PL

ceramika porowata; mulczowanie; nawadnianie kroplowe; nawadnianie podpowierzchniowe; nawadnianie powierzchniowe; retencja wody glebowej; włóknina syntetyczna

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo ITP
• Czasopismo: Journal of Water and Land Development
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: no. 31
• Strony: 73--85
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., fot., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kadbhane S. J.

• Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat, India

autor

Manekar V. L.

• Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat, India

Bibliografia

• ALLEN R., PEREIRA L.S., RAES D., SMITH M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper. No. 56. Rome. FAO. ISBN 92-5-104219-5 pp. 300.
• ARAGÜÉS R., MEDINA E.T., CLAVERIA I., MARTÍNEZ-COB A., FACI J. 2014. Regulated deficit irrigation, soil salinization and soil sodification in a table grape vineyard dripirrigated with moderately saline waters. Agricultural Water Management. Vol. 134 p. 84–93.
• AYARS J.E., PHENE C.J., HUTMACHER R.B., DAVIS K.R., SCHONEMAN R.A., VAIL S.S., MEAD R.M. 1999. Subsurface drip irrigation of row crops: A review of 15 years of research at the Water Management Research Laboratory. Agricultural Water Management. Vol. 42. Iss. 1 p. 1–27.
• CONSOLI S., BARBAGALLO S. 2012. Estimating water requirements of an irrigated mediterranean vineyard using a satellite-based approach. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. Vol. 138. Iss. 10 p. 896–904.
• DU T., KANG S., ZHANG J., LI F., YAN B. 2008. Water use efficiency and fruit quality of table grape under alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation. Agricultural Water Management. Vol. 95. Iss. 6 p. 659–668.
• FACI J.M., BLANCO O., MEDINA E.T., MARTÍNEZ-COB A. 2014. Effect of post veraison regulated deficit irrigation in production and berry quality of Autumn Royal and Crimson table grape cultivars. Agricultural Water Management. Vol. 134 p. 73–83.
• GARCÍA-VILA M., FERERES E. 2012. Combining the simulation crop model AquaCrop with an economic model for the optimization of irrigation management at farm level. European Journal of Agronomy. Vol. 36. Iss. 1 p. 21–31.
• GHAMARNIA H., ARJI I., SEPEHRI S., NOROZPOUR S., KHODAEI E. 2011. Evaluation and comparison of drip and conventi onal irrigation methods on sugar beets in a semiarid region. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. Vol. 138. Iss. 1 p. 90–97.
• Government of India 2014. Hand book on horticulture statistics 2014. New Delhi. Ministry of Agriculture Department of Agriculture and Cooperation pp. 34.
• IPCC 2007. An assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change: Synthesis Report. 4 p. 26–40.
• IS:2720-2 1973. Methods of test for soils. P.2: Determination of water content. Second revision. New Delhi. Bureau of Indian Standards pp. 18.
• LAZAROVITCH N., SHANI U., THOMPSON T., WARRICK A. 2006. Soil hydraulic properties affecting discharge uniformity of gravity-fed subsurface drip irrigation systems. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. Vol. 132. Iss. 6. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437 (2006)132:6(531) p. 531–536.
• MARTÍNEZ J., RECA J. 2014. Water use efficiency of surface drip irrigation versus an alternative subsurface drip irrigation method. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. Vol. 745. Iss. 1 p. 733–743.
• NETZER Y., YAO C.R., SHENKER M., BRAVDO B.A., SCHWARTZ A. 2009. Water use and the development of seasonal crop coefficients for Superior Seedless grapevines trained to an open-gable trellis system. Irrigation Science. Vol. 27. Iss. 2 p. 109–120.
• RODRIGUEZ-SINOBAS L., GIL M., JUANA L., SANCHEZ R. 2009. Water distribution in laterals and units of subsurface drip irrigation. I: Simulation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. Vol. 135. Iss. 6 p. 721–728. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000058.
• ROSSI G., CANCELLIERE A. 2002. At-site and regional drought identification by Redim model. In: Tools for drought mitigation in Mediterranean regions. Eds. G. Rossi, A. Cancelliere, L.S. Pereira, T. Oweis, M. Shatanawi, A. Zairi. Ser. Water Science and Technology Library. Vol. 44. New York. Springer p. 37–54.
• SAXENA M. (ed.) 2015. Indian Horticulture database. New Delhi. Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India pp. 286.
• SIKKA D.R. 2009. Two decades of medium-range weather forecasting in India: National Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting. Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies Technical Report. No. 276 pp. 100.
• STEDUTO P., HSIAO T.C., FERERES E., RAES D. 2012. Crop yield response to water. Irrigation and Drainage Paper. No. 66. Rome. FAO p. 270–275.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).