PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Call for Integral Protection of Biocultural Diversity

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Postulat integralnej ochrony różnorodności biokulturowej
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The contemporary ecological crisis compels us to undertake research and adopt measures that will ensure the sustainable development of humanity. The main point here is that while satisfying the needs of current generations, it is necessary to respect the needs of future generations as well as nature’s capabilities. Works on a concept of development that would allow this task to be accomplished have been carried out for the last several decades. They resulted in the formulation of the still-evolving idea of sustainable development. With the current state of knowledge, it seems vital that this idea should comprise protection of biocultural diversity since, as clearly evidenced by the research conducted, the interrelated biological, cultural and linguistic diversity affects development. This article aims at highlighting the necessity of incorporating biocultural diversity into the idea of sustainable development and it points out the need for integral concern for the diversity of Earth’s heritage. Only integral care of all types of diversity gives hope for the protection of each of them and increases the chances of building a sustainable world.
PL
Współczesny kryzys ekologiczny skłania do podejmowania badań i działań, które zapewnią trwały rozwój ludzkości. Chodzi o to, by zaspakajając potrzeby aktualnego pokolenia respektować potrzeby przyszłych pokoleń oraz możliwości przyrody. Prace nad koncepcją rozwoju, która pozwoli zrealizować to zadanie trwają od kilku dekad. W ich wyniku powstała idea zrównoważonego rozwoju, która wciąż ewoluuje. Przy obecnym stanie wiedzy ważne wydaje się uwzględnienie w niej ochrony różnorodności biokulturowej. Badania jednoznacznie wskazują bowiem na korelację pomiędzy rozwojem a wzajemnie ze sobą powiązanymi różnorodnościami: biologiczną, kulturową i językową. Artykuł ten stawia sobie za cel ukazanie potrzeby włączenia różnorodności biokulturowej do idei zrównoważonego rozwoju oraz wskazanie na konieczność łącznej troski o różnorodność ziemskiego dziedzictwa, tylko integralna troska o wszystkie rodzaje różnorodności daje bowiem nadzieję na ochronę każdej z nich i zwiększa szanse na zbudowanie zrównoważonego świata.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
37--45
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 47 poz., fig., tab.
Twórcy
  • Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Institute of Ecology and Bioethics, Wóycickiego 1/3, building 23, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. ASH N., FAZEL A., 2007, Biodiversity, in: UNEP, Global Environment Outlook 4: Environment for Development, UNEP, Nairobi.
  • 2. BERKES F., 2012,Sacred Ecology, Routledge, New York.
  • 3. BLOOM P., 2002, Explaining Linguistic Diversity, in: American Scientist vol. 90, no 4, p. 374-375.
  • 4. BORODITSKY L., 2009, How Does Our Language Shape the Way We Think?, in: What's next? Dispatches on the Future of Science: Original Essays from a New Generation of Scientists, ed. Brockman M., Vintage Books, New York. p. 116-129.
  • 5. COUNCIL OF EUROPE, 2002, Linguistic Diversity. A Challenge for European Cities and Regions, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg.
  • 6. ELMES D., 2013, The Relationship between Language and Culture, in: Annals of Fitness and Sports Sciences, vol. 46, no 3, p. 11-18.
  • 7. FICE (First International Congress of Ethnobiology), 1988,Declaration of Belém, www.ethnobiology.net/wp-content/uploads/Decl-Belem -Eng-from-Posey.pdf (3.10.2016).
  • 8. GORENFLO L. J., ROMAINE S., MITTERMEIER R. A., WALKER-PAINEMILLA K., 2012, Co-occurrence of Linguistic and Biological Diversity in Biodiversity Hotspots and High Biodiversity Wilderness Areas, in: PNAS, vol. 109, no 21, p. 8032-8037.
  • 9. HALLAM A., WIGNALL P. B., 1997, Mass Extinctions and Their Aftermath, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, Tokyo.
  • 10. HARMON D., 2002, In Light of Our Differences: How Diversity in Nature and Culture Makes us Human, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.
  • 11. HARMON D., LOH J., 2010, The Index of Linguistic Diversity: A New Quantitative Measure of Trends in the Status of the World's Languages, in: Language Documentation & Conservation, vol. 4, p. 97-151.
  • 12. KIM L. S., 2003, Exploring the Relationship between Language, Culture and Identity, in: GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, vol. 3, no 2, p. 64-76.
  • 13. KOLBERT E., 2014, The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History, Henry Holt and Company, New York.
  • 14. ŁEPKO Z., 1991,Antropologia Konrada Lorenza, in: Z zagadnień filozofii przyrodoznawstwa i filozofii przyrody, ed. Lubański M., Ślaga Sz., ATK, Warszawa, p. 157-279.
  • 15. LEWIS M. P., SIMONS G. F., FENNIG Ch. D., 2016, Ethnologue: Languages of the World, SIL International, Dallas.
  • 16. LORENZ K., 1973, Civilized Man’s Eight Deadly Sins, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
  • 17. MAFFI L., 2005, Linguistic, Cultural, and Biological Diversity, in: Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 29, p. 599-617.
  • 18. MAFFI L., 2007, Biocultural Diversity and Sustainability, in: The SAGE handbook of environment and society, ed. Pretty J.N. et al., SAGE, Los Angeles, p. 267-277.
  • 19. MAFFI L., WOODLEY E., 2010, Biocultural diversity conservation: a global sourcebook, Earthscan, London, Washington.
  • 20. MCKINNEY M. L., 1997, How do Rare Species Avoid Extinction? A Paleontological View, in: Biology of Rarity: Causes and Consequences of Rare-Common Differences, ed. Kunin W. E., Gaston K. J., Springer, Dordrecht, p. 110-128.
  • 21. NABHAN G. P., 2001, Cultural Perceptions of Ecological Interactions: An ‘Endangered People's’ Contribution to the Conservation of Biological and Linguistic, in: On Biocultural Diversity. Linking Language, Knowledge and the Environment, ed. Maffi L., Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, London, p. 145-156.
  • 22. NELSON G. C., 2005, Drivers of Ecosystem Change, in: Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends, Vol. 1, ed. Hassan R. M., Scholes R. J., Island Press, Washington, p. 73-76.
  • 23. NSF (National Science Foundation), Researchers find that Earth may be home to 1 trillion species, http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp ?cntn_id=138446, (8.10.2016).
  • 24. POWER C., 2014,The Power of Education: Education for All, Development, Globalisation and UNESCO, Springer, Singapore.
  • 25. PRETTY J., ADAMS B., BERKES F., de ATHAYDE S., DUDLEY N., HUNN E., MAFFI L., MILTON K., RAPPORT D., ROBBINS P., STERLING E., STOLTON S., TSING A., VINTINNERK E., PILGRIM S., 2009, The Intersections of Biological Diversity and Cultural Diversity: Towards Integration, in: Conservation and Society, vol. 7, no 2, p. 100-112.
  • 26. ROMAINE S., 2013, Keeping the Promise of the Millennium Development Goals: Why Language Matters, in: Applied Linguistics Review, vol. 4, no 1, p. 1-21.
  • 27. ROMAINE S., 2016, Language and Sustainable Development, in: The Economics of Language Policy, eds. Gazzola M., Wickström B.A., MIT Press, Cambridge, p. 402-431.
  • 28. SKUTNABB-KANGAS T., 2002, Why Should Linguistic Diversity be Maintained and Supported in Europe? Some Arguments, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
  • 29. SUTHERLAND W. J., 2003, Parallel extinction risk and global distribution of languages and species, in: Nature, vol. 423, p. 276-279.
  • 30. UN, 2016a, The Sustainable Development Agenda, http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/ (25.10.2016).
  • 31. UN, 2016b, Goal 15: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss, www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/biodiversity/ (25.10.2016).
  • 32. UN, 2016c, Goal 7: Ensure Environmental Sustainability, www.un.org/millenniumgoals/environ.shtml (25.10.2016).
  • 33. UN, 2016d, Convention on Biological Diversity, www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf (14.10.2016).
  • 34. UN, 2016e, Proclamation of the World Decade for Cultural Development, www.un.org/documents/ga/res/41/a41r187.htm (13.10.2016).
  • 35. UNCED, 1992, Agenda 21, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf (25.10.2016).
  • 36. UNEP, 2010, What is Biodiversity?, UNEP.
  • 37. UNEP, 2015, YouthXchange Biodiversity and Lifestyles Guidebook, UNEP.
  • 38. UNESCO, 1993, World Commission on Culture and Development, UNESCO, Paris.
  • 39. UNESCO, 2002, Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity, UNESCO, Paris.
  • 40. UNESCO, 2005, Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, UNESCO, Paris.
  • 41. UNESCO, 2007, UNESCO and the Question of Cultural Diversity 1946-2007. Review and Strategies, UNESCO, Paris.
  • 42. UNESCO, 2009, Investing in Cultural Diversity and Intercultural Dialogue, UNESCO, Paris.
  • 43. UNESCO, 2016a, Biodiversity and Linguistic Diversity. Maintaining Indigenous Languages Conserving Biodiversity, www.unesco.org/new/ en/culture/themes/endangered-languages/biodiversity-and-linguistic-diversity/ (20.10.2016).
  • 44. UNESCO, 2016b, Cultural and Linguistic Diversity, http://www.unesco.org/new/en/indigenous-peoples/cultural-and-linguistic-diversity/ (2.11.2016).
  • 45. UNESCO, 2016c, UNESCO a Zrównoważony Rozwój, http://www.unesco.pl/edukacja/dekada -edukacji-nt-zrownowazonego-rozwoju/unesco -a-zrownowazony-rozwoj/ (25.10.2016).
  • 46. VOISKOUNSKY A. E., 1988, Internet: Culture Diversity and Unification, in: Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology, ed. Ess Ch., Sudweeks F., University of Sydney Press, Sydney, p. 100-115. https://www.it.murdoch.edu.au/catac/catac98/pdf/07_voiskounsky.pdf (13.10.2016).
  • 47. WCCD (World Commission on Culture and Development), 1996, Our Creative Diversity, UNESCO, Paris 1996.
Uwagi
Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017)
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-7434b532-6e91-4118-aaa4-1300a501bb73
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.