PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

20 years of the Grammar Matrix: cross-linguistic hypothesis testing of increasingly complex interactions

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The Grammar Matrix project is a meta-grammar engineering framework expressed in Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG) and Minimal Recursion Semantics (MRS). It automates grammar implementation and is thus a tool and a resource for linguistic hypothesis testing at scale. In this paper, we summarize how the Grammar Matrix grew in the last decade and describe how new additions to the system have made it possible to study interactions between analyses, both monolingually and cross-linguistically, at new levels of complexity.
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Strony
49--137
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 183 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Facultade de Informática Universdade da Coruña, Spain
autor
  • Firemuse Research Rockville, Maryland, USA
autor
  • University of Cambridge Cambridge, UK
  • Vrije Universiteit & Eindhoven University of Technology Amsterdam & Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  • LivePerson Inc. Seattle, Washington, US
  • LivePerson Inc. Seattle, Washington, US
  • University of Washington Seattle, Washington, USA
  • Independent scholar
  • University of Washington Seattle, Washington, USA
Bibliografia
  • 1. Anne ABEILLÉ and Rui P. CHAVES (2021), Coordination, in Stefan MÜLLER, Anne ABEILLÉ, Robert D. BORSLEY, and Jean-Pierre KOENIG, editors, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: The handbook, pp. 723–774, Language Science Press, Berlin, doi:10.5281/zenodo.5599848.
  • 2. Peter ACKEMA, Patrick BRANDT, Maaike SCHOORLEMMER, and Fred WEERMAN, editors (2006), Arguments and agreement, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • 3. Gabriel AGUILA-MULTNER and Berthold CRYSMANN (2018), Feature resolution by lists: The case of French coordination, in Annie FORET, Greg KOBELE, and Sylvain POGODALLA, editors, Proceedings of International Conference on Formal Grammar, pp. 1–15, Springer, New York.
  • 4. Alexandra AIKHENVALD (2004), Evidentiality, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • 5. Jason BALDRIDGE, Sudipta CHATTERJEE, Alexis PALMER, and Ben WING (2007), DotCCG and VisCCG: Wiki and programming paradigms for improved grammar engineering with OpenCCG, in Tracy Holloway KING and Emily M. BENDER, editors, Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop on Grammar Engineering Across Frameworks, pp. 5–25, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
  • 6. Kent BECK (2003), Test-driven development: by example, Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.
  • 7. Emily M. BENDER (2007), Combining research and pedagogy in the development of a crosslinguistic grammar resource, in Tracy Holloway KING and Emily M. BENDER, editors, Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop on Grammar Engineering Across Frameworks, pp. 26–45, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
  • 8. Emily M. BENDER (2008), Grammar engineering for linguistic hypothesis testing, in Nicholas GAYLORD, Alexis PALMER, and Elias PONVERT, editors, Computational Linguistics For Less-studied Languages, pp. 16–36, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
  • 9. Emily M. BENDER (2010), Reweaving a grammar for Wambaya: A case study in grammar engineering for linguistic hypothesis testing, Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 3(3):1–34, doi:10.33011/lilt.v3i.1215.
  • 10. Emily M. BENDER (2014), Language CoLLAGE: Grammatical description with the LinGO Grammar Matrix, in Nicoletta CALZOLARI, Khalid CHOUKRI, Thierry DECLERCK, Hrafn LOFTSSON, Bente MAEGAARD, Joseph MARIANI, Asuncion MORENO, Jan ODIJK, and Stelios PIPERIDIS, editors, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), pp. 2447–2451, Paris, http: //www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2014/pdf/639_Paper.pdf.
  • 11. Emily M. BENDER, Joshua CROWGEY, Michael Wayne GOODMAN, and Fei XIA (2014), Learning grammar specifications from IGT: A case study of Chintang, in Jeff GOOD, Julia HIRSCHBERG, and Owen RAMBOW, editors, Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on the Use of Computational Methods in the Study of Endangered Languages, pp. 43–53, Baltimore, MD, doi:10.3115/v1/W14-2206, https://aclanthology.org/W14-2206.
  • 12. Emily M. BENDER, Scott DRELLISHAK, Antske FOKKENS, Laurie POULSON, and Safiyyah SALEEM (2010), Grammar customization, Research on Language and Computation, 8:1–50, doi:10.1007/s11168-010-9070-1.
  • 13. Emily M. BENDER and Guy EMERSON (2021), Computational linguistics and grammar engineering, in Stefan MÜLLER, Anne ABEILLÉ, Robert D. BORSLEY,
  • 14. Gabriel AGUILA-MULTNER and Berthold CRYSMANN (2018), Feature resolution by lists: The case of French coordination, in Annie FORET, Greg KOBELE, and Sylvain POGODALLA, editors, Proceedings of International Conference on Formal Grammar, pp. 1–15, Springer, New York.
  • 15. Alexandra AIKHENVALD (2004), Evidentiality, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • 16. Jason BALDRIDGE, Sudipta CHATTERJEE, Alexis PALMER, and Ben WING (2007), DotCCG and VisCCG: Wiki and programming paradigms for improved grammar engineering with OpenCCG, in Tracy Holloway KING and Emily M. BENDER, editors, Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop on Grammar Engineering Across Frameworks, pp. 5–25, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
  • 17. Kent BECK (2003), Test-driven development: by example, Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.
  • 18. Emily M. BENDER (2007), Combining research and pedagogy in the development of a crosslinguistic grammar resource, in Tracy Holloway KING and Emily M. BENDER, editors, Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop on Grammar Engineering Across Frameworks, pp. 26–45, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
  • 19. Emily M. BENDER (2008), Grammar engineering for linguistic hypothesis testing, in Nicholas GAYLORD, Alexis PALMER, and Elias PONVERT, editors, Computational Linguistics For Less-studied Languages, pp. 16–36, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
  • 20. Emily M. BENDER (2010), Reweaving a grammar for Wambaya: A case study in grammar engineering for linguistic hypothesis testing, Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 3(3):1–34, doi:10.33011/lilt.v3i.1215.
  • 21. Emily M. BENDER (2014), Language CoLLAGE: Grammatical description with the LinGO Grammar Matrix, in Nicoletta CALZOLARI, Khalid CHOUKRI, Thierry DECLERCK, Hrafn LOFTSSON, Bente MAEGAARD, Joseph MARIANI, Asuncion MORENO, Jan ODIJK, and Stelios PIPERIDIS, editors, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), pp. 2447–2451, Paris, http: //www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2014/pdf/639_Paper.pdf.
  • 22. Emily M. BENDER, Joshua CROWGEY, Michael Wayne GOODMAN, and Fei XIA (2014), Learning grammar specifications from IGT: A case study of Chintang, in Jeff GOOD, Julia HIRSCHBERG, and Owen RAMBOW, editors, Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on the Use of Computational Methods in the Study of Endangered Languages, pp. 43–53, Baltimore, MD, doi:10.3115/v1/W14-2206, https://aclanthology.org/W14-2206.
  • 23. Emily M. BENDER, Scott DRELLISHAK, Antske FOKKENS, Laurie POULSON, and Safiyyah SALEEM (2010), Grammar customization, Research on Language and Computation, 8:1–50, doi:10.1007/s11168-010-9070-1.
  • 24. Emily M. BENDER and Guy EMERSON (2021), Computational linguistics and grammar engineering, in Stefan MÜLLER, Anne ABEILLÉ, Robert D. BORSLEY,
  • 25. Gosse BOUMA, Gertjan VAN NOORD, and Robert MALOUF (2001b), Alpino: Wide-coverage computational analysis of Dutch, in Walter DAELEMANS, Khalil SIMA’AN, Jorn VEENSTRA, and Jakub ZAVREL, editors, Selected papers from the Eleventh Meeting for Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands, pp. 45–59, Rodopi, Amsterdam, doi:10.1163/9789004333901_004.
  • 26. Ana Paula Barros BRANDÃO (2014), A reference grammar of Paresi-Haliti (Arawak), Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
  • 27. Leston Chandler BUELL (2005), Issues in Zulu verbal morphosyntax, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • 28. Miriam BUTT and Tracy Holloway KING (2002), Urdu and the Parallel Grammar Project, in Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Asian Language Resources and International Standardization, Taipei, doi:10.3115/1118759.1118762.
  • 29. Miriam BUTT, Tracy Holloway KING, María-Eugenia NIÑO, and Frédérique SEGOND (1999), A grammar writer’s cookbook, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
  • 30. Joan L. BYBEE, Revere Dale PERKINS, William PAGLIUCA, et al. (1994), The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • 31. Daniel BÜRING (2009), Towards a typology of focus realization, in Malte ZIMMERMANN and Caroline FÉRY, editors, Information Structure: Theoretical, Typological, and Experimental Perspectives, pp. 177–205, Oxford University Press, Oxford, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570959.001.0001.
  • 32. Ulrich CALLMEIER (2000), PET – A platform for experimentation with efficient HPSG processing techniques, Natural Language Engineering, 6:99–108.
  • 33. Marie-Hélène CANDITO (1999), Organisation modulaire et paramétrable de grammaires électroniques lexicalisées. Application au franćais et á l’italien (Modular and parameterized organisation of lexicalised electronic grammars. Applications to French and Italian), Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris 7.
  • 34. Robert L. CARPENTER (2005), The logic of typed feature structures: With applications to unification grammars, logic programs and constraint resolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • 35. Yang CHUNLEI and Dan FLICKINGER (2014), ManGO: Grammar engineering for deep linguistic processing, Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 30(3):57–64.
  • 36. Liviu CIORTUZ and Vlad SAVELUC (2012), Fluid Construction Grammar and feature constraint logics, pp. 289–311, Springer, Berlin, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34120-5_12.
  • 37. Liviu-Virgil CIORTUZ (2002), LIGHT – A constraint language and compiler system for typed-unification grammars, in Matthias JARKE, Jana KOEHLER, and Gerhard LAKEMEYER, editors, Proceedings of the 25th Annual German Conference on AI, pp. 3–17, Springer, Berlin, doi:10.1007/3-540-45751-8_1.
  • 38. Lionel CLÉMENT and Alexandra KINYON (2003), Generating parallel multilingual LFG-TAG grammars from a Meta Grammar, in Erhard W. HINRICHS and Dan ROTH, editors, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 184–191, Sapporo, doi:10.3115/1075096.1075120.
  • 39. Bernard COMRIE (1976), Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • 40. Bernard COMRIE (1985), Tense, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Elizabeth CONRAD (2021), Tracing and reducing lexical ambiguity in automatically inferred grammars, Master’s thesis, University of Washington.
  • 41. Ann COPESTAKE (2002a), Definitions of typed feature structures, in Stephan OEPEN, Dan FLICKINGER, Jun-ichi TSUJII, and Hans USZKOREIT, editors, Collaborative Language Engineering: A Case Study in Efficient Grammar-Based Processing, pp. 227–230, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
  • 42. Ann COPESTAKE (2002b), Implementing typed feature structure grammars, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
  • 43. Ann COPESTAKE (2009), Slacker semantics: Why superficiality, dependency and avoidance of commitment can be the right way to go, in Alex LASCARIDES, Claire GARDENT, and Joakim NIVRE, editors, Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1–9, Athens, doi:10.3115/1609067.1609167.
  • 44. Ann COPESTAKE, Dan FLICKINGER, Robert MALOUF, Susanne RIEHEMANN, and Ivan SAG (1995), Translation using minimal recursion semantics, in Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation of Natural Languages, pp. 15–32, Leuven.
  • 45. Ann COPESTAKE, Dan FLICKINGER, Carl POLLARD, and Ivan A. SAG (2005), Minimal recursion semantics: An introduction, Research on Language and Computation, 3(4):281–332.
  • 46. Greville G CORBETT (2000), Number, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Greville G. CORBETT (2006), Agreement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • 47. Francisco COSTA and António BRANCO (2010), LXGram: A deep linguistic processing grammar for Portuguese, in António TEIXEIRA, Vera Lúcia Strube LIMA, Luís Caldas OLIVEIRA, and Paulo QUARESMA, editors, Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language, volume 6001 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 86–89, Springer, Berlin, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12320-7_11.
  • 48. Benoît CRABBÉ, Denys DUCHIER, Claire GARDENT, Joseph Le ROUX, and Yannick PARMENTIER (2013), XMG: eXtensible MetaGrammar, Computational Linguistics, 39(3):591–629, doi:10.1162/COLI_a_00144.
  • 49. Joshua CROWGEY (2012), An a priori typology of sentential negation from an HPSG perspective, in Stefan MÜLLER, editor, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp. 107–122, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, doi:10.21248/hpsg.2012.7.
  • 50. Joshua CROWGEY (2013), The syntactic exponence of sentential negation: A model for the LinGO Grammar Matrix, Master’s thesis, University of Washington.
  • 51. Joshua CROWGEY (2019), Braiding language (by computer): Lushootseed grammar engineering, Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington.
  • 52. Berthold CRYSMANN (2012), HaG: A computational grammar of Hausa, in Michael R. MARLO, Nikki B. ADAMS, Christopher R. GREEN, Michelle MORRISON, and Tristan M. PURVIS, editors, Selected Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference on African Linguistics, pp. 321–337, Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA.
  • 53. Berthold CRYSMANN and Woodley PACKARD (2012), Towards efficient HPSG generation for German, a non-configurational language, in Martin KAY and Christian BOITET, editors, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 695–710, Mumbai, http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C12-1043.
  • 54. Chris CURTIS (2018a), Valence change library for the Grammar Matrix, Master’s thesis, University of Washington.
  • 55. Chris CURTIS (2018b), Valence-changing morphology via lexical rule composition, in Stefan MÜLLER and Frank RICHTER, editors, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp. 36–48, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, doi:10.21248/hpsg.2018.3.
  • 56. Michael CYSOUW (2003), The paradigmatic structure of person marking, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • 57. Glauber Romling DA SILVA (2013), Morfossintaxe da lingua Paresi-Haliti (Arawak) (Morphosyntax of the Paresi-Haliti language (Arawakan)), Ph.D. thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
  • 58. Östen DAHL (1979), Typology of sentence negation, Linguistics, 17(1–2):79–106. Östen DAHL (1985), Tense and aspect systems, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
  • 59. Matthew DAVIDSON (2002), Studies in Southern Wakashan (Nootkan) grammar, Ph.D. thesis, University of New York at Buffalo.
  • 60. Ferdinand DE SAUSSURE (1916), Cours de linguistique générale (Course in general linguistics), Payot, Lausanne–Paris.
  • 61. Robert M.W. DIXON (2004), Adjective classes in typological perspective, in Robert M.W. DIXON and Alexandra Y. AIKHENVALD, editors, Adjective Classes: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, pp. 1–49, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • 62. Scott DRELLISHAK (2004), A survey of coordination strategies in the world’s languages, Master’s thesis, University of Washington.
  • 63. Scott DRELLISHAK (2008), Complex Case Phenomena in the Grammar Matrix, in Stefan MÜLLER, editor, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp. 67–86, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
  • 64. Scott DRELLISHAK (2009), Widespread but not universal: Improving the typological coverage of the Grammar Matrix, Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington.
  • 65. Scott DRELLISHAK and Emily M. BENDER (2005), A coordination module for a crosslinguistic grammar resource, in Stefan MÜLLER, editor, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp. 108–128, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, doi:10.21248/hpsg.2005.6.
  • 66. Matthew S. DRYER (2013a), Expression of Pronominal Subjects, in Matthew S. DRYER and Martin HASPELMATH, editors, The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, https://wals.info/chapter/101.
  • 67. Matthew S. DRYER (2013b), Negative Morphemes, in Matthew S. DRYER and Martin HASPELMATH, editors, The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, https://wals.info/chapter/112.
  • 68. Matthew S. DRYER and Martin HASPELMATH, editors (2013), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, https://wals.info/.
  • 69. Guy EMERSON (2017), (Diff)List appends in TDL, http://www.delph-in.net/2017/append.pdf, DELPH-IN summit, Oslo, Norway.
  • 70. Guy EMERSON (2019), Wrapper types: Relational constraints without relational constraints, http: //users.sussex.ac.uk/~johnca/summit-2019/wrapper-types.pdf, DELPH-IN summit, Cambridge, UK.
  • 71. Guy EMERSON (2021), On the Turing completeness of typed feature structure unification, https://raw.githubusercontent.com/delph-in/docs/main/ summits/2021/turing.pdf, DELPH-IN summit, online.
  • 72. Guy EMERSON (forthcoming), Computation as subtyping: On the Turing completeness of type systems, with applications to formal grammars.
  • 73. Zhenzhen FAN (2018), Building an HPSG Chinese grammar (Zhong), Ph.D. thesis, Nanyang Technological University.
  • 74. Zhenzhen FAN, Sanghoun SONG, and Francis BOND (2015), An HPSG-based shared-grammar for the Chinese languages: ZHONG [|], in Emily M. BENDER, Lori LEVIN, Stefan MÜLLER, Yannick PARMENTIER, and Aarne RANTA, editors, Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Grammar Engineering Across Frameworks, pp. 17–24, Beijing, doi:10.18653/v1/W15-3303.
  • 75. Yimai FANG, Haoyue ZHU, Ewa MUSZYŃSKA, Alexander KUHNLE, and Simone TEUFEL (2016), A Proposition-based abstractive summariser, in Yuji MATSUMOTO and Rashmi PRASAD, editors, Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 567–578, Osaka, https://aclanthology.org/C16-1055.
  • 76. Charles J. FILLMORE, Paul KAY, and Mary Catherine O’CONNOR (1988), Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of Let Alone, Language, 64(3):501–538.
  • 77. Dan FLICKINGER (2000), On building a more efficient grammar by exploiting types, Natural Language Engineering, 6(1):15–28.
  • 78. Dan FLICKINGER (2011), Accuracy v. robustness in grammar engineering, in Emily M. BENDER and Jennifer E. ARNOLD, editors, Language from a Cognitive Perspective: Grammar, Usage and Processing, pp. 31–50, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
  • 79. Dan FLICKINGER, Carl POLLARD, and Tom WASOW (2021), The evolution of HPSG, in Stefan MÜLLER, Anne ABEILLÉ, Robert D. BORSLEY, and Jean-Pierre KOENIG, editors, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: The handbook, 9, pp. 47–87, Language Science Press, Berlin.
  • 80. Dan FLICKINGER and Jiye YU (2013), Toward more precision in correction of grammatical errors, in Julia HOCKENMAIER and Sebastian RIEDEL, editors, Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 68–73, Sofia.
  • 81. Antske FOKKENS (2010), Documentation for the Grammar Matrix word order library, https://github.com/delph-in/docs/wiki/MatrixDoc_WordOrder.
  • 82. Antske FOKKENS (2011), Metagrammar engineering: Towards systematic exploration of implemented grammars, in Dekang LIN, editor, Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1066–1076, Portland, OR.
  • 83. Antske FOKKENS (2014), Enhancing empirical research for linguistically motivated precision grammars, Ph.D. thesis, Saarland University.
  • 84. Antske FOKKENS and Tania AVGUSTINOVA (2013), SlaviCLIMB: Combining expertise for Slavic grammar development using a metagrammar, in Proceedings of High-level Methodologies for Grammar Engineering, pp. 87–92, Orleans.
  • 85. Antske FOKKENS, Tania AVGUSTINOVA, and Yi ZHANG (2012), CLIMB grammars: Three projects using metagrammar engineering, in Nicoletta CALZOLARI, Khalid CHOUKRI, Thierry DECLERCK, Mehmet Uğur DOĞAN, Bente MAEGAARD, Joseph MARIANI, Asuncion MORENO, Jan ODIJK, and Stelios PIPERIDIS, editors, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 1672–1679, Istanbul.
  • 86. Antske FOKKENS, Yi ZHANG, and Emily M. BENDER (2011), Spring cleaning and grammar compression: Two techniques for detection of redundancy in HPSG grammars, in Minghui Dong HELENA HONG GAO, editor, Proceedings of the 25th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, pp. 236–244, Tokyo.
  • 87. Caroline FÉRY and Manfred KRIFKA (2008), Information structure: Notional distinctions, ways of expression, in Piet VAN STERKENBURG, editor, Unity and Diversity of Languages, pp. 123–136, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, doi:10.1075/z.141.
  • 88. Gerald GAZDAR, Ewan KLEIN, Geoffrey PULLUM, and Ivan SAG (1985), Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • 89. Jonathan GINZBURG and Ivan SAG (2000), Interrogative investigations, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
  • 90. Talmy GIVÓN (1994), The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion, in Talmy GIVÓN, editor, Voice and Inversion, pp. 3–44, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
  • 91. Michael Wayne GOODMAN (2013), Generation of machine-readable morphological rules from human readable input, University of Washington Working Papers in Linguistics, 30, http://depts.washington.edu/uwwpl/vol30/goodman_2013.pdf.
  • 92. Michael Wayne GOODMAN (2019), A Python library for deep linguistic resources, in Jieh HSIANG and Michael STANLEY-BAKER, editors, 2019 Pacific Neighborhood Consortium Annual Conference and Joint Meetings, pp. 1–7, Singapore.
  • 93. Thomas GRAF and Kalina KOSTYSZYN (2021), Multiple wh-movement is not special: The subregular complexity of persistent features in minimalist grammars, in Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics, volume 4, pp. 275–285, ScholarWorks@UMAss Amherst, Amherst, MA.
  • 94. Tali Arad GRESHLER, Livnat HERZIG SHEINFUX, Nurit MELNIK, and Shuly WINTNER (2015), Development of maximally reusable grammars: Parallel development of Hebrew and Arabic grammars, in Stefan MÜLLER, editor, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp. 27–40, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, https://proceedings.hpsg.xyz/article/view/318.
  • 95. Michael HAEGER (2017), An evidentiality library for the LinGO Grammar Matrix, Master’s thesis, University of Washington.
  • 96. Claude HAGÈGE (2008), Towards a typology of interrogative verbs, Linguistic Typology, 12:1–44, doi:10.1515/LITY.2008.031.
  • 97. Harald HAMMARSTRÖM, Robert FORKEL, Martin HASPELMATH, and Sebastian BANK (2021), Glottolog database 4.5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.5772642, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5772642.
  • 98. Jorge HANKAMER and Vera LEE-SCHOENFELD (2005), What moves in German VP-fronting, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254070408_ What_Moves_in_German_VP-Fronting, handout of presentation at Berkeley Syntax/Semantics Circle.
  • 99. Martin HASPELMATH, Michael MEEUWIS, APiCS CONSORTIUM, et al. (2013), Position of interrogative phrases in content questions, in Susanne Maria MICHAELISC, Philippe MAURER, Martin HASPELMATH, and Magnus HUBER, editors, The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures, pp. 44–47, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • 100. Martin HASPELMATH and Thomas MÜLLER-BARDEY (2001), Valence change, in G. BOOIJ, C. LEHMANN, and J. MUGDAN, editors, A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
  • 101. Jeffrey HEATH (2017), A grammar of Jalkunan (Mande, Burkina Faso), Language Description Heritage Library, doi:10.17617/2.2346932.
  • 102. Bernd HEINE (1997), Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization, 83, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511581908.
  • 103. Lars HELLAN and Petter HAUGEREID (2003), The NorSource grammar – an exercise in the Matrix grammar building design, in Emily M BENDER, Dan FLICKINGER, Frederik FOUVRY, and Melanie SIEGEL, editors, Proceedings of Workshop on Multilingual Grammar Engineering, ESSLLI 2003.
  • 104. Andreas HÖLZL (2018), A typology of questions in Northeast Asia and beyond: An ecological perspective, Language Science Press, Berlin.
  • 105. Kristen HOWELL (2020), Inferring grammars from Interlinear Glossed Text: Extracting typological and lexical properties for the automatic generation of HPSG grammars, Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington.
  • 106. Kristen HOWELL and Emily M. BENDER (2022), Building analyses from syntactic inference in local languages: An HPSG grammar inference system, Northern European Journal of Language Technology, 8(1), doi:10.3384/nejlt.2000- 1533.2022.4017, https://nejlt.ep.liu.se/article/view/4017/3515.
  • 107. Kristen HOWELL and Olga ZAMARAEVA (2018), Clausal modifiers in the Grammar Matrix, in Emily M. BENDER, Leon DERCZYNSKI, and Pierre ISABELLE, editors, Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 2939–2952, Santa Fe, NM.
  • 108. Kristen HOWELL, Olga ZAMARAEVA, and Emily M. BENDER (2018), Nominalized clauses in the Grammar Matrix, in Stefan MÜLLER and Frank RICHTER, editors, The 25th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, doi:10.21248/hpsg.2018.5.
  • 109. David INMAN (2019), Multi-predicate constructions in Nuuchahnulth, Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington.
  • 110. David INMAN and Ruth MORRISON (2014), Negation in Nanti: Syntactic evidence for head and dependent negators, in Stefan MÜLLER, editor, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp. 103–113, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, doi:10.21248/hpsg.2014.6, https://proceedings.hpsg.xyz/article/view/306.
  • 111. Aravind K JOSHI and Yves SCHABES (1997), Tree-Adjoining Grammars, in Grzegorz ROZENBERG and Arto SALOMAA, editors, Handbook of Formal Languages, pp. 69–123, Springer, New York.
  • 112. Ronald M. KAPLAN and Joan BRESNAN (1982), Lexical-Functional Grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation, in Joan BRESNAN, editor, The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pp. 173–281, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • 113. Marina KHASANOVA and Alexander PEVNOV (2002), Myths and tales of the Negidals, Nakanishi, Kyoto.
  • 114. Jong-Bok KIM and Jaehyung YANG (2003), Korean phrase structure grammar and its implementations into the LKB system, in Dong Hong JI and Kim Teng LUA, editors, Proceedings of the 17th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, pp. 88–97, COLIPS Publications, Singapore.
  • 115. Valia KORDONI and Julia NEU (2005), Deep analysis of Modern Greek, in Keh-Yih SU, Oi Yee KWONG, Jn’ichi TSUJII, and Jong-Hyeok LEE, editors, Proceedings of the 2004 International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 674–683, Springer, Berlin.
  • 116. Hans-Ulrich KRIEGER and Ulrich SCHÄFER (1994), TDL – A type description language for HPSG, in Makoto NAGAO and Yorick WILKS, editors, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 893–899, Kyoto.
  • 117. Meredith LANDMAN and Marcin MORZYCKI (2003), Event-kinds and the representation of manner, in Nancy Mae ANTRIM, Grant GOODALL, Martha SCHULTE-NAFEH, and Vida SAMIIAN, editors, Proceedings of the Western Conference in Linguistics, volume 11, pp. 1–12, Fresno, CA.
  • 118. Rob MALOUF, John CARROLL, and Ann COPESTAKE (2002), Efficient feature structure operations without compilation, in Stephan OEPEN, Dan FLICKINGER, Jun-ichi TSUJII, and Hans USZKOREIT, editors, Collaborative Language Engineering: A Case Study in Efficient Grammar-Based Processing, pp. 105–125, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
  • 119. Montserrat MARIMON (2010), The Spanish Resource Grammar, in Nicoletta CALZOLARI, Khalid CHOUKRI, Bente MAEGAARD, Joseph MARIANI, Jan ODIJK, Stelios PIPERIDIS, Mike ROSNER, and Daniel TAPIAS, editors, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Valletta, http: //www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2010/pdf/602_Paper.pdf.
  • 120. Detmar MEURERS, Gerald PENN, and Frank RICHTER (2002), A web-based instructional platform for constraint-based grammar formalisms and parsing, in Dragomir RADEV and Chris BREW, editors, Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Effective tools and methodologies for teaching natural language processing and computational linguistics, pp. 19–26, Philadelphia, PA.
  • 121. Yusuke MIYAO and Jun’ichi TSUJII (2008), Feature forest models for probabilistic HPSG parsing, Computational Linguistics, 34(1):35–80.
  • 122. Osahito MIYAOKA (2012), A grammar of Central Alaskan Yupik (CAY), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, doi:10.1515/9783110278576.
  • 123. David MOELJADI, Francis BOND, and Sanghoun SONG (2015), Building an HPSG-based Indonesian resource grammar (INDRA), in Emily M. BENDER, Lori LEVIN, Stefan MÜLLER, Yannick PARMENTIER, and Aarne RANTA, editors, Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Grammar Engineering Across Frameworks, pp. 9–16, Beijing, doi:10.18653/v1/W15-3302.
  • 124. Richard MONTAGUE (1974), Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
  • 125. Luís MORGADO DA COSTA, Francis BOND, and Xiaoling HE (2016), Syntactic well-formedness diagnosis and error-based coaching in computer assisted language learning using machine translation, in Hsin-Hsi CHEN, Yuen-Hsien TSENG, Vincent NG, and Xiaofei LU, editors, Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Natural Language Processing Techniques for Educational Applications, pp. 107–116, Osaka.
  • 126. Luis MORGADO DA COSTA, Roger WINDER, Shu Yun LI, Benedict Christopher Lin Tzer LIANG, Joseph MACKINNON, and Francis BOND (2020), Automated writing support using deep linguistic parsers, in Nicoletta CALZOLARI, Frédéric BÉCHET, Philippe BLACHE, Khalid CHOUKRI, Christopher CIERI, Thierry DECLERCK, Sara GOGGI, Hitoshi ISAHARA, Bente MAEGAARD, Joseph MARIANI, Hélène MAZO, Asuncion MORENO, Jan ODIJK, and Stelios PIPERIDIS, editors, Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pp. 369–377, Marseille.
  • 127. Sarah E. MURRAY (2017), The semantics of evidentials, Oxford University Press, Oxford, doi:10.1093/oso/9780199681570.001.0001.
  • 128. Stefan MÜLLER (1999), Deutsche Syntax deklarativ: Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar für das Deutsche (Declarative German Syntax: Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar for German), Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen, doi:10.1515/9783110915990.
  • 129. Stefan MÜLLER (2007), The Grammix CD-ROM: A software collection for developing typed feature structure grammars, in Tracy Holloway KING and Emily M. BENDER, editors, Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop on Grammar Engineering Across Frameworks, pp. 259–266, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/GEAF/2007/.
  • 130. Stefan MÜLLER (2015), The CoreGram project: Theoretical linguistics, theory development and verification, Journal of Language Modelling, 3(1):21–86, doi:10.15398/jlm.v3i1.91.
  • 131. Stefan MÜLLER, Anne ABEILLÉ, Robert D. BORSLEY, and Jean-Pierre KOENIG, editors (2021), Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: The handbook, Language Science Press, Berlin, doi:10.5281/zenodo.5543318.
  • 132. Elizabeth NIELSEN and Emily M. BENDER (2018), Modeling adnominal possession in multilingual grammar engineering, in Stefan MÜLLER and Frank RICHTER, editors, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp. 140–153, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, doi:10.21248/hpsg.2018.9.
  • 133. Elizabeth K NIELSEN (2018), Modeling adnominal possession in the linGO Grammar Matrix, Master’s thesis, University of Washington.
  • 134. Michael NOONAN (2007), Complementation, in Timothy SHOPEN, editor, Language Typology and Syntactic Description, pp. 52–150, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2nd edition, doi:doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.
  • 135. Stephan OEPEN (2002), Competence and performance profiling for constraint-based grammars: A new methodology, toolkit, and applications, Ph.D. thesis, Universität des Saarlandes.
  • 136. Stephan OEPEN, Emily M. BENDER, Ulrich CALLMEIER, Dan FLICKINGER, and Melanie SIEGEL (2002), Parallel distributed grammar engineering for practical applications, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Grammar Engineering and Evaluation, Taipei.
  • 137. Stephan OEPEN, Dan FLICKINGER, Kristina TOUTANOVA, and Christopher D. MANNING (2004), LinGO Redwoods: A rich and dynamic treebank for HPSG, Research on Language and Computation, 2(4):575–596, doi:10.1007/s11168-004-7430-4.
  • 138. Stephan OEPEN and Daniel P. FLICKINGER (1998), Towards systematic grammar profiling: Test suite technology ten years after, Journal of Computer Speech and Language, 12(4):411–435, doi:10.1006/csla.1998.0105.
  • 139. Stephan OEPEN, Erik VELLDAL, Jan Tore LØNNING, Paul MEURER, Victoria ROSÉN, and Dan FLICKINGER (2007), Towards hybrid quality-oriented machine translation. On linguistics and probabilities in MT, in Andy WAY and Barbara GAWRONSKA, editors, The 11th International Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation, Skövde, Sweden, https://aclanthology.org/2007.tmi-papers.
  • 140. Kelly O’HARA (2008), A morphotactic infrastructure for a grammar customization system, Master’s thesis, University of Washington.
  • 141. Petya OSENOVA (2010), BURGER: BUlgarian Resource Grammar – Efficient and Realistic, http://bultreebank.org/en/bulgarian-resource-grammar-burger/, technical report, Stanford, CSLI.
  • 142. Petya OSENOVA (2011), Localizing a core HPSG-based grammar for Bulgarian, in Hanna HEDELAND, Thomas SCHMIDT, and Kai WÖRNER, editors, Proceedings of the Conference of the German Society for Computational Linguistics and Language Technology, pp. 175–182, Hamburg.
  • 143. Woodley PACKARD (2015), Full forest treebanking, Master’s thesis, University of Washington.
  • 144. Barbara H. PARTEE (1979), Constraining Montague grammar: A framework and a fragment, in S. DAVIS and M. MITHUN, editors, Linguistics, Philosophy, and Montague Grammar, pp. 51–101, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, doi:10.7560/746251- 004.
  • 145. Doris L. PAYNE and Immanuel BARSHI, editors (1999), External Possession, John Benjamins Publishing Co., Amsterdam, doi:10.1075/tsl.39.
  • 146. John R PAYNE (1985), Complex phrases and complex sentences, in Timothy SHOPEN, editor, Language typology and syntactic description, volume 2, pp. 3–41, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1st edition, doi:doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.
  • 147. Gerald PENN (2000), Applying constraint handling rules to HPSG, in Thom FRÜHWIRTH, editor, Proceedings of the Workshop on Rule-Based Constraint Reasoning and Programming, http://www.informatik.uni-ulm.de/pm/ fileadmin/pm/home/fruehwirth/cl2000r.html.
  • 148. Gerald PENN (2004), Balancing clarity and efficiency in typed feature logic through delaying, in Donia SCOTT, editor, Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 239–246, Barcelona, doi:10.3115/1218955.1218986.
  • 149. Carl POLLARD and Ivan A. SAG (1987), Information-based syntax and semantics, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
  • 150. Carl POLLARD and Ivan A. SAG (1994), Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • 151. Laurie POULSON (2011), Meta-modeling of tense and aspect in a cross-linguistic grammar engineering platform, in Sanghoun SONG and Joshua CROWGEY, editors, University of Washington Working Papers in Linguistics, volume 28, pp. 1–62.
  • 152. Conor QUINN (2006), Referential-access dependency in Penobscot, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University.
  • 153. Aarne RANTA (2011), Grammatical framework: Programming with multilingual grammars, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
  • 154. Frank RICHTER (2021), Formal Background, in Stefan MÜLLER, Anne ABEILLÉ, Robert D. BORSLEY, and Jean-Pierre KOENIG, editors, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: The handbook, pp. 89–124, Language Science Press, Berlin, doi:DOI:10.5281/zenodo.5599822.
  • 155. Ivan A. SAG, Hans C. BOAS, and Paul KAY (2012), Introducing Sign-Based Construction Grammar, in Hans C. BOAS and Ivan A. SAG, editors, Sign-Based Construction Grammar, pp. 1–29, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
  • 156. Safiyyah SALEEM (2010), Argument optionality: A new library for the Grammar Matrix customization system, Master’s thesis, University of Washington.
  • 157. Safiyyah SALEEM and Emily M. BENDER (2010), Argument optionality in the LinGO Grammar Matrix, in Chu-Ren HUANG and Dan JURAFSKY, editors, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 1068–1076, Beijing.
  • 158. Robert SCHIKOWSKI (2012), Chintang morphology, unpublished manuscript, University of Zürich.
  • 159. Melanie SIEGEL, Emily M. BENDER, and Francis BOND (2016), Jacy: An implemented grammar of Japanese, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, http://web.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/site/9781684000180.shtml.
  • 160. Anna SIEWIERSKA (2004), Person, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Glenn C SLAYDEN (2011), Thai Grammar, available at http://agree-grammar.com/src/grammars/thai. Accessed 05-20-2022. Glenn C SLAYDEN (2012), Array TFS storage for unification grammars, Master’s thesis, University of Washington.
  • 161. Sanghoun SONG (2014), A grammar library for information structure, Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington.
  • 162. Sanghoun SONG, Jong-Bok KIM, Francis BOND, and Jaehyung YANG (2010), Development of the Korean resource grammar: Towards grammar customization, in Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Asian Language Resouces, pp. 144–152.
  • 163. Edward STABLER (1997), Derivational minimalism, in Christian RETORÉ, editor, Proceedings of the International Conference on Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, pp. 68–95, Springer, New York.
  • 164. Leon STASSEN (1997), Intransitive predication, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • 165. Leon STASSEN (2000), AND-languages and WITH-languages, Linguistic Typology, 4:1–54.
  • 166. Leon STASSEN (2013), Predicative adjectives, in Matthew S. DRYER and Martin HASPELMATH, editors, The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, http://wals.info/chapter/118.
  • 167. Mark STEEDMAN (2000), The syntactic process, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • 168. Patrick SUPPES, Tie LIANG, Elizabeth E. MACKEN, and Dan FLICKINGER (2014), Positive technological and negative pre-test-score effects in a four-year assessment of low socioeconomic status K-8 student learning in computer-based math and language arts courses, Computers and Education, 71:23–32, doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.008.
  • 169. Sandra A THOMPSON, Robert E LONGACRE, and Shin Ja J HWANG (1985), Adverbial clauses, in Timothy SHOPEN, editor, Language Typology and Syntactic Description, pp. 171–234, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1st edition, doi:doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.
  • 170. John TORR (2018), Constraining MGbank: Agreement, L-selection and supertagging in Minimalist Grammars, in Iryna GUREVYCH and Yusuke MIYAO, editors, Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 590–600, Melbourne, doi:10.18653/v1/P18-1055, https://aclanthology.org/P18-1055.
  • 171. Thomas TRIMBLE (2014), Adjectives in the LinGO Grammar Matrix, Master’s thesis, University of Washington.
  • 172. Hans USZKOREIT, Rolf BACKOFEN, Stephan BUSEMANN, Abdel Kader DIAGNE, Elizabeth A. HINKELMAN, Walter KASPER, Bernd KIEFER, Hans-Ulrich KRIEGER, Klaus NETTER, Gunter NEUMANN, Stephan OEPEN, and Stephen P. SPACKMAN (1994), DISCO – An HPSG-based NLP system and its application for appointment scheduling, in Makoto NAGAO and Yorik WILKS, editors, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Kyoto, https://aclanthology.org/C94-1072.
  • 173. Gertjan VAN NOORD (2006), At Last Parsing Is Now Operational (APLINO), in Piet MERTENS, Cédrick FAIRON, Anne DISTER, and Patrick WATRIN, editors, Actes de la 13ème Conférence sur le Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles, pp. 20–42, l’Association pour Traitement Automatique des Langues, Leuven, http://talnarchives.atala.org/TALN/TALN-2006/ taln-2006-invite-002.pdf.
  • 174. David WAX (2014), Automated grammar engineering for verbal morphology, Master’s thesis, University of Washington.
  • 175. Olga ZAMARAEVA (2016), Inferring morphotactics from interlinear glossed text: Combining clustering and precision grammars, in Micha ELSNER and Sandra KUEBLER, editors, Proceedings of the 14th Workshop on Computational Research in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology, pp. 141–150, Berlin, doi:10.18653/v1/W16- 2021.
  • 176. Olga ZAMARAEVA (2021a), Assembling syntax: Modeling constituent questions in a grammar engineering framework, Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington.
  • 177. Olga ZAMARAEVA (2021b), Morphological marking of constituent questions: A case for nonlocal amalgamation, in Stefan MÜLLER and Nurit MELNIK, editors, Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp. 241–261, Frankfurt/Main, doi:10.21248/hpsg.2021.13.
  • 178. Olga ZAMARAEVA and Emily M. BENDER (2014), Focus case outside of Austronesian: An analysis of Kolyma Yukaghir, in Stefan MÜLLER, editor, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp. 176–196, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, doi:10.21248/hpsg.2014.10, https://proceedings.hpsg.xyz/article/view/310.
  • 179. Olga ZAMARAEVA and Guy EMERSON (2020), Multiple question fronting without relational xonstraints: An analysis of Russian as a basis for cross-linguistic modeling, in Stefan MÜLLER and Anke HOLLER, editors, Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp. 157–177, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, doi:10.21248/hpsg.2020.9.
  • 180. Olga ZAMARAEVA, Kristen HOWELL, and Emily M. BENDER (2019a), Handling cross-cutting properties in automatic inference of lexical classes: A case study of Chintang, in Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on the Use of Computational Methods in the Study of Endangered Languages, Honolulu, HI.
  • 181. Olga ZAMARAEVA, Kristen HOWELL, and Emily M. BENDER (2019b), Modeling clausal complementation for a grammar engineering resource, in Gaja JAROSZ, Max NELSON, Brendan O’CONNOR, and Joe PATER, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the Society for Computation in Linguistics, pp. 39–49, ScholarWorks@UMAss Amherst, Amherst, MA, doi:10.7275/dygn-c796.
  • 182. Olga ZAMARAEVA, František KRATOCHVÍL, Emily M. BENDER, Fei XIA, and Kristen HOWELL (2017), Computational support for finding word classes: A case study of Abui, in Antti ARPPE, Jeff GOOD, Mans HULDEN, Jordan LACHLER, Alexis PALMER, and Lane SCHWARTZ, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on the Use of Computational Methods in the Study of Endangered Languages, pp. 130–140, Honolulu, HI, doi:10.18653/v1/W17-0118.
  • 183. Arnold M. ZWICKY, Joyce FRIEDMAN, Barbara C. HALL, and Donald E. WALKER (1965), The MITRE syntactic analysis procedure for Transformational Grammars, in Robert W. RECTOR, editor, AFIPS Conference Proceedings, volume 27, pp. 317–326, Spartan Books, Washington, D.C., doi:10.1145/1463891.1463928.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-73c6fcd5-d130-48b2-91ec-46448ef98ac0
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.