The Effects of Various Organic Materials on Dactylis glomerata Yield and Content of Selected Macroelements

• Autorzy: Malinowska Elżbieta , Wiśniewska-Kadżajan Beata , Ostaszewska Urszula , Horaczek Tomasz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/163431

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the experiment was to assess the effects of various organic materials on Dactylis glomerata yield, on the content of selected macroelements (K, Ca and Mg) and on K:Ca, K:Mg and K:(Ca + Mg) ratios. As a valuable forage plant, Dactylis glomerata (cocksfoot grass) is a common grass in Poland both in grassland and in arable fields. Its rapid spring growth and its resistance to drought, low temperatures, but also to frequent mowing and pests, makes it a common species in meadows, pastures and grassland, both permanent and alternating. In order to achieve the research goal, a three-year pot experiment was established in a greenhouse. The experiment was conducted in a completely random design, in four replications. In the autumn before the experiment, soil was mixed with organic materials (chicken manure, mushroom substrate and rye straw) and put into pots. To selected units, an additional amount of mineral N was applied in the first year and NPK fertilizers in consecutive years. Mineral fertilizers were applied at the beginning of the growing period. Compared to control, the application of mineral and organic fertilizers resulted in a significant increase in Dactylis glomerata yield. The highest biomass yield (average over the growing periods) was recorded on the unit treated with manure, straw and mineral fertilizers (27.64 g•pot^-1) and on the one with mushroom substrate applied together with rye straw and mineral fertilizers (26.47 g•pot^-1). The K:(Ca+Mg) ratio in the forage was normal and averaged 0.933, but mineral fertilizers, compared to other treatments, narrowed it.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Dactylis glomerata; yield; organic materials; K; potassium; Ca; calcium; Mg; magnesium

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 24, nr 7
• Strony: 108--118
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 36 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Malinowska Elżbieta

• Faculty of Agrobioengineering and Animal Husbandry, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, ul. B. Prusa 14, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3087-859X

autor

Wiśniewska-Kadżajan Beata

• Faculty of Agrobioengineering and Animal Husbandry, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, ul. B. Prusa 14, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland

autor

Ostaszewska Urszula

• Faculty of Agrobioengineering and Animal Husbandry, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, ul. B. Prusa 14, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland

autor

Horaczek Tomasz

• Institute of Technology and Life Science, Aleja Hrabska 3, 05-090 Falenty, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Becher M. 2013. Skład chemiczny podłoża po uprawie pieczarki jako odpadowego materiału organicznego. Ekonomia i Środowisko, 4(47), 208–213.
• 2. Bolan N., Kunhikrishnan A., Thangarajan R., Kumpiene J., Park J., Makino T., Kirkham M.B., Scheckel K. 2014. Remediation of heavy metal(loid)s contaminated soils - To mobilize or to immobilize? Journal of Hazardous Materials, 266, 141–166.
• 3. Czuba R., Mazur T. 1988. Wpływ nawożenia na jakość plonów. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
• 4. Dikinya O., Mufwanzala N. 2010. Chicken manure-enhanced soil fertility and productivity: Effects of application rates. Journal of Soil Science Environmental Management, 1(3), 46–54.
• 5. Dróżdż D., Wystalska K., Malińska K., Grosser A., Grobelak A., Kacprzak M. 2020. Management of poultry manure in Poland – Current state and future perspectives.
• 6. Gabryszuk M., Barszczewski J., Wróbel B. 2021. Characteristics of grasslands and their use in Poland. Journal of Water and Land Development., 51(X–XII), 243–249. https://doi.10.24425/jwld.2021.139035
• 7. Gaweł E. 2009. Struktura i wielkość plonu, zasobność w składniki oraz wartość pokarmowa mieszanki motylkowato-trawiastej w warunkach różnej częstotliwości wypasania. Fragmenta Agronomica, 26(2), 43–54.
• 8. Geisert B.G., Erickson G.E., Klopfenstein T.J., Luebbe M.K. 2005. Effects of dietary phosphorus level in beef finishing diets on phosphorus excretion characteristics. Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports. Paper 165. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NB, 51–53.
• 9. Guo M., Chorover J. 2004. Solute release from weathering of spent mushroom substrate under controlled conditions. Compost Science and Utilization, 1(3), 225–234.
• 10. Harlt W., Putz B., Erhart E. 2003. Influence of rates and timing of biowaste compost application on rye yield and soil nitrate levels. European Journal of Soil Biology, 39(3), 129–139.
• 11. Jasińska A., Prasad R., Lisiecka J., Roszak M., Stoknes K., Mleczak M., Niedzielski P. 2022. Combined dairy manure-food waste digestate as a medium for Pleurotus djamor—mineral composition in substrate and bioaccumulation of elements in fruiting bodies. Horticulturae, 8(10), 934. https://doi.10.3390/horticulturae8100934
• 12. Juknevičius S., Sabienė N. 2007. The content of mineral elements in some grasses and legumes. Ekologija, 53(1), 44–52.
• 13. Kalembasa D., Majchrowska-Safaryan A. 2009. Zasobność zużytego podłoża z pieczarkarni. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych, 535, 195–200.
• 14. Kalembasa S., Carlson R.W., Kalembasa D. 1989. A new method for the reduction in nitrates in total nitrogen determination according to the Kjeldahl method. Polish Journal of Soil Science, 22(2), 21–26.
• 15. Kalembasa S., Kuziemska B., Kalembasa D., Popek M. 2014. Effect of liming and addition materials on yielding and levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and sulphur in biomass of cock’s foot (Dactylis glomerata L.) grown under conditions of varied content of nickel in soil. Acta Agrophysica, 21(1), 35–50.
• 16. Kalembasa S., Wysokiński A. 2004. Zawartość wybranych mikroelementów w osadach ściekowych świeżych i kompostowanych z dodatkiem popiołu z węgla brunatnego. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych, 502, 819–824.
• 17. Kebreab K., Strathe A., Fadel J., Moraes L., France J. 2010. Impact of dietary manipulation on nutrient flows and greenhouse gas emissions in cattle. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 39 (Suppl. spe), 458–464.
• 18. Latshaw J.D., Zhao L. 2011. Dietary protein effects on hen performance and nitrogen excretion. Poultry Science, 90(1), 99–106.
• 19. López-Masquera M.E., Cabaleiro F., Sainz M.S., López- Fabal A., Carral E. 2008. Fertilizing value of broiler litter: Effects of drying and pelletizing. Bioresource Technology, 99, 5626–5633.
• 20. Łabętowicz J., Stępień W., Kobiałak M. 2019. Innovative waste treatment technologies for agroecological utylity fertilizers. Ecological Engineering, 20(1), 13–23. https://doi.10.12912/23920629/106203
• 21. Majchrowska-Safaryan A., Tkaczuk C. 2016. Changes in phosphorus and phosphatases activity in soil fertilized with spent mushroom substrate. Acta Agrophysica, 23(3), 433–444.
• 22. Malinowska E. 2016a. The effect of compost made with sewage sludge on heavy metal content in soil and in Lolium multiflorum Lam. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 17(3), 106–112. https://doi.10.12911/22998993/63317
• 23. Malinowska E. 2016b. The effect of sludge compost on the content of selected elements in soil and in Lolium multiflorum Lam. Folia Pomeranae Universitatis Technologiae Stetinensis seria Agricultura, Alimentaria, Piscaria et Zootechnica, 39(3), 328, 159–170. https://doi.10.21005/AAPZ2016.39.3.13
• 24. Malinowska E. 2016c. The effects of compost made with sewage sludge on quality and quantity of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) yield. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 25(9), 3740–3747.
• 25. Niżewski P., Dach J., Jędruś A. 2006. Management of mushrooms subgrade waste by composting process. Journal Research Applications Agric Engineering, 51(1), 24–27.
• 26. Petersen S.O., Henriksen K., Mortensen G.K., Kroght P.H., Brandt K.K., Sørensen J., Madsen T., Petersen J., Grøn C. 2003. Recycling of sewage sludge and household compost to arable land: fate and effects of organic contaminants, and impact on soil fertility. Soil and Tillage Research, 72(2), 139–152. https://doi.10.1013/SO167-1987(03)00084-9.
• 27. Pietrzak S., Fila J. 2016. Ocena składu nawozów naturalnych w wybranych gospodarstwach rolnych z północnego Mazowsza. Zagadnienia Doradztwa Rolniczego, 3, 87–96.
• 28. PN-ISO 10390:1997. Test procedures/standards.
• 29. Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska 2015 w sprawie listy rodzajów odpadów, które osoby fizyczne lub jednostki organizacyjne niebędące przedsiębiorcami mogą poddawać odzyskowi na potrzeby własne, oraz dopuszczalnych metod odzysku (Dz.U. z 2016 roku, poz. 93).
• 30. Salomez J., De Bolle S., Sleutel S., De Neve S., Hofman G. 2009. Nutrient legislation in flanders (Belgium). More sustainability in agriculture: New fertilizers and fertilization management. 18th International Symposium of CIEC, Proceedings CIEC, 546–551.
• 31. Sosnowski J., Król J. 2018. The effect of synthetic plant hormones on Ca, Mg, and K concentration in Medicago x varia T. Martyn and Trifolium repens L. Annual Set the Environment Protection, 20, 145–1479.
• 32. Sosnowski J., Wróbel B., Truba M. 2023. Effect of Tytanit on selected morphological, physiological and chemical characteristics of Lolium multiflorum dry matter. Journal of Water and Land Development, 56(I–III), 7–13. https://doi.10.24425/jwld.2023.143738
• 33. StatSoft, Inc. STATISTICA data analysis Software system, version 13,1, 2021, StatSoft, Inc., USA. www.statsoft.com.
• 34. Wiater J. 2000. The impact of organic and mineral fertilization on the balance of organic carbon in the soil. Folia Pomeranae Universitatis Technologiae Stetinensis seria Agricultura, 84, 515–520.
• 35. Wiśniewska-Kadżajan B. 2014. Effect of mushroom substrate on the feed quality from the permanent meadow. Journal Ecological Engineering, 15, 45–49.
• 36. Wiśniewska-Kadżajan B., Malinowska E. 2022. The Effects of spent mushroom substrate on the yield and nutritional value of Festulolium braunii (K. Richt.) A. Camus. Agriculture, 12(10), 1537. https://doi.10.33901/agriculture12101537