Geometria rozmaitości modułów

• Autorzy: Bobiński Grzegorz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14708/wm.v42i01.5036

• Języki publikacji: PL
• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Matematyczne
• Czasopismo: Wiadomości Matematyczne
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: T. 42, Nr 1
• Strony: 3--13
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 39 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Bobiński Grzegorz

• Wydział Matematyki i Informatyki UM K ul. Chopina 12/18 87-100 Toruń

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1770-2290

Bibliografia

• [1] S. Balcerzyk, Wstęp do algebry homologicznej, Biblioteka Matematyczna 34, PWN, Warszawa, 1970.
• [2] S. Balcerzyk, T. Józefiak, Pierścienie przemienne, Biblioteka Matematyczna 58, PWN, Warszawa, 1985.
• [3] M. Вarot, J. Schröer, Module varieties over canonical algebras, J. Algebra 246 (2001), 175-192.
• [4] J. Bender, K. Bongartz, Minimal singularities in orbit closures of matrix pencils, Linear Algebra Appl. 365 (2003), 13-24.
• [5] G. Bobiński, Geometry of decomposable directing modules over tame algebras, J. Math. Soc. Japan, 54 (2002), 609-620.
• [6] G. Bobiński, Geometry of regular modules over canonical algebras, Tran. Amer. Math. Soc., w druku.
• [7] G. Bobiński, A. Skowroński, Geometry of modules over tame quasi-tilted algebras, Colloq. Math. 79 (1999), 85-118.
• [8] G. Bobiński, A. Skowroński, Geometry of directing modules over tame algebras, J. Algebra 215 (1999), 603-643.
• [9] G. Bobiński Geometry of periodic modules over tame concealed and tubular algebras, Algebr. Represent. Theory 5 (2002), 187-200.
• [10] G. Bobiński, G. Zwara, Normality of orbit closures for Dynkin quivers of type A_n, Manuscripta Math. 105 (2001), 103-109.
• [11] G. Bobiński, G. Zwara, Schubert varieties and representations of Dynkin quivers, Colloq. Math. 94 (2002), 285-309.
• [12] G. Bobiński Normality of orbit closures for directing modules over tame algebras, J. Algebra 298 (2006), 120-133.
• [13] K. Bongartz, A geometric version of the Morita equivalence, J. Algebra 139 (1991), 159-171.
• [14] K. Bongartz, Minimal singularities for representations of Dynkin quivers, Comment. Math. Helv. 69 (1994), 575-611.
• [15] K. Bongartz On degenerations and extensions of finite-dimensional modules, Adv. Math. 121 (1996), 245-287.
• [16] M. Brion, Multiplicity-free subvarieties of flag varieties, in: Commutative Algebra (Grenoble/Lyon, 2001), Contemp. Math. 331, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2003, 13-23.
• [17] H. Cartan, S. Eilenberg, Homological Algebra, Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1999.
• [18] M. Domokos, H. Lenzing, Invariant theory of canonical algebras, J. Algebra 228 (2000), 738-762.
• [19] M. Domokos Moduli spaces for representations of concealed-canonical algebras, J. Algebra 251 (2002), 371-394.
• [20] D. Eisenbud, J. Harris, The Geometry of Schemes, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 197, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.
• [21] P. Gabriel, Unzerlegbare Darstellungen. I, Manuscripta Math. 6 (1972), 71-103.
• [22] Ch. Geiss, On degenerations of tame and wild algebras, Arch. Math. (Basel) 64 (1995), 11-16.
• [23] Ch. Geiss, J. Schröer, Varieties of modules over tubular algebras, Colloq. Math. 95 (2003), 163-183.
• [24] D. Happel, A characterization of hereditary categories with tilting object, Invent. Math. 144 (2001), 381-398.
• [25] D. Happel, I. Reiten, S. Smalø, Tilting in abelian categories and quasitilted algebras, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 120 (1996), viii-f- 88.
• [26] M. Kashiwara, Y. Saito, Geometric construction of crystal bases, Duke Math. J. 89 (1997), 9-36.
• [27] O. Kerner, Tilting wild algebras, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 39 (1989), 29-47.
• [28] E. Kunz, Introduction to Commutative Algebra and Algebraic Geometry, Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston, MA, 1985.
• [29] V. Lakshmibai, P. Magyar, Degeneracy schemes, quiver schemes, and Schubert varieties, Internat. Math. Res. Notices 1998 (1998), 627-640.
• [30] H. Lenzing, A. Skowroński, Quasi-titled algebras of canonical type, Colloq. Math. 71 (1996), 161-181.
• [31] J. A. de la Peña, Tame algebras with sincere directing modules, J. Algebra 161 (1993), 171-185.
• [32] Ch. Riedtmann, Degenerations for representations of quivers with relations, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 19 (1986), 275-301.
• [33] C. M. Ringel, Tame Algebras and Integral Quadratic Forms, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1099, Springer, Berlin, 1984.
• [34] A. Skowroński, Tame quasi-tilted algebras, J. Algebra 203 (1998), 470-490.
• [35] A. Skowroński, J. Weyman, Semi-invariants of canonical algebras, Manuscripta Math. 100 (1999), 391-403.
• [36] T. A. Springer, Linear Algebraic Groups, Progress in Mathematics 9, Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston, MA, 1998.
• [37] G. Zwara, Degenerations of finite-dimensional modules are given by extensions, Compositio Math. 121 (2000), 205-218.
• [38] G. Zwara, An orbit closure for a representation of the Kronecker quiver with bad singularities, Colloq. Math. 97 (2003), 81-86.
• [39] G. Zwara, Regularity in codimension one of orbit closures in module varieties, J. Algebra 283 (2005), 821-848.