Learning organization as a tool for high-performance management

• Autorzy: Antalová Mária , Fodranová Iveta , Labudová Viera

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2022.26.1.02

Warianty tytułu

PL

Organizacja ucząca się jako narzędzie wysokowydajnego zarządzania

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The increasing need for sustainable development puts enormous pressure on companies facing new and more sophisticated challenges. The changing market environment itself requires an immediate response. Being flexible means not only surviving but also profiting under existing conditions. The key to higher performance management practice is successful, productive organizational change, which significantly impacts the organization as a whole. To achieve this goal, the study has developed a theory of the learning organization based on employees' working conditions and professional competencies, which are a priority in the changing process. The goal was to develop the theoretical framework of the learning organization for the empirical study and on the results of primary analyzes to offer an implementation model, considering every step of organizational transformation. In an empirical framework, research data are focused on diagnosing a specific organization and analyzing its problems and barriers to implementing learning processes. Several statistical methods were used, such as univariate, bivariate and correlation analysis. The regression analysis was used to verify the relationships between indicators at a higher empirical level. Based on the obtained results, the authors have proposed a universal implementation model of the learning organization suitable for all types of organizations in accordance with the sustainable development strategy.

PL

Rosnąca potrzeba zrównoważonego rozwoju wywiera ogromną presję na firmy stojące przed nowymi i bardziej wyrafinowanymi wyzwaniami. Zmieniające się otoczenie rynkowe samo w sobie wymaga natychmiastowej reakcji. Bycie elastycznym oznacza nie tylko przetrwanie, ale także czerpanie korzyści z istniejących warunków. Kluczem do praktyki zarządzania wyższą wydajnością jest udana, produktywna zmiana organizacyjna, która znacząco wpływa na organizację jako całość. Aby osiągnąć ten cel, w opracowaniu opracowano teorię organizacji uczącej się w oparciu o warunki pracy pracowników oraz kompetencje zawodowe, które uznano za kluczowe w procesie zmian. Celem badania było opracowanie ram teoretycznych organizacji uczącej się na potrzeby badania empirycznego oraz przedstawienie na podstawie wyników analiz p modelu wdrożenia niniejszej organizacji, uwzględniającego każdy etap transformacji organizacyjnej. W obszarze badań empirycznych dane badawcze koncentrują się na diagnozie konkretnej organizacji oraz analizie jej problemów i barier zidentyfikowanych podczas procesu implementacji organizacji uczącej się. Zastosowano kilka metod statystycznych, takich jak analiza jednowymiarowa, dwuwymiarowa i analiza korelacji. Analiza regresji posłużyła do weryfikacji zależności między wskaźnikami na wyższym poziomie empirycznym. Na podstawie uzyskanych wyników autorzy zaproponowali uniwersalny model wdrażania organizacji uczącej się, odpowiedni dla wszystkich typów organizacji zgodnie ze strategią zrównoważonego rozwoju.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

learning organization; organizational change; competencies of employees; working conditions; sustainable development

PL

organizacja ucząca się; zmiana organizacyjna; kompetencje pracowników; warunki pracy; zrównoważony rozwój

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 26, No. 1
• Strony: 26--44
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 40 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Antalová Mária

• University of Economics in Bratislava, Faculty of National Economy, Department of Social Development and Labour

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0160-6568

autor

Fodranová Iveta

• University of Economics in Bratislava, Faculty of Commerce, Department of Tourism, Bratislava, Slovak Republic

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2668-6680

autor

Labudová Viera

• University of Economics in Bratislava, Faculty of Economic Informatics, Department of Statistics

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2022-1751

Bibliografia

• 1.Al-Alawi, A. I., Al-Marzooqi, N. Y. and Mohammed, Y. F. (2007). Organizational culture and knowledge sharing: critical success factors. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 22-42.
• 2.Al-Dhuwaihi, A., Alahrani, Y. (2020). The degree of achievement of learning organization dimensions in the schools of the Royal Commission in Jubail by using Senge's model. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(12), 181-202.
• 3.Alharbi, G. A. (2021). Assessing the functioning of government schools as learning organizations. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(3), 1036-1051.
• 4.Ashauer, S. A., Macan, T. (2013). How can leaders foster team learning? Effects of leader-assigned mastery and performance goals and psychological safety. Journal of Psychology, 147(6), 541-561.
• 5.Beck, W. A., Maesen, L. J. G. and Walker, A. S. (1997). The Social Quality of Europe. Hague/London/Boston: Kluwer Law International. ISBN-10: 9041104569.
• 6.Bernousi, I. (2012). Study of the entrepreneurship in universities as learning organization based on Senge model. International Education Studies. 5(1), 67-77.
• 7.Boyung S. (2021). Workplace learning: how to build a culture and continuous employee development. The learning organization, 28(4), 457-459.
• 8.Ellinger, A. D., Ellinger, A.E. (2021). Providing strategic leadership for learning: optimizing managerial coaching to build learning organizations. The Learning Organization, 28(4), 337-351.
• 9.European working conditions. (2021). Available at: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/surveys/european-working-conditions-surveys-ewcs (accessed 26 May 2021).
• 10.Flood, R. L., Romm, N. R. A. (2018). A systematic approach to processes of power in learning organizations: Part I - Literature, theory, and methodology of triple loop learning. The Learning Organization Journal, 25(4), 260-272.
• 11.Garbarino, S., Holland, J. (2009). Quantitative and qualitative methods in impact evaluation and measuring results. GSDRC (Governance and Social Development Resource Centre), ISBN 0704427563.
• 12.Gentle, P., Clifton, L. (2017). How does leadership development help universities become learning organizations? The Learning Organization Journal, 24(5), 278-285.
• 13.Goh, S. C. (2020) Measurement of the learning organization construct: A critical perspective and future directions for research. The Oxford handbook of the learning organization. Oxford University Press.
• 14.Gouthro, P., Taber N. and Brazil, A. (2018). Universities as inclusive learning organizations for women? Considering the role of women in faculty and leadership roles in academe. The Learning Organization Journal, 25(1), 29-39.
• 15.Inkpen, A. C. (2002). Learning through joint ventures: a framework of knowledge acquisition. Journal of Management Studies. 37(7), 1019-1044.
• 16.Illeris, K. (2008). Contemporary theories of learning. London: Routledge.
• 17.Illeris, T. (2009), Transfer of learning in the learning society: How can the barriers between different learning spaces be surmounted and how can the gap between learning inside and outside schools be bridged? International Journal of Lifelong Education, 28(2), 137-148.
• 18.Jarvis, P. (2008). Democracy, lifelong learning and the learning society. Active citizenship in a late modern age. New York: Routledge.
• 19.Kaminska, R., Borzillo, S. (2018). Challenges to the Learning Organization in the Context of Generational Diversity and Social Networks. The Learning Organization, 25(2), 92-101.
• 20.Kačerauskas, T. (2015). Creative Society: Concepts and Problems. Culture International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, 12(2), 27-44.
• 21.Lam, A., Lundvall, B. A. (2007). The learning organization and national systems of competence building and innovation. Available at: http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/12320/. (Accessed 27. 5. 2022).
• 22.Lenart-Gansiniec, R., Sulkowski, L. (2020). Organizational learning and value creation in local governance: the mediating role of crowdsourcing. The Learning Organization, 27(4), 322-335.
• 23.Lillies, F. (2001). Summary of a case study of a knowledge-based organization. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2(1), 1-4.
• 24.Mamatha, S. V., Geetanjali, P. (2020). Founder leaders and organization culture: A comparative study on Indian and American founder leaders based on Schein's model of organizational culture. IIM Kozhikode Society and Management Review, 9(1), 23 -33.
• 25.Marsick, J. V., Bitterman, J. and Veen, R. (2000). From the learning organization to learning communities toward a learning society. Ohio: Ohio State University.
• 26.Mastio, E., Chew, E. and Dovey, K. A. (2021). The learning organization as a context for value co-creation. The learning organization, 28(4), 291-303.
• 27.Morland, K., Breslin, D. and Stevenson, F. (2019). Development of a multi-level learning framework. The Learning Organization, 26(1), 78-96.
• 28.Örtenbland, A. (2018). What does learning organization mean? The Learning Organization Journal, 25(3), 150-158.
• 29.Reese, S. (2021). Learning organizations and value creation. The Learning Organization, 27(4), 379-382.
• 30.Rigolizzo, M. (2018). The labs (learning as behaviors) framework for higher-order learning. The Learning Organization Journal, 25(4), 224-236.
• 31.Rupčič, N. (2017). How to unlearn and change - that is the question! The Learning Organization Journal, 24(2), 127-130.
• 32.Rupčić, N. (2017). Managing People and Learning: Major Challenge for Modern Managers. The Learning Organization, 24(4), 257-61.
• 33.Senge, P. (2006). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (2nd ed.). New York: Doubleday/Currency.
• 34.Schein, E. H. (2019). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: A Wiley Imprint. ISBN 0-7879-6845-5.
• 35.Sprinkle, T. A., Urick, J. M. (2018). Three generational issues in organizational learning: knowledge management, perspectives on training and low-stakes development. The Learning Organization Journal, 25(2), 102-112.
• 36.Stanistreet, P. (2020). Thinking differently, together: Towards a lifelong learning society. International Review of Education, 66, 449-455.
• 37.Teaching and learning - towards the learning society. (1995). White paper on education and training. Brussels, Luxembourg: ECSC- EC-EAEC.
• 38.Thomas, K., Allen, S. (2006). The Learning Organization: a meta-analysis of themes in literature. The Learning Organization Journal, 13(2), 123-139.
• 39.Van der Zee, H. (2006). The learning society. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 10(3), 213-230.
• 40.Webb, S., Holford, J., Hodge, S., Milani, M. and Waller, R. (2019). Conceptualizing lifelong learning for sustainable development and education 2030. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 38(3), 237-240.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).