Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Ranking new comers to work based on commitment propensity through hybrid method of AHP and TOPSIS

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
This research provides a tool to select and prioritize new comers to work based on their preentry organizational commitment propensity through examining links between the big five personality factors: extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness; and three component model of organizational commitment: affective commitment, continues commitment, normative commitment. Findings show that extroversion and openness respectively have positive and negative effects on all three components of organizational commitment. Results gained by Structured Equation Modelling (SEM) indicate neuroticism is negatively related to affective and continues commitment and positively to conscientiousness effects on continues commitment. In the second part of the study, the received results are applied to extract the general equations that enables to estimate new comer’s pre-entry organizational commitment and to rank them using TOPSIS and AHP. The AHP is used to determine the relative weights of commitment criteria and TOPSIS is employed for the final ranking of new comers based on these criteria’s.
  • Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, 1411713114 Tehran, Iran
  • UNIDEMI, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal
  • Department of Industrial Management, University of Tehran, Iran
  • UNIDEMI, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal
  • Department of Industrial Management, University of Tehran, Iran
  • [1] Silverthone C., The impact of organizational culture and person-organization fit on organizational commitment and job satisfaction in Taiwan, The Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25, 592–599, 2004.
  • [2] Arrowsmith J., Parker J., The meaning of ‘employee engagement’ for the values and roles of the HRM function, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 14, 2692–2712, 2013.
  • [3] Akroyd D., Legg J., Jackowski M.B., Adams R.D., The impact of selected organizational variables and managerial leadership on radiation therapists organizational commitment, Radiography, 15, 113–120, 2008.
  • [4] Almeida S., Fernando M., Sheridan A., Revealing the screening: organisational factors influencing the recruitment of immigrant professionals, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 9, 1950–1965, 2012.
  • [5] Celep C., Yilmazturk O.E., The relationship among organizational trust, multidimensional organizational commitment and perceived organizational support in educational organizations, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5763–5776, 2012.
  • [6] Paulin M., Ferguson R.J., Bergeron J., Service climate and organizational commitment: The importance of customer linkages, Journal of Business Research, 59, 906–915, 2006.
  • [7] Guleryuz G., Guney S., Aydin E.M., Asan O., The mediating effect of job satisfaction between emotional intelligence and organizational commitment of nurses: a questionnaire survey, International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45, 1625–1635, 2008.
  • [8] Bednarczyk T.K., Human resources and motivation in knowledge management, Management and Production Engineering Review, 1, 4, 13–18, 2010.
  • [9] Meyer J.P., Allen N.J., Commitment in the workplace: theory, research, and application, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1997.
  • [10] Ng T.W.H., Feldman D.C., Can you get a better deal elsewhere? The effects of psychological contract replicability on organizational commitment over time, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 268– 277, 2008.
  • [11] Steers R.M., Task-goal attributes, n achievement, and supervisory performance, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 3, 392–403, 1975.
  • [12] Steers R.M., Porter L.W., Work and motivation: some concluding observations, Motivation and Work Behavior, pp. 573–582, 1991.
  • [13] McCrae R.R., Costa P.T. Jr., Validation of the fivefactor model of personality across instruments and observers, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90, 1987.
  • [14] Meyer J.P., Allen N.J., Testing the “side-bet theory” of organizational commitment: some methodological considerations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372–378, 1984.
  • [15] Meyer J.P., Herscovitch L., Commitment in the workplace toward a general model, Human Resource Management Review, 11, 299–326, 2001.
  • [16] Meyer J.P., Allen N.J., Gellatly I.R., Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: evaluation of measure and analysis of concurrent and time-lagged relations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 710–720, 1990.
  • [17] Panuwatwanich K., Nguyen T.T., Influence of organisational culture on total quality management implementation and firm performance: evidence from the Vietnamese construction industry, Management and Production Engineering Review, 8, 1, 5–15, 2017.
  • [18] Allen T.D., Johnson R.C., Saboe K.N., Cho E., Dumani S., Evans S., Dispositional variables and workfamily conflict: a meta-analysis, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 17–26, 2012.
  • [19] Staw B.M., Bell N.E., Clausen J.A., The dispositional approach to job attitudes: a lifetime longitudinal approach, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 56– 77, 1986.
  • [20] Allport G.W., Pattern and growth in personality, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, NY, 1961.
  • [21] Sternberg R.J., Pathways to psychology, 2nd ed., Harcourt, A Division of Thomson Learning, Inc., New York, NY, 2000.
  • [22] House R.J., Shane S.A., Herold D.M., Rumors of the death of dispositional research are vastly exaggerated, Academy of Management Review, 21, 1, 203– 224, 1996.
  • [23] Eysenck H.J., Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire, Hodder & Stoughton, 1975.
  • [24] Armstrang P.I., Anthoney S.F., Personality facets and RIASEC interests: an integrated model, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75, 346–359, 2009.
  • [25] Barrick M.R., Mount M.K., The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: a MetaAnalysis, Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26, 1991.
  • [26] Erdheim J., Wang M., Zickar M.J., Linking the Big Five personality constructs to organizational commitment, Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 5, 959–970, 2006.
  • [27] Kumar K., Bakhshi A., The five-factor model of personality and organizational commitment: is there any relationship?, Humanity Social Sciences Journal, 5, 1, 25–34, 2010.
  • [28] Panaccio A., Vandenberghe C., Five-factor model of personality and organizational commitment: the mediating role of positive and negative affective states, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 647–658, 2012.
  • [29] Wille B., Fruyt F.D., Feys M., Vocational interests and Big Five traits as predictors of job instability, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 547–558, 2010.
  • [30] Rubenzer S.J., Faschingbauer T.R., Personality, character & leadership in the White House, Washington, D.C.: Brassey’s, Inc., 2004.
  • [31] Stadnicka D., Sakano K., Employees motivation and openness for continuous improvement: comparative study in Polish and Japanese companies, Management and Production Engineering Review, 8, 3, 70– 86, 2017.
  • [32] Saaty T.L., The analytic hierarchy process, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  • [33] Amiri P.M., Project selection for oil-fields development bu using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods, Expert Systems with Applications Journal, 37, 6218–6224, 2010.
  • [34] Hwang C.L., Yoon K.P., Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1981.
  • [35] Behzadian M., Otaghsara K.H.S., Yazdani M., Ignatius J., A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications, Expert Systems with Applications Journal, 39, 13051–13069, 2012.
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.