Survival analysis on data of different surgery techniques to evaluate risk of postoperative complications

• Autorzy: Briš R. , Praks P. , Janurová K. , Martínek L.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Medical survival censored data of about 850 patients are evaluated to compare two basic surgery techniques. Data comes from patients who underwent colectomy in the University Hospital of Ostrava. The data has been screened into three general groups: all patients (data from both rectum and colon operations), data from rectum operations, data from colon operations. Two basic surgery techniques are used for the colectomy: either classical (open) or laparoscopic operation. Basic question which arises at the colectomy operation is which type of operation to choose to guarantee longer overall survival time. Two methodological approaches have been used to answer this relevant question. First is the non-parametric approach which results from Kaplan- Meier estimates of the survival function. For each data group two survival curves are constructed, i.e. for both open and laparoscopic type of operation. Final survival curves are compared and evaluated using advanced methods of statistical inference (e.g. log-rank test). Second is parametric approach which results from modelling of survival time. It is based on Maximum Likelihood Estimation method to estimate parameters of probability distribution of overall survival time. Moreover, two Weibull models are used to compare the two surgery techniques. Mean survival times assigned to particular types of operation are compared

Słowa kluczowe

EN

colectom; censored medical survival data; comparison of surgery techniques

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Bezpieczeństwa i Niezawodności
• Czasopismo: Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: Vol. 2, No. 1
• Strony: 33--38
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 14 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Briš R.

• VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic

autor

Praks P.

• VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic

autor

Janurová K.

• VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic

autor

Martínek L.

• University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• [1] Abraham, N.S., Young, J.M., Solomon, & M.J. (2004). Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br. J. Surg., 91:1111-1124.
• [2] Bonjer, H.J., Hop, W.C.J., Nelson, H., et al. (2007). Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer. Arch. Surg., 142:298-303.
• [3] Cox, D.R. & Oakes, D. (1984). Analysis of Survival Data. Chapman and Hall, ISBN 0-41224490-X.
• [4] Fleming, T.R. & Harrington, D.P. (1991). Counting processes and Survival Analysis. Wiley, ISBN 0-471-52218-X.
• [5] Fleshman, J., Sargent, D.J., Green, E. et al. (2007). Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferioir to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST study group trial. Ann. Surg., 246: 655-662.
• [6] Hosmer, D. & Lemeshow, S. (2008). Applied Survival Analysis (2nd Edn.), Wiley series in probability and statistics. ISBN 978-0-471-75499-2.
• [7] Jackson, T.D., Kaplan, G.G., Arena, G. et al. (2007). Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer: a metaanalysis of oncologic outcomes. J. Am. Coll. Surg., 204:439-446
• [8] Kalbfleisch, J.D. & Prentice, R.L. (1980). The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.1980, ISBN 0-471-05519-0.
• [9] Kitano, S., Kitajima, M., Konishi, F. et al. (2006). A multicenter study on laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in Japan. Surg. Endos., 20:1348-1352.
• [10] Prabhakar Murthy, D.N., Xie, M. & Renyan Jiang. (2004). Weibull Models, Wiley series in probability and statistics, ISBN 0-471-36092-9.
• [11] Praks, P., Sikora, T, Labeau, P.-E. & Briš, R. (2009). Wear-out characteristics of underground cables by one- and two- mode models. 10th International Scientific Conference Electric Power Engineering 2009; VSB - TU Ostrava, pg. 1-3, ISBN 978-80-248-1947-1.
• [12] Savage, I.R. (1956). Contributions to the theory of rank order statistics-the two sample case. Ann. Math. Stat., 27, 590-615.
• [13] Schwenk, W., Hase, O., Neudecker, J. & Muller, J.M. (2005). Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, Issue 2.: art. No.CD003145.
• [14] Veldkamp, R., Gholghesaei, M., Bonjer, H.J., Meijer, D.W., Buunen, M., Jeekel, J., Anderberg, B., Cuesta, M. A., Cuschieri, A., Fingerhut, A., Fleshman, J.W., Guillou, P.J., Haglind, E., Himpens, J., Jacobi, C.A., Jakimowicz, J.J., Koeckerling, F., Lacy, A.M., Lezoche, E., Monson, J.R., Morino, M., Neugebauer, E., Wexner, S.D. & Whelan, R.L. (2004). Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: Consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Suregry. Surg. Endosc., 18, s.1163-1185.