Project success and communication with stakeholders

• Autorzy: Targiel Krzysztof S.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2022.155.34

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The aim of this paper is to analyze possibilities of using sentiment analysis in project management. Design/methodology/approach: The research methods used in the article were desk research analysis of available source data on the success of project. Then additional research was done on methods of sentiment analysis. Findings: During the course of this work was found a way of use sentiment analysis to improve project management. Research limitations/implications: The proposed idea necessitates research on the verification of the usefulness of the proposed indicators. Practical implications: The indicators proposed in the work have the potential to be used in the project management support application. Originality/value: Novelty of proposed paper are idea of two indicators for improvement project management

Słowa kluczowe

EN

project management; stakeholders analysis; sentiment analysis

PL

zarządzanie projektami; analiza interesariuszy; analiza nastrojów

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: z. 155
• Strony: 527--534
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Targiel Krzysztof S.

• University of Economics in Katowice, Faculty of Informatics and Communication, Katowice

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7815-1210

Bibliografia

• 1. Alexander, I., Robertson, S. (2004). Understanding Project Sociology by Modeling Stakeholders. IEEE Software, Vol. 21, pp. 23-27.
• 2. Ansoff, H.I. (1965). Corporate Strategy. New York: McGraw Hill.
• 3. Churchman, C.W. (1979). The systems approach. New York: Dell Pub.
• 4. Cooke-Davies, T. (2002). The ’real’ success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management. Vol. 20, Iss. 3, pp. 185-190.
• 5. Dinov, I.D. (2018). Natural Language Processing/Text Mining. In: I.D. Dinov (ed.). Data Science and Predictive Analytics: Biomedical and Health Applications Using R, (pp. 659- 95). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• 6. Dodds, P.S., Harris, K.D., Kloumann, I.M., Bliss, C.A., Danforth, Ch.M. (2011). Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: Hedonometrics and twitter. PloS one, Vol. 6, Iss. 12, p. e26752.
• 7. Donaldson, T., Preston, L. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, pp. 65-91.
• 8. El-Saboni, M., Aouad, G., and Sabouni, A. (2009). Electronic Communication Systems Effects on the Success of Construction Projects in United Arab Emirates. Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 23, Iss. 1, pp. 130-38.
• 9. Freeman, R.E. (2010). Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach, Cambridge: University Press.
• 10. Fricker, S. (2009). Specification and Analysis of Requirements Negotiation Strategy in Software Ecosystems. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 505, pp. 19-33.
• 11. ISO 21500, (2012). Guidance on Project Management. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
• 12. Jansson E. (2005). The Stakeholder Model: The Influence of the Ownership and Governance Structures. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 56, Iss. 1, pp 1-13.
• 13. Jugdev, K., and Müller R. (2005). A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success. Project management journal, Vol. 36, Iss. 4, pp. 19-31.
• 14. Murgia, A., Tourani, P., Adams, B., and Ortu, M. (2014). Do developers feel emotions? An exploratory analysis of emotions in software artifacts. Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), Hyderabad, India.
• 15. Natural language processing. Available online https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_language_processing, 15.12.2021
• 16. Pang, B., and Lee, L. (2008). Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, Vol. 2, Iss. 1-2, pp. 1-135.
• 17. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, Ch.D. (2014). GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation.
• 18. Plutchik, R. The Nature of Emotions. Retrieved from http://www.fractal.org/Bewustzijns-Besturings-Model/Nature-of-emotions.htm, 14.04.2021.
• 19. Plutchik, R. (1980). Emotion: A Psychoevolutionary Synthesis. New York: Harper and Row.
• 20. Preston, L., Post, J. (1975). Private Management and Public Policy. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• 21. Project Management Institute (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Project Management Institute Inc.
• 22. Rhenman, E. (1973). Organization theory for long-range planning. New York: J. Wiley.
• 23. Scholes, E., Clutterbuck, D. (1998). Communication with Stakeholders: An Integrated Approach. Long Range Planning, Vol. 31, Iss. 2, pp. 227-38.
• 24. Sentiment analysis. Available online https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentiment_analysis, 14.04.2021.
• 25. Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., Stede, M. (2011). Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational linguistics, Vol. 37, Iss. 2, pp. 267-307.
• 26. Targiel, K.S. (2017). Modeling the Structures of Stakeholder Preferences. Project Management Development – Practice and Perspectives, pp. 286-92.
• 27. Targiel, K.S. (2021). Modelling the Structures of Stakeholder Preferences with Modified DEMATEL Method. In: K.T. Atanassov, V. Atanassova, J. Kacprzyk, A. Kaluszko, M. Krawczak, J.W. Owsinski, S. Sotirov, E. Sotirova, E. Szmidt and S. Zadrozny (Eds.), Uncertainty and Imprecision in Decision Making and Decision Support: New Challenges, Solutions and Perspectives (pp. 239-50). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• 28. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G., Cai, D., and Kappas, A. (2010). Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 61, Iss. 12, pp. 2544-2558.
• 29. Tourani, P., Yiang, Y., and Adams, B. (2017). Monitoring sentiment in open source mailing lists: exploratory study on the apache ecosystem. Proceedings of 24th Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, CASCON’14, pp. 34-44.
• 30. Votaw, D., and Sethi, S. (Eds.), (1973). The Corporate Dilemma: Traditional Values vs. Contemporary Problems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• 31. Warriner, A.B., Kuperman, V., and Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 english lemmas. Behavior research methods, Vol. 45, Iss. 4, pp. 1191-1207.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).