PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

Identification of external risk factors: on the example of production of fertilisers based on digestate

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
In the era of renewable energy development, one of the most important problems is the utilisation of residues of production of the so-called clean energy. In the case of biogas plants, the problem is the utilisation of waste after the anaerobic methane fermentation process of the organic substrate. One of the ways to use it is to produce organic and mineral fertilisers. However, the fertiliser plant may be exposed to a number of threats that may prevent its functioning. To avoid this, the factors that carry the risk need to be identified. The purpose of the article is to identify external risk factors for a fertiliser plant based on digestate. The following types of risk were identified as a result of the research: risk of supplying fertiliser components of inadequate quality; risk of non-compliance with deadlines for the delivery of raw materials or their total absence; risk of the presence of eggs of parasites and pathogenic bacteria in fertiliser; price risk; cyclical risk; risk of competition; currency, credit and interest rate risk.
Twórcy
  • CRACOW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, 24 Warszawska Str., 31-155 Krakow, Poland
  • AGH University of Science and Technology, 30 Mickiewicza Av, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
  • Precarpathian National University, 57 Shevchenko Str., Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine
  • Precarpathian National University, 57 Shevchenko Str., Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine
Bibliografia
  • [1] M. Kratzeisen, N. Starcevic, M. Martinov, J. Muller, Applicability of biogas digestate as solid fuel, Fuel, 89, 2010, pp. 2544–2548.
  • [2] M. Szymańska, Masa pofermentacyjna – uciążliwy odpad czy przydatny nawóz? [Eng. Digestate - troublesome waste or useful fertilizer?], http://www.farmer.pl/ produkcja-roslinna/nawozy/masapofermentacyjna-uciazliwy-odpad-czy-przydatny-nawoz,43062.html
  • [3] W. Czekała, K. Pilarski, J. Dach, D. Jamczak, M. Szymańska, Analiza możliwości zagospodarowania pofermentu z biogazowni, Technika rolnicza, ogrodowa, leśna [Eng. Analysis of digestate utilization options from biogas plants, Agricultural, gardening, and forestry technology], 4/2012, p. 13-15.
  • [4] Marciniak A., Możliwości zagospodarowania odpadu pofermentacyjnego z biogazowni [Eng. Possibilities for digestate waste management from biogas plants], Ecologiae et Bioethicae UKSW studies, 12(2014)2, p. 123-133.
  • [5] Regulation of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of 18 June 2008 on the implementation of certain provisions on fertilisers and fertilisation (Journal of Law no. 119, item 765).
  • [6] Regulation of the Minister of the Environment of 20 January 2015 on the law of the R10 recovery process (Journal of Laws of 2015, item 132).
  • [7] N. Scarlat, J.-F. Dallemand, F. Fahl, Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe, Renewable Energy 129 (2018) 457-472.
  • [8] K. Kozłowski, M. Pietrzykowski, W. Czekała, J. Dacha, A. Kowalczyk-Juśkoc, K. Jóźwiakowskic, M. Brzoskia, Energetic and economic analysis of biogas plant with using the dairy industry waste, Energy 183 (2019) 1023-1031.
  • [9] M. Lauer, U. Leprich, D. Thrän, Economic assessment of flexible power generation from biogas plants in Germany's future electricity system, Renewable Energy 146 (2020) 1471-1485.
  • [10] C. Herbes, V. Halbherr, L. Braun, Factors influencing prices for heat from biogas plants, Applied Energy 221 (20180 308-318.
  • [11] E. Winquist, P. Rikkonen, J. Pyysiainen, V. Varho, Is biogas an energy or a sustainability product? – Business opportunities in the Finnish biogas branch, Journal of Cleaner Production 233 (2019) 1344-1354.
  • [12] K. Ahlberg-Eliasson, E. Nadeau, L. Leven, A. Schnürer, Production efficiency of Swedish farm-scale biogas plants, Biomass and Bioenergy 97 (2017) 27-37.
  • [13] D. Ruiz, G. San Miguel, B. Corona, A. Gaitero, A. Domínguez, Environmental and economic analysis of power generation in a thermophilic biogas plant, Science of The Total Environment 633 (2018) 1418-1428.
  • [14] N.K. Bulatov, D.K. Sarzhanov, S.Z. Elubaev, T.B. Suleymenov, O.T. Balabayev, Model of effective system of processing of organic wastes in biogas and environmental fuel production plant, Food and Bioproducts Processing 115 (2019) 194-207.
  • [15] M. Lauer, J.K. Hansen, P. Lamers, D. Thrän, Making money from waste: The economic viability of producing biogas and biomethane in the Idaho dairy industry, Applied Energy 222 (2018) 621-636.
  • [16] G.M. Dobers, Acceptance of biogas plants taking into account space and place, Energy Policy 135 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117756.
  • [17] K.H. Zemo, T.E. Panduro, M. Termansen, Impact of biogas plants on rural residential property values and implications for local acceptance, Energy Policy 129 (2019) 1121-1131.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-72a78d55-7558-40c9-bec6-7707d10d8f7c
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.