Numerical investigation of pores statistic distribution influence on porous material mechanical behaviour

• Autorzy: Miedzińska D.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the work presented in the paper was to investigate the influence of pores statistic distribution used for porous material idealistic microstructure model generation on modelled material mechanical properties. Three distribution models were used: homogenous, normal and Weibull one. The model idea was based on the observation of SEM visualisation of shale rock structure which is characterized with dual porosity. The proposed models will be useful for mechanical behaviour of such structures prediction.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

dual porosity material; statistical distribution; finite element method

• Wydawca: Instytut Podstawowych Problemów Techniki PAN
• Czasopismo: Engineering Transactions
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 65, iss. 1
• Strony: 89--95
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 11 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Miedzińska D.

• Military University of Technology them. Jaroslaw Dabrowski Gen. S. Kaliski St. 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Kalantari-Dahaghi A., Numerical simulation and modeling of enhanced gas recovery and CO2 sequestration in shale gas reservoirs: A feasibility study, Proceedings of SPE International Conference on CO2 Capture, Storage, and Utilization, 10–12 November, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, West Virginia University, pp. 122–134, 2010, doi: 10.2118/139701-MS.
• 2. Freire-Gormaly M., Ellis J.S., Bazylak A., MacLean H.L., Comparing thresholding techniques for quantifying the dual porosity of Indiana Limestone and Pink Dolomite, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 207: 84–89, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.01.002.
• 3. Futaba D.N. et al., Dual porosity single-walled carbon nanotube material, Nano Letters, 9(9): 3302–3307, 2009, doi: 10.1021/nl901581t.
• 4. Williams S.K. et al., Dual porosity expanded polytetrafluoroethylene for soft-tissue augmentation, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 115(7): 1995–2006, 2005, doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000163324.17001.E3.
• 5. Electron microscopy of shale hydrocarbon reservoirs, Camp W.K., Diaz E., Wawak B. [Eds.], AAPG Memoir vol. 102, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 2013, doi: 10.1306/M1021339.
• 6. Scheffler M., Colombo P., Cellular ceramics: structure, manufacturing, properties and applications, Wiley-VCH Verl, Weinheim 2005.
• 7. Haws W.P., Rao S.C., Simunek J., Poye I.C., Single-porosity and dual-porosity modeling of water flow and solute transport in subsurface-drained fields using effective field-scale parameters, Journal of Hydrology, 313(3–4): 257–273, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.035.
• 8. Uleberg K., Kleppe J., Dual porosity, dual permeability formulation for fractured reservoir simulation, TPG4150 Reservoir Recovery Techniques 2003.
• 9. Bloomfield J.P., Barker J.A., Robinson N., Modeling fracture porosity development using simple growth laws, Ground Water, 43(3): 314–326, 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1745- 6584.2005.0039.x.
• 10. Chitez A.S., Jefferson A.D., Porosity development in a thermo-hygral finite element model for cementitious materials, Cement and Concrete Research, 78(B): 216–233, 2015, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.07.010.
• 11. Shoshany Y., Prialnik D., Podolak M., Monte Carlo modeling of the thermal conductivity of porous cometary ice, Icarus, 157(1): 219–225, 2002, doi: 10.1006/icar.2002.6815.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).