Survey of society expectations towards sustainable 4P in the new public management perspective

• Autorzy: Trojanowski Tomasz , Kazibudzki Paweł Tadeusz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2022.157.38

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The purpose of the article is to draw attention to the important problem of taking into account the expectations of buyers of products to the activities of manufacturing companies in the area of marketing mix to a more sustainable, as a way of modern social management. Design/methodology/approach: The article has a theoretical and empirical character. The theoretical part of the study was prepared on the basis of a review of the literature concerning the subject, while the research part of the work is the result of own survey conducted among the inhabitants of the Silesian province. The research was based on the survey method with the use of distributed questionnaires, also commonly known as street surveys. The tool used to obtain data was a survey questionnaire containing a structured set of open and closed questions. Findings: In the course of the research study it was determined that there should be a modification of the marketing mix elements in terms of environmental and social, by means of which production, trade and service enterprises directly affect consumers. Customers' decision to purchase a product is increasingly dependent on the company's active involvement in pro-environmental and pro-social activities. Research limitations/implications: The research results obtained are not representative in the statistical sense, although they are an interesting approach to the problem and undoubtedly have a cognitive character in the area in question. Practical implications: Business activities of enterprises should focus not only on achieving financial goals or expanding market shares, but should also take into account environmental and social objectives. Middle and high-level managers are expected to change the way of managing the organization into a more pro-environmental and pro-social one, which in turn will contribute to changing the perception of the enterprise itself among consumers, as a sustainable organization. Social implications: Considerations contained in the article indicate the need to change the behavior and attitudes of buyers to a more responsible in terms of environmental protection and other market participants. The article draws attention to the need to make conscious purchase choices, which in turn should contribute to improving the condition of the environment and the life’s quality of societies. Originality/value: As a result of the conducted research study, a theoretical-cognitive gap was identified. It was also found that there is a scarcity of qualitative and quantitative research in the area of the undertaken topic. Therefore, there is a need for further examinations, which should be characterized by intensity and depth in both theoretical and empirical layers. The article is addressed to managers of manufacturing companies, as well as service companies who want to conduct business in accordance with the concept of sustainable development.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sustainable development; new public management; pro-social management

PL

zrównoważony rozwój; Nowe zarządzanie publiczne; zarządzanie prospołeczne

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: z. 157
• Strony: 589--608
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 46 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Trojanowski Tomasz

• Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9781-5545

autor

Kazibudzki Paweł Tadeusz

• Faculty of Economics and Management, Opole University of Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1203-4235

Bibliografia

• 1. Andreopoulou, Z., Koliouska, C. (2018). Benchmarking internet promotion of renewable energy enterprises: is sustainability present? Sustainability, 10(11), p. 4187, doi: 10.3390/su10114187.
• 2. Armstrong, G., Kotler, P. (2012). Introduction to marketing. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.
• 3. Belz, F., Peattie, K. (2010). Sustainability marketing. A global perspective. New York: Wiley & Sons.
• 4. Belz, F. (2006). Marketing in 21st century. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(3), pp. 139-144.
• 5. Cyfert, S., Dyduch, W., Latusek-Jurczak, D., Niemczyk, J., Sopińska, A. (2014). Subdisciplines in management sciences – logic of separation, identification of the conceptual model and thematic content. Organization and Management, no. 1(161), pp. 37-49.
• 6. Dam, Y., Apeldoorn, P. (2008). Critical Marketing. Contemporary Issues in Marketing. London: Wiley & Sons.
• 7. De Koeijer, B., de Lange, J., and Wever, R. (2017). Desired, perceived, and achieved sustainability: trade-offs in strategic and operational packaging development. Sustainability, 9(10), p.1923, doi.org/10.3390/su9101923.
• 23 8. Diez-Martin, F., Blanco-Gonzalez, A., and Prado-Roman, C. (2019). Research challenges in digital marketing: sustainability. Sustainability, 11(10), p. 2839, doi.org/10.3390/su11102839.
• 9. Emery, B. (2012). Sustainable marketing. Edinburgh: Pearson.
• 10. Ertz, M., Sarigöllü, E. (2019). Assessing the potential of sustainable value chains in the collaborative economy. Sustainability, 11(2), p. 390, doi.org/10.3390/su11020390.
• 11. Fuller, D. (1999). Sustainable marketing. Managerial-ecological issues. California: SAGE.
• 12. García-Arca, J., Garrido, A., & Prado-Prado, J. (2017). Sustainable Packaging Logistics. The link between sustainability and competitiveness in supply chains. Sustainability, 9(7), p. 1098, doi.org/10.3390/su9071098.
• 13. Grajewski, P. (2016). Process organization. Warsaw: PWE, p. 54.
• 14. Hausner, J. (2002). From ideal bureaucracy to public management. In: J. Hausner and M. Kukiełka (eds.), Studies in Public Management, Vol. II (p. 64). Cracow: Cracow University of Economics.
• 15. Hood, Ch.C. (1995). Contemporary Public Management. A New Global Paradigm. Public Policyand Administration, no. 2, p. 104.
• 16. Hunt, S. (2011). Sustainable marketing, equity and economic growth: a resource-advantage, economic freedom approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), pp. 7-20.
• 17. Jacyna, M., Wasiak, M., Lewczuk, K., Chamier-Gliszczyński, N. and Dąbrowski, T. (2018). Decision Problems in Developing Proecological Transport System. Yearbook: Environmental Protection, 20(2), pp. 1007-1025.
• 18. Jianu, I., Turlea, C., and Gusatu, I. (2015). The reporting and sustainable business marketing. Sustainability, 8(1), p. 23, doi.org/10.3390/su8010023.
• 19. Jones, P., Clarke-Hill, C., and Comfort, D. (2008). Marketing and sustainability. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 26(2), pp. 123-129.
• 20. Kadirov, D. (2010). Sustainability marketing systems. Berlin: VDM Verlag.
• 21. Kazibudzki, P.T., and Trojanowski, T.W. (2020). Examination of marketing mix performance in relation to sustainable development of the Poland’s confectionery industry. PlOSOne, 15(10), doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240893.
• 22. Kemper, J.A., Hall, C.M., and Ballantine, P.W. (2019). Marketing and Sustainability: Business as Usual or Changing Worldviews? Sustainability, 11(3), p. 780, doi.org/10.3390/su11030780.
• 23. Kettl, D.F. (1997). The Global Revolution in Public Management: Driving Themes, Missing Links. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, no. 3, p. 448.
• 24. Khan, A.A., Wang, M.Z., Ehsan, S., Nurunnabi, M., and Hashmi, M.H. (2019). Linking sustainability-oriented marketing to social media and web atmospheric cues. Sustainability, 11(9), p. 2663, doi.org/10.3390/su11092663.
• 25. Kotowska, E. (2015). Implementation of managerial management methods and tools in the public sector. In: W. Harasim (ed.), Management of intangible assets in the era of digital economy (p. 45). Warsaw: Higher School of Promotion, Media and Show Business.
• 26. Kożuch, B. (2004). Public management. In theory and practice of Polish organizations. Warsaw: Placet, p. 46.
• 27. Krukowski, K. (2011). Process management in public administration. Contemporary Management, 1, p. 23.
• 28. Layton, R., Grossbart, S. (2006). Macro marketing: past, present and possible future. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), pp. 193-2013.
• 29. Lee, K., Carter, S. (2009). Global marketing management. New York: Oxford University Press.
• 30. Leitner, K. (2010). Balanced sustainability marketing. Berlin: Verlag.
• 31. Martin, D., Schouten, J. (2012). Sustainable marketing. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• 32. Masiello, B., Moscariello, N., and Fera, P. (2018). Political marketing strategies to foster the sustainability of private transnational organizations: The case of the IASB. Sustainability, 10(8), p. 2652, doi.org/10.3390/su10082652.
• 33. Palić, M., and Bedeka, A. (2010). Application of sustainability marketing practice among Croatian top brands. In: An enterprise odyssey: from crisis to prosperity – challenges for government and business. Zagreb: University of Zagreb.
• 34. Pearce, D., Barbier, E., Markandya, A. (2000). Sustainable development. Economics and environment in the third world. London: Routledge – Taylor & Francis Group.
• 35. Peszko, A. (2002). Fundamentals of organizational management. Cracow: AGH Publishing House.
• 36. Pierścieniak, A. (2011). Effectiveness of organizational arrangements in public institutions. In: M.G. Woźniak (ed.), Social inequality and economic growth. Determinants of efficient operation in a company and region (p. 336). UR. Z. 20. Rzeszów.
• 37. Poczta, J., and Malchrowicz-Mośko, E. (2018). Modern running events in sustainable development – more than just taking care of health and physical condition (Poznan Half Marathon Case Study). Sustainability, 10(7), p. 2145, doi.org/10.3390/su10072145.
• 38. Pomering, A., and Johnson, L. (2018). Building sustainability into services marketing: expanding decision-making from a mix to a matrix. Sustainability, 10(9), p. 2992, doi.org/10.3390/su10092992.
• 39. Rudawska, E. (2019). Perception of the concept of sustainable marketing by SME managers in selected European and Asian countries. Entrepreneurship and Management, 20(6)2, pp. 351-364.
• 40. Selby, D., Jones, P., and Kagawa, F. (2009). Sustainability promotion and branding: messaging challenges and possibilities for higher education institutions. Sustainability, 1(3), pp. 537-555, doi.org/10.3390/su1030537.
• 41. Solér, C. (2012). Conceptualizing sustainably produced food for promotional purposes: a sustainable marketing approach. Sustainability, MDPI AG, 4(3), 294-340, doi.org/10.3390/su4030294.
• 42. Sudoł, S. (2014). Basic methodological problems of management science. Organization and Management, No. 1(161), pp. 11-35.
• 43. Supernat, J., Public Administration in Light of the Concept of New Public Management, http://www.supernat.pl/artykuly/administracja_publiczna_w_swietle_koncepcji_new_public_management.html, 26.12.2016.
• 44. Trojanowski, T. (2020). The Attitudes of Managers Towards the Concept of Sustainable Development in Polish Food Industry Enterprises. Yearbook: Environmental Protection, 22(2), pp. 622-634.
• 45. Wagner, M. (2015). The link of environmental and economic performance: Drivers and limitations of sustainability integration. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), pp. 1306-1317, doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.051.
• 46. Wiatrak, A.P. (2006). Management in public sector units and its determinants. In: K. Krukowski (ed.), Managing Public Organizations (p. 23). Olsztyn: UWM.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).