PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

Agile Organization as a concept of production adjustment in the face of the crisis

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The concept of an Agile Organization is the part of the management concepts which aim at adjustment of the production to ever changing environmet. In today’s fast changing landscape, agility may prove to be the difference between success and failure for any business. An organization can be agile only and only if it is focused on business drivers and the factors that shape the business drivers. The aim of the article is to present the concept of an Agile Organization and to identify its basic assumptions for the production in the face of crisis.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
19--22
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 11 poz., rys.
Twórcy
  • University of Social Sciences, Faculty of Management, ul. Sienkiewicza 9, 90-113 Łódz, Poland
  • WSB University in Wrocław, Fabryczna Street 29-31, 53-609 Wroclaw, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. BROWN A.D. 2002. Organization Studies and identity: Towards a research agenda, “Human Relations”, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 113-121.
  • 2. CILLIERS P. 2000. What Can We Learn From a Theory of Complexity?, “Emergence”, No. 2, pp. 23-33.
  • 3. COLLINS J. 2001. Good to great: Why Some Companies Make The Leap...and Others Don’t, Harper Business, New York, pp. 96-110.
  • 4. GODIN S. 2000. In the Face of Change the Competent are Helpless, Fast Company, January-February, pp. 230–234.
  • 5. DYER L., ERICKSEN J. 2007 Dynamic Organizations: Achieving Marketplace Agility Through Workforce Scalability, [in:] J. Storey (ed.), Human Resource Management: A Critical Text, 3rd Edition, Thomson Learning, London, pp. 263-280.
  • 6. DYER L., ERICKSEN J. 2009. Complexity-based Agile Enterprises: Putting Self-Organizing Emergence to Work, [in:] T. Redman, A. Wilkinson (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Human Resource Management, Sage, London, pp. 436-457.
  • 7. HAMEL G., VALIKANGAS L. 2003. The Quest for Resilience, Harvard Business Review, September, 2003, pp. 52-63.
  • 8. HOLBROOK M. 2003. Adventures in Complexity, “Academy of Marketing Science Review”, No. 6, pp. 1-181.
  • 9. STACEY R. 2006. The Science of Complexity: An Alternative Perspective for Strategic Change Processes, [in:] R. MacIntosh, D. Maclean, R. Stacey, D. Griffin (eds.), Complexity and Organization: Readings and Concersations, Routledge, London, pp. 74-100.
  • 10. STACEY R., GRIFFIN D. SHAW P. 2000 Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking?, Routledge, London, pp. 54.
  • 11. ULEWICZ R., MAZUR M. 2013. Fatigue testing structural steel as a factor of safety of technical facilities maintenance, „Production Engineering Archives”, Vol. 1, No 1, pp 32-34.
Uwagi
Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-71b4d5bd-8766-468b-9843-7c657dbce5be
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.