PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Species Richness of Yapen Island for Sustainable Living Benefit in Papua, Indonesia

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The objective of this study was to precisely identify the types of forest resources utilization in two local communities. All forest plants used were identified and classified based on their types and classes during data collection. Semi-structural interviews through questionnaires were undertaken to obtain daily information. The results showed that there were a total of 64 forest plant life forms and categories extracted for various reasons. Most of the subject forest plants were found in the surrounding lowland tropical forest, the dominant categories were monocotyledons followed by dicotyledons, pteridophytes, and thallophytes. A strong positive correlation was determined between the frequency of species use and the benefit value that was gained (0.6453), while a strong negative correlation was observed between the value of plant’s benefit and the difficulty of access to those plants (-0.2646). Frequency of use and the future prospect of forest plant availability (-0.1405) also showed a negative correlation.
Twórcy
  • Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, University of Papua, Jl. Gunung Salju Amban, Manokwari, West Papua Province, Indonesia
  • Environmental Study Center, University of Papua, Jl. Gunung Salju Amban, Manokwari, West Papua Province, Indonesia
autor
  • Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, University of Papua, Jl. Gunung Salju Amban, Manokwari, West Papua Province, Indonesia
  • Papua Forestry and Conservation Service, Jl. Tanjung Ria, Jayapura Papua Province, Indonesia
  • Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, University of Papua, Jl. Gunung Salju Amban, Manokwari, West Papua Province, Indonesia
  • Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, University of Papua, Jl. Gunung Salju Amban, Manokwari, West Papua Province, Indonesia
  • Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, University of Papua, Jl. Gunung Salju Amban, Manokwari, West Papua Province, Indonesia
Bibliografia
  • 1. Aronggear A. 2010. Non timber forest products identification in Papuma and Natabui villages of Kepulauan Yapen District. [Mini-Thesis]. Faculty of Forestry, State University of Papua, Manokwari.
  • 2. Bognounou F., Morton R., Ayangma S., Jonkers L., Bjorkman C., Bylund H., Vega A., Oden P.C. 2011. Stand structure of monocotyledons and dicotyledons in different successional stages in Corcovado National Park, Costa Rica. Bois Et Forets Des Tropique 307, 33–40.
  • 3. Cabuy R.L., Marwa J., Manusawai J., Rahawarin Y.Y. 2012. Non-woody plant species of Papuan Island forests, A sustainable source of food for the local communities. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 11, 586–292.
  • 4. Center of Statistics Agency. 2018. Kepulauan Yapen in figure. Centre of Statistics Agency of Kepulauan Yapen.
  • 5. Colfer C.J.P., Sheil D., Kishi M. 2006. Forest and human health. Assessing the evidence. Occasional Paper No. 45. Center for International Forest Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
  • 6. Dhakal P., Paudel D.R., Baral D.R. 2016. Inventory of non-timber forest products in western Nepal and strategies for sustainable management. International Journal of Environment, 5, 87–103.
  • 7. Eastin I., Garcia C.M.C., Cortiguerre E.M. 2001. Some considerations for the more effective production and marketing of non-timber forest products in the Philippines. Final Marketing Report, FPRDIITTO Project PD 15/96 Rev.2 (M,I).
  • 8. Ehara H., Toyoda Y., Johnson D.V. 2018. Sago palm. Multiple contributions to food security and sustainable livelihoods. Springer.
  • 9. Eiserhardt W.L., Svenning J.C., Kissling W.D., Balslev. 2011. Geographical ecology of the palms (Arecaceae): determinants of diversity and distributions across spatial scales. Annals of Botany, 108, 1391–1416.
  • 10. Elias G.A., Giehl E.L., De Gasper A.L., Lima J.M.T., Dos Santos R. 2019. Low temperature extremes influence both the presence of palms and palm species richness in the Atlantic Forest, Southern Brazil. Ecología Austral, 29, 041–049.
  • 11. FAO. 2011. Forests for improved nutrition and food security. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
  • 12. Granville J-J. 1984. Monocotyledons and pteridophytes indicators of environmental constraints in the tropical vegetation. Conservatoire Et Jardin Botaniques De Geneva, 39, 265–269.
  • 13. Hlaing Z.C., Kamiyama C., Saito O. 2017. Interaction between rural people’s basic needs and forest products: A case study of the Katha District of Myanmar. International Journal of Forest Research, Article ID 2105012, 18 pages, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2105012.
  • 14. Huang W., Pohjonen V., Johansson S., Nashanda M., Katigula M.I., Luukkanen O. 2003. Species diversity, forest structure and species composition in Tanzanian tropical forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 173, 11–24.
  • 15. Kamga R., Kouamé C., Akyeampong E. 2013. Vegetable consumption patterns in Yaounde, Cameroon. African J. of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 13, 7399–7414.
  • 16. Keppel G., Navuso F.C., Naikatini A., Thomas N.T., Rounds I.A., Osborne T.A., Batinamu N., Senivasa E. 2005. Botanical diversity at Savura, a lowland rain forest site along the PABITRA Gateway transect, Viti Levu, Fiji. Pacific Science, 59, 175–191.
  • 17. Klute M. 2008. Forest in Papua: Data and fact. Contribution to the forest conference of the West Papua network in Witten on 26th January 20108. https://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk/docs/papua_article.pdf.
  • 18. Lekitoo K., Peday H.F.Z., Panambe N., Cabuy R.L. 2017. Ecological and ethnobotanical facet of 'Kelapa Hutan' (Pandanus spp.) and perspectives towards its existence and benefit. International Journal of Botany, 13, 103–114.
  • 19. Lina S.B., Okazaki M., Kimura S.D., Quevedo M.A., Loretoz A.B., Mariscal A.M. 2010. Nitrogen uptake and growth response of sago palm (Metroxylon sagu Rottb.) to two types of urea fertilizer application. Sago Palm, 18, 73–83.
  • 20. Maroyi A. 2014. Not just minor wild edible forest products: consumption of pteridophytes in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Ethnobotany and Ethnomedicine, 10, 1–9.
  • 21. Márton M., Mándoki Zs., Kiss-Csapó Zs., Csapó L. 2010. The role of sprouts in human nutrition. Acta Univ. Sapientiae Alimentaria, 3, 81–117.
  • 22. Marwa J., Sardjono M.A., Ruchaemi A., Devung S., Cabuy R.L. 2019. Benefit sharing schema from the forest: Identifying potential distributions to customary communities in Teluk Bintuni District, Indonesia. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunenses, 67(4), 963-972.
  • 23. Michon G. 2005. Domesticating forests. How farmers manage forest resources. Center for International Forest Reseach and The World Agroforestry Centre.
  • 24. Mitchell C.P., Corbridge S.E., Jewitt S.L., Mahapatra A.K., Kumar S. 2003. Non timber forest products: Availability, production, consumption, management and marketing in Eastern India. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08ce8ed915d3cfd0016d4/R6916FTR.pdf
  • 25. Morsello C., Ruiz-Mallén I., Diaz M.D.M., ReyesGarcía V. 2012. The Effects of processing nontimber forest products and trade partnerships on people’s well-being and forest conservation in amazonian societies. PLoS ONE, 7, e43055. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043055.
  • 26. Neumann R.P., Hirsch E. 2000. Commercialisation of non-timber forest products: Review and analysis of research. Center for International Forest Research with support from Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome.
  • 27. Novero A.U. 2012. Recent advances in sago palm (Metroxylon sagu Rottb.) micropropagation. Frontier on Recent Developments in Plant Science, 1, 60–66.
  • 28. Nowak D.J. 2017. Assessing the benefits and economic values of trees. In: Ferrini, Francesco; van den Bosch, Cecil CK; Fini, Alessio, eds. Routledge handbook of urban forestry. New York, NY: Routledge: 152–163. Chapter II.
  • 29. Ostertag R., Narahari I.F., Cordell S., Giardina C.P., Sack L. 2014. Forest structure in low-land tropical forests: A study of Hawaiian wet and dry forests. PLoS ONE, 9 (8), 1-8, e103268. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103268.
  • 30. Powell B., Ickowitz A., McMullin S., Jamnadass R., Padoch C., Pinedo-Vasquez M., Sunderland T. 2013. The role of forests, trees and wild biodiversity for nutritionsensitive food systems and landscapea. ICN2 Second Internaitonal Conference on Nutrition. Better Nutrition Better Lives.
  • 31.Rasingam L., Parthasarathy N. 2008. Diversity of understory plants in undisturbed and disturbed tropical lowland forests of Little Adaman Island. Biodivers Conservs, 18, 1045–1065.
  • 32. R Development Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL http://www.R-project.org.
  • 33. Ros-Tonen M.A.F., Wiersum K.F. 2003. The importance of non-timber forest products for forest-based rural livelihoods: an evolving research agenda. Paper presented at The International Coference on Rural Livelihoods, Forest and Biodiversity 19–21 May 2003, Bonn, Germany.
  • 34. Sandelowski M., Voils C.I., Knafi G. 2009. On quantitizing. Journal of mixed methods research, 3, 208–222.
  • 35. Sim E.S., Ahmed M.I. 1991. Leaf nutrient variations in sago palms. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Sago Symposium. In Ng T. T., Tie Y. L., Kueh H. S. (Eds). Lee Ming Press Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia, pp. 102–110.
  • 36. Sonbait L.Y., Warmetan H., Manik H., Cabuy R.L. 2018. Inter-dependency of forest diversity and service towards the potency of ecotourism development in Pegunungan Arfak nature reserve. Ecology, Environment and Conservation Journal, 24, 1952–1957.
  • 37. Sunderland T., Besong S., Ayeni J.S.O. 2002. Distribution, utilisation and sustainability of the nontimber forest products of the Takamanda Forest Reserve, Cameroon. A consultancy report for the project: Protection of the Forests Around Akwaya (PROFA).
  • 38. Sunderland T., Ndoye O. 2004. Forest products, livelihoods and conservation. Case studies of nontimber forest product systems. Vol 2 – Africa. Center for International Forest Research. Bogor, Indonesia.
  • 39. Takeuchi W., Maturbongs R., Sambas E., Allison A., Kurniati H., Menzies J., Murwanto A., Novotny V., Auga J., Amir M., Cholik E., Taylor G., Renyaan S., van Balen B., Kilmaskossu A. 2003. Flora and fauna survey of the Tangguh LNG site Papua Province, Indonesia. Exclusive summary. British Petroleum.
  • 40. Tölgyesi C., Valkó O., Deák B., Kelemen A., Bragina T.M., Gallé R., Erdoz L., Bátori Z. 2018. Tree-herb co-existence and community assembly in natural forest-steppe transitions. Plant Ecology and Diversity DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2018.1544674.
  • 41. Tongco D.C. 2007. Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Application, 5, 147–158.
  • 42. Vinceti B., Ickowitz A., Powell B., Kehlenbeck K., Termote C., Cogill B., Hunter D. 2013. The contribution of forests to sustainable diets. International Conference of Forests for Food Security and Nutrition. FAO, Roma.
  • 43. Wasser S. 2002. Medicinal mushrooms as a source of antitumor and immunomodulating polysaccharides. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 60, 258–274.
  • 44. Whitehead D., Schneider Z. 2012. Mixed-methods research. Ch. 14. Book: Nursing and midwifery research. 4th edition, 432 pp.
  • 45. Whitmore T.C. 1998. An Introduction to Tropical Rain Forests, 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • 46. Wollenberg E., Ingles A. 1998. Incomes from the forest. Methods for the development and conservation of forest products for local communities. Center for International Forest Research (CIFOR), 227 pp.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-7134e6d4-d023-4559-9f93-53fca639485b
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.