Polish Version of the Negative Attitude Toward Robots Scale (NARS-PL)

• Autorzy: Pochwatko G. , Giger J.-C. , Różańska-Walczuk M. , Świdrak J. , Kukiełka K. , Możaryn J. , Piçarra N.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14313/JAMRIS_3-2015/25

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper presents the Polish adaptation of the Negative Attitude toward Robots Scale (NARS-PL), primarily created by Nomura et al. (2004). 213 individuals participated in the study (49 professionals and 164 non- professionals). The Polish version obtained satisfactory psychometric properties for a two-factor structure. Both subscales, the Negative Attitudes toward Robots that Display Human Traits (NARHT) and the Negative Attitudes toward Interactions with Robots (NATIR) possess good internal consistency. Effects of participant gender and robot’s appearance were found. Theory consistent relationships between attitude toward robots, belief in human nature uniqueness and robots’ human-likeness are discussed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

social robots; acceptance of robots; anthropomorphism; human uniqueness; human-robot interaction

• Wydawca: Łukasiewicz Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP
• Czasopismo: Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 9, No. 3
• Strony: 65--72
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 23 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Pochwatko G.

• Virtual Reality and Psychophysiology Lab, Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, 00-378, Poland

autor

Giger J.-C.

• Department of Psychology and Sciences of Education, University of Algarve and Research Centre for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics – CIEO

autor

Różańska-Walczuk M.

• Institute of Automatic Control and Robotics, Faculty of Mechatronics, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland

autor

Świdrak J.

• Virtual Reality and Psychophysiology Lab, Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, 00-378, Poland

autor

Kukiełka K.

• Institute of Automatic Control and Robotics, Faculty of Mechatronics, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland

autor

Możaryn J.

• Institute of Automatic Control and Robotics, Faculty of Mechatronics, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland

autor

Piçarra N.

• University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal

Bibliografia

• [1] Fong T., Nourbakhsh I., Dautenhahn K., “A survey of socially interactive robots”, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 42, no. 3–4, 2003, 143–166. DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00372-x.
• [2] Komatsu T., Kurosawa R., Yamada S., ”How does the difference between users’ expectations and perceptions about a robotic agent affect their behavior?”, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 4, no. 2, 2012, 109–116. DOI: 10.1007/s12369-011-0122-y.
• [3] Stafford R.Q., MacDonald B.A., Li X., Broadbent E., “Older people’s prior robot attitudes influence evaluations of a conversational robot”, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 6, no. 2, 2014, 281-297.DOI: 10.1007/s12369-013-0224-9.
• [4] Nomura T., Kanda T., Suzuki T., “Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human-robot interaction”. In: 3 rd Workshop on Social Intelligence Design, SID, Enschede, 2004.
• [5] Nomura T., Kanda T., Suzuki T., “Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human-robot interaction”, Ai & Society, vol. 20, no. 2, 2006, 138–150.DOI: 10.1007/s00146-005-0012-7
• [6] Nomura T., Shintani T., Fujii K., Hokabe K., “Experimental investigation of relationships between anxiety, negative attitudes, and allow-able distance of robots”. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IASTED International Conference on Human Computer Interaction IASTED-HCI’, 2007.
• [7] Weiss A., Bernhaupt R., Tscheligi M., Yoshida E., “Addressing user experience and societal impact in a user study with humanoid robot”. In: AISB Symposium on the New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2009
• [8] Bartneck C., Nomura T., Kanda T., Suzuki T., Kato K., “A cross-cultural study on attitudes towards robots”. In: 1st International Conference on Usability & Internationalization HCI, Las Vegas, USA, 2005.
• [9] Halpern D., Katz J.E., “Unveiling robotophobia and cyber-dystropianism: The role of gender, technology and religion on attitudes towards robots”. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction HRI’12, 2012, 139–140. DOI: 10.1145/2157689.2157724.
• [10] Weiss A., Igelsbӧck J., Wurhofer D., Tscheligi M., ”Looking forward to a “robotic society”?”, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 3, no. 2, 2011, 111–123.DOI: 10.1007/s12369-010-0076-5.
• [11] Syrdal D., Dautenhahn K., Koay K., Walters M., “The negative attitudes towards robots scale and reactions to robot behavior in a live human robot interaction study”. In: AISB Symposium on the New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2009.
• [12] Piçarra N., Giger J.-C., Pochwatko G. , Gonçalves G., ”Validation of the Portuguese version of the Negative Attitudes towards Robots Scale”, Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée, vol. 65, 2015, 93–104. DO: 10.1016/j.erap.2014.11.002.1162-9088.
• [13] Demoulin S., Leyens J.-Ph., Yzerbyt V.Y., “Lay theories of essentialism”, Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, vol. 9, no. 1, 2006, 25–42. DOI: 10.1177/1368430206059856.
• [14] Piçarra N., Giger J. C., Pochwatko G., ““You can cry, but you never will be human, You Mecha!”: Beliefs of Human Nature Uniqueness and social robots perception” (in press).
• [15] Piçarra N., Giger J. C., Pochwatko G., Gonçalves G., Humanizing robots: Need for cognition, perspective taking and beliefs in human nature unicity as predictors of anthropomorphization of social robots (submitted).
• [16] Epley N., Waytz A., Cacioppo J.T., “On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism”, Psychological Review, vol. 114, no. 4, 2007, 864–886. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864.
• [17] Reiser U., Jacobs T., Arbeiter G., Parlitz C., Dautenhahn K., “Care-O-bot® 3 – Vision of a Robot Butler”. In: Trappl, Robert (Ed.), Your Virtual Butler: The Making-of, Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 2013, 97–116.
• [18] Yoshikawa M., Matsumoto Y., Sumitani M., Ishiguro H., “Development of an android robot for psychological support in medical and welfare fields”. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), 7,11, 2011, 2378–2383. DOI: 10.1109/ROBIO.2011.6181654
• [19] Jolliffe I.T., Principal Component Analysis, Springer Series in Statistics, 2002.
• [20] Davidshofer K.R., Murphy C.O., Psychological testing: principles and applications , 6 th ed., Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-189172-3, 2005.
• [21] Cozby P.C., Methods in behavioral research, 10 th ed., Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2009.
• [22] Field A., „Discovering statistics using SPSS”, Sage, 2009.
• [23] Carr E., Hofee G., Himlin L., Saygin A., “Constructing the uncanny valley: Empirical evidence of a top-down fluency account for affective responses to non-human agents”, Cognition, 2014, in review.