Investigation of Heavy Metals in the Surface and Groundwater and its Health Risk Assessment in the Parts of Gudiyattam Region, Tamilnadu, India

• Autorzy: Krishnam Shankar Hemath Naveen , Ponnusamy Porchelvan

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12912/27197050/162704

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Health risk assessment and heavy metals analysis was carried out for 8 lakes water samples and 8 open well water samples in Gudiyattam region. Metal Index(MI), Adult Infusion(AI), and Hazardous Quotient(HQ) were determined to know the health risk in all locations using ingestion and dermal pathway. MI values are greater than 1 in all lakes as well as in well water for the location S1 to S3 and in S6 which indicates this water is unfit for drinking purposes. Based on HQ_ingestion and HQ_dermal value, the location S1 to S4 are more polluted for the lake water. Among all the well locations S4 is the most polluted. Considering the Hazard Index (HI) of these metals was found to be greater than 1. Carcinogenic Index(CI) exceeded the acceptable limit of 1.0x 10^{(-06 to-04)} in 5 locations for lake water and 1 location for well water. Especially the location S4 in lake water as well as in well water have direct proportionality in pollution load. The water sample previously said location can pose a serious risk to living beings.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ground water; lake; risk assessment; metals

• Wydawca: Lubelski Oddział Polskiego Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology ; WNGB Wydawnictwo Naukowe
• Czasopismo: Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 24, iss. 5
• Strony: 20--29
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Krishnam Shankar Hemath Naveen

• Department of Environmental and Water Resource Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamilnadu, India

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2364-0345

autor

Ponnusamy Porchelvan

• Department of Environmental and Water Resource Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamilnadu, India

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5263-0077

Bibliografia

• 1. APHA. 2012. American Public Health Association, 22nd edn. American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, Washington DC, USA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater.
• 2. Bodrud-Doza, M., et al. 2020. Groundwater quality and human health risk assessment for safe and sustainable water supply of Dhaka City dwellers in Bangladesh. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 10, 100374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100374
• 3. Chen, S.C., Liao, C.M. 2006. Health risk assessment on human exposed to environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons pollution sources. Science of the Total Environment, 366, 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.047
• 4. Dang, H.S., et al. 1996. Age dependent physical and anatomical Indian data for application in internal dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 63, 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjou rnals.rpd.a031532
• 5. Darapu, S.S.K., et al. 2011. Determining water quality index for the evaluation of water quality of river Godavari. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 1, 174–18.
• 6. Galina-Aleixandre, M.V., Mendoza-Roca, J.A., Bes-Pia, A. 2011.Reducing sulfates concentration in the tannery effluent by applying pollution prevention techniques and nano filtration. Journal of Cleaner Production,19, 91–98.
• 7. Hemath Naveen, K.S., Brijesh Nair. 2022. Assessment of Lake Water Quality in Gudiyattam Region using Multivariate Statistical Techniques. J. Environ. Treat. Tech, 10, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.47277/JETT/10(1)102
• 8. Iqbal, J., Tirmizi, S.A., Shah, M.H. 2012. Noncarcinogenic health risk assessment and source apportionment of selected metals in source freshwater Khanpur lake, Pakistan. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 88, 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-011-0480-z
• 9. Jain, C.K., Bandyopadhyay A., Bhadra, A. 2009.Assessment of ground water quality for drinking purpose, District Nainital, Uttarakhand, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,166, 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1031-5
• 10. Kang, S., et al. 2016. Atmospheric mercury depositional chronology reconstructed from lake sediments and ice core in the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau. Environmental science and Technology, 50, 2859–69. https://doi.org/10.102 1/acs.est.5b04172
• 11. Khan, F.A., Ansari, A.A. 2005. Eutrophication: An Ecological Vision. Botanical Review, 71, 449-482. https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2005)071[0449:EAEV]2.0.CO;2
• 12. Liang, F., Yang, S., Sun, C. 2011. Primary health risk analysis of metals in surface water of Taihu Lake, China. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology., 87, 404–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-011-0379-8
• 13. Miguel, E.D., et al. 2007.Risk-based evaluation of the exposure of children to trace elements in playgrounds in Madrid (Spain). Chemosphere, 66, 505–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.065
• 14. Nasirian, M. 2007. A New Water Quality Index for Environmental Contamination Contributed by Mineral Processing: A Case Study of Amang (Tin Tailing) Processing Activity. Journal of Applied Sciences, 20, 2977–2987.
• 15. Schuster, P.F., et al. 2002. Atmospheric mercury deposition during the last 270 years:a glacial ice core record of natural and anthropogenic sources. Environmental Science and Technology, 36, 2303–2310. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0157503
• 16. Shams, M., et al. 2020. Heavy metals exposure, carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic human health risks assessment of groundwater around mines in Joghatai, Iran. J. Environ. Anal. Chem, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2020.1743835
• 17. Simoes, F.S., et al. 2008.Water Quality Index as a Simple Indicator of Aquaculture Effects on Aquatic Bodies. Ecological indicators, 8, 476–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.05.002
• 18. Tajudeen, Y., et al. 2022. Healthrisks of Ecosystem Services in Ologe Lagoon, Lagos, Southwest Nigeria. Pollution., 8, 681–692. https://doi.org/10.22059/.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.10.011
• 19. Thiripurasundari, K., Ponsakt Hisurya, C., Ponsakthisurya, C. 2018. Comparative Analysis among minor Clusters of Leather Industry in Tamil Nadu. Journal of advanced research, 3, 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.10.011
• 20. USEPA. 1989. Risk assessment guidance for superfund volume I human health evaluation manual (Part A). EPA/540/1-89/002. Office of emergency and remedial response US environmental protection agency Washington, DC.
• 21. USEPA.1991. Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in Superfund Remedy Selection Decisions (Memorandum from D. R. Clay, OSWER 9355.0 – 30, April 1991).Washington, DC, USA.
• 22. USEPA. 2004. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Vol. 1, Human Health Evaluation Manual. Part E (supplemental guidance for dermal risk assessment). EPA/540/R/99/005.Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, Washington, DC, USA.
• 23. USEPA. 2005. Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. Risk Assessment Forum,U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.
• 24. Vellore District-statistical-hand-book-2016-17.
• 25. Wu, B., et al. 2010. Health risk from exposure of organic pollutants through drinking water consumption in Nanjing, China. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 84, 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-009-9900-8
• 26. WHO. 2004. Water Sanitation and Hygiene Links to Health. WHO Press. Geneva.
• 27. WHO. 2011. Guidelines for drinking-water quality. 4th edn. World Health Organization. Geneva.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).