User involvement in the ergonomic development of a medical instrument: a longitudinal case study

• Autorzy: Tovolgyi S.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this study the focus is on the continuous ergonomic-focused development of a medical instrument that is capable of performing blood group serological tests. Primarily, a medical device must be clinically effective and safe. At the same time it must also meet the needs of its users. This calls for consideration of numerous ergonomic aspects. The development process of the product line in question was supported by a longitudinal series of carefully designed focus groups. Altogether, the 23 focus groups conducted included 245 participants from 72 laboratories. The aim of the empirical research was to collect users’ experiences, ideas and needs as inputs for the following phase of the product development process. During the mentioned focus group analyses, around 100 development proposals were conceived. Besides presenting more of the mentioned development proposals, the focus group analysis was shown as a proper methodology to involve end-users in the development and implementation of new technology or devices.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

blood group serology; development of medical instruments; user involvement; focus group analysis

PL

badania biologiczne; badania medyczne; reakcje serologiczne; określanie grupy krwi

• Wydawca: Taylor & Francis
• Czasopismo: International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 22, No. 2
• Strony: 207--217
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 42 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Tovolgyi S.

• Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary

Bibliografia

• 1.Statistical Yearbook of Hungary. Hungarian Central Statistical Office; 2011 [Cited 2014 March 11]. Available from: http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/evkonyv/evkonyv_2011.pdf
• 2.Nemes Nagy Zs. Transzfuziológia eBook [Transfusiology eBook]. Medical Vocational Training Institution; 2010.
• 3.Az Országos Vérellátó Szolgálat honlapja [Website of Hungarian National Blood Transfusion Service]. [Cited 2014 March 11]. Available from: http://www.ovsz.hu(open in a new window)
• 4.Website of Science of Nursing. [Cited 2014 March 11]. Available from: http://apolastudomany.hupont.hu/13/vercsoport-meghatarozas
• 5.Sawyer D. Do it by design. An introduction to human factors in medical devices. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, Food and Drug Administration, Centre for Device and Radiological Health; 1997.
• 6.Tóvölgyi S. Evaluating the product development process based on user needs in case of a medical device. Period Polytech. 2014;22(1):65-74.
• 7.LeRouge C, Ma J, Sneha S, et al. User profiles in the design and development of consumer health technologies. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2013;82:251-268. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.006
• 8.Csécs Zs, Zsitnyányi Á. Development of a blood group serological automaton - business plan; 2002.
• 9.Website of Cytotech Ltd. [Cited 2014 January 17] Available from: http://cytotech.hu/
• 10.International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Quality management systems – requirements (Standard No. ISO 9001:2008). Geneva: ISO; 2008.
• 11.Lettl C. User involvement competence for radical innovation. J. Eng. Technol. Manage. 2007;24:53-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.01.004
• 12.Website of the International Organization for Standardization. [Cited 2014 March 11]. Available from: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/management-standards/iso_9000.htm
• 13.Website of the European Commission. [Cited 2014 March 11]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/european-standards/harmonised-standards/iv-diagnostic-medical-devices/index_en.htm
• 14.Kotler P. Kotler a marketingről: Jönni, látni, győzni a piacon [How to create, win, and dominate markets]. Budapest: Park Kiadó. 2010.
• 15.Szabo Zs, Friss Á, Buckó J, et al. Validation of an automated anti globulin test machine (ACT 24). Transfusion Medicine. 1992;2(1):72.
• 16.Voak D. Validation of new technology for antibody detection. Vox Sang. 1994;67(Issue suppl. s3):113–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1994.tb04555.x
• 17.Ságvári B. A kreatív gazdaság elméletéről [About the theory of creative economy]. Budapest: ELTE-Ithaka; 2005.
• 18.Petruska I. Fogyasztói piac és vásárlói magatartás in Marketing -stratégia és menedzsment [Consumer market and customer behavior in Marketing strategy and management]. Budapest: Alinea Press; 2007.
• 19.Little E, Marandi E. Kapcsolati marketing [Relationship marketing]. Budapest: Akadémiai Press; 2005.
• 20.Kotler P, Keller K. Marketingmenedzsment [Marketing management]. Budapest: Akadémiai Press; 2006.
• 21.Shah SGS, Robinson I. Benefits and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 2007;23(1):131–37.
• 22.Aquino Schluzas LM, Leifer LJ. The insight-value-perception (iVP) model for user-cantered design. Technovation; 2012;34(11):649-662.
• 23.Vincent CJ, Li Y, Blandford A. Integration of human factors during medical device design and development: it's all about communication. Appl Ergon. 2014;45(3):413-419. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.05.009
• 24.Money AG, Barnett J, Kuljis J, et al. The role of the user within the medical design and development process: medical device manufacturers’ perspectives. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making. 2011;11:15. [Cited 2014 March 11]. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/11/15
• 25.Shah SGS, Robinson I. User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literate review. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 2006;19(6):500-515. doi: 10.1108/09526860610687619
• 26.Garmer K, Ylvén J, Karlsson ICM. User participation in requirements elicitation comparing focus group interviews and usability tests for eliciting usability requirements for medical equipment: a case study. Int J Ind Ergon. 2004;33:85-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2003.07.005
• 27.Kourinka I. Participatory ergonomics at the shop floor level. In: Karwowski W, editor. International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors. London: Taylor & Francis; 2001. p. 1290–1292.
• 28.Haines HM, Wilson JR. Development of a framework for participatory ergonomics. Health and Safety Executive report. HMSO for HSE Books; 1998;174.
• 29.Caplan S. Using focus group methodology for ergonomics design. Ergonomics 1990;33:27–533. doi: 10.1080/00140139008927160
• 30.Nielsen J. Usability engineering. Academic Press; 1993.
• 31.Szokolszky Á. Research in psychology. Budapest: Osiris; 2004.
• 32.Website of Hungarian Central Statistical Office. [Cited 2014 March 11]. Available from: http://www.ksh.hu/szamlap/hivatas_ver.html
• 33.Website of KD Nuggets. [Cited 2014 December 5]. Available from: http://www.kdnuggets.com/polls/2013/analytics-big-data-mining-data-science-software.html
• 34.Hohner N, Fekete RT. Marketing study on the method of the introduction of an evolving intelligent blood group serological device to the Hungarian and European market; 2005.
• 35.Kertész A, Hámornik B, Soós J, et al. Hungarian Technology Program - Tender “A2 cy_robot”, OM number: OM-00115/2008, OM-00116/20082008 - Research report; 2008.
• 36.MédiaGuru Hungary Ltd. Hungarian Technology Program - Tender ”A2 cy_robot”, OM number: OM-00115/2008, OM-00116/20082008 - Research report; 2010.
• 37.Tóvölgyi S, Hámornik BP. Focus group analysis of the reliability of a blood group serological device: analyzing the stress caused by responsibility and automation. Munkavédelem és Biztonságtechnika. 2013;25(1):21-30.
• 38.Hungarian Technology Program – Tender ”A2 cy_robot”, OM number: OM-00115/2008, OM-00116/20082008. p. 5–6. Website of the Hungarian Economic Development Centre. [Cited 2014 March 11]. Available from: http://magzrt.hu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=167%3Anemzetitechnologiaprogramkf&catid=51%3Alejartfelhivas&Itemid=112. Website of Cytotech Ltd. [Cited 2014 March 11]. Available from: http://www.cytotech.hu/loader.php?csop=hirek&site=palyazatok
• 39.Website of the production of Lima. [Cited 2014 March 11]. Available from: http://meetlima.com/blog/?p=138(open in a new window)
• 40.Website of Kickstarter. [Cited 2014 March 11]. Available from: https://www.kickstarter.com
• 41.Martin JL, Clark DJ, Morgan SP, et al. A user-centered approach to requirements elicitation in medical device development: a case study from an industry perspective. Appl Ergon. 2012;43:184-19. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.05.002
• 42.Directive 98/79/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 1998 on the in vitro diagnostic medical devices. OJ. 1998;L331. [Cited 2014 March 11]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31998L0079&from=EN

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.